Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Tnuctip
Sep 25, 2017

Hows that big ol drat doing these days? Havent heard much lately, i actually hope its ok because if it breaks then millions of people will die.

The fact it isnt being talked about more is actually suspicious, if everything was fine id expect more propaganda about it.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Shumagorath
Jun 6, 2001

Haramstufe Rot posted:

Like, I feel sorry for this dude but also lmao.
playing the Curb theme on a very small huqin

oohhboy
Jun 8, 2013

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
I didn't watch laowhy back then as he had clearly drank the cool aid. Sperentz hadn't. He was pretty neutral calling it as is, pointing out oddities good and bad. Nothing third rail, pretty harmless. The system was getting to him, an irritation, increasing wariness. He started going negative on China while in China which was funny enough partly driven by nationalist not happy with neutral.

laowhy took some time after bugging out before the tankie worked out of his system. For a while he was still defending Social Credit but in an unsure way. You could see the goggles slipping.

Now they are the two most anti CCP youtubers out there.

Tnuctip posted:

Hows that big ol drat doing these days? Havent heard much lately, i actually hope its ok because if it breaks then millions of people will die.

The fact it isnt being talked about more is actually suspicious, if everything was fine id expect more propaganda about it.

The unnamed country can only leak.

In recent leaks this time by Cohen :pisstape:. Leaks were indeed made.

Not So Fast
Dec 27, 2007


I only started watching Laowhy / SerpentZA recently, I didn't realise they used to be pro-CCP. From the sound of their recent videos it sounded like they like the country and the people, but not the CCP itself.

Not So Fast fucked around with this message at 17:31 on Aug 16, 2020

Tupperwarez
Apr 4, 2004

"phphphphphphpht"? this is what you're going with?

you sure?
serpentza was an entertaining watch because of the increasingly strenuous gymnastics he had to do to dance around hot-button subjects. When he touched on one of those subjects, there would always be this torrent of qualifying statements to get the wumaos of his back (not that it stopped them from trying to hassle him anyway, chuds are chuds, regardless of country).

Watching the dam crack and eventually break was also entertaining.

oohhboy
Jun 8, 2013

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Not So Fast posted:

I only started watching Laowhy / SerpentZA recently, I didn't realise they used to be pro-CCP. From the sound of their recent videos it sounded like they like the country and the people, but not the CCP itself.

laowhy was functionally a tankie, a lucky one that met SerpentZA who kept a reality check. It's pretty telling how one of them had to scramble out and the other had an organized exit.

SerpentZA has always been fond of the people never pro-ccp and kept them separated. It was entertaining seeing him dance around things he clearly wanted to say even if it had been harmless elsewhere. It didn't help there were less and less things to say that wasn't negative. Seeing him read the writing on the wall while laowhy kept humming along was a delight. It was like watching them pack their bags.

Blistex
Oct 30, 2003

Macho Business
Donkey Wrestler

oohhboy posted:

SerpentZA has always been fond of the people never pro-ccp and kept them separated.

Even when trying to stream and olds would stick their faces between his and his phone, he was still cheerful and polite with them. He only ever complained about the Chuds, the overly rude/indifferent people, or the angry racists. He did an admirable job of covering the good things about China until he ran out of them because they were all covered or the government got rid of them.

Laowhy's 180 was inevitable. You can't possibly stay a tankie if you have to live in China outside of a useful idiot/white person bubble. As soon as you actually try and "live" in China, it all falls apart.

Ups_rail
Dec 8, 2006

by Fluffdaddy
a few years ago I came across a laoway video talking about how he had to follow the custom of "buying a house for his wife" and when he showed the house the build quality was poo poo and he tried to dance around why it was normal or okay in china. So I kinda wrote him off.

vanity slug
Jul 20, 2010

i don't listen to afrikaners or tankies

Dont Touch ME
Apr 1, 2018

I don't think either of them are afrikaaners

Wendigee
Jul 19, 2004

Dont Touch ME posted:

I don't think either of them are afrikaaners

ehhh... serpentza is most definitely south african, grew up there.... and he had some interesting shares but it has been a very long time so can people change?

bonelessdongs
Jul 17, 2019

oohhboy posted:

Hahha nice, but I didn't ask for this.

Things are bad and messy, not existential, well maybe for Trump it is. Things look worse than they are as we can see all of it. The frustrating thing is America is more than able to fix the vast majority of its problems, its not a question of resources.

China is disturbingly opaque, but we can safely infer more aggressive, asinine the positive stories are, more leaks, the worse things are. I wonder why there is this sudden push to not waste food as a virtue which runs completely in the opposite direction to cultural expectations. There are multiple factors pointing to food insecurity. We have seen this before else where like the stock markets. Hmmm.

The gently caress are you talking about, the CCP just successfully completed the most ambitious irrigation project ever, one which marks the end of the era of American agriculture

exmachina
Mar 12, 2006

Look Closer

Wendigee posted:

ehhh... serpentza is most definitely south african, grew up there.... and he had some interesting shares but it has been a very long time so can people change?

Not all white south Africans are afrikaaners

Wendigee
Jul 19, 2004

exmachina posted:

Not all white south Africans are afrikaaners

ppl threw shade at him and called him racist many times I'm just sharing what they said. I never spent time getting to the bottom of it.

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

bonelessdongs posted:

The gently caress are you talking about, the CCP just successfully completed the most ambitious irrigation project ever, one which marks the end of the era of American agriculture

lol I get it

Grand Fromage
Jan 30, 2006

L-l-look at you bar-bartender, a-a pa-pathetic creature of meat and bone, un-underestimating my l-l-liver's ability to metab-meTABolize t-toxins. How can you p-poison a perfect, immortal alcohOLIC?


Wendigee posted:

ppl threw shade at him and called him racist many times I'm just sharing what they said. I never spent time getting to the bottom of it.

Afrikaaner is an ethnic group, my dude.

Wendigee
Jul 19, 2004

Grand Fromage posted:

Afrikaaner is an ethnic group, my dude.

i thought it was just white dutch racists that created apartheid and Rhodesia, my bad for real.

exmachina
Mar 12, 2006

Look Closer
Yeah a group of Dutch and Flemish colonised south africa, they speak a dialect known as Afrikaans which is related to Dutch, shares a lot of vocabulary and some grammer

Wendigee
Jul 19, 2004

exmachina posted:

Yeah a group of Dutch and Flemish colonised south africa, they speak a dialect known as Afrikaans which is related to Dutch, shares a lot of vocabulary and some grammer

are Die Antwoord Afrikaaners? What is it they are speaking? ( just started watching a movie and they had a track on it and reminded me that I can't understand all the words they say)

GotLag
Jul 17, 2005

食べちゃダメだよ

Grand Fromage posted:

Afrikaaner is an ethnic group, my dude.

I've always seen it used to refer to white people who speak Afrikaans, regardless of what exact flavour of European their ancestors were, i.e. typically but not always Dutch

Wendigee
Jul 19, 2004

GotLag posted:

I've always seen it used to refer to white people who speak Afrikaans, regardless of what exact flavour of European their ancestors were, i.e. typically but not always Dutch

this was my impression as well im sorry i phrased it so shittily above...

Wendigee
Jul 19, 2004

i can't can't get enough of their short-short booty war pants though...



probably the only people to get skin cancer on their thighs in the world.

Deki
May 12, 2008

It's Hammer Time!
If China is having food security issues what's stopping them from just buying more from overseas? Especially if Trump loses and Biden is willing to reset the tarriff dickwaving contest?

Blistex
Oct 30, 2003

Macho Business
Donkey Wrestler

Deki posted:

If China is having food security issues what's stopping them from just buying more from overseas? Especially if Trump loses and Biden is willing to reset the tarriff dickwaving contest?

Not so much "security issues" as, "we need more cheap meat/fish to keep the populace happy". There is a lot of farmland being used to grow feed for livestock and to grow fruit/veg for export. Should caloric intake drop to unacceptable levels, they could repurpose that land to grow potatoes/rice/anything to keep people from starving.

China's desire for cheap protein is why they are in the process of raping and killing the South China Sea and have pulled a panel van next to the Galapagos islands' car in the parking lot just before closing time.

Xi needs meat on everyone's table to retain power, as he's put too much weight into his, "I made China prosperous" propaganda. If people have to go without, they're going to see that he's failed them and popular opinion (imo) will swing too hard to counter. If China were to experience food shortages, you could expect the "poor China is being ganged up on by the world" propaganda to start up a few years before that, as to change the public perception, as Xi's been playing the, "we're big and strong" angle for too long. Should people start going without and the narrative hasn't adapted beforehand, that would be a good recipe for a quick leader/regime change.

feizhouxiongdi2
Oct 9, 2019

Blistex posted:

Not so much "security issues" as, "we need more cheap meat/fish to keep the populace happy". There is a lot of farmland being used to grow feed for livestock and to grow fruit/veg for export. Should caloric intake drop to unacceptable levels, they could repurpose that land to grow potatoes/rice/anything to keep people from starving.

China's desire for cheap protein is why they are in the process of raping and killing the South China Sea and have pulled a panel van next to the Galapagos islands' car in the parking lot just before closing time.

Xi needs meat on everyone's table to retain power, as he's put too much weight into his, "I made China prosperous" propaganda. If people have to go without, they're going to see that he's failed them and popular opinion (imo) will swing too hard to counter. If China were to experience food shortages, you could expect the "poor China is being ganged up on by the world" propaganda to start up a few years before that, as to change the public perception, as Xi's been playing the, "we're big and strong" angle for too long. Should people start going without and the narrative hasn't adapted beforehand, that would be a good recipe for a quick leader/regime change.

The propaganda has already started. Back when the trade war started, the propaganda started turning up the rhetoric of "we've gotta start tightening our belt to prepare for the challenging times ahead". The news release of 600 million people earn less than 1,000 RMB (about $140 US dollars) per month was part of that too. Recently they've also released memos and new regulations about "no food wasting" and it's being played up everywhere.

But IMO although the party is powerful, it's not really a well oiled machine on many fronts. At the end of the day, the great leap forward happened not because there was not enough food to go around. So it's very possible that the third world part of China could go into a famine or the food price can get through the roof but the first world stays fine or relatively unaffected.

feizhouxiongdi2
Oct 9, 2019

So i have a question.

English is my second language. And I looked up the word Tankie while I was reading the thread. "Tankie is a pejorative term which originally referred to those members of the Communist Party of Great Britain that followed the Kremlin line, agreeing with the crushing of the revolution in Hungary and later the Prague Spring by Soviet tanks; or more broadly, those who followed a traditional pro-Soviet position." is what Wikipedia offers.

The question is: Where do you draw the line of someone being a tankie? For example, is Bernie a tankie?

Or is a tankie someone who must praise the tanks going into Tian'an men Square? In that case, very few people can be called tankies. On the other hand, if the wishy washy attitude towards China (such as "It's better to engage China than not" or "Free trade will bring more changes to China", or something like "it's not perfect but it will get better" ) can mark someone as a tankie, then I think America was a tankie for 30 years until recently...

Fur20
Nov 14, 2007

すご▞い!
君は働か░い
フ▙▓ズなんだね!
like all languages, words change and evolve. right now, "tankie" describes a kind of person who cheerleads policy implemented by countries that call themselves communist, even if their values are largely capitalist. no matter what that country does, it's always in-the-right; for example, a modern tankie would celebrate xinjiang as a brilliant solution for promoting national unity.

Grand Fromage
Jan 30, 2006

L-l-look at you bar-bartender, a-a pa-pathetic creature of meat and bone, un-underestimating my l-l-liver's ability to metab-meTABolize t-toxins. How can you p-poison a perfect, immortal alcohOLIC?


Tankies will support any repressive action by any authoritarian state which has a red flag, basically. They also don't know anything, so you get cases like North Korea tankies despite the fact that North Korea itself has not claimed to be leftist for many years and removed references to socialism/communism from its constitution.

GotLag
Jul 17, 2005

食べちゃダメだよ
It's people whose complaint about brutal oppression is not that it's happening, but that they're not the ones in charge of it

The junk collector
Aug 10, 2005
Hey do you want that motherboard?

Deki posted:

If China is having food security issues what's stopping them from just buying more from overseas? Especially if Trump loses and Biden is willing to reset the tarriff dickwaving contest?

China is already the second largest importer of food in the world. The largest, USA, is a bit of a special case because the US is also by FAR the largest exporter of food in the world at roughly 3x any other country. China exports an amount of food roughly in line with other developed countries but this is really rather low if you look at their land mass. Germany for instance imports and exports roughly the same amount of food as China in dollar denomination. Knowing the internal production of China is pretty difficult for all the normal reasons so it could all be going to internal demand and it's difficult to make an assessment on how secure their food production actually is. All said, there is a reason that China's retaliatory tariffs were on food and probably a reason why they did not last long.

url
Apr 23, 2007

internet gnuru
Jimmy Lai gives no fucks.

quote:

The typical malicious-looking Wang Yi, often purple with rage, has turned friendly. “China is ready to restart the dialogue mechanisms with the US side at any level, in any area and at any time. All issues can be put on the table for discussion”; “Avoid confrontation, keep the channels open for candid dialogue, reject decoupling and stand up to shared responsibilities,” how sincere and heartwarming. Too bad, it is too late. The Cold War has begun, and now it is not the CCP’s choice of whether or not they want to engage. This is an unprecedented shock to the CCP. Will Emperor Xi be able to hold up, and lead the Chinese people back to the Mao-style “communist paradise”, where everyone has a place and everything they need? Or since the warrior-wolf attack on the Western powers, the ship has sailed and there is no return; that the Xi Dynasty is on a decline before it has taken shape?

Seeing Xi Dada’s serene photo taken leisurely by the corns, I shuddered, Woah! China is currently facing enormous floods and a tsunami of bans from major powers. In the face of national crises, you still have the mood to go and review crop production? Shouldn’t you be rolling up your sleeves and attending to myriads of state affairs? Crises and traps are all around, for whom are you constructing this whimsical image? The rumor that the in-party fighting glowing white with heat might be true.

Where there is no integrity, there is no loyalty. There is no mutual trust between people; people are always half skeptical, to curry favor is the only means to survive. Under the imperial system, there must be a single authority. Some are just instructions from the emperor, without a unifying goal; the authority sets the goal, and everyone follows and executes it. The only way to sustain such a regime is to divvy up the spoils. Balance the forces of all parties, while concentration all power on one authority. Officials are only to carry out instructions, but do not lead power; authority leads the distribution of benefits, uses power to squeeze the people dry, and then uses these resources to consolidate financial resources and power.

A party with multiple camps that fight each other to balance the distribution of power, but unite under one goal – do things for the party and the country. When power struggle reaches a dead end, the goal of doing things for the party and the country becomes a moral force to break the siege. This power can do quite some good. Take the miracle of China’s economic development in the last 40 years. Calling it “good” is actually controversial. You remove my freedom, then return a bit to me; I perform a miracle, but have to turn around to give my utmost thanks to you? A little comical, is it not? But that is another story.



The power struggles of various camps in the past were destructive and creative at the same time. The constant metabolism of power keeps the various camps in the party alive. Today, seeing the officials in Xi’s palace in a trance, with their heads held low, we know that the Xi Dynasty…

In the past, the many camps within the CCP used power struggles to divide powers and co-govern. With just one authority at the moment, power is centralized, and no longer balanced through power struggles. The structure of governance has changed, and only those from Xi’s camp have power. The more the resources, the greater the power, and the more fierce the power struggle. In the past, the power of various camps relied on the struggle to achieve balance and used power to divvy up the spoils. Now it is no asking of the weight of the cauldron. Indeed, there is no factional power struggle, but without the force to counter Xi Dada’s power, there is no check and balance of the autocratic power given by the co-governance of various camps in the past; to maintain stability, things must not be allowed to cross the boundaries. Xi Dada led China into this impasse today, all because there were no factional checks and balances; Emperor Xi’s words are the mandate, and nobody would dare to point out even grave mistakes; therefore he became rash and bold, and cooked up today’s disaster.

In the golden era, you can rule over the world; in troubling times, you are besieged on all fronts, the strongman with just an empty shell, pretty f*cking pathetic. If this is the current situation of Xi Dada, do you believe it? If such a saying does not violate the national security law, I believe.

Many factions of power struggles divvy up the spoils and contribute to self-balance. The checks and balances ensure that they will not go overboard. If there were a collective leadership, will there be One Belt One Road today? Will there be military bases built in the South China Sea? Or the vigorous promotion of Huawei 5G, encouragements of technological thefts, or the bribes of US and European talents to transfer technology to China, will there be today’s Sino-US conflict?

A clique-dictatorship at least has factions within to play the role of suppression, to stop behaviors that are too aggressive. Now that there is one authority, simply charging forward with whatever grand plans and initiatives, so long as Xi Dada feels good about them. This created the Sino-US relations today. If there is a balance of power between factions, diplomacy would not be getting out of bound. The ridiculous, diplomatic mess with all leaders of countries spearheaded by the United States, whose fault is it? And we are supposed to worship him as a god? God bless my fellow countrymen indeed.

If one camp grows and monopolizes power, and sets up a single authority in a totalitarian structure, without the moral high ground of “doing things for the party and country”, integrity and loyalty are both rendered meaningless. If it is not for the party nor the country, it is for oneself, what loyalty is there? With the loss of the moral power of the common goal, what is left is the personal gain of each individual. Therefore, the structure of the Xi dictatorship is purely sustained by the operation of divvying up the spoils; involving the struggle of faction officials and local governments, it becomes a very convoluted structure for the distribution of spoils.

From here, you can see Xi Dada’s style of aggression. Yes, you won a glorious victory in the fight against corruption, which made you feel that heavenly power was bestowed upon you, and hence the wolf-warrior. However, your return to old Mao’s single-authority power structure has yet to be formed, like going full force on a race car with parts that have not yet been put together, and provoking the world in every way. All this led to the besiege on all fronts by the West. Embarrassing, with looming crises all around. This is all thanks to your majestic talents, not stopping even as you crowned yourself emperor, but that you want to be the one god of the universe, to lead the “common destiny of mankind,” and that was how it all began. If you were not so rash, how did China end up with these severe sanctions by the great powers?

This seems very explicit by comparison. Usually they refer to the emporer in a round-about way.
Guess this is the end of the road for Lai.

McGavin
Sep 18, 2012

Chinathread: Xi Dada’s serene photo taken leisurely by the corns

Vesi
Jan 12, 2005

pikachu looking at?
lolled bigly at the header, I feel so certain of china's food security now

McGavin
Sep 18, 2012

:wth: Look at all that corns! :wow:

Wendigee
Jul 19, 2004

That's! Alot of nuts!

The Cubelodyte
Sep 1, 2006

Practicing Hypnolaw since 1990
Grimey Drawer

Grand Fromage posted:

North Korea itself has not claimed to be leftist for many years and removed references to socialism/communism from its constitution.

Uh, whoa. This is news to me. When did this change??

d0s
Jun 28, 2004

From what I've seen modern tankies are less about supporting the more brutal actions of authoritarian states but claiming they are complete fabrications or CIA disinformation. I looked at r/sino the other day and the top rated thread was one "disproving" the tiananmen square massacre. it's basically quanon for people on the far left

e: and it shouldn't be used for everyone with far left ideology, it's a specific set of beliefs. a lot of it is 4chan style super edgy trolling too, not that it makes it ok

d0s fucked around with this message at 07:59 on Aug 17, 2020

CIGNX
May 7, 2006

You can trust me

The Cubelodyte posted:

Uh, whoa. This is news to me. When did this change??

They didn't remove socialism, but they did remove all mention of Marxism-Leninsm in 1992 and Communism in 2009

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_North_Korea

It also looks like they replaced Juche with Kimilsungism-Kimjongilism. Not quite as catchy.

Fur20
Nov 14, 2007

すご▞い!
君は働か░い
フ▙▓ズなんだね!

Vesi posted:

lolled bigly at the header, I feel so certain of china's food security now



it was all sparrows?
always was...

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BrigadierSensible
Feb 16, 2012

I've got a pocket full of cheese🧀, and a garden full of trees🌴.

d0s posted:

From what I've seen modern tankies are less about supporting the more brutal actions of authoritarian states but claiming they are complete fabrications or CIA disinformation. I looked at r/sino the other day and the top rated thread was one "disproving" the tiananmen square massacre. it's basically quanon for people on the far left

e: and it shouldn't be used for everyone with far left ideology, it's a specific set of beliefs. a lot of it is 4chan style super edgy trolling too, not that it makes it ok
How do they do that? Do they claim all photos and videos of it are CGI fakes? Even though they were around before CGI was that good? Or do they downplay it? i.e. "A few rowdy students got punched. The thanks were never actually in the square but far away at the outskirts of the suburbs" etc. Either way, why waste that much mental gymnastics to disprove something that happened within living memory. Something your uncles can remember seeing firsthand?

Is it just a "La la la, I am not listening! Everything even nominally communist can do no wrong." And to the poster who asked what a "Tankie" is, that is my limited understanding of it. Someone who barracks for the word "communism" or "socialism" like it's a loving footy team, and that they can do no wrong. And the things that they provably are doing wrong get argued away as either being good, actually, or the "bad people", (usually the USA)'s fault ... somehow.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply