Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Lady Demelza
Dec 29, 2009



Lipstick Apathy

Darth Walrus posted:

Yup, the Tories having complete bipartisan acceptance of their approach is definitely going to be the thing that destroys them.

It's not politically useful to destroy the Tories until the full effects of Brexit have hit. Obviously this means the country will be burned down and the earth salted, but that's a price they're willing for us to pay.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Convex
Aug 19, 2010

Lungboy posted:

White chocolate Cocopops are your friend.

Thanks for the suggestion - I tried them but it's just not the same man :smith:

Pistol_Pete
Sep 15, 2007

Oven Wrangler
I wish I could read a history of this period written 50-100 years in the future. Seeing the decay and disintegration of our state institutions described with a bit of historical perspective would be really helpful right now.

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting
Rice crispies and sugar.

Nutapii
Jun 24, 2020

goddamnedtwisto posted:

What would the situation be if we *did* keep the NI/ROI border open, and not do any checks on stuff crossing the Irish Sea? Would Ireland be forced to "close" the border by the terms of their EU treaty commitments?

Cypriot car dealers open franchises in Newry, the Shenzhen/Derry JV flat distribution centre is inaugurated; and round about the same time some chaps on UK student visas from 2016 get off the ferry from Liverpool, Frontex emerge and attempt to close the border from the Republic's side. Which will be novel.

Soylent Yellow
Nov 5, 2010

yospos

Convex posted:

Fucks sake just realised they stopped making Ricicles back in 2017. I hate 2020 :mad:

yes I know I can just add sugar to rice Krispies but it's not the same

Please say Lidl or Aldi make some kind of knock-off. I generally don't buy breakfast cereal, but at least once a year I'd see ricicles in a supermarket, buy them, and then rush home to shovel down at least two heaped bowls in the space of 10 minutes. At least there's still Frosties, but they're a dim second.

Convex
Aug 19, 2010

Soylent Yellow posted:

generally don't buy breakfast cereal, but at least once a year I'd see ricicles in a supermarket, buy them, and then rush home to shovel down at least two heaped bowls in the space of 10 minutes.

:same:

feels bad man

Checked on ebay and unopened packs are going for £35 plus £4 postage. I hate everything

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
I assume ricicles is pronounced in the Classical Greek manner, like if Rik Mayall played Heracles.

Dabir
Nov 10, 2012

Guavanaut posted:

I assume ricicles is pronounced in the Classical Greek manner, like if Rik Mayall played Heracles.

I know they're not the same person but I just imagined Matt Berry bellowing it and it workstoo well

PeterCat
Apr 8, 2020

Believe women.

BBC posted:

Northern Ireland Secretary admits new bill will 'break international law'

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-54073836

cynic
Jan 19, 2004



CancerCakes posted:

I would be kicking off about this, you need to be 2 m away from anything that might be a shared area.

My current plan is to work from home until I am forced back, then take holiday until the 2nd wave starts proper in October.

Yeah, we're getting a screen in front of us. All I need is one to the left and my fortress will be complete. In related news, there are at least two covid denialists/conspiracy theorists that have identified themselves in the office today which should be fun once they chat with the people in the same open plan office who have dead relatives and best friends in comas.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
Coma's short for coman cold, Toby Young said so.

Relatedly, we're getting this, which'll be fun in the first local lockdown city.

Ms Adequate
Oct 30, 2011

Baby even when I'm dead and gone
You will always be my only one, my only one
When the night is calling
No matter who I become
You will always be my only one, my only one, my only one
When the night is calling




Yeah but you only need to worry about that if you're trying to move away from being exploited by American capitalism, not enthusiastically toward it.

CancerCakes
Jan 10, 2006

goddamnedtwisto posted:

https://twitter.com/AdamJKucharski/status/1265375154055544832/photo/1

Huh, so they did have the same idea as I did of testing blood donors for covid antibodies to give a baseline picture of the infection rate. Slightly baffled as to why they haven't continued it on past Week 22 (end of May) or if they have why they're not published the numbers.

Probably lag due to time between submission and review/ journal publication.

In other news:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54081131

Here we loving go

thespaceinvader
Mar 30, 2011

The slightest touch from a Gol-Shogeg will result in Instant Death!
I... assume they have a way of stopping you getting COVID from blood donated by someone who had it right? Or is it not transmissible that way?

E:

quote:

But it will not apply to schools, workplaces or Covid-secure weddings, funerals and organised team sports.

So... none of the things that loving matter, then.

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting

thespaceinvader posted:

So... none of the things that loving matter, then.

Eh?

Climbing back in my box for 6 months.

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

Are we allowed to call the government policy on Covid control manslaughter edging yet?

Julio Cruz
May 19, 2006

thespaceinvader posted:

So... none of the things that loving matter, then.

just another step in the govt's plan to blame the second wave 100% on the youth having house parties and raves

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

Meanwhile tables of up to 6 gammons continue to gather in the homeless thundercat's temple of Moloch to cough directly into each others mouths to own the libs.

goddamnedtwisto
Dec 31, 2004

If you ask me about the mole people in the London Underground, I WILL be forced to kill you
Fun Shoe

thespaceinvader posted:

I... assume they have a way of stopping you getting COVID from blood donated by someone who had it right? Or is it not transmissible that way?

Apparently it can't be transmitted via blood which doesn't make a huge amount of sense to me but there's cleverer people than me that might be able to weigh in on why - maybe some kind of life cycle thing?

They're very interested to find out if you've got it at the time of donation but obviously that's about not transmitting it to the staff and other donors, and also interested if you might have had it in the past because of the possiblity of using your plasma with all its lovely antibodies to treat patients (although I've not heard anything more about this lately - presumably there are other treatments with less risk/availability bottlenecks now?)

Jedit
Dec 10, 2011

Proudly supporting vanilla legends 1994-2014

Bobby Deluxe posted:

Are we allowed to call the government policy on Covid control manslaughter edging yet?

Manslaughter is unintentional.

Tarnop
Nov 25, 2013

Pull me out

thespaceinvader posted:

So... none of the things that loving matter, then.

But the contact tracers say all the transmission is happening in homes! No we don't have actual data to support that, and our world-beating contact tracing scheme definitely isn't just a way to add a hint of credibility to our "all work, no play" excuse for a lockdown

Vitamin P
Nov 19, 2013

Truth is game rigging is more difficult than it looks pls stay ded

Lady Demelza posted:

It's not politically useful to destroy the Tories until the full effects of Brexit have hit. Obviously this means the country will be burned down and the earth salted, but that's a price they're willing for us to pay.

Starmer is gonna win the next election partly because of this, the brexit and corona impacts are gonna be real and why would you destroy the tories when you can preserve the tories whilst an utterly harmless Labour government is there to take 90% of the heat?

Pistol_Pete posted:

I wish I could read a history of this period written 50-100 years in the future. Seeing the decay and disintegration of our state institutions described with a bit of historical perspective would be really helpful right now.

There's never going to be 'a history' of this period, we're in this wierd space where we have incredible levels of artifact historicity but the gatekeeping systems are so tied into the establishment publishing systems and the rich have such total sociopolitical control over that gatekeeping that your hypothetical good book will just be an irrelevance if it ever exists.

Comrade Fakename
Feb 13, 2012


gently caress Starmer and he totally deserves the poo poo we give him, but he is 100% right not to have Labour campaign to rejoin the EU.

Lungboy
Aug 23, 2002

NEED SQUAT FORM HELP

thespaceinvader posted:

I... assume they have a way of stopping you getting COVID from blood donated by someone who had it right? Or is it not transmissible that way?

E:


So... none of the things that loving matter, then.

I'm so happy that Covid can distinguish between a social gathering and a business one.

In other news, https://twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/status/1303450343452422151?s=19

justcola
May 22, 2004

La-Li-Lu-Le-Lo

goddamnedtwisto posted:

Apparently it can't be transmitted via blood which doesn't make a huge amount of sense to me but there's cleverer people than me that might be able to weigh in on why - maybe some kind of life cycle thing?

They're very interested to find out if you've got it at the time of donation but obviously that's about not transmitting it to the staff and other donors, and also interested if you might have had it in the past because of the possiblity of using your plasma with all its lovely antibodies to treat patients (although I've not heard anything more about this lately - presumably there are other treatments with less risk/availability bottlenecks now?)

I donated a month or two ago, they wanted me to take my mask off so they could better read the expression on my face in case I felt poorly, but I kept it on all the same. I was the only patient there with about 10 members of staff and 20 or so beds in a big open room, though they did pre-donation interviews with everyone in the same room. Prior to that you washed your hands in a private bathroom.

I imagine everythings wiped down and that, but I always think about the vapours

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwX1XfgjFok

kingturnip
Apr 18, 2008
It's notable that the BBC's coverage of the restrictions is almost clinical in how little they comment on things. Even Laura "I suck Boris' balls" Kuenssberg's column steers well clear of editorialising.
Which, admittedly, isn't surprising since the only two possible editorial lines are 1) The British people are loving idiots for going out and socialising; or 2) The UK Govt is loving stupid for telling people it's okay to go out and socialise

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

Jedit posted:

Manslaughter is unintentional.
You can have malicious neglect manslaughter though. Like say, if someone left a mains wire hanging at head height with no signage and then hosed off home. Or spilled a load of grease on a cliffside road and then didn't clean it up. Or pushed the population back to work and school to bolster the economy in the middle of a pandemic.

It's the difference between 'I want to kill someone with this' and 'I don't care that someone is probably going to die because of the thing i did.' In the latter case I'm pretty sure there's a legal argument that fulfils the criteria for manslaughter, but I don't remember it.

I also feel like calling it murder comes across as hyperbole, but people understand enough about manslaughter for it to give them pause.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

It can't be either anyway because you can't be held legally accountable for things you do in government.

So call it murder why not, it's no less that than anything else.

Jaeluni Asjil
Apr 18, 2018

Sorry I thought you were a landlord when I gave you your old avatar!

OwlFancier posted:

It can't be either anyway because you can't be held legally accountable for things you do in government.

So call it murder why not, it's no less that than anything else.

Is that true? I didn't know that.
So how do War Crimes trials happen then when the perpetrator is a government?

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

As far as I know government officials in the UK literally can not be held legally responsible for the consequences of their decisions as long as the decisions themselves are not against the law.

Jaeluni Asjil posted:

So how do War Crimes trials happen then when the perpetrator is a government?

Usually someone else invades and drags the people in question to another country's court, might makes right.

Specifically re: the government thing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_immunity#United_Kingdom

quote:

Historically, the general rule in the United Kingdom has been that the Crown has never been able to be prosecuted or proceeded against in either criminal or civil cases.[38] The only means by which civil proceedings could be brought were:

by way of petition of right, which was dependent on the grant of the royal fiat (i.e. permission);
by suits against the Attorney General[which?] for a declaration; or
by actions against ministers or government departments where an Act of Parliament had specifically provided that immunity be waived.

The position was drastically altered by the Crown Proceedings Act 1947 which made the Crown (when acting as the government) liable as of right in proceedings where it was previously only liable by virtue of a grant of a fiat.[39] With limited exceptions, this had the effect of allowing proceedings for tort and contract to be brought against the Crown.[39] Proceedings to bring writs of mandamus and prohibition were always available against ministers, because their actions derive from the royal prerogative.[citation needed]

Criminal proceedings are still prohibited from being brought against Her Majesty's Government unless expressly permitted by the Crown Proceedings Act.[40]

As the Crown Proceedings Act only affected the law in respect of acts carried on by or on behalf of the British government, the monarch remains personally immune from criminal and civil actions.[41] However, civil proceedings can, in theory, still be brought using the two original mechanisms outlined above – by petition of right or by suit against the Attorney General for a declaration.[42]
Other immunities

The monarch is immune from arrest in all cases; members of the royal household are immune from arrest in civil proceedings.[43] No arrest can be made "in the monarch's presence", or within the "verges" of a royal palace. When a royal palace is used as a residence (regardless of whether the monarch is actually living there at the time), judicial processes cannot be executed within that palace.[44]

The monarch's goods cannot be taken under a writ of execution, nor can distress be levied on land in their possession. Chattels owned by the Crown, but present on another's land, cannot be taken in execution or for distress. The Crown is not subject to foreclosure.[45]

So as far as I'm aware that means the government literally can not be criminally liable for anything except, like, not paying up on a contract or something. You could try to sue them civilly for something but lol good luck if you think you'll win.

OwlFancier fucked around with this message at 01:45 on Sep 9, 2020

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

So corporations can sue the government for loss of profit, but people can't sue them for loss of income or life.

Yep.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I don't know specifically what "tort" means because it seems like it might include murder but the assumption seems to be that you wouldn't ever need a civil case for murder.

Either way CPS aren't gonna sue the government.

Also apparently all the nonce royals could escape capture if they just never leave their palaces.

E: Looking further it seems like even if you could civilly sue the government for murder they couldn't go to prison for it because you can't send people to prison for civil offences, so it would be like, compensation money for killing your family or something. Which historically has been hilariously parsimonious. Like a couple hundred quid per dead child or something.

OwlFancier fucked around with this message at 02:27 on Sep 9, 2020

Pistol_Pete
Sep 15, 2007

Oven Wrangler
Christ, this new Covid spin is such transparent bullshit. They're literally going to blame irresponsible young people for causing a 2nd wave, while in the next breath urging everyone to get back to work on public transport and pile into the bars and restaurants to boost the economy.

Miftan
Mar 31, 2012

Terry knows what he can do with his bloody chocolate orange...

Tarnop posted:

But the contact tracers say all the transmission is happening in homes! No we don't have actual data to support that, and our world-beating contact tracing scheme definitely isn't just a way to add a hint of credibility to our "all work, no play" excuse for a lockdown

They're probably right in that you get it off one person at work/the pub and immediately give it to everyone you live with because of the very close proximity (but then they also give it to someone at work). YOU don't infect people at work/the pub because someone else already did. But not going to work/the pub is how you break the transmission chain, unless the govt wanna spring for covid hotels like China.

goddamnedtwisto
Dec 31, 2004

If you ask me about the mole people in the London Underground, I WILL be forced to kill you
Fun Shoe

Miftan posted:

They're probably right in that you get it off one person at work/the pub and immediately give it to everyone you live with because of the very close proximity (but then they also give it to someone at work). YOU don't infect people at work/the pub because someone else already did. But not going to work/the pub is how you break the transmission chain, unless the govt wanna spring for covid hotels like China.

That sounds like it'll hurt GDP, much better to stop people transmitting it at home by banning going home. Conveniently your employer can deduct your rent for the 1947 Army surplus sleeping bag under your desk directly from your pay!

XMNN
Apr 26, 2008
I am incredibly stupid
If you spend all day locked inside a classroom with 30 other teenagers and a teacher, that's fine.

You won't die of the virus (unless you decide to have underlying health conditions, like an idiot) so it's cool.



If you go play football in the park after school with six of your classmates, that's a £100 fine.

After all, you might not die but you could get really hosed up and kill your parents and grandparents, which is not cool.


I'm glad we've learnt our lessons from the last six months, got the testing system all sorted out, and prepared for the inevitable mass school closures (which have already started) by planning for effective remote learning.

It would have been crazy if we'd just assumed all schools will be running full time all year so we don't need to bother with that sort of thing.

Communist Thoughts
Jan 7, 2008

Our war against free speech cannot end until we silence this bronze beast!


All we need now is a government minister immediately hosting a 200 person sex party and the rules being dropped

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting
As long as you're paying the people to be there or theres an element of organised sport I think thats still allowed.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

Communist Thoughts posted:

All we need now is a government minister immediately hosting a 200 person sex party and the rules being dropped
They'll invite enough journos that it will suddenly not be in the public interest to report on it.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply