|
Punkin Spunkin posted:This is some sovcit guy for sure but i dont care, lord this channel is a thing of beauty I get a similar stress reaction when I see him bullying officers to when I see officers bullying people, but sometimes it's really funny. This one in particular: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r55BFO9ZVaM Dr. Arbitrary has issued a correction as of 09:04 on Jun 9, 2020 |
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 09:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 02:56 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/REALpunknews/status/1270007806305976323?s=20
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 09:36
|
|
|
I didn't recognize the poster, but knew it was too good to be true.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 09:45
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/paddyraffcomedy/status/1269987204576788486
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 10:03
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/AndrewProjDent/status/1270023344491020291
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 11:00
|
|
|
Yestermoment posted:I didn't recognize the poster, but knew it was too good to be true. hard times is a poster you should know. they can go toe to toe w the onion
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 11:10
|
|
|
This guy owns https://twitter.com/leegunwoo98/status/1270153031661703169?s=20
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 11:45
|
|
|
lmao https://twitter.com/jimwaterson/status/1270308564607938566?s=20
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 11:56
|
|
|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:I get a similar stress reaction when I see him bullying officers to when I see officers bullying people, but sometimes it's really funny. lol @ the detective impotently telling him to leave a municipally owned property
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 12:11
|
|
|
We know that our AI software is going to make a mistake, but we can't prevent it, only change it once it's already finished. - Not a science fiction plot line
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 12:29
|
|
|
Samurai Sanders posted:We know that our AI software is going to make a mistake, but we can't prevent it, only change it once it's already finished. I'm detecting a whole new job market here.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 12:41
|
|
|
lol they fired all of their human editors when they transitioned over to that thing
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 12:51
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 13:02
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/SamAdlerBell/status/1270211926686158849
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 13:36
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Hooters/status/1270048380140621825?s=20
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 14:26
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/PeonFlux/status/1270193478333579264?s=20
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 14:44
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 15:11
|
|
|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:I get a similar stress reaction when I see him bullying officers to when I see officers bullying people, but sometimes it's really funny. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMe3uHsd-Bk Is a pretty funny channel too. Extremely insufferable person uses powers + privilege for good(?)
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 15:47
|
|
|
Samurai Sanders posted:We know that our AI software is going to make a mistake, but we can't prevent it, only change it once it's already finished. Its pretty much the plot of The Machine That Won The War, which is honestly one of the most prophetic Asimov stories
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 15:49
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/PSBurton/status/1270054352678457344
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 16:24
|
|
|
Antonymous posted:artists, actors and other talent who get paid for their unique skill or idea directly are probably the one exception to capitalist production that can get filthy rich without exploitation, though obviously film, TV, music are as exploitative as any industry. JK rowling does benefit as a capitalist from toys and games and whatever else in that realm. They aren't different. An idea is just an idea. You can write the best book ever, but are you gonna go out, run a paper mill (and managed a forest to log for paper), run and manage the printing presses etc? There is labor being exploited along the way that is required for their existence. A rich actor can't act without the teams of other artists to support them and so on. Its a grift/myth individuals use to maintain the myth they are not replaceable and consolidate wealth. To a certain extent, this is true, but not 100 millions of dollars true. Same for Rowling, sure if she had self published maybe. But endless merchandising and print requires a lot of labor to produce and sell that she certainly did not do.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 16:55
|
|
|
hell yes came here to post this
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 17:17
|
|
|
quote:What Thirlwall could not have known, according to sources at the company, is that the image was selected by Microsoft’s artificial intelligence software, which is already responsible for editing parts of the news site, which attracts hundreds of millions of readers worldwide. this seems like a really generous way to say "hundreds of millions of people dont know how to change their internet explorer home page"
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 17:25
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 18:02
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/MichaelBarden8/status/1270250771024470017 Antifa debit cards are real. There is no way this is fake 
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 18:52
|
|
|
Koishi Komeiji posted:https://twitter.com/MichaelBarden8/status/1270250771024470017 They are real in that you can buy them, but they are just sold to raise money for anti-nazi programs
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 18:55
|
|
|
Going to get my BOFA visa card change to read ANTIFA on it, they don't really check the images
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 19:00
|
|
|
ANTIFA Deez nuts
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 19:06
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/bijanstephen/status/1270416808802164739
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 19:08
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ShadowPowerup/status/1270325113649532930?s=20
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 21:18
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 21:23
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 21:39
|
|
|
Even goons have a place in the revolution 
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 21:55
|
|
|
In case anygoon is in the market for a new av:
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 22:07
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/dhm/status/1270409770139254786
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 22:20
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Otto_English/status/1270464383165087745?s=20
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 22:22
|
|
|
Piers Morgan doing his "every 6 months I will actually for once act like a real human with morals and reason" routine again I see
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 22:39
|
|
|
she owns https://twitter.com/noahtoly/status/1269340349190811648?s=20
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 22:45
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 22:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 02:56 |
|
|
Sylink posted:They aren't different. An idea is just an idea. You can write the best book ever, but are you gonna go out, run a paper mill (and managed a forest to log for paper), run and manage the printing presses etc? Obviously you have to break it down. Rowling does not own or run a book binding business, and I don't know exactly how it the book industry works but I'm guessing the publisher does not either and will make those contracts and negotiate those prices. Is Rowling making rent from her publisher and book binder due to her getting royalties from the story they are printing? Traditionally the publisher would be the capitalist, compensating the writer less than the labor time spent making the work, and profiting off of that, much like any artist who labors for their patron. It is assumed JK Rowling makes 15% off of each book sold, it just so happens that they've sold about 9 billion dollars worth of books. There's some other use values to having a physical book, like how it presents on your shelf if you put it up as decoration, but I cannot find an easy way to say that Rowling's writing isn't the main use value created and put to sale, that it isn't from her own labor alone. That's why I wrote ebook, so we can maybe ignore the artist who drew the cover and the labor and capital from printing a book. But elsewhere it's hard to apply in a space where the work performed isn't 100% interchangeable and floating in a competitive market. I see intellectual property is a kind of private property, i.e. capital that does divert value away from those who create it, though the way it does this is a little obscure. The films, the games, the toys and bedsheets and so on - here to me she's clearly a capitalist, and the intellectual property of Harry Potter is being used as capital and siphoning off labor from society. I think marx's theory for what defines the capitalist era is mass production of identical goods, labor which is de jure free to negotiate and associate and not tied to land, and so on. But a key thing is that 'Tom Cruise' is not a reproducible good, nor is the story of Harry Potter, and that's where you'd need a real marxist economist to figure out mathematically, structurally what's going on. As I recall Marx himself has virutally nothing to say about artist labor or intellectual property. Grundrisse says actors do no perform productive labor simply by making a play, but my making a play that returns more money to the theater owner than they are compensated. I think that's a point to the publisher being the capitalist, not Rowling. As far as intellectual property, he says that capitalism has constrained itself by universally measuring value as labor time and that this value and system of exploitation will apply to things which cannot logically be measured this way in order to keep the system consistent, as an example he mentioned science and social intercourse taking on value forms. I think you can easily make the jump that when ideas become factors of production legally guarded as private property it's obvious they are functioning as capital, I'm just having trouble seeing selling your direct labor for 15% of returns as immediately the same thing.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2020 23:02
|
|
