Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
nut
Jul 30, 2019

the tuning fork stuff is cool but im sorry that fight club vid is whack its so thin it has to pad the back of it with the back to the future goods

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Fiend
Dec 2, 2001
I am Jack's tenuous link to pizzagate.

Mameluke
Aug 2, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

:frogout:

Doc Hawkins
Jun 15, 2010

Dashing? But I'm not even moving!


I did not know they dared to make a second adaptation of The 39 Steps after Hitchcock's.

But I did know this thread had a bad history of egging on the mentally ill for kicks.

Proletarian Mango
May 21, 2011

Idk cuppy makes a lot of sense to me

mod sassinator
Dec 13, 2006
I came here to Kick Ass and Chew Bubblegum,
and I'm All out of Ass
is this the thread for posters west of the rockies?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViN2bRGrBx8

crepeface
Nov 5, 2004

r*p*f*c*

crepeface posted:

wtf she was literally in the last photo of a dead child beauty queen?

edit: calling a child a beauty queen is weird as gently caress. why are they child beauty pageants held anyway, are elites influencing our entire culture to normalize sexualizing children? is even our idealized image of a beautiful supermodel as a thin, child-like waif a result of elites funding their preferences? have they inceptioned everyone in this thread since birth with media??

...crack ping


https://twitter.com/ayyverty/status/1296174786738102272?s=20

poo poo like this just keeps me crack pinged

crepeface has issued a correction as of 10:02 on Aug 21, 2020

Loucks
May 21, 2007

It's incwedibwe easy to suck my own dick.

The cuties thing is appalling. according to random tweets apparently it’s a French piece about how gross and harmful the sexualization of young girls is, and Netflix’s marketing team decided that the best way to position it was as blatant pedobait. I feel sorry for the woman who made the thing.

crepeface
Nov 5, 2004

r*p*f*c*
it's ironic pedophilic satire, and it's art.

Truga
May 4, 2014
Lipstick Apathy
i went and watched the trailer this morning and didn't see anything objectionable, it's apparently a growing up film about girls who do dumb poo poo because they kids

also, that poster is apparently a netflix original so someone at netflix went real on photoshop making porny pics of 11 year olds lmao

Loucks
May 21, 2007

It's incwedibwe easy to suck my own dick.

crepeface posted:

it's ironic pedophilic satire, and it's art.

If you watch it and the content is actually like that image in any way let us know, but I haven’t gotten the impression that’s the case.

Wonder whether Netflix, which is known to use heavy differential marketing, has a defined segment marked “pedo” and also how large that population is.

the milk machine
Jul 23, 2002

lick my keys

Victory Position posted:

so how do they demand architects rig up these structures and still have a workable veneer throughout

like, how do you make a tuning fork to the damned and then put a McDonald's in it

probably hypnosis and threats from the deep state, but let's not discount the custom version of HAARP the US recently built on little st. james island that's specifically tuned to affect the brains of architects and engineers (that's what that weird cube temple is)

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
You know how Netflix produced at least two movies about the Mossad, and a miniseries about the Mossad? And then now they're marketing directly to pedos?

Huh.

StratGoatCom
Aug 6, 2019

Our security is guaranteed by being able to melt the eyeballs of any other forum's denizens at 15 minutes notice


Marketing is accurate, those creepy fuckers are doing that, and likely thrown a black film maker's career down the toilet in the process:

https://twitter.com/BrndnStrssng/status/1296520139639263232

gh0stpinballa
Mar 5, 2019

https://twitter.com/tinkeringhalo10/status/1296815522646982662?s=19

god drat it

papa horny michael
Aug 18, 2009

by Pragmatica
the cancer gun is real.

papa horny michael
Aug 18, 2009

by Pragmatica
do not probe. free cuppy

Mister Speaker
May 8, 2007

WE WILL CONTROL
ALL THAT YOU SEE
AND HEAR

taqueso posted:

tell me more about the moire thing and visual scanning of it

it's bullshit

Doc Hawkins posted:

this thread had a bad history of egging on the mentally ill for kicks.

The Saucer Hovers
May 16, 2005

papa horny michael posted:

the cancer gun is real.

and heart attack and maybe stroke too

papa horny michael
Aug 18, 2009

by Pragmatica
the covid gun causes all three and the cia held it up to the planet's head, cloud.

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

The Saucer Hovers posted:

and heart attack and maybe stroke too

the heart attack gun they admitted to in public decades ago lol

cuppy tea
Feb 6, 2009

by Cyrano4747

nut posted:

the tuning fork stuff is cool but im sorry that fight club vid is whack its so thin it has to pad the back of it with the back to the future goods

There was a better fight club 9/11 video that got deleted without the mary 8888 stuff. Even talked about how World War Z was a prediction of an upcoming bioweapon release.

Also this well known back to the future 9/11 vid is shadowbanned from youtube search. sergey brin larry (bob) page deus ex

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1ULjJ3EqyY

Truga
May 4, 2014
Lipstick Apathy

StratGoatCom posted:

Marketing is accurate, those creepy fuckers are doing that, and likely thrown a black film maker's career down the toilet in the process:

https://twitter.com/BrndnStrssng/status/1296520139639263232

https://twitter.com/nprandchill/status/1296583258336104450

:laffo::laffo::laffo:
netflix knew

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

I love it when tech invents an algorithm to fill absolutely no need whatsoever.

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

mod sassinator posted:

is this the thread for posters west of the rockies?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViN2bRGrBx8

Well that brings back some memories.

Truga
May 4, 2014
Lipstick Apathy

Bip Roberts posted:

I love it when tech invents an algorithm to fill absolutely no need whatsoever.

this is a true and tried capitalist tradition to extract money from a market that doesn't yet exist, and isn't limited to tech: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-advertisers-convinced-americans-they-smelled-bad-12552404/

Truga has issued a correction as of 17:05 on Aug 21, 2020

Doc Hawkins
Jun 15, 2010

Dashing? But I'm not even moving!


maria farmer must be the healthiest goddamn person in the world, epstein's butler was dead from this same cancer within a few months.

Delta-Wye
Sep 29, 2005

papa horny michael posted:

do not probe. free cuppy

The CSS has gold fringes indicating this is an admiralty forum, and therefor mods do not have the authority to probate me.

The Saucer Hovers
May 16, 2005

a hypodermic umbrella that injects a radioactive pellet is so close to an on the record cancer gun

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN
Researchers have been chemically inducing cancer in lab animals for some time now. So in theory, under controlled conditions, it might be that the capacity to surreptitiously induce cancer in an unsuspecting victim has been developed, much like the CIA's infamous heart attack gun. But a hypothetical 'cancer gun' seems like a mostly impractical weapon outside a few specific scenarios. If you have the resources that would be necessary to pull that off then there are much easier and seemingly more efficient ways to silence someone such as inducing a complete mental breakdown with drugs, or staging a fatal accident, a suicide or a 'random' violent crime. All of those would be cheaper and more reliable techniques to achieve the same result.

In Farmer's case her cancer diagnosis seems to have directly contributed to her decision to break her silence and start discussing her experiences with Epstein and Wexner in greater depth after spending years in hiding. If you want an example of suspicious 'natural' health problem afflicting someone related to Epstein then I think Chef Andy "dying in his sleep" is a better example of a conveniently timed but supposedly natural death. Farmer's health problems are not so unusual that they demand a special explanation and giving someone who had already held their silence for decades a slow acting terminal illness doesn't strike me as a very efficient way to silence them.

Spergin Morlock
Aug 8, 2009

Helsing posted:

Researchers have been chemically inducing cancer in lab animals for some time now. So in theory, under controlled conditions, it might be that the capacity to surreptitiously induce cancer in an unsuspecting victim has been developed, much like the CIA's infamous heart attack gun. But a hypothetical 'cancer gun' seems like a mostly impractical weapon outside a few specific scenarios. If you have the resources that would be necessary to pull that off then there are much easier and seemingly more efficient ways to silence someone such as inducing a complete mental breakdown with drugs, or staging a fatal accident, a suicide or a 'random' violent crime. All of those would be cheaper and more reliable techniques to achieve the same result.

In Farmer's case her cancer diagnosis seems to have directly contributed to her decision to break her silence and start discussing her experiences with Epstein and Wexner in greater depth after spending years in hiding. If you want an example of suspicious 'natural' health problem afflicting someone related to Epstein then I think Chef Andy "dying in his sleep" is a better example of a conveniently timed but supposedly natural death. Farmer's health problems are not so unusual that they demand a special explanation and giving someone who had already held their silence for decades a slow acting terminal illness doesn't strike me as a very efficient way to silence them.

the US gave hugo chavez rear end cancer with a cancer-inducing buttplug

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN
See that is why it's so important to never skimp on body safe sex toys.

Tubgoat
Jun 30, 2013

by sebmojo

Spergin Morlock posted:

a cancer-inducing buttplug

That's no way to talk about the American president. :nono: Which one? Lol.

Mister Speaker
May 8, 2007

WE WILL CONTROL
ALL THAT YOU SEE
AND HEAR
Didn't Veidt give a whole bunch of people cancer in Watchmen in order to make Doctor Manhattan look stupid?

inferis
Dec 30, 2003


it’s actually more than that, i believe Netflix has multiple thumbnails for every piece of content so that one was specifically for the pedos. it’s a bunch of people telling on themselves

Doc Hawkins
Jun 15, 2010

Dashing? But I'm not even moving!


Mister Speaker posted:

Didn't Veidt give a whole bunch of people cancer in Watchmen in order to make Doctor Manhattan look stupid?

yeah, and not the kind you eventually get better from.

taqueso
Mar 8, 2004


:911:
:wookie: :thermidor: :wookie:
:dehumanize:

:pirate::hf::tinfoil:

Helsing posted:

See that is why it's so important to never skimp on body safe sex toys.

Seems like having a huge variety to rotate through would be sensible to avoid excessive contact with any particular one.

Maybe that butt plug was really good though :thunk:

DAD LOST MY IPOD
Feb 3, 2012

Fats Dominar is on the case


i have a lib friend who is totally dismissive of the tara reade stuff and says it's been "disproven," says she has no contemporary evidence, has accused dozens of people, etc. do we have a good source that libs might believe backing her up, or did that turn out to actually be a nothingburger too?

inferis
Dec 30, 2003

it’s not like there’s any evidence that would make them believe, it’s not about truth. if people can ignore videos of biden molesting children nothing short of a video of him raping tara reade would convince them and even that would get called a deep fake because all video looked like poo poo until 2009.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

rex rabidorum vires
Mar 26, 2007

KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN

DAD LOST MY IPOD posted:

i have a lib friend who is totally dismissive of the tara reade stuff and says it's been "disproven," says she has no contemporary evidence, has accused dozens of people, etc. do we have a good source that libs might believe backing her up, or did that turn out to actually be a nothingburger too?

No because it's been swept under the rug lol.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply