|
Respiratory megaherpes somehow manages to sound both horrifying and anticlimactic at the same time. EDIT: oh wow really?
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 07:51 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 04:30 |
|
Acebuckeye13 posted:God dammit, I'm sorry but I'm getting loving sick of this line of argument, A) because he won't and B) because he wouldn't. trump is a liar and the american people are gullible
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 08:04 |
Abongination posted:some wild poo poo do you have any source at all on this one
|
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 09:54 |
|
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 10:24 |
|
I heard covid19 comes from
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 12:25 |
|
US Berder Patrol posted:I heard covid19 comes from poo poo I do that anyways.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 12:26 |
|
LingcodKilla posted:poo poo I do that anyways. Please stop pissing on my feet.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 13:03 |
|
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...t-idUSKCN20M124 Some patients have gotten it again, could just be that they have garbage immune systems or the virus could go dormant. Missus got the news from various emt Facebook groups she’s on so not the best source, not sure if there were articles linked but I found the above with a quick google. Abongination fucked around with this message at 13:14 on Mar 10, 2020 |
# ? Mar 10, 2020 13:12 |
|
From the Congressional Record: Joe Biden posted:Saddam is dangerous. The world would be a better place without him. But the reason he poses a growing danger to the United States and its allies You can read Joe's entire speech at the link below, it starts on page 215 of the PDF. It's heavy in talking about how much reaching across the aisle and working with Republicans took place to pass a flawed AUMF that President Bush swears he won't use to go to war. It's a little weasily the way he says he didn't believe that Saddam had nuclear weapons as he did believe that Saddam was seeking them. https://www.congress.gov/crec/2002/10/10/CREC-2002-10-10.pdf
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 13:34 |
|
It sure will be nice when we can get rid of all these loving antique politicians.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 13:45 |
|
bird cooch posted:It sure will be nice when we can get rid of all these loving antique politicians. That's what's really frustrating about Joe's "I'm a bridge to the candidates standing behind me" comment. If you want them to be in control, step down! People better put their helmets on, because short of a miracle, Trump's getting reelected. Nothing so far has stuck to him, and I don't see anything actually hindering him.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 13:50 |
|
SimonCat posted:From the Congressional Record: I forget, was the whole 'Saddam wants nukes' story a out-and-out lie, or just a really bad distortion of the truth? I could have sworn I read some CIA analysis online somewhere that said that Saddam may have wanted nukes, but didn't stand a chance in hell of getting anything even close.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 13:54 |
|
Of course he wanted nukes. Actually having nuclear weapons is one of the most effective ways to keep the US out of your country and at the negotiating table.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 13:59 |
|
SimonCat posted:That's what's really frustrating about Joe's "I'm a bridge to the candidates standing behind me" comment. If you want them to be in control, step down! I mean he pretty narrowly missed being impeached for a bunch of crimes, is hated by probably more people worldwide than anyone since Dubya, and possibly already has corona virus. On the other side of the coin, the only alternatives on offer are a choice between an 80 year old socialist and a republican who put on the wrong coloured tie some time back in the 1960s and just decided to go with it, who also happens to be experiencing some serious cognitive decline, so I get the pessimism. Crazy how even with a population of 372 million, the democrats can't find a candidate that's likely to survive a full two terms.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 14:04 |
BigDave posted:I forget, was the whole 'Saddam wants nukes' story a out-and-out lie, or just a really bad distortion of the truth? Depends on how much you believe of what the Israelis thought his intentions were back in 81 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Opera
|
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 14:15 |
|
BigDave posted:I forget, was the whole 'Saddam wants nukes' story a out-and-out lie, or just a really bad distortion of the truth? IIRC Iraq had a nuclear program in the '80s that got obliterated by an Israeli airstrike. Their chemical and biological facilities were also destroyed during the '90s, so by the time Bush came to power they had precisely jack and poo poo in terms of WMDs. Administration didn't care about the evidence, twisted reality to fit their worldview (telling the CIA for instance to only give them intelligence that showed Iraq was involved with Al Qaeda and pursuing WMDs), and got Colin Powell to ruin his reputation by presenting false evidence in front of the UN to get the rest of the world on board. Got I'm getting mad just thinking about it. The Bush administration was just completely insane, and the lengths they went to justify the war (while simultaneously refusing to actually prepare for it, producing precisely zero plans for the occupation or) withdraw) was incredibly brazen. paul wolfowitz, paul bremer, and david rumsfeld would have been shot for treason in a just reality, and Tommy Franks and Ricardo Sanchez charged with dereliction of duty
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 14:23 |
|
BigDave posted:I forget, was the whole 'Saddam wants nukes' story a out-and-out lie, or just a really bad distortion of the truth? He had a program up till the Gulf War, after which he dismantled the program. Here is a lecture from Berkley that explains what the UN inspectors found and how primitive, though possibly effective, his program was in the 80s. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJbyvCmybuk&t=2514s I recommend watching the entire video, it's nuclear weapons for future heads of state and should be required viewing in high school.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 14:31 |
The plan was to pay RAND et.al. to tell them what they should purchase from Raytheon and co. The plan worked perfectly at what it was supposed to do
|
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 14:32 |
|
Don Dongington posted:I mean he pretty narrowly missed being impeached for a bunch of crimes, is hated by probably more people worldwide than anyone since Dubya, and possibly already has corona virus. Other than Trump dying of the Corona virus, the other two don't really matter. Impeachment just came and went, and the rest of the world doesn't get a vote on who the president is.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 14:33 |
|
https://twitter.com/carlquintanilla/status/1237399555584471040?s=19 https://twitter.com/KT_So_It_Goes/status/1237401559031521281?s=19
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 16:41 |
|
Excuse you I distinctly remember the Newsweek article with illustrations showing Sadam’s mobile weapons labs
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 16:54 |
|
well that's one way to communicate with voters https://twitter.com/BoKnowsNews/status/1237387463246708736?s=20
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 17:00 |
That sounds exactly like the way you’d want to communicate to Michigan auto workers. Biden is a republican in all but name and is going to do nothing but vague gestures towards gun control. “You’re full of poo poo” was actually the perfect response there
|
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 17:04 |
That being the “most electable” he’s been on camera recently is a pretty drat low bar though
|
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 17:06 |
|
Acebuckeye13 posted:well that's one way to communicate with voters Broke brain sundowning gently caress.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 17:09 |
|
But looks pretty solid to me. He called him out. No Hillary Clinton diversion, no stump speech, no BS. Got yelled at, yelled back. What's to be mad about? Y'all all work in offices or something?
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 17:09 |
|
bird cooch posted:But looks pretty solid to me. He called him out. No Hillary Clinton diversion, no stump speech, no BS. "100 rounds! Who needs 100 rounds for their AR-14?" lmao
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 17:10 |
|
Denying he said the things he said during the debates is “electable” in the same way trump is “presidential”, I guess.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 17:11 |
|
Bored As gently caress posted:"100 rounds! Who needs 100 rounds for their AR-14?" AR stands for assault rifle. I was a Warren supporter and I don't feel bad about the way that turned out and I'm not stoked on Biden but so much of the poo poo that's posted in here is just either bullshit or much Ado about nothing. (If you don't get the ar joke....) bird cooch fucked around with this message at 17:19 on Mar 10, 2020 |
# ? Mar 10, 2020 17:11 |
|
“I’m not going to take your guns I just said I would and I’m definitely going to take most of them away so you can’t defend yourself”
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 17:21 |
|
Yeah I supported warren as well, largely because I think AOC's approach to take lead pipes to kneecaps from inside the dem party and primarying centrists is better than bernie's approach of not joining the dem party.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 17:23 |
|
https://twitter.com/poaststructural/status/1230716504414441474?s=20
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 17:24 |
|
PookBear posted:Yeah I supported warren as well, largely because I think AOC's approach to take lead pipes to kneecaps from inside the dem party and primarying centrists is better than bernie's approach of not joining the dem party. Same! I want to see a movement rise up so that there is some power in the institutions when we get a president. That's what it takes to actually make stuff happen. I like technocrats.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 17:25 |
|
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 17:26 |
|
bird cooch posted:But looks pretty solid to me. He called him out. No Hillary Clinton diversion, no stump speech, no BS. Yep. Trumpers are sending the video around and everyone's either triggered by "AR-14" or celebrating that Biden did exactly what he should've loving did. Biden's been bleating about his trusty shotgun for decades - call the fuckers out to their face if they're going to show up with the anti-gun poo poo. PS: enjoy this if you disagree https://twitter.com/Relentlessbored/status/1237205102894735365?s=19
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 17:27 |
|
https://twitter.com/simonmaloy/status/969217563279396864?s=21
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 17:31 |
|
PookBear posted:Yeah I supported warren as well, largely because I think AOC's approach to take lead pipes to kneecaps from inside the dem party and primarying centrists is better than bernie's approach of not joining the dem party. bird cooch posted:Same! I want to see a movement rise up so that there is some power in the institutions when we get a president. That's what it takes to actually make stuff happen. did yall just completely ignore the last 10 years
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 17:38 |
|
bird cooch posted:I was a Warren supporter and I don't feel bad about the way that turned out and I'm not stoked on Biden but so much of the poo poo that's posted in here is just either bullshit or much Ado about nothing. Pretty much where I'm at right now. If Sanders still has a shot by the time my primary rolls around, I'm gonna vote for him, but watching people trip over themselves to post/share misleading and out of context poo poo about Biden is stupid as gently caress.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 17:46 |
Warren and AOC took down the bad dems so I don't know why you're questioning it.
|
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 17:47 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 04:30 |
|
why in the gently caress are you guys comparing AOC to warren? You goddam dorks.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2020 17:50 |