Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
SaintFu
Aug 27, 2006

Where's your god now?

FlamingLiberal posted:

It's by the TNG Season 8 Twitter guy so I hope it's decent

In other news, I made the mistake of watching TOS: Assignment: Earth last night. I get that this is an aborted pilot for another show retooled to work with TOS but wow, it's bad. Just filled to the brim with Apollo program stock footage to the point where it seemed like every time Scotty showed up on screen it was just to stand next to a screen showing classic NASA footage. Gary Seven is a strange character with minimal backstory that feels like a ripoff of both Doctor Who and James Bond at the same time.

It seems really unlikely that anyone working on Star Trek had seen Doctor Who.

Teri Garr apparently hated working on this episode because of Gene Roddenberry and her ever-decreasing costume.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Snow Cone Capone
Jul 31, 2003


tbh I'm kind of looking forward to a Trek show that isn't hamstrung by the need to introduce a galaxy-spanning threat to deal with

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



Snow Cone Capone posted:

tbh I'm kind of looking forward to a Trek show that isn't hamstrung by the need to introduce a galaxy-spanning threat to deal with
OK but how about a universe destroying threat?

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



Oh and according to Memory Alpha, the shots of Scotty behind the transporter console next to the stock footage IS ALSO reused footage from The Enemy Within

It's the Inception of reusing footage

Zurui
Apr 20, 2005
Even now...



It's impossible that the screenwriter of Assignment: Earth hadn't heard of Doctor Who given that Gary Seven literally has a sonic screwdriver.

The_Doctor
Mar 29, 2007

"The entire history of this incarnation is one of temporal orbits, retcons, paradoxes, parallel time lines, reiterations, and divergences. How anyone can make head or tail of all this chaos, I don't know."

Zurui posted:

It's impossible that the screenwriter of Assignment: Earth hadn't heard of Doctor Who given that Gary Seven literally has a sonic screwdriver.

The sonic screwdriver wasn’t much more than an actual screwdriver until Pertwee came along in 1970.

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



The more you look at Roddenberry's non-Trek work the more you understand how much of a fluke ST was

feedmyleg
Dec 25, 2004

FlamingLiberal posted:

The more you look at Roddenberry's non-Trek work the more you understand how much of a fluke ST was

Didn't he just remake Genesis II like 5 times?

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



feedmyleg posted:

Didn't he just remake Genesis II like 5 times?
I had to look this up, but yes, it was reused four times

Zurui
Apr 20, 2005
Even now...



FlamingLiberal posted:

The more you look at Roddenberry's non-Trek work the more you understand how much of a fluke ST was

It's pretty clear that other writers took his basic concepts and created something good. As proof, name a good TOS episode written by Roddenberry.

I'll wait.

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



Yeah Gene Coon never gets enough credit for making the modern Trek universe

Cat Hatter
Oct 24, 2006

Hatters gonna hat.

SaintFu posted:

It seems really unlikely that anyone working on Star Trek had seen Doctor Who.

Teri Garr apparently hated working on this episode because of Gene Roddenberry and her ever-decreasing costume.

I've never wanted to stay awake through that episode, so I'm just imagining she starts out in a regular costume but in every subsequent scene she has a smaller and smaller costume.

Tunicate
May 15, 2012

feedmyleg posted:

Didn't he just remake Genesis II like 5 times?

quote:

The plot point about the Tyranians having a dual circulatory system with two hearts and thus identifiable because they were born with two navels was an elaborate in-joke. While producing Star Trek, Roddenberry was constantly besieged by demands for changes from the censors at NBC's Broadcast Standards department, which he took to calling the "BS Department" due to the often petty nature of their revisions. Among the things to which the censors routinely objected was the depiction of a navel on anyone with a bare midriff, resulting in several reshoots of scenes with actors in revealing but otherwise "decent" attire whose navels showed. By making the double navel the distinguishing physical feature of the Tyranians, Roddenberry was effectively filming every navel that he had been forced to censor from Star Trek twice over.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

WilWheaton posted:

isn't there like two rules for starfleet ship design , and one is just dont block the path between the nacelles? Yet this somehow feels like it went out of its way to do so.
I think it was an unwritten Roddenberry rule, which was broken in the TOS movies (Oberth), reinstated in TNG while he was still alive, then gradually whittled down to nothing once the Defiant was introduced. (Another rule that was eventually abandoned was "no odd numbers of warp nacelles".)

There was concept art for TMP of the officers' lounge showing some kind of energy field crackling between the nacelles at warp, explaining the "don't put stuff between the warp engines" idea, but it was dropped.

Zaroff
Nov 10, 2009

Nothing in the world can stop me now!

Zurui posted:

It's impossible that the screenwriter of Assignment: Earth hadn't heard of Doctor Who given that Gary Seven literally has a sonic screwdriver.

That would be very impressive since Assignment Earth was broadcast March 29, 1968, while the episode of Fury from the Deep where the sonic screwdriver was introduced (as an actual screwdriver rather than a magic wand) was broadcast March 16th, 1968.

So unless Assignment Earth was written, filmed and completed in 13 days, it's likely to be a complete coincidence!

Nullsmack
Dec 7, 2001
Digital apocalypse

I still say that the turbolifts travel between halves like a Wonkavator.

Zurui
Apr 20, 2005
Even now...



Zaroff posted:

That would be very impressive since Assignment Earth was broadcast March 29, 1968, while the episode of Fury from the Deep where the sonic screwdriver was introduced (as an actual screwdriver rather than a magic wand) was broadcast March 16th, 1968.

So unless Assignment Earth was written, filmed and completed in 13 days, it's likely to be a complete coincidence!

I learned a thing today!

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



Even if the Who episode had been a little before, they would have had to had a guy watch it in the UK, come to America, say "Guys! We gotta rip this thing off!" and work it into the plot, which probably requires more than a couple of weeks lead time. What seems more likely is that something else, perhaps in a SF magazine of the time, had referred to a "sonic screwdriver" and both the Who guys and the ST guys read the same magazine.

Hipster_Doofus
Dec 20, 2003

Lovin' every minute of it.

WilWheaton posted:

isn't there like two rules for starfleet ship design , and one is just dont block the path between the nacelles? Yet this somehow feels like it went out of its way to do so.

They could hardly be more blocked than they are on the Defiant.

FlamingLiberal posted:

It's by the TNG Season 8 Twitter guy so I hope it's decent

Whoa, whaaaaat?! I find that very reassuring.

Cross-Section
Mar 18, 2009

https://twitter.com/CodySDax/status/1278380608138461185?s=20

man now I hope this is the case

feedmyleg
Dec 25, 2004
I mean, I get why the ship is designed that way—the lower decks being physically separated from the upper decks with no ability to travel between really pushes the fact that the lower deck workers are second-class citizens—but it does kind of feel a bit canon-breaking. I'm sure they'll justify it somehow, like the above explanation, but it still doesn't sit all that well.

bull3964
Nov 18, 2000

DO YOU HEAR THAT? THAT'S THE SOUND OF ME PATTING MYSELF ON THE BACK.


What if they are glorified shuttle pilots, transporting saucer sections to be married with stardrive sections at a different location or recovering saucers from stardrive sections that went boom. They would have no real reason to go on to the other portion of the "ship."

Cross-Section
Mar 18, 2009

feedmyleg posted:

I mean, I get why the ship is designed that way—the lower decks being physically separated from the upper decks with no ability to travel between really pushes the fact that the lower deck workers are second-class citizens—but it does kind of feel a bit canon-breaking. I'm sure they'll justify it somehow, like the above explanation, but it still doesn't sit all that well.

What? The arrow is clearly pointing towards the lower aft of the saucer.

feedmyleg
Dec 25, 2004
Oh geez. For some reason I was thinking it was set in the secondary hull (?) between the nacelles.

Well now I'm even more confused about that ship design.

Drink-Mix Man
Mar 4, 2003

You are an odd fellow, but I must say... you throw a swell shindig.

I can't believe this is what it takes to get the pre-TNG movies design philosophy back.

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



feedmyleg posted:

Oh geez. For some reason I was thinking it was set in the secondary hull (?) between the nacelles.

Well now I'm even more confused about that ship design.
It definitely looks like a kitbash and I suspect they're going for "we're ROUGH and TUMBLE and WACKY because we're in a second-tier salvaged ship class" to some extent, just looking at the visual language.

Weren't there a bunch of Galaxies (presumably fitted internally for military ops) in DS9 ship battle scenes? Like well beyond the 'they made 6 and laid up frames for another 6' numbers in the TNG tech guide.

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



https://twitter.com/trekcore/status/1278371684458864641?s=21

1000 Brown M and Ms
Oct 22, 2008

F:\DL>quickfli 4-clowns.fli

Nessus posted:

It definitely looks like a kitbash and I suspect they're going for "we're ROUGH and TUMBLE and WACKY because we're in a second-tier salvaged ship class" to some extent, just looking at the visual language.

Weren't there a bunch of Galaxies (presumably fitted internally for military ops) in DS9 ship battle scenes? Like well beyond the 'they made 6 and laid up frames for another 6' numbers in the TNG tech guide.

Sure were. IIRC the DS9 tech manual says something about them being rushed off the production line with only a third of their internal fittings installed, which would make sense in a wartime environment. I don't know when the TNG manual was supposed to be published in-universe, but you can always handwave the numbers away by saying that 12 was the initial order and after they decided to build a whole bunch more.


I'm also getting a bit of a Steamrunner vibe from that ship with the deflector between the nacelles.

Cross-Section
Mar 18, 2009


This reply they retweeted is even better:

https://twitter.com/DarrenJEvans/status/1278396330914844672?s=20

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



Farragut? More like gently caress Your Guts Out

feedmyleg
Dec 25, 2004
Years ago I was made aware of anthropomorphic airplane porn. Now you've all made me realize that there must be the equivalent for starships. Perhaps kit bashing has been a euphemism this whole time.

Powered Descent
Jul 13, 2008

We haven't had that spirit here since 1969.

bull3964 posted:

What if they are glorified shuttle pilots, transporting saucer sections to be married with stardrive sections at a different location or recovering saucers from stardrive sections that went boom. They would have no real reason to go on to the other portion of the "ship."

I think I like that idea. It's a tow ship -- the actual ship consists of only the bigass nacelles, the minimalist stardrive section and the ugly squared-off brackets sticking up. The saucer on top is just what they're moving this week. Next week it'll be a comically huge hull section for a new starbase; the week after that it's a giant sentient asteroid that needs a warp-speed lift to go on vacation to Rosseau V (trust me, it's like Risa for space rocks); the week after that it's an enormous wrapped-up birthday present for the new leader of Altair VI (no peeking!).

F_Shit_Fitzgerald
Feb 2, 2017



SaintFu posted:

It seems really unlikely that anyone working on Star Trek had seen Doctor Who.

Teri Garr apparently hated working on this episode because of Gene Roddenberry and her ever-decreasing costume.

I don't blame Garr considering the cringe-inducing dialogue they put into her mouth: "My generation cares about this country, even if we act a little crazy sometimes" (I'm paraphrasing). It's not Way of Eden bad, but going in the "fellow kids" direction for sure.

Ramadu
Aug 25, 2004

2015 NFL MVP


Drone posted:

So did anyone like... actively want an animated comedy Star Trek?

Like, who asked for this?

It can't be worse than picard

Astroman
Apr 8, 2001


Nessus posted:

Even if the Who episode had been a little before, they would have had to had a guy watch it in the UK, come to America, say "Guys! We gotta rip this thing off!" and work it into the plot, which probably requires more than a couple of weeks lead time. What seems more likely is that something else, perhaps in a SF magazine of the time, had referred to a "sonic screwdriver" and both the Who guys and the ST guys read the same magazine.

"GENE! ITS ME! YOUR COUSIN FROM ENGLAND, LLWELLYN! LLWELLYN RODDENBERRY!

YOU KNOW THAT NEW SCIFI GADGET YOU WERE LOOKING FOR? LISTEN TO THIS!"

"...oh my giddy aunt!"

ashpanash
Apr 9, 2008

I can see when you are lying.

Cross-Section posted:

If they end up not having an episode about figuring out how to get down to the deflector then I'm burning it all down

McMahon's behind it, I guarantee you they will.

ashpanash fucked around with this message at 04:04 on Jul 2, 2020

Cross-Section
Mar 18, 2009

feedmyleg posted:

Years ago I was made aware of anthropomorphic airplane porn. Now you've all made me realize that there must be the equivalent for starships. Perhaps kit bashing has been a euphemism this whole time.



MikeJF
Dec 20, 2003






It looks so much better upside down.

Apparently it's a bit inspired by how goofy the top left Matt Jeffries sketch looks



bull3964 posted:

What if they are glorified shuttle pilots, transporting saucer sections to be married with stardrive sections at a different location or recovering saucers from stardrive sections that went boom. They would have no real reason to go on to the other portion of the "ship."

The actual plot is that they're a 'second contact' ship, they trail around to places the hero ships have been and do the paperwork and clean up the mess.

MikeJF fucked around with this message at 04:42 on Jul 2, 2020

Arivia
Mar 17, 2011
Just got to Q-Who in my rewatch. Jeez they sell the Borg real well. And that baby in the crèche is just as terrifying as I remember 25 years later.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

MikeJF
Dec 20, 2003




The_Doctor posted:

The weird thing for me about Lower Decks is that they’re insisting it’s canon.

Maybe they'll be like 'events occured. The recounting may or may not be reliable'.

They could do like How I Met Your Mother, frame the first episode with Captain Maincharacter in the future telling stories of her time as an ensign. Makes it canonical but lets you assume the really silly bits are a good storyteller.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply