|
Nice piece of fish posted:Where I live they wouldn't even have gotten permit to construct the fence. Also we have a special court that would have forcibly rearranged the properties to avoid that moronic crap.
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2020 22:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 08:16 |
|
|
Nice piece of fish posted:What I'm saying is they wouldn't have cause for such an off-fence That one was beyond the pale.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2020 23:34
|
|
|
I’m just gonna stake out my claim and say: that joke sucked
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2020 23:46
|
|
|
gently caress all of you. Puns are the greatest form of humor excepting dick jokes.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2020 00:04
|
|
|
therobit posted:gently caress all of you. Puns are the greatest form of humor excepting dick jokes. Truly. The intellect of punners is metes and bounds ahead of the haters.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2020 00:40
|
|
|
Wisdom from the shire.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2020 02:07
|
|
|
Dead Reckoning posted:Tell me more. There's a special land court that can just say, "your agreed on property lines are stupid" and give your land to your neighbors? https://www.oicrf.org/-/land-consolidation-organized-in-a-special-court-experiences-from-norway
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2020 07:07
|
|
|
I think acquisitive prescription is cooler than adverse possession.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2020 15:53
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:I think acquisitive prescription is cooler than adverse possession. I think having to memorize a whole new vocabulary for the same concepts was the most annoying part of the Louisiana bar exam.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2020 18:28
|
|
|
ulmont posted:I think having to memorize a whole new vocabulary for the same concepts was the most annoying part of the Louisiana bar exam. Usufruct
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2020 19:12
|
|
|
the idea i could just hang out somewhere for 10yrs and make it mine is intriguing
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2020 22:04
|
|
|
owlhawk911 posted:the idea i could just hang out somewhere for 10yrs and make it mine is intriguing You have to have color of title* and improve the land and have “””hostile possession “”” * sometimes
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2020 01:16
|
|
|
euphronius posted:You have to have color of title* and improve the land and have “””hostile possession “”” My brother is a notary, he can get you a colorable title to anything for the right price
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2020 01:24
|
|
|
That price is ::: $5
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2020 01:25
|
|
|
So what I'm hearing is that the Scooby Doo method of land acquisition is real?
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2020 04:45
|
|
|
Volmarias posted:So what I'm hearing is that the Scooby Doo method of land acquisition is real? Dressing up in a mask and scaring people off their land is one of the cornerstones of property ownership, especially in the South.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2020 06:58
|
|
|
pseudanonymous posted:Dressing up in a mask and scaring people off their land is one of the cornerstones of property ownership, especially in the South. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2020 07:43
|
|
|
pseudanonymous posted:Dressing up in a mask and scaring people off their land is one of the cornerstones of property ownership, especially in the South. Hot drat
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2020 14:24
|
|
|
pseudanonymous posted:Dressing up in a mask and scaring people off their land is one of the cornerstones of property ownership, especially in the South. That one's gonna be a Jinkies for me
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2020 19:54
|
|
|
pseudanonymous posted:Dressing up in a mask and scaring people off their land is one of the cornerstones of property ownership, especially in the South. Holy poo poo
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2020 20:10
|
|
|
do adverse possession laws intersect cleanly with mining claims/patent claims, such as in nevada where it's supposedly relatively more permissive to stake a claim? I've heard tales of "legally" grabbing someone's land by virtue of establishing a claim and then doing the necessary improvements to that claim to maintain it and then you can actually live on it as long as you still nominally mine the claim basically tell me your stories about modern-day claim jumping, if you have them
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2020 21:54
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:do adverse possession laws intersect cleanly with mining claims/patent claims, State by state issue, but, in short: no, not really. In Texas "mining" is the same as "mineral rights" for oil and gas, and the types of adverse possession that goes doesn't really track with mineral rights the same way it does to surface rights. Edit: the reason why is that the "possession" part of adverse possession means actual drilling (or I guess mining) which generally a surface owner doesn't do - its leased out, and any lease or permission to drill defeats the "adverse" part of adverse possession. Its a super long and arduous explanation to really describe the issue, but just accept the above, even though its so woefully incomplete so as to be almost misleading. blarzgh fucked around with this message at 22:16 on Jul 27, 2020 |
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2020 22:12
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:do adverse possession laws intersect cleanly with mining claims/patent claims, I’m assuming you’re talking about land patents, not utility patents. About which I have no idea. But for utility patents, adverse possession is totally inapplicable and we actually have a SCOTUS case (SCA Hygiene) saying it’s 100% okay to watch someone use your patent and then wait 6 years to sue them.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2020 23:27
|
|
|
yeah land patents, specifically patented claims, which are like normal mining claims but double-extra protected with additional papers with more fancy stamps and whatnot affixed to them.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2020 23:33
|
|
|
So, my landlord has a tenant who moved out about 3.5 years ago, and they left a small boat in the backyard. He has contacted them a few times about it, and it's always "yeah, I'll be by". What would happen if this boat was listed on Craig's List?
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2020 04:24
|
|
|
Hopes Fall posted:So, my landlord has a tenant who moved out about 3.5 years ago, and they left a small boat in the backyard. He has contacted them a few times about it, and it's always "yeah, I'll be by". Is this property in a state where boats are titled at the DMV? Otherwise it might be hard to prove. There is probably an abandoned property procedure the landlord must follow though.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2020 04:26
|
|
|
Bet a scrapyard will haul it off for free, at absolute worst
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2020 04:30
|
|
|
gently caress if it's aluminum and there are no titles in your state take off all the steel and take it to the scrap yard yourself. The price of nonferrous metals is way up from a year ago.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2020 04:34
|
|
|
Hopes Fall posted:So, my landlord has a tenant who moved out about 3.5 years ago, and they left a small boat in the backyard. He has contacted them a few times about it, and it's always "yeah, I'll be by". What boat?
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2020 05:40
|
|
|
a boat that still floats is worth more than scrap metal, usually especially if it has a trailer that it already fits on, and which is roadworthy
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2020 06:39
|
|
|
I'm guessing based on the owner's level of care and maintenance being "left outside untouched for 3.5 years" that it is not one of those boats
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2020 07:19
|
|
|
Javid posted:I'm guessing based on the owner's level of care and maintenance being "left outside untouched for 3.5 years" that it is not one of those boats I mean, if it's a fancy boat that's been beat to hell by weather/critters then sure. But if it's just a little 14' aluminum fishing deal then it's going to be fairly bullet-proof and probably worth at least a few hundred bucks to someone. There are procedures to follow for property abandoned by tenants that will be state specific. Should be easy to find and follow since it's not uncommon for tenants to leave crap behind. Your landlord would be wise to follow it to the letter, because if the former renter gets pissed off it could get ugly.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2020 12:49
|
|
|
I mean is someone who left their jon boat for 3.5 years yet still takes the time to make excuses to the former landlord really a high risk for litigating if it disappears? Landlord can just counterclaim for 3.5 years of storage fees
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2020 13:20
|
|
|
I guess, but seems like it's simple enough to look up whatever notice is required and follow it 
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2020 15:07
|
|
|
If they've been in contact since then and expressly stated that they don't intent to abandon the property then that's likely a sticking point. The rules will be jurisdiction specific, but a "you need to pick up your property within *reasonable amount of time* or I'm scrapping it" of some sort will be needed. e: having prior contact where no storage fee is discussed and the presence of the boat is accepted likely estops any storage fee.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2020 17:05
|
|
|
Boat Law: the New Tree Law
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2020 17:10
|
|
|
Alchenar posted:e: having prior contact where no storage fee is discussed and the presence of the boat is accepted likely estops any storage fee. It's not to win on the merits, it's go away leverage. All these city mouse solutions for a country mouse problem.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2020 18:29
|
|
|
blarzgh posted:Boat Law: the New Tree Law What if the boat's been there so long that a tree is growing out of it, huh? WHAT THEN??
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2020 18:32
|
|
|
Bad Munki posted:What if the boat's been there so long that a tree is growing out of it, huh? WHAT THEN?? if the prior owner of the boat has to cut the tree down to recover their boat and does so...
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2020 18:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 08:16 |
|
|
Also the tree is growing out over the fence and dropping poo poo on the neighbor's prized azaleas. e: Said neighbor is the boat owner
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2020 18:36
|
|