Pick posted:

Yeah they said because people were falsely claiming she was a nazi

I would also like, if I were a celebrity, to make it very clear that I was not a Nazi

biracial bear for uncut posted:

It's a shame there isn't a better way to do that than to file spurious lawsuits.

MizPiz posted:

Wasn't literally all of that just a response to her feud with Kanye West?

Pick posted:

How can you prove someone who has never expressed a certain belief in any way doesn't secretly harbor it. That's insane.

Grendels Dad posted:

You forgot GET OUT OF THERE! smh

biracial bear for uncut posted:

You can pretty drat well guess what a person's beliefs are by the company they keep, though.

Partying with people that wear nazi imagery and blackface is extremely damning.

Solice Kirsk posted:

Yeah, but everything is nazi imagery these days. Tree emojis, milk, Mac Tonight. The list is boundless!

Solice Kirsk posted:

Yeah, but everything is nazi imagery these days. Tree emojis, milk, Mac Tonight. The list is boundless!

beanieson posted:

I saw a nazi with a tattoo of this the other day

biracial bear for uncut posted:

We have GIF tattoos now?

Whooping Crabs posted:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1240389384916086784

Whooping Crabs posted:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1240389384916086784

Jamesman posted:

I would like to become a member of The Flayed Lord's church, please.

Tree Bucket posted:

Well, that was weirdly unsettling.

pop fly to McGillicutty posted:

Go ahead, no skin off of my back.

Data Graham posted:

The guy was flexing really fast ok

TITANKISSER69 posted:

That's called public masturbation

Hyperlynx posted:

No. No no no no no.

When you make a claim, it is on you to back it up with evidence, not your reader. You can't just lazily wave your hand and say "I don't know, I read it somewhere, look it up yourself". Especially when someone directly asked you to back up your statement, which you made in contradiction to someone else.

chitoryu12 posted:

I don't remember this Talking Heads song.

alexandriao posted:

and with philosophy, where you can list the author or publication that led you to believe a specific idea.

quote:

“People always talked about the good clean smell of fresh sweat. They had to make excuses for it. They never talked about the good clean smell of fresh poo poo. There was nothing really as glorious as a good beer poo poo - I mean after drinking twenty or twenty-five beers the night before. The odor of a beer poo poo like that spread all around and stayed for a good hour-and-a-half. It made you realize that you were really alive.”

alexandriao posted:

alexandriao posted:

But I just did, so clearly your view is fallacious.

Ultimately you're referring to a rule of debate, but this isn't a debate. They told me something I said wasn't true, and I referred them to sources where they can learn more, and asked them to search for further information. I did that because I do not have my primary sources available, so I would be providing the first sources I found, and if I did provide sources, we would spend hours on the merry-go-round of they poking holes in, and not liking, my sources, while not disproving or disputing my claim, and me providing alternative sources for hours. I do not have the time for that, and as much as it will hurt you, I am not the fountain of all information.

Life isn't a debate club for you, you are an adult and capable of researching someone else's claim on your own time, rather than wasting theirs. Other people do not usually spend hours of their lives categorising their life experiences and sources so that other people can peruse them when they don't believe something, and almost nobody can these days list the exact sources that led them to believe something.

If I had listed sources, all I would have done would have gone to Google, typed in the same search I displayed, and linked a few articles from there. There is absolutely no reason why you cannot do that on your own time.

The burden of proof works with science, where you can list a specific experimental claim or paper that demonstrates what you claim, and with philosophy, where you can list the author or publication that led you to believe a specific idea. It falls down when making general claims (especially about cultures), as many of them are either experiencial, and do not lend easily to being cited or referred to, or are part of such a web of different supporting beliefs you could build a library out of the primary sources. Unless you want every single chat history and interaction I have had for the last decade? I guess that would be a primary source.

Nuns with Guns posted:

No one has yet answered how it is that you make a wave out of vapor

alexandriao posted:

But I just did, so clearly your view is fallacious.

Ultimately you're referring to a rule of debate, but this isn't a debate. They told me something I said wasn't true, and I referred them to sources where they can learn more, and asked them to search for further information. I did that because I do not have my primary sources available, so I would be providing the first sources I found, and if I did provide sources, we would spend hours on the merry-go-round of they poking holes in, and not liking, my sources, while not disproving or disputing my claim, and me providing alternative sources for hours. I do not have the time for that, and as much as it will hurt you, I am not the fountain of all information.

Life isn't a debate club for you, you are an adult and capable of researching someone else's claim on your own time, rather than wasting theirs. Other people do not usually spend hours of their lives categorising their life experiences and sources so that other people can peruse them when they don't believe something, and almost nobody can these days list the exact sources that led them to believe something.

If I had listed sources, all I would have done would have gone to Google, typed in the same search I displayed, and linked a few articles from there. There is absolutely no reason why you cannot do that on your own time.

The burden of proof works with science, where you can list a specific experimental claim or paper that demonstrates what you claim, and with philosophy, where you can list the author or publication that led you to believe a specific idea. It falls down when making general claims (especially about cultures), as many of them are either experiencial, and do not lend easily to being cited or referred to, or are part of such a web of different supporting beliefs you could build a library out of the primary sources. Unless you want every single chat history and interaction I have had for the last decade? I guess that would be a primary source.

Nuns with Guns posted:

No one has yet answered how it is that you make a wave out of vapor

Nuns with Guns posted:

No one has yet answered how it is that you make a wave out of vapor

Nuns with Guns posted:

No one has yet answered how it is that you make a wave out of vapor

Nuns with Guns posted:

No one has yet answered how it is that you make a wave out of vapor

doverhog posted:

PittTheElder posted:

https://i.imgur.com/y6uw95R.gifv

Android Apocalypse posted:

Jets going transsonic is cool.

Google searching "transsonic" brings up… different results.

Slush Garbo posted: