Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
BANNED USER
May 18, 2010

I have this real nasty habit of punching faces

the_steve posted:

I registered Independent when I turned 18.
Tried swapping to D in 2016 so I could vote Bernie in the primaries, but some sort of fuckery in the system kept it from going through until like a month after the PA primaries. Been D ever since so that I'd be prepared for this year, but, that poo poo is coming to an end after April. I'm going back to Independent once I've at least gotten to vote for Bernie once in my goddamn life.

I turned 18 right before Obama ran for his first term. I registered as an Independent, and voted for him both times, because he appeared to have the most honesty and integrity out of all the politicians I was exposed to. I did the same with Sanders, the guy doesn't flip-flop like Romney does, he's not a racist (like Biden used to be) and he's got a consistent track record that is easily verified. I want honest politicians with integrity, the "socialist jew" was sadly the only candidate that didn't have real skeletons in the closet, but because of his political label, his age, and his 'appearance' (who the gently caress cares?) he wasn't viewed as "electable" by either democrats or republicans. I'm not at all surprised that he was independent before, but if he can convince the left that socialist policies are what will regain their power in the government, then at least he made a positive impact.

Biden is just Trump with a blue tie instead of red, a literal Douche vs.Turd situation. Thanks South Park.

How can you waste a vote, so long as you vote? There's a reason you can write-in a candidates name. I'm going to ignore Bernie from 2016, and I am absolutely going to write him in this time. Hopefully the rest of his supporters do the same, if Democrats want to use my face as a stepping stone, then I'm going to let them fall.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

REMEMBER SPONGE MONKEYS
Oct 3, 2003

What do you think it means, bitch?

V. Illych L. posted:

ubi is not a socialist policy!!!! there's a reason it fell to a dork like yang to carry its torch!!!!

What is it then? Forgive my ignorance.

the_steve
Nov 9, 2005

We're always hiring!

So, are there any handy rebuttals to this lovely "Young people just didn't want to vote badly enough, or else they would have?" victim-blaming narrative that people keep peddling?
I keep seeing it on my timeline from a friend of mine who should goddamn know better, and it's driving me up the wall.

HootTheOwl
May 13, 2012

Hootin and shootin

the_steve posted:

So, are there any handy rebuttals to this lovely "Young people just didn't want to vote badly enough, or else they would have?" victim-blaming narrative that people keep peddling?
I keep seeing it on my timeline from a friend of mine who should goddamn know better, and it's driving me up the wall.
Because every nursing home is a polling station while a college of 4,000 share one.

V. Illych L.
Apr 11, 2008

ASK ME ABOUT LUMBER

ubi is a policy that says that the problem with late capitalism is that some people just can't participate enough as consumers - it seeks to alleviate the issues of the day by paying people to shut up and go away, effectively. socialism is all about liberating the human from the chains of capital, and ubi is doing... not the opposite of that, but it absolutely is designed to exist in a capitalist system where employment is the individual's responsibility and if you cannot find some way to have surplus value extracted from you, you die

the actual likely effects of UBI would be to drive inflation like crazy and to set up huge slums where unemployable people go outside of the areas where they cannot afford to stay - and, in all likelihood, it would be politically unstable as all get out because people with power don't like inflation

the only situation where it makes sense is if we've already crushed the bourgeoisie and have decided that this is how we're handling things. in that context, sure, some universal basis quota is a reasonable system

the problem of people made obsolete by technology is usually dealt with by disability welfare and related systems - but the fact is, there's no reason why anyone should be obsolete, that very obsolescence is a function of the capitalist economy in the first place

Mat Cauthon
Jan 2, 2006

The more tragic things get,
the more I feel like laughing.



the_steve posted:

So, are there any handy rebuttals to this lovely "Young people just didn't want to vote badly enough, or else they would have?" victim-blaming narrative that people keep peddling?
I keep seeing it on my timeline from a friend of mine who should goddamn know better, and it's driving me up the wall.

If you go back in my post history for this thread there's a link to a study that shows that youth turnout is up overall. The problem is that older voter turnout is also way up, so it kind of cancels out.

V. Illych L.
Apr 11, 2008

ASK ME ABOUT LUMBER

the_steve posted:

So, are there any handy rebuttals to this lovely "Young people just didn't want to vote badly enough, or else they would have?" victim-blaming narrative that people keep peddling?
I keep seeing it on my timeline from a friend of mine who should goddamn know better, and it's driving me up the wall.

there's a bunch of soft reasons - young people have lower income and are less integrated in their communities, both things that make them less likely to vote, and typically have a harder time arranging transportation than their elders. they're often in jobs which make it inconvenient to vote. they have a generally lower degree of confidence in democracy, so don't think there's as much point in voting. they think the democratic party is really lame. many such reasons!

PerniciousKnid
Sep 13, 2006

V. Illych L. posted:

ubi is not a socialist policy!!!! there's a reason it fell to a dork like yang to carry its torch!!!!

I'm pretty sure that's because it isn't "realistic", not because workers aren't entitled to some of the nation's wealth.

Buckwheat Sings posted:

Centralists are such awful people that even Jesus said they are scum.

"Because you are lukewarm--neither hot nor cold--I am about to spit you out of my mouth."

What a weird guy.

Rainbow Knight
Apr 19, 2006

We die.
We pray.
To live.
We serve

the_steve posted:

So, are there any handy rebuttals to this lovely "Young people just didn't want to vote badly enough, or else they would have?" victim-blaming narrative that people keep peddling?
I keep seeing it on my timeline from a friend of mine who should goddamn know better, and it's driving me up the wall.

I'm having a really (frustratingly) hard time finding actual numbers and not percentages, but I'm pretty sure the youth vote didn't decrease, it was just that their share of the votes decreased from increased older voter turnout. Hence everyone talking about boomers trying to kill the younger generation

V. Illych L.
Apr 11, 2008

ASK ME ABOUT LUMBER

socialism is about taking power for the class, not getting a handout from the bosses

we want it all

GlyphGryph
Jun 23, 2013

Down came the glitches and burned us in ditches and we slept after eating our dead.
I mean, I'm clearly not a socialist since I'm fine with only a smattering of nationalized industries and a UBI program predicated on the notion that it prevents the ultra-wealthy from even being able to exist by steadily reaccumulating wealth into the hands of the masses.

But pretty much everyone in America would consider me a dirty socialist because the word has basically come to mean "Is opposed to continued total dominance of the haves over the have nots and in favour of redistributing wealth to ensure a more egalitarian society, or at least in favour of democratically deciding the government is allowed to do good things with tax dollars".

It's the new word for egalitarian, basically, whether you believe that can must be accomplished through traditional socialist means or whether you think there are predominantly market friendly routes to do so

FlapYoJacks
Feb 12, 2009
I love that every proposal so far is everything but UHC. How many more deaths will it take? 1,000,000?

Probably not. Probably > 10 rich corporate donors and both parties will start talking about UHC seriously.

Ague Proof
Jun 5, 2014

they told me
I was everything

Pingui
Jun 4, 2006

WTF?

ratbert90 posted:

I love that every proposal so far is everything but UHC. How many more deaths will it take? 1,000,000?

Probably not. Probably > 10 rich corporate donors and both parties will start talking about UHC seriously.

We won't know for a looong time, probably a few weeks even.

the_steve
Nov 9, 2005

We're always hiring!

HootTheOwl posted:

Because every nursing home is a polling station while a college of 4,000 share one.

That was one of the things I mentioned, along with other outright voter suppression tactics and the fact that most people literally couldn't afford to wait in line for 8+ hours.
The reply was:

quote:

If it's that important, you find a way to vote. You want poo poo like this fixed? You find a way to get your vote counted. In most states, there were ways -- early voting, vote by mail/absentee balloting. All it would have taken was some research and planning ahead. You just do it. Period. Excuses for not making it the priority it should have been.

This is why next election cycle the same things will happen.

Pingui
Jun 4, 2006

WTF?

the_steve posted:

That was one of the things I mentioned, along with other outright voter suppression tactics and the fact that most people literally couldn't afford to wait in line for 8+ hours.
The reply was:

Your friend appears to not be very bright; you can ask him/her how the students thrown out of student housing due to Corona the days before voting, were supposed to vote when they had to go home to their parents or live on the streets, because they were registered to vote at their school and not their parents home in a different state?

Alternatively you can spare yourself some grief, realize this person is either tremendously stupid or not an honest actor, and :sever:

Pingui fucked around with this message at 00:50 on Mar 20, 2020

Solanumai
Mar 26, 2006

It's shrine maiden, not shrine maid!
Principle is cool and all, but I've worked several retail jobs in my 18-27 years that would absolutely not have cared why I needed an hour on a Tuesday between 7a and 7p. When I was working two jobs, that would mean asking one job that I started at like 3pm if I could start at 4. If they asked why I couldn't go earlier and I was honest "I'm working my other job from 7-2" they'd say tough poo poo. Usually they just say no, we need you when so and so's shift ends. Ask the early job and they'll say no, we need you to open the store.

Okay now I worked 7-2 and 3-9 and the polls are closed. Oh well. Guess I should have bootstraps'd and skipped the only meal break I get in my day to go vote.

HootTheOwl
May 13, 2012

Hootin and shootin

the_steve posted:

That was one of the things I mentioned, along with other outright voter suppression tactics and the fact that most people literally couldn't afford to wait in line for 8+ hours.
The reply was:

How many hours did you wait at your polling station? Oh, zero? It only took minutes? Cool.
(Also, look at the age breakdown chart and compare them to the total population. 17-29 spans eleven years, every other breakdown is fifteen except seniors where everyone 65 and up got lumped together. No poo poo therey more of them because, again, their very houses are polling stations)

Rainbow Knight
Apr 19, 2006

We die.
We pray.
To live.
We serve

the_steve posted:

That was one of the things I mentioned, along with other outright voter suppression tactics and the fact that most people literally couldn't afford to wait in line for 8+ hours.
The reply was:

So next time your friend makes a dire mistake because they didn't "do the research" or whatever I hope you're there to remind them that if they wanted it enough they could have it.

bootstraps arguments from liberals. gently caress

PerniciousKnid
Sep 13, 2006

the_steve posted:

So, are there any handy rebuttals to this lovely "Young people just didn't want to vote badly enough, or else they would have?" victim-blaming narrative that people keep peddling?
I keep seeing it on my timeline from a friend of mine who should goddamn know better, and it's driving me up the wall.

Young people have multiple jobs and young kids to deal with. Old people don't deserve any special accolades for taking time out of doing nothing to vote.

Cactus Ghost
Dec 20, 2003

you can actually inflate your scrote pretty safely with sterile saline, syringes, needles, and aseptic technique. its a niche kink iirc

the saline just slowly gets absorbed into your blood but in the meantime you got a big round smooth distended nutsack

https://twitter.com/mippyofficial/status/1240621608689176579?s=20

FlapYoJacks
Feb 12, 2009

HootTheOwl posted:

How many hours did you wait at your polling station? Oh, zero? It only took minutes? Cool.
(Also, look at the age breakdown chart and compare them to the total population. 17-29 spans eleven years, every other breakdown is fifteen except seniors where everyone 65 and up got lumped together. No poo poo therey more of them because, again, their very houses are polling stations)

My coworker (LA) couldn't vote in the Primary because she had a UTI and her voting place CLOSED THE BATHROOMS. The line was over 3 hours long.

BANNED USER
May 18, 2010

I have this real nasty habit of punching faces

the_steve posted:

So, are there any handy rebuttals to this lovely "Young people just didn't want to vote badly enough, or else they would have?" victim-blaming narrative that people keep peddling?
I keep seeing it on my timeline from a friend of mine who should goddamn know better, and it's driving me up the wall.

Reverse ageism, older people chose to vote against their interests because it's easier to support the devil you know, than the man you don't. Blaming young people for not succeeding is one of the oldest plays in the book.

El Destructo
Jul 28, 2004

The football is in my path.
In 12 seconds' time she pulls
it away. I'm already lying there, 12 seconds into the future.

HootTheOwl posted:

Because every nursing home is a polling station while a college of 4,000 share one.
And every out-of-state student must jump through several time- and money-intensive hoops just to be eligible for the chance to wait for hours in that one line to that one polling place. Yep, those kids are just so disinterested and lazy!

Concerned Citizen
Jul 22, 2007
Ramrod XTreme
tulsi's brother weighs in

HootTheOwl
May 13, 2012

Hootin and shootin

Concerned Citizen posted:

tulsi's brother weighs in


I'm not sure Bernie has to approve your endorsement

Gatts
Jan 2, 2001

Goodnight Moon

Nap Ghost

Concerned Citizen posted:

tulsi's brother weighs in



I don't think I'd want the endorsement of someone who supports Modi genociding muslims in India.

spouse
Nov 10, 2008

When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.


Concerned Citizen posted:

tulsi's brother weighs in



Lmao as if Tulsi's endorsement isn't tepid, meaningless poo poo to everyone except her 17 fans and apparently American Samoa.

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

https://twitter.com/ag_due/status/1240716742453755905?s=20

Good luck in November poo poo eaters.

Ague Proof
Jun 5, 2014

they told me
I was everything

HootTheOwl posted:

I'm not sure Bernie has to approve your endorsement

The opposite of Pete.

phasmid
Jan 16, 2015

Booty Shaker
SILENT MAJORITY

I wonder how cozy people are that they hate others for trying to improve their lives. You'd think they all lived in opulence or something but no. They just detest change and youth and paying their fair share. Disgusting.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Who is this unverified guy with a 5 month old account and no followers and why is this significant?

Rainbow Knight
Apr 19, 2006

We die.
We pray.
To live.
We serve

He's probably a nobody but man what an rear end in a top hat lol. His pinned tweet was something that I didn't remember from the 2016 debate

https://twitter.com/ag_due/status/1194276681458032642

I can't believe they asked him that question. I'm going to take a guess that HRC wasn't pressed on things like Honduras. Nothing changes, I guess!

Raenir Salazar
Nov 5, 2010

College Slice
I support a large variety of "socialist" policies but don't necessarily see it as necessary to destroy "capital" or "capitalism"; even if I understand and am sympathetic to the arguments as to why it is ideal in the long run. For as long as it doesn't seem practical and I must measure outcomes according to net utility; I will accept less ideal outcomes that improve net utility over supporting outcomes that might not happen and thus provide no net utility.

UBI is good, UBI solves fundamental issues with automation eventually making the human race overwhelmingly unemployable as per CGP Grey's video "Humans Need Not Apply". If eventually capitalism determines it can safely eliminate the working class through AI and automation it will do so, and I'm not sure how exactly Marxists have in general adapted to this inevitable eventuality where the "working class" suddenly ceases to meaningfully exist.

Maybe the proleteriate just expands to computer touchers maintaining robots that make widgets but the idea of socialist revolution carried on the backs of blue collar workers making a living by the sweat of their brow and selling their labour is dead and buried or dying a slow extended death.

The Dark Project
Jun 25, 2007

Give it to me straight...

phasmid posted:

I wonder how cozy people are that they hate others for trying to improve their lives. You'd think they all lived in opulence or something but no. They just detest change and youth and paying their fair share. Disgusting.

I trust very few randoms on twitter to actually be acting or talking in good faith. Who knows who might be operating any number of these accounts. If it is real, then it's really hosed up, just as much as all the people making jokes about "lol, who is going to vote for Biden when all the olds are going to die from corona". It really is grotesque the state of things at the moment.

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

Rainbow Knight posted:

He's probably a nobody but man what an rear end in a top hat lol. His pinned tweet was something that I didn't remember from the 2016 debate

https://twitter.com/ag_due/status/1194276681458032642

I can't believe they asked him that question. I'm going to take a guess that HRC wasn't pressed on things like Honduras. Nothing changes, I guess!

Bernie should challenge joe to one final debate


hosted by jimmy dore

phasmid
Jan 16, 2015

Booty Shaker
SILENT MAJORITY

The Dark Project posted:

I trust very few randoms on twitter to actually be acting or talking in good faith. Who knows who might be operating any number of these accounts. If it is real, then it's really hosed up, just as much as all the people making jokes about "lol, who is going to vote for Biden when all the olds are going to die from corona". It really is grotesque the state of things at the moment.

Good point. It's sort of the infuriating prospect that there actually *are* people like that, I suppose.

Apogee15
Jun 16, 2013

El Destructo posted:

And every out-of-state student must jump through several time- and money-intensive hoops just to be eligible for the chance to wait for hours in that one line to that one polling place. Yep, those kids are just so disinterested and lazy!

It's pretty lovely for the places that engaged in voter supression, but doesn't really explain places like Washington.

Apogee15 fucked around with this message at 04:33 on Mar 20, 2020

Phenotype
Jul 24, 2007

You must defeat Sheng Long to stand a chance.



the_steve posted:

I registered Independent when I turned 18.
Tried swapping to D in 2016 so I could vote Bernie in the primaries, but some sort of fuckery in the system kept it from going through until like a month after the PA primaries. Been D ever since so that I'd be prepared for this year, but, that poo poo is coming to an end after April. I'm going back to Independent once I've at least gotten to vote for Bernie once in my goddamn life.

Sorry if I'm being ignorant, but is there any real benefit to registering as an independent? I'm registered as a Democrat so I can vote in the primary (although I actually don't think I have to be in Michigan) and because there's pretty much no chance I'd ever vote for a Republican, so I thought I might as well let them know it's a Democratic vote for them to lose.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Substandard
Oct 16, 2007

3rd street for life

the_steve posted:

So, are there any handy rebuttals to this lovely "Young people just didn't want to vote badly enough, or else they would have?" victim-blaming narrative that people keep peddling?
I keep seeing it on my timeline from a friend of mine who should goddamn know better, and it's driving me up the wall.

Honestly I've been mostly responding with poo poo posting about the general election.

Biden can't win with only 44+ support, young people will never vote for Biden. They should have voted for Bernie if they cared at all about defeating Trump. They have denied themselves the opportunity to win in the general and are the reason we will be stuck with Trump.

I'm not sure I'm winning hearts and minds, but it's at least fun for me.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply