Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Munkeymon
Aug 14, 2003

Motherfucker's got an
armor-piercing crowbar! Rigoddamndicu𝜆ous.



Lemming posted:

Yeah and all him saying that does it make it sound like his position that it's safe to vote is what the science says, which it doesn't

He lied about that before

https://jacobinmag.com/2020/03/joe-biden-bernie-sanders-coronavirus-primary-voting

I read it the opposite way - weird!

Anyway, I didn't realize this was part of a pattern of irresponsibility that, you're right, is bad.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

Acebuckeye13 posted:

I think we're getting a little off track.

The post I was originally replying to said "Biden isn't offering anything other than not being Trump." And for a variety of reasons, that's not really true, which is why I posted policies, things he is offering. And, like I said, you can argue about constantly whether you can trust him to carry out those policies, or whether those policies are enough—but those are separate arguments to "he's not offering anything." Likewise, "He needs to communicate those policies better" is another, separate argument to whether those policies exist or not.

Anyway


They really can't? They can pressure him to drop out, but once he secures a majority of the delegates I don't believe there's anything in the party bylaws that would allow the DNC to force Biden off the ticket. Same problem the RNC had with Trump back in 2016 when it looked like he was going to drag the party into a flaming wreck.

I think it's possible for the Rules Committee to change any of The Rules, it just won't happen unless he's dead or dying.


Lessail posted:

What does left pressure actually mean instead of it being a thought terminating phrase

I mean my big Gimmick for that right now is the state and national conventions and I should update / consolidate / dumb down my effortposting for that

there are only 4000 some national delegates, pound for pound becoming one is a pretty good way to nudge things left

Pick
Jul 19, 2009
Nap Ghost
This has been a done deal for what, a month? Easy? Where was everyone

Lemming
Apr 21, 2008

OhDearGodNo posted:

People keep saying Bernie would have done better against trump than Biden would... yet couldn’t get enough votes out to win the nomination.

Some here need to come back to reality.

https://twitter.com/PerryFellow/status/1240669108485660672?s=19

The primary and the general are two very, very different elections. In the primary, the DNC has a ton of pull, as we saw when the average Democrat went to vote for Biden once the DNC told them to vote for him. If they told everyone to vote for Bernie, they would have. This effect is not very useful in the general election and it's all Biden has going for him

Arglebargle III
Feb 21, 2006

Isn't Biden's campaign like penniless?

Unoriginal Name
Aug 1, 2006

by sebmojo
Nothing Will Fundamentally Change 2020

How You Gonna Pay For It 2020

Sanguinia
Jan 1, 2012

~Everybody wants to be a cat~
~Because a cat's the only cat~
~Who knows where its at~

Pick posted:

This has been a done deal for what, a month? Easy? Where was everyone

They were already having this exact conversation in the Primary thread, just instead of the other side of it being people who already knew biden was the nominee the other side of it was people who wanted to believe a turnaround for Bernie was still possible.

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!!
May 31, 2006

Arglebargle III posted:

Isn't Biden's campaign like penniless?

it was, through super tuesday, at which point all the donors who'd been backing everyone else decided to come home out of fear, with the single notable exception of the megadonor who told Elizabeth Warren "no really honey stay in you've definitely got this here's 200 mil" with a straight face.

Peacoffee
Feb 11, 2013


at least we are all here debating and discussing, a higher and more ennobling act than mere talking, and, if I may say so, debating and discussing might in fact have the power to make terrible opinions BECOME good, with enough eloquence and a paucity in partisanship, preventing politicking from potential proletarians pocketing popular public policy to prepare against particularly pathetic "patriots"

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!! posted:

it was, through super tuesday, at which point all the donors who'd been backing everyone else decided to come home out of fear, with the single notable exception of the megadonor who told Elizabeth Warren "no really honey stay in you've definitely got this here's 200 mil" with a straight face.

Who donated $200 million to Elizabeth Warren after Super Tuesday?

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Who donated $200 million to Elizabeth Warren after Super Tuesday?
It was like $9 million

Tibalt
May 14, 2017

What, drawn, and talk of peace! I hate the word, As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee

Dietrich posted:

Elections are not coin flips, and results in one state are highly correlated with results in another. There aren't many probable outcomes where NC or ME flips but CO does not. If the national turnout on the dem coalition is high enough to flip Arizona, then it's very likely we have the senate.
Okay. Walk with me here. Let's assume AZ flips, okay? You see the results for AZ but are being asked to guess about CO.

What odds do you give Gardner in CO? Would you say "0%"? No, you wouldn't, because the probabilty of the events themselves are independent.

The same goes for the results on AL, ME, GA, and NC. There is a chance that the Democrats flip all of them, or none of them, or some combination in between. Sum them all up, and the possibilities of D+4 or more is less likely than the possibilities of D+3 or less.

Pick
Jul 19, 2009
Nap Ghost
That's not correct.

Fritz the Horse
Dec 26, 2019

... of course!
the primary is over

haha primary posting go brrr

Tibalt
May 14, 2017

What, drawn, and talk of peace! I hate the word, As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee

Pick posted:

That's not correct.
I can start talking about doors and donkeys if you like.

Pick
Jul 19, 2009
Nap Ghost
The odds that it will be three or fewer is always less than the odds of it being four or fewer, but the actual odds of three flips versus four depends on the conditions in each state. If each of four states had a 99% odds of flipping, the odds of four flips would be greater than the odds of only three, while the odds of 3+ would still exceed the odds of 4, with 3+ obviously being inclusive of four.

Acebuckeye13
Nov 2, 2010

Against All Tyrants

Ultra Carp

Tibalt posted:

Okay. Walk with me here. Let's assume AZ flips, okay? You see the results for AZ but are being asked to guess about CO.

What odds do you give Gardner in CO? Would you say "0%"? No, you wouldn't, because the probabilty of the events themselves are independent.

The same goes for the results on AL, ME, GA, and NC. There is a chance that the Democrats flip all of them, or none of them, or some combination in between. Sum them all up, and the possibilities of D+4 or more is less likely than the possibilities of D+3 or less.

Keep in mind the Republicans are defending twice as many seats as the Dems (A whopping 23 out of 35), so the Dems straight up have more chances to cause unexpected flips, Republican money will be spread thinner, and if the Dems win the presidency they only need 3 seats with the VP tiebreaker.

Tibalt
May 14, 2017

What, drawn, and talk of peace! I hate the word, As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee

Pick posted:

The odds that it will be three or fewer is always less than the odds of it being four or fewer, but the actual odds of three flips versus four depends on the conditions in each state. If each of four states had a 99% odds of flipping, the odds of four flips would be greater than the odds of only three, while the odds of 3+ would still exceed the odds of 4, with 3+ obviously being inclusive of four.
Great.

The Democrats don't have a 99% chance of keeping Alabama.

Pick
Jul 19, 2009
Nap Ghost

Tibalt posted:

Great.

The Democrats don't have a 99% chance of keeping Alabama.

Right, that's like a 0%. I don't know why Jones voted like he was pretending he could keep it.

Medullah
Aug 14, 2003

FEAR MY SHARK ROCKET IT REALLY SUCKS AND BLOWS
Personally, I really like what they did with Darkwing Duck in the new series. It was a great throwback to the original while still making it a unique spin on the character. Gizmo Duck is a little too close to the original, I'm not real sold on him. I do really like Secret Agent Beasley though.

Parakeet vs. Phone
Nov 6, 2009

Lemming posted:

It depends on what you mean by "offer"

In my view, if the candidate is not effectively arguing for something themselves, they aren't *really* offering it. The kind of voter you're talking about, the ones that will do things like look up candidates' policies on their websites, are a very, very small minority of people, it's just not how people generally operate. With this definition, no, I don't think those are things Biden is offering people. What he's offering the regular voter is a return to Obama times, where people didn't need to worry about politics and things could feel normal to them day to day. Now, this is obviously a fantasy, but that's his sales pitch. Vote for me and take a nap.

This is what really scares me for the general. We're already moving on to the stage where we swear that if you just check their website there's a great plan waiting. We're really just going to speedrun the 2016 election, aren't we?

Doctor Teeth
Sep 12, 2008


Medullah posted:

Personally, I really like what they did with Darkwing Duck in the new series. It was a great throwback to the original while still making it a unique spin on the character. Gizmo Duck is a little too close to the original, I'm not real sold on him. I do really like Secret Agent Beasley though.

:same:

Grouchio
Aug 31, 2014

Is it going to be unwise to hope for a brighter future for sometime? Even if I have no agency in many of the crises devouring this country?

FilthyImp
Sep 30, 2002

Anime Deviant
Hey today sucks balls but I just learned that Linda Tripp was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer a week ago and she just croaked so maybe it ain't all poo poo.

I mean FF7 comes out tomorrow rite?

BigBallChunkyTime
Nov 25, 2011

Kyle Schwarber: World Series hero, Beefy Lad, better than you.

Illegal Hen

Grouchio posted:

Is it going to be unwise to hope for a brighter future for sometime? Even if I have no agency in many of the crises devouring this country?

Hope for the best, sure, but expect the worst.

Chimp_On_Stilts
Aug 31, 2004
Holy Hell.

Grouchio posted:

Is it going to be unwise to hope for a brighter future for sometime? Even if I have no agency in many of the crises devouring this country?

It is never unwise to hope for a brighter future.

Acebuckeye13
Nov 2, 2010

Against All Tyrants

Ultra Carp

Grouchio posted:

Is it going to be unwise to hope for a brighter future for sometime? Even if I have no agency in many of the crises devouring this country?

Always hope for the best, and prepare for the worst.

e: beaten! that's it, last time I hope for anything

America Inc.
Nov 22, 2013

I plan to live forever, of course, but barring that I'd settle for a couple thousand years. Even 500 would be pretty nice.

Medullah posted:

Personally, I really like what they did with Darkwing Duck in the new series. It was a great throwback to the original while still making it a unique spin on the character. Gizmo Duck is a little too close to the original, I'm not real sold on him. I do really like Secret Agent Beasley though.

Personally I'm more of a fan of the older grittier Darkwing Duck in the Duck Knight series.

Doctor Teeth
Sep 12, 2008


https://twitter.com/jonathanchait/status/1247984665585233920

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWa0dZMHYeE

Mat Cauthon
Jan 2, 2006

The more tragic things get,
the more I feel like laughing.



Xombie posted:

I literally said it several hours ago:



How does long lines in few precincts constitute a "massive level of voter suppression"?


He did better in Texas than Virginia, Massachussetts, or Minnesota. Maybe he should push for longer lines, because they seem to correlate with where he overperforms.

There's been a concerted campaign of voter suppression going on for the last four years, like an active full court press beyond the usual disenfranchisement and bullshit:

https://www.aclu.org/news/civil-liberties/block-the-vote-voter-suppression-in-2020/

Arglebargle III posted:

Isn't Biden's campaign like penniless?

IIRC Biden has like $12 million cash on hand and Sanders has somewhere around $20 million? Biden's campaign is actively trying to get the date where they can start to tap general election money moved up because he is not fundraising enough to be viable past like next month.

"The Sanders campaign had raised $182 million by the end of February, with roughly $19 million cash on hand, according to Federal Election Commission records. The Biden campaign, meanwhile, had raised $88 million and had $12 million cash on hand at that point in the campaign."

Edit: cited from here: https://theintercept.com/2020/04/08/bernie-sanders-drops-out/

God those numbers are bleak. Sanders raised literally twice as much money as Biden, the vast majority of it from working class people, and still got turbofucked. Electoral politics are a joke.

Mat Cauthon fucked around with this message at 22:03 on Apr 8, 2020

Chimp_On_Stilts
Aug 31, 2004
Holy Hell.

Acebuckeye13 posted:

Always hope for the best, and prepare for the worst.

e: beaten! that's it, last time I hope for anything

No such thing as beaten, friendo. We're comrades in hope for a brighter tomorrow.

mcmagic
Jul 1, 2004

If you see this avatar while scrolling the succ zone, you have been visited by the mcmagic of shitty lib takes! Good luck and prosperity will come to you, but only if you reply "shut the fuck up mcmagic" to this post!

SKULL.GIF posted:

The DNC must replace Biden as the nominee. Having a credibly accused rapist for the party's nomination is unacceptable.

The Democratic party is far too friendly to rapists.

The only way this is happening because of the rape allegation is if Obama says so.

LITERALLY MY FETISH
Nov 11, 2010


Raise Chris Coons' taxes so that we can have Medicare for All.

OhDearGodNo posted:

People keep saying Bernie would have done better against trump than Biden would... yet couldn’t get enough votes out to win the nomination.

Some here need to come back to reality.

As long as the reality you're espousing is about how the media annointed biden because he was the first one to really beat bernie in any contest, and that the reality is bernie never stood a chance because there is no way dems would have let even just a democratic socialist near the levers of power and would rather have 4 more years of trump than that, then sure.

OhDearGodNo
Jan 3, 2014

LITERALLY MY FETISH posted:

As long as the reality you're espousing is about how the media annointed biden because he was the first one to really beat bernie in any contest, and that the reality is bernie never stood a chance because there is no way dems would have let even just a democratic socialist near the levers of power and would rather have 4 more years of trump than that, then sure.

Why are you invalidating other people’s votes?

Maybe you’re right, I don’t know. But again you’re blaming the media when the fact is more people voted for Biden.

Maybe SA, reddit, and twitter don’t reflect the country after all.

America Inc.
Nov 22, 2013

I plan to live forever, of course, but barring that I'd settle for a couple thousand years. Even 500 would be pretty nice.
Has anyone done a proper Marxist analysis of Duck Tales?

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Mat Cauthon posted:


God those numbers are bleak. Sanders raised literally twice as much money as Biden, the vast majority of it from working class people, and still got turbofucked. Electoral politics are a joke.

Shouldn't it be good that money doesn't have a 1:1 correlation with electoral success, though?

mcmagic
Jul 1, 2004

If you see this avatar while scrolling the succ zone, you have been visited by the mcmagic of shitty lib takes! Good luck and prosperity will come to you, but only if you reply "shut the fuck up mcmagic" to this post!

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Shouldn't it be good that money doesn't have a 1:1 correlation with electoral success, though?

It still does. The earned media is just not in that fundraising figure.

Uncle Wemus
Mar 4, 2004


I was wondering how long until this poo poo started trickling in

Dietrich
Sep 11, 2001

Tibalt posted:

Okay. Walk with me here. Let's assume AZ flips, okay? You see the results for AZ but are being asked to guess about CO.

What odds do you give Gardner in CO? Would you say "0%"? No, you wouldn't, because the probabilty of the events themselves are independent.

The same goes for the results on AL, ME, GA, and NC. There is a chance that the Democrats flip all of them, or none of them, or some combination in between. Sum them all up, and the possibilities of D+4 or more is less likely than the possibilities of D+3 or less.

As of right now, I'd arrange all the possible flips and holds in this sequence of likelihood, starting with the most likely, ending with the greatest stretch.

CO > AZ > NC > ME > AL > GA > IA > KS > MT

What you're saying is that 3 flips is more likely than 4 flips. I agree, but not because of pure probabilities multiplied against each other. If people think there's a 50% chance that D turnout is high enough to hold Alabama, then it's more likely than not that it's also high enough to flip ME, NC, AZ, and CO. Not 100%, sure, but like 80-90%, because turnout does vary state to state, however it is strongly correlated.

So rather than .75 * .75 * .75 * .5 for 21%, just doing .5 (or whatever the odds for the tipping point state are) * .8 (or whatever you want to consider the probability of correlation with the states above it), for 40% is probably closer to the real odds.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Flapjack Monty
Oct 28, 2013



Grouchio posted:

Is it going to be unwise to hope for a brighter future for sometime? Even if I have no agency in many of the crises devouring this country?

I'll never dissuade someone from punching themselves in the face in the hope that next time might hurt less.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply