|
Slippery posted:Fair enough. What do you mix it with though Why would you mix it? Thems are sippin’ eggs.
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 03:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 14:36 |
|
|
if I got the 60 eggs I'd probably eat like 8 in one sitting and then make like 10 devilled eggs with scorpion peppers and eat them later in the day and then mash 2 up with avocodos for a sandwich for lunch tomorrow then take the last 40 and pickle them
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 03:24
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/AsteadWesley/status/1306416907256557569
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 03:24
|
|
|
Ty for letting us know. E:about your egg plans I mean. I will never thank moon slayer. Content: https://twitter.com/lizardrumsfeld/status/1306405915596390402?s=21 Yngwie Mangosteen has a new favorite as of 03:33 on Sep 17, 2020 |
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 03:24
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Noooooooch/status/1306242311303639041?s=19
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 03:39
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/steve_lieber/status/1250262427926581250 https://twitter.com/steve_lieber/status/1250266431909855232
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 03:54
|
|
|
ultrafilter posted:https://twitter.com/steve_lieber/status/1250262427926581250 Sure, if you ignore the rest of the text which talks about plural frogs.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 03:59
|
|
|
Just let us have this one.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 04:00
|
|
|
ultrafilter posted:Just let us have this one. לא
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 04:00
|
|
|
Selectively ignoring parts of the Bible is like, how you are supposed to use the bible.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 04:01
|
|
|
Ornamental Dingbat posted:Selectively ignoring parts of the Bible is like, how you are supposed to use the bible. That's not how Jews are supposed to use it. Midrash my loving rear end.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 04:03
|
|
|
You're all forgetting the verse where Pharaoh piloted the sphinx like a gundam and punched the kaiju frog, accidentally splitting it into a rain of a million regular frogs.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 04:07
|
|
|
Poor Miserable Gurgi posted:You're all forgetting the verse where Pharaoh piloted the sphinx like a gundam and punched the kaiju frog, accidentally splitting it into a rain of a million regular frogs. I'm not saying I'm not already getting the popcorn to watch this movie, but it ain't in the Torah.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 04:07
|
|
|
Mak0rz posted:Five dozen eggs is like 4700 calories though? Is it 6 dozen? I estimated it at 2, I'm dumb. Oh well, according to Google it would be a lot lower in calories if they were poached instead.  
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 04:10
|
|
|
Captain Monkey posted:Ty for letting us know.  This is violence
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 04:10
|
|
|
All the plagues were like that. One giant frog, one giant locust, death of one giant firstborn, etc.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 04:10
|
|
|
Karia posted:I see Sakeru Gum is diversifying their product line... Goodness, every time i watch this i forget how cute it ends up being 
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 04:24
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/whitneyarner/status/1306290061839929346?s=20
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 04:24
|
|
|
ultrafilter posted:https://twitter.com/steve_lieber/status/1250262427926581250 Well I guess it is Wednesday my dudes
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 04:24
|
|
|
Mak0rz posted:All the plagues were like that. One giant frog, one giant locust, death of one giant firstborn, etc. Ah, I see you too have played Drakengard.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 04:27
|
|
|
I'm no expert, but wouldn't that have to come from some sort of rabbinical authority to count? I feel like this dude is just saying "look a typo" and coming up with his own aprocryphal explanation. it's awfully protestant is what I'm saying.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 04:29
|
|
|
I asked one. He said the giant frog thing is correct.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 04:33
|
|
|
I just changed the thread title
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 04:42
|
|
|
Cocaine Bear posted:I asked one. He said the giant frog thing is correct. Further googling suggests that Rashi mentioned "some people believed this". Real self-promoter, him, managed to get a sweet deal on having his exegeses integrated into the Hebrew/Onkelos Torah, everybody knows who he is. Edit for content: https://twitter.com/House_Feminist/status/1306205568109916160 Absurd Alhazred has a new favorite as of 05:15 on Sep 17, 2020 |
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 04:46
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/dril/status/1304225501410541568?s=21
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 05:22
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/alexhern/status/1306177535852642304 https://twitter.com/SarahCAndersen/status/1306239570799931393 e: https://twitter.com/anne_theriault/status/1306420983465730048 Arsenic Lupin has a new favorite as of 05:34 on Sep 17, 2020 |
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 05:28
|
|
|
Elviscat posted:Is it 6 dozen? I estimated it at 2, I'm dumb. You're not dumb, but you are making me feel old. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVdgaSuAjII
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 06:45
|
|
|
on the one hand, everyone manually driving a car needs to show diligence where the 'safety driver' of this uber vehicle failed to do so on the other hand, many people manually driving cars do not show this same diligence, and the level of adherence to safety standards will plummet in the case of any mass adoption of supposed self driving cars, so... i guess it all depends on how much you trust barely regulated corporations to look out for the public's best interest
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 07:16
|
|
|
luxury handset posted:on the one hand, everyone manually driving a car needs to show diligence where the 'safety driver' of this uber vehicle failed to do so The amount of due diligence you'd have to show to avoid this accident completely eliminates the point of having a self driving car.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 07:24
|
|
|
Agreed, it’s almost as if the entire concept is really loving dumb and pointless and should’ve just remained a tech concept, or use the features to override the driver in case of emergency.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 07:27
|
|
|
EL BROMANCE posted:Agreed, it’s almost as if the entire concept is really loving dumb and pointless and should’ve just remained a tech concept, or use the features to override the driver in case of emergency. that last one is gonna result in killing someone too eventually, either keeping a driver from swerving away from someone or tearing the wheel out of someones hand when it didn't need to and killing the driver or one of the passengers.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 07:32
|
|
|
You need the car to be controlled by the road, not itself. Put them on rails. Then connect a bunch of them together. And just build a train.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 08:27
|
|
|
Slippery posted:Fair enough. What do you mix it with though A little mint and some vodka and you've got yourself an Egg de Menthe my friend.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 09:42
|
|
|
luxury handset posted:on the one hand, everyone manually driving a car needs to show diligence where the 'safety driver' of this uber vehicle failed to do so It's worth pointing out that the Uber self driving car here failed in it's task utterly. There were fundamental flaws in the programming of the car which lead to the crash, this is 100% a case of corporate homicide due to negligence on Uber's part.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 10:29
|
|
|
Aramoro posted:It's worth pointing out that the Uber self driving car here failed in it's task utterly. There were fundamental flaws in the programming of the car which lead to the crash, this is 100% a case of corporate homicide due to negligence on Uber's part. But if you pay someone less than minimum wage to sit behind the wheel with strict instructions to never actually touch the wheel unless there's someone right in front of the car you're absent all corporate responsibility.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 10:53
|
|
|
AFAIK most countries still have laws saying that fully self driving cars are not allowed and each car should have a driver who is 100% responsible for what the car does. They have these laws exactly to prevent crashes like these where the driver says it's the AI's fault and they weren't paying attention because they felt it's not their job to make sure their car doesn't kill anyone. The driver is not allowed by law to leave the driving to the AI. Uber is definitely trying to circumvent these rules and use minimum wage slaves as patsies for murder by car + negligence and should be punished as well but the lady behind the wheel is 100% responsible for a death caused by the car that she was the driver of, self driving car or no.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 11:00
|
|
|
I understand that, but if a company owned bus kills someone because the brakes failed the company is considered responsible, not the employee driving the bus.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 11:14
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/FREE_FACTS/status/1306537405776830464
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 11:21
|
|
|
Skwirl posted:I understand that, but if a company owned bus kills someone because the brakes failed the company is considered responsible, not the employee driving the bus. If the brakes fail while underway, sure. But if the driver knows the brakes are not functioning before she enters the bus but it is company policy to drive buses with broken brakes she does not get to hide behind orders from her corporate overlord and is, in fact, responsible. Being asked to do something by your corporate overlords does not absolve you of having to obey the law. I'd like to stress that there is no dichotomy here, both can be responsible. Like with murder-for-hire, there is no need to ask whether the murderer or the one putting out the hit is responsible, they can both be guilty of a crime.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 11:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 14:36 |
|
|
My wife once had a judge correct her on the pronunciation of our last name.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2020 11:49
|
|
