Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold
in light of theory of relativity i move that materialism be renamed to energyism

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Hodgepodge
Jan 29, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 214 days!

Jon Joe posted:

Everything is made of matter.

matter is made of energy

whatever the gently caress energy is, it has no issue behaving like matter one moment and just turning into movement of matter in timespace the next

gratz on taking the position decartes got owned by newton on though

T-man
Aug 22, 2010


Talk shit, get bzzzt.

My penis is a monad and you can't stop me

ToxicAcne
May 25, 2014
Why is veganism always labelled as a liberal distraction in leftist circles? If humanity is to have any chance of surviving the next century, we have to cut down meat consumption, yet the vitriol towards vegans and animal rights activists is insane.

3
Aug 26, 2006

The Magic Number


College Slice

ToxicAcne posted:

Why is veganism always labelled as a liberal distraction in leftist circles? If humanity is to have any chance of surviving the next century, we have to cut down meat consumption, yet the vitriol towards vegans and animal rights activists is insane.

It's because the most vocal subset of vegans most people have the misfortune of interacting with are predominantly petit bourgeois liberals who uphold a lifestyle choice without being cognizant of the exploitation of labor necessary to make it possible. Veganism is a moral choice only when capitalism has vanished from this earth.

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy
i'd like to see this vitriol. wouldn't surprise me and there's a lot of toxic behavior on the left. but most people in the world who have access to meat eat it, so moral arguments probably won't get you very far, although i don't think it's sustainable for americans to eat meat three times a day like they do. if we can make artificial meat substitutes that are also cheaper than animal flesh then that could help get people off it

Mr. Lobe
Feb 23, 2007

... Dry bones...


Still hope to see mass produced vat meat personally

I hope they make salmon sashimi flavor

belgend
Mar 6, 2008

me when The Club do another win

ToxicAcne posted:

Why is veganism always labelled as a liberal distraction in leftist circles? If humanity is to have any chance of surviving the next century, we have to cut down meat consumption, yet the vitriol towards vegans and animal rights activists is insane.

there's two big problems with veganism

1) countering the idea that veganism is going to bring us closer to a climate neutral world -> consumption patterns in the long run do not really change the global emissions. 100 fossil fuel companies and their investors are responsible for half of the CO˛ emissions since the industrial revolution and 71% of current emissions. if veganism would change production on a global scale, we would see a decrease in meat production with a decrease in meat consumption. however, the statistics we have of european countries with a large food industry shows production has grown despite the decrease in national meat consumption because of higher exports

2) veganism does not solve any crisis in capitalism, and like consumer organisations just promote the idea of a pure and ethical consumption that doesn't exist. vegan products need as much packaging, as much exploitation of labor and the same scale of production as non-vegan products in capitalism. the production processes of vegan products aren't gonna be magically socialist

of course, apart from hardline anti-vegans i don't think anyone is saying we don't need to lower meat consumption, if only for health reasons

PERPETUAL IDIOT
Sep 12, 2003

3 posted:

It's because the most vocal subset of vegans most people have the misfortune of interacting with are predominantly petit bourgeois liberals who uphold a lifestyle choice without being cognizant of the exploitation of labor necessary to make it possible. Veganism is a moral choice only when capitalism has vanished from this earth.

I disagree about the last statement - veganism is a moral choice now. It's just not a sufficient choice, same as every other choice any one person can make.

3
Aug 26, 2006

The Magic Number


College Slice

PERPETUAL IDIOT posted:

I disagree about the last statement - veganism is a moral choice now. It's just not a sufficient choice, same as every other choice any one person can make.

You're correct, I could've phrased that better. Regardless, I have no disdain towards people who practice veganism as an ethical choice, I think any attempt to reduce the amount of cruelty and suffering that animals experience is admirable to an extent. But I have nothing but disdain for those who advocate it as a meaningful way to achieve lasting change while ignoring the systemic reasons behind why our societal consumption habits are absolutely nightmarish to begin with.

Southpaugh
May 26, 2007

Smokey Bacon


Being a vegan is fine and dandy, on paper. Its not a one size fits all diet though and you need to stay ontop of your micro and macronutrients. If you want to do it, fine.

Veganism as a movement a typical liberal non-solution to any material question you might have i.e. We need to reduce methane/food carbon emissions.

That all the vegans I know will lecture you on meat production in between railing lines of coke is an irony lost on them.

Benagain
Oct 10, 2007

Can you see that I am serious?
Fun Shoe
My wife went full vegan for a year and I've always been pretty vegetable forward so it was easy enough to follow her. We don't keep animal products in the fridge for the most part but have both gone more of a flexitarian route for takeout. She tracked her macros to an insane degree before she was a vegan and was also pregnant and did the vegan thing for that entire time with no problems whatsoever, consulting with a doctor but seeing no problems since, again, she stays on top of that.

The amount of times I have been lectured by people about how she was killing the baby or asked in worried tones if she's healthy drove me insane and I began instantly cutting people off when they would ask me about it with a curt "we're talking to a doctor, it's fine."

Conclusion: you can be an annoying preachy rear end in a top hat whatever your personal consumption habits. I will wholeheartedly agree that veganism won't save poo poo but I do feel pretty healthy and my poops are good.

edit: also are the vegans you know sharing the cocaine or are you just staring at them with cocaine-desiring puppy dog eyes while they do rail after rail in front of you.

Southpaugh
May 26, 2007

Smokey Bacon


Oh they are hugely generous cokeheads, can't fault them in that regard.

PERPETUAL IDIOT
Sep 12, 2003

Southpaugh posted:

Being a vegan is fine and dandy, on paper. Its not a one size fits all diet though and you need to stay ontop of your micro and macronutrients. If you want to do it, fine.

Veganism as a movement a typical liberal non-solution to any material question you might have i.e. We need to reduce methane/food carbon emissions.

That all the vegans I know will lecture you on meat production in between railing lines of coke is an irony lost on them.

The second part here seems like a very strange attitude to me. If not veganism, or at least something much closer to veganism than our current diets, what is your solution to the environmental effects of providing everyone sufficient food? I certainly agree that it needs to be part of a change to a socialist economic system, and that individual action won't be enough, but it also seems like socialism is not itself sufficient to solve the problem. So, what's the deal?

ToxicAcne
May 25, 2014
Also where does the North American left's affinity towards Islam come from? Anti-imperialism? Malcolm X? As someone who was raised Muslim it's kinda cool but also really perplexing.

MizPiz
May 29, 2013

by Athanatos

ToxicAcne posted:

Also where does the North American left's affinity towards Islam come from? Anti-imperialism? Malcolm X? As someone who was raised Muslim it's kinda cool but also really perplexing.

The anti-imperialism stuff mostly, though I don't know if I'd say the left has an affinity towards Islam. There's definite sympathy for Muslims and more than a few converts, but I'd say that most western leftists have a Protestant theology even if they aren't specifically Christian.

ToxicAcne
May 25, 2014
Hmm. maybe it's the circle that I frequent in real life and online, but there are like that lefty trans activist on twitter that converted to islam, or the chapo people's (joking) use of Shia theology that I'm thinking of. It kinda reminds me of how white liberals gravitate towards Buddhism.

Hodgepodge
Jan 29, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 214 days!

ToxicAcne posted:

Also where does the North American left's affinity towards Islam come from? Anti-imperialism? Malcolm X? As someone who was raised Muslim it's kinda cool but also really perplexing.

the above, plus a reaction to gross people like dawkins whose take on christianity and atheism we barely tolerated, even those who are leftist athiests, when it was aimed at deserving christians suddenly becoming totally okay and cool with the worst of those in order to make it clear that when they say religion they mean islam

i don't think islam is better than other religions, but i don't think it's worse; i think any definition of the west that isn't written to purely to justify wars of conquest and hegemony has to include the birthplace of islam and the heritage of muslim philosophy, science, culture, and yes, religion, as well as its regional antecedents (all of which are shared with the rest of the "west"). most of the current bad poo poo in islam is a circumstantial reflection of the bad stuff in, particularily american, christianity.

also i think the government of israel and its supporters, currently and historically, are apartheid colonialists who spit on and abuse the memory of their own kin who died in the holocaust by recreating it, and my support for their palestinian victims in the face of their blasphemous hypocrisy is an expression of the idea the the holocaust should never happen again, to anyone. and they work tirelessly to ensure that it does, and are damned in every sense, religious or secular for it.

Hodgepodge fucked around with this message at 00:49 on Sep 21, 2020

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
Anti-Muslim bigotry undergirded the abridgment of civil liberties post-9/11, the War on Terror, and of course the Iraq War. Americans on the left opposed all of those things, so combating that bigotry took on fundamental importance.

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

strict veganism never made sense to me from a sustainability perspective. i get my eggs from the egg lady down the street but my avocados are from chiapas and huehuetenango

Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

ToxicAcne posted:

Why is veganism always labelled as a liberal distraction in leftist circles? If humanity is to have any chance of surviving the next century, we have to cut down meat consumption, yet the vitriol towards vegans and animal rights activists is insane.

because the really vocal and insistent advocates are always liberals, and as other smarter people have said, it doesn't matter right now and wouldn't matter without global change. also, while industrial farming is bad, i don't actually think cattle ranching itself is bad and something that should be stopped. just the scale reduced, and dependence on reduced. its like how the perfect socialist future wont have every person need a car every day, but cars will still exist


also the green fascist psychos who are always talking about population control tend to be advocates of strict vegan enforcement too and therefore veganism is cringe

Homeless Friend
Jul 16, 2007
return of the larry

Homeless Friend
Jul 16, 2007

PERPETUAL IDIOT
Sep 12, 2003

i say swears online posted:

strict veganism never made sense to me from a sustainability perspective. i get my eggs from the egg lady down the street but my avocados are from chiapas and huehuetenango

At least in the US, probably very few of the eggs that are eaten are from the egg lady down the street, and the overwhelming majority are from factory farms.

And some people's vegan diets may be worse from an environmental perspective than others, and at the extreme end some people's vegan diets may even be worse than people who eat meat at an average American level, it's sort of a game of averages. The average vegan diet is probably far, far less environmentally destructive than the average American diet. It doesn't need to be true in each individual case.

THS
Sep 15, 2017


god drat i wish

Southpaugh
May 26, 2007

Smokey Bacon


PERPETUAL IDIOT posted:

The second part here seems like a very strange attitude to me. If not veganism, or at least something much closer to veganism than our current diets, what is your solution to the environmental effects of providing everyone sufficient food? I certainly agree that it needs to be part of a change to a socialist economic system, and that individual action won't be enough, but it also seems like socialism is not itself sufficient to solve the problem. So, what's the deal?

It was better put up thread, but basically, all industrial agriculture is suspect. Capitalism makes it that way. Look at the vast oversupply of food that went to waste right at the start of the pandemic. Crops being mulched back into the fields and so on. We overproduce and the mismanagement starts in the boardroom.

This is without bringing up things like food grading and other oversupply/production issues. Or the vast amounts of traditional forests/rainforest that gets cleared and tilled every year to supply an ever growing demand for vegetable oils palm and soybeans and poo poo. Look up how much water almonds take up in california alone and you'll realise that the issue like, everything else is gross mismanagement and free market capitalism.

Veganism as a solution is often brought up as a personal choice that the individual has to make, you know, its the ethical choice. You want to do the right thing right? But individuals do not effect markets, corporations do, and a corporation already decides what diet you eat based off of what's available in your locally (often traditionally)/their own supply chains. Unless you are hitting the farmers market you're probably being fed by a corporate entity.

My take on it is that people have very strong emotional connections with foods and diets, frequently unexamined ones and bringing up your personal diet is about as relevant to the discussion as your sex life.

Kindest Forums User
Mar 25, 2008

Let me tell you about my opinion about Bernie Sanders and why Donald Trump is his true successor.

You cannot vote Hillary Clinton because she is worse than Trump.

Larry Parrish posted:

because the really vocal and insistent advocates are always liberals, and as other smarter people have said, it doesn't matter right now and wouldn't matter without global change. also, while industrial farming is bad, i don't actually think cattle ranching itself is bad and something that should be stopped. just the scale reduced, and dependence on reduced. its like how the perfect socialist future wont have every person need a car every day, but cars will still exist


also the green fascist psychos who are always talking about population control tend to be advocates of strict vegan enforcement too and therefore veganism is cringe

Most environmentalists are liberals. In fact, a lot of causes are predominately liberal. probably because there's a lot of liberals and not many radicals. weird.

The moral, social, environmental, and economic impacts of meat production are insane. I'm not sure why any leftist would take any time defending the lifestyle surrounding it.

Maybe instead of patronizing vegan liberal activists, maybe you could take the time to teach them a little class consciousnesses. A lot of them are extreme with their activism: sabotaging, breaking-and-entering, constant protest. They are are pretty effective and you might want them on your side. Just because they haven't read Marx doesn't mean they should be dismissed as a group.


Larry Parrish posted:

i don't actually think cattle ranching itself is bad and something that should be stopped. just the scale reduced, and dependence on reduced. its like how the perfect socialist future wont have every person need a car every day, but cars will still exist

This is the most liberal outcome of meat production. Like, sure, cattle ranching is sustainable when it's only available to wealthy consumers. If meat production only was done through grassland grazing, I'm not sure how you'd be able to sustainably and equitably make beef available for 7.5 billion people.

Homeless Friend
Jul 16, 2007

THS posted:

god drat i wish

imagine having that compute rtoucher money... sheeitt

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

Kindest Forums User posted:

This is the most liberal outcome of meat production. Like, sure, cattle ranching is sustainable when it's only available to wealthy consumers. If meat production only was done through grassland grazing, I'm not sure how you'd be able to sustainably and equitably make beef available for 7.5 billion people.

soup rations

ToxicAcne
May 25, 2014
Historically, in the Islamic world, most people only ate meat on Eid al Adha. I think that in a future society, meat being this treat that's given out once a while to everybody would be tolerable.

PERPETUAL IDIOT
Sep 12, 2003

Southpaugh posted:

It was better put up thread, but basically, all industrial agriculture is suspect. Capitalism makes it that way. Look at the vast oversupply of food that went to waste right at the start of the pandemic. Crops being mulched back into the fields and so on. We overproduce and the mismanagement starts in the boardroom.

This is without bringing up things like food grading and other oversupply/production issues. Or the vast amounts of traditional forests/rainforest that gets cleared and tilled every year to supply an ever growing demand for vegetable oils palm and soybeans and poo poo. Look up how much water almonds take up in california alone and you'll realise that the issue like, everything else is gross mismanagement and free market capitalism.

Veganism as a solution is often brought up as a personal choice that the individual has to make, you know, its the ethical choice. You want to do the right thing right? But individuals do not effect markets, corporations do, and a corporation already decides what diet you eat based off of what's available in your locally (often traditionally)/their own supply chains. Unless you are hitting the farmers market you're probably being fed by a corporate entity.

My take on it is that people have very strong emotional connections with foods and diets, frequently unexamined ones and bringing up your personal diet is about as relevant to the discussion as your sex life.

This is all true. Like I said, veganism, or close to it, is necessary but not enough on its own.

The last line is the funny one though. People have strong feelings about a lot of aspects of their lives. You're comfortable bringing up the socialist revolution, and explaining how it's necessary, but not also tell people that they need to eat less hamburgers? The second part of that is the one that's a bridge too far?

Southpaugh
May 26, 2007

Smokey Bacon


For people day to day? Kind of yeah? I mean you can't get people to wear loving masks right now. You're not going to tell them that grandmas special gravy and that roast beef on a sunday is now exclusively for christmas or thanksgiving or whatever. Drugs are illegal, they frequently come from very far away, completely illegally. Drugs are something most people have reservations about. They still sell and are supplied in vast quantities.

Can you imagine what a black market for loving, paté or chicken nuggets or whatever would be like?

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy


wonder what kind of person would have their family's heirlooms stored in a Russian museum

apropos to nothing
Sep 5, 2003
same but replace the family heirlooms with failed/sabotaged revolutions and rearming the reichswehr

Hodgepodge
Jan 29, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 214 days!

lol if i could clear 30k a year i'd be in so much better shape

(in cnd but i also don't have your nightmare medical system to painfully execute me for being poor)

Algund Eenboom
May 4, 2014


I never noticed the astronaut with the gun is wearing an ohio patch. A nice memory of historical meme origins

Hodgepodge
Jan 29, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 214 days!
one of the funnier parts of the bible is when god gives the tribes manna in the desert, which is a perfect food literally from heaven that tastes exactly like whatever you most want it to except better because it's pefect.

the people demanded meat. really feel for moses thinking about him having to tell that one to the big g. like pure "please don't abandon or kill my people, even though i would totally be with you on their deserving it right now" energy there

e: there are sturgeon in the fraser, and only local people such as the sto:lo are allowed to fish them, for ceremonial purposes such as feasts. i've eaten a little, as a guest. society has ways of dealing with a meat being an occasional treat due to conservationist concerns that aren't necessarily "sell this to the richest rear end in a top hat."

Hodgepodge fucked around with this message at 04:12 on Sep 21, 2020

Algund Eenboom
May 4, 2014

Its less important to get every1 to stop eating meat, and more important to get bourgeois amerikkkan settler pigs to stop eating meat imo. This will be easy once every westerner is shipped to antarctica

Hodgepodge
Jan 29, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 214 days!

Algund Eenboom posted:

Its less important to get every1 to stop eating meat, and more important to get bourgeois amerikkkan settler pigs to stop eating meat imo. This will be easy once every westerner is shipped to antarctica

nah, just the bourgeoise and their fanclub will do

also, while this is normally considered a forced relocation, a communist state in a position to do such things could easily infiltrate them with a musk type who convinces them they're going as brave pioneers who will later escape to mars

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Wheeee
Mar 11, 2001

When a tree grows, it is soft and pliable. But when it's dry and hard, it dies.

Hardness and strength are death's companions. Flexibility and softness are the embodiment of life.

That which has become hard shall not triumph.

there are plenty of decent logistical arguments in favor of people adopting a more plant-focused diet, but veganism is an empty liberal ideology that comes in the form of an eating disorder and is only possible on the scale it presently enjoys due to energy-intensive modern transport and farming technology

giving the stink eye to someone eating a burger raised the next state or province over while enjoying a salad in which half the ingredients were shipped from another continent is prime lib poo poo

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5