|
It would always be fair to say our readiness is degraded by a Trump order
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 03:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 06:15 |
|
|
bulletsponge13 posted:OPSEC! I hope you told him to OPsuck on your balls
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 03:31
|
|
|
PeterCat posted:So, would it be fair to say that our readiness is degraded by having the rapid response force of the 82nd stuck in the desert for months on some bullshit? Degraded? The president doesnt even know the meaning of word degraded! So of course not! All good!
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 04:19
|
|
|
bulletsponge13 posted:Von Braun chat- he was a loving Nazi. Doesn't matter how you try to justify it, he was Nazi who built terror weapons with slave labor. It's, a, uh, little hard to believe a thirdhand story from an anonymous source.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 04:59
|
|
|
Acebuckeye13 posted:It's, a, uh, little hard to believe a thirdhand story from an anonymous source. Yeah, seems totally out of character for a Nazi to have Nazi poo poo. No, I get your point, but I'm willing to believe this account considering how he got his job, and actions on previous employment
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 05:11
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/atheist_bad/status/1254177902905774085 Note that the audio is  if, for some godforsaken reason, you're in an office these days
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 05:21
|
|
|
Acebuckeye13 posted:It's, a, uh, little hard to believe a thirdhand story from an anonymous source. Plus passage of time, and apparently Von Braun was _so_ Nazi that a Nazi swastika just wasn't enough, so he went the extra mile to procure an SS totenkopf* to take to an American jeweler to craft into his double secret, double evil, double pin that he wore everywhere but no-one ever saw. * The insignia of the 3rd SS Panzer Division which took part in the invasion of France until spring '41 and spent the rest of the war on the Eastern Front. joat mon fucked around with this message at 09:02 on Apr 27, 2020 |
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 05:27
|
|
|
LingcodKilla posted:Degraded? The president doesnt even know the meaning of word degraded! So of course not! All good! He'll have you know he got tremendous grades. Beautiful, even. You just can't see them. Any of them. Ever. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 05:32
|
|
|
bulletsponge13 posted:Yeah, seems totally out of character for a Nazi to have Nazi poo poo. I'm willing to completely trash this account because it references Richard Hoagland multiple times and ends with "Hoagland was right." Richard Hoagland has a well-documented hatred for NASA and is also known for claiming NASA is hiding evidence of extraterrestrial activity, that he designed the Pioneer 10 plaque along with Carl Sagan, and frequently plagiarizes to puff up his own credentials.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 05:32
|
|
|
Also he spent decades lying about a face on Mars.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 05:33
|
|
|
Porfiriato posted:https://twitter.com/atheist_bad/status/1254177902905774085 Going outside to own the people protesting that you can't go outside. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 05:35
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kkBseVTUow
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 06:45
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:Going outside to own the people protesting that you can't go outside. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 06:57
|
|
|
I just watched that whole thing and that was a terrifying snap shot of a bunch of people who are suffering from mental illness or probably have a serious cognitive defect. Holy moly.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 07:02
|
|
|
PeterCat posted:So, would it be fair to say that our readiness is degraded by having the rapid response force of the 82nd stuck in the desert for months on some bullshit? Probably not, they're already deployed. Probably easier to send them somewhere else from Kuwait than from home station. The regular Army isn't super busy anyway, at least not in regards to combat operations. Most BDEs just train up for a training center rotation and then go to Korea, Kuwait, eastern Europe or somewhere around the Pacific.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 08:40
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1254586604360011776
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 12:37
|
|
|
... he's retweeting himself? That is just wrong.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 12:41
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:Going outside to own the people protesting that you can't go outside. dude,
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 12:54
|
|
|
Porfiriato posted:https://twitter.com/atheist_bad/status/1254177902905774085 "Get an essential job, you piece of poo poo" 
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 13:07
|
|
|
BigDave posted:... he's retweeting himself? That is just wrong. He retweets himself constantly, but he's doing our equivalent of quoting himself in a new post there. Which he also does regularly. e: for example, 
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 13:14
|
|
|
BigDave posted:... he's retweeting himself? That is just wrong. He also retweeted this and failed to notice the account’s name was “Trump and Biden are Rapey.” 
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 13:17
|
|
|
Handsome Ralph posted:"Get an essential job, you piece of poo poo" I lol every time at the middle-aged Karen dropping "nice Wal-Mart shoes!!" like it's some sort of sick own.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 13:26
|
|
Porfiriato posted:https://twitter.com/atheist_bad/status/1254177902905774085 Good counterprotest there. This one too imo. https://twitter.com/steveahlquist/status/1254109349749895174
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 13:28
|
|
|
Porfiriato posted:I lol every time at the middle-aged Karen dropping "nice Wal-Mart shoes!!" like it's some sort of sick own. I dunno about you, but when I’m putting my entire community at risk by demanding that my governor reopen my hairdresser, I wouldn’t be caught dead in anything but my Balenciagas. Economic reopening and looking good come at a price!
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 13:30
|
|
|
Porfiriato posted:I lol every time at the middle-aged Karen dropping "nice Wal-Mart shoes!!" like it's some sort of sick own. That and the guy who was like "Oh is your mom here giving free blow jobs?" Sick own Farva.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 13:37
|
|
|
Was there ever any info about the US troops injured in Iran’s rocket attacks?
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 13:37
|
|
|
Abongination posted:Was there ever any info about the US troops injured in Iran’s rocket attacks? There was a ton of TBI injuries iirc
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 14:44
|
|
|
Flikken posted:There was a ton of TBI injuries iirc Just some headaches. Not very serious.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 14:49
|
|
|
Woofer posted:Just some headaches. Not very serious. 800mg of Mortin, change your socks and drink more water.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 15:04
|
|
|
What in the flying gently caress is this 5-4 Supreme Court majority on this case? https://twitter.com/mjs_DC/status/1254774269692612608?s=19 That is a loving wild lineup of justices and the chambers discussions had to be really weird.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 15:15
|
|
|
Not about injuries, but it sounds like the base had 12-18 hours of forewarning, and were told to anticipate a chem/bio attack. https://taskandpurpose.com/news/us-troops-warned-before-iran-ballistic-missile-attack
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 15:17
|
|
|
facialimpediment posted:What in the flying gently caress is this 5-4 Supreme Court majority on this case? Based on the summaries it looks like: The majority: the “government edicts doctrine” holds that works for hire by the government are public domain Thomas’s dissent: if congress wanted to create a government edicts doctrine they should’ve written one into copyright law, the entire thing is dumb Ginsburg dissent: the government edicts doctrine does not apply here because it applies only to the works of the government, not its contractors. The majority could have some pretty wide ranging implications I think?
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 15:27
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:Ginsburg dissent: the government edicts doctrine does not apply here because it applies only to the works of the government, not its contractors. Ehhhh, that kinda makes sense? I don't necessarily agree, but I can see the logic behind her reasoning.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 15:35
|
|
|
The majority called it a work for hire though which means that its as if the government itself wrote it. The government being able to copyright its "edicts" using a work for hire would not only undermine the concept of the edicts doctrine but also the definition of a work for hire.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 15:42
|
|
|
EFF posted:The case originated when Georgia’s Code Revision Commission threatened, and ultimately sued, open records activist Carl Malamud and his organization Public.Resource.Org (PRO). In an effort to make Georgia’s official laws easily accessible, Malamud had bought a hard copy of the OCGA, paying more than $1,200 for it. (The 11th Circuit opinion reports that a copy currently costs $404, although it isn’t clear if that price applies to non-residents.) Malamud then scanned the books, and sent each Georgia legislator a USB stick with two full copies—one of the scanned OCGA, and another encoded in XML format. I should be surprised that my state did this, but I'm not.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 16:13
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:The majority called it a work for hire though which means that its as if the government itself wrote it. The government being able to copyright its "edicts" using a work for hire would not only undermine the concept of the edicts doctrine but also the definition of a work for hire. If they went the other way I could argue that my work is my IP, and not the IP of the company?
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 16:19
|
|
|
EBB posted:If they went the other way I could argue that my work is my IP, and not the IP of the company? You could always draw up a contract that specified otherwise as Georgia did. But Georgia did it to avoid its legal responsibilities and thats a bit of a no no. Seems like a bit of a mess, which is why the opinions fell as they did. Well, other Thomas with his classic "this court should only have the power to adjudicate one water right dispute between states every 5 years" ruling
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 16:29
|
|
|
EBB posted:If they went the other way I could argue that my work is my IP, and not the IP of the company? I did not at all read this case as something that could be used as an attack on work for hire, and Ginsburg's dissent does not track that either. I have not read Thomas' dissent. Ginsburg argued that the commission and publication of the annotations was outside the scope of legislative work that is exempted from copyright protection because they only published annotations on extant laws, were silent on the legislature's interpretation, and were merely collections of people other than the legislature's interpretations. As the annotations have no connection to a legislative function, she would have upheld their copyright status.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 16:32
|
|
|
fifty-four thousand dead in the us
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 16:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 06:15 |
|
|
Doc Hawkins posted:fifty-four thousand dead in the us Time to open up! The cure cannot be worse than the disease. They said millions would die and only 54k? Sounds like this is no big deal.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2020 16:37
|
|