|
Mr. Funny Pants posted:Probably stupid question... Sagebrush posted:The tanks are usually installed close to the unladen center of gravity so that emptying them doesn't cause a shift in the overall loading moment. That's also one of the reasons fuel tanks are generally placed in the wings; that way fuel burn doesn't require continuous changes in trim. Watch videos of the DC-10 tanker. You can watch the nose coming down the entire length of the drop. You can see it with the 747 tanker as well, but it’s more obvious with the Douglas, imo.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 14:33 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 08:09 |
|
Sagebrush posted:the sudden loss of thousands of pounds without any change in airspeed or AoA is going to result in a huge lift surplus and they're going to balloon upwards. This seems like a good thing when you've just pointed a retired airliner at a burning hillside.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 15:06 |
|
Platystemon posted:And then there’s Concorde. I just had the weird thought of using Concordes as firefighting aircraft. Civil version of F-104s as low-level attack jets.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 17:03 |
|
Mortabis posted:I just had the weird thought of using Concordes as firefighting aircraft. Civil version of F-104s as low-level attack jets. Fight fire with fire?
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 17:09 |
|
Mortabis posted:I just had the weird thought of using Concordes as firefighting aircraft. Civil version of F-104s as low-level attack jets. There's a hell of an 80's TV movie vibe there. President: "The fire is too far away and moving too fast! It's going to destroy the pyrovirus facility before any of our tankers can reach it!" Buck Splashwell, Concorde tanker pilot for hire: "Excuse me, Mr. President, but I think there's one thing you're forgetting..."
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 17:29 |
|
God drat it Buck! You're the last person I want to see, but you're the only one who can do this. This doesn't make up for what you did at Rio Belcho.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 17:50 |
|
Ola posted:Fight fire with fire? The fire captain would have to fly a DC-10.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 18:43 |
|
Mr. Funny Pants posted:Probably stupid question... Some of the longer airplanes are also set up so that the retardant tanks operate in a sequence with the most forward and aft tanks dumping as a pair, then the next most forward and aft ones, etc... which minimizes the CG shifting as they drop.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 19:24 |
|
Pretty sure this video was linked in the thread before, but it's relevant again, has all sorts of stuff about the drop systems in the Global Supertanker https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-pC7XYHV7s
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 23:21 |
|
Thanks for all the responses, cool stuff.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 00:59 |
|
https://twitter.com/MennoSwart/status/1311284887857647618?s=20 https://twitter.com/stefanspeaking/status/1311208437758349312?s=20 F-35B went down, pilot ejected and lived.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 13:52 |
|
mlmp08 posted:pilot ejected and lived. That's what matters.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 14:18 |
|
Wow, really curious about how that happened. Damage to #1 and the fuel leak visible might be damage sustained in the crash landing. Hot dogging with a close pass after breaking contact? Or just the mother of all overshoots trying to connect?
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 14:18 |
|
So, about where the tanker came to rest. Is the pavement grooved like that specifically to drain away fuel in a situation like this?
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 14:24 |
|
bull3964 posted:So, about where the tanker came to rest. Is the pavement grooved like that specifically to drain away fuel in a situation like this? That’s what a plowed field looks like. This one is slightly exaggerated for irrigation.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 14:26 |
|
Ah, for some reason I thought they made it to an airport and confused the dirt for concrete.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 14:32 |
|
mlmp08 posted:That’s what a plowed field looks like. This one is slightly exaggerated for irrigation. It's getting irrigated alright. Still, better than a full on crash. Glad everyone seems to be OK. It will be interesting to hear the story. I bet something really, really dumb.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 14:44 |
|
Tests of love and acceptance of aeronautical insanity: will your significant other tolerate this purchase?
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 16:06 |
|
bull3964 posted:So, about where the tanker came to rest. Is the pavement grooved like that specifically to drain away fuel in a situation like this? As noted that is just a plowed field, but you are onto something sort of. Many airports now have what is called EMAS, the engineered material arresting system, where the area beyond the end of the runway is made of concrete bricks designed to collapse and slow the plane down if it overruns.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 16:25 |
|
It might just be an illusion, but the KC-130 looks like a hull loss to me. The wings look... A little droopier than they should be. Super happy everyone walked away though.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 20:03 |
|
MrYenko posted:It might just be an illusion, but the KC-130 looks like a hull loss to me. The wings look... A little droopier than they should be. The KC-130 is still in production, I'd assume they'd recover what they can for parts and use the fuselage for loadmaster training or something.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 20:10 |
|
https://twitter.com/aldin_ww/status/1311365856639758337 drat
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 20:26 |
|
hobbesmaster posted:The KC-130 is still in production, I'd assume they'd recover what they can for parts and use the fuselage for loadmaster training or something. "And this is the part of the plane where you shout 'nonner' at people."
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 21:13 |
|
I really hope the camera made the smoke look worse! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VV2vxYYD8P0
|
# ? Oct 1, 2020 07:01 |
|
that's completely normal
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 12:38 |
|
imagine if ww3 started because a shriveled tangerine got rona
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 13:22 |
|
Those aircraft fly almost every day, that dude is dumb.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 15:00 |
|
Lou Takki posted:Those aircraft fly almost every day, that dude is dumb. Yeah. And they've been extra busy in the last year or so as DOD is all "great powers argle bargle" Have a GE9X testbed photo.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 15:03 |
|
mlmp08 posted:Yeah. And they've been extra busy in the last year or so as DOD is all "great powers argle bargle" You vs the engine she tells you not to worry about.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 15:40 |
|
mlmp08 posted:Yeah. And they've been extra busy in the last year or so as DOD is all "great powers argle bargle" the number 2 engine got stung by a gee bee
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 15:42 |
|
Lou Takki posted:Those aircraft fly almost every day, that dude is dumb. I think the interesting thing here is that they've chosen to turn ADS-B on, because it very publicly signals to anybody paying attention that *someone* still has their finger on the button.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 15:45 |
|
Safety Dance posted:I think the interesting thing here is that they've chosen to turn ADS-B on, because it very publicly signals to anybody paying attention that *someone* still has their finger on the button. it's not interesting. it's very uninteresting, in fact. they fly all the time, in those same areas, with ADS-B broadcasting because its legally required. it's the same kind of twitter hyperventilation you see when someone notices a train full of army rolling stock go through their neighborhood for the first time.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 15:59 |
|
Safety Dance posted:I think the interesting thing here is that they've chosen to turn ADS-B on, because it very publicly signals to anybody paying attention that *someone* still has their finger on the button. I beg to differ, it's sensationalism with nothing to back it up. Looks like normal everyday ops to me.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 16:00 |
|
Safety Dance posted:I think the interesting thing here is that they've chosen to turn ADS-B on, because it very publicly signals to anybody paying attention that *someone* still has their finger on the button. The governmental actors who pay attention to things like TACAMO missions do not need ADS-B to track the aircraft. 99.9% of the country doesn't know what an E-6B is, or what ADS-B is or how to receive those signals, so it's not intended to reassure civilians or whatever either. Also, they may not even have ADS-B on at all; the ADS-B Exchange website also reports aircraft locations by multilateral triangulation from mode S signals. As noted, those planes are up all the time; you can check the history of that particular tail number and see that it flies basically every day. That guy is reading way too much into the fact that he coincidentally saw one flying around off Washington at the moment he thinks Trump was officially diagnosed with COVID. It's just doomer conspiracy theory e: https://twitter.com/jimsciutto/status/1312027909390045184 of course, that's just what they want you to believe Sagebrush fucked around with this message at 18:31 on Oct 2, 2020 |
# ? Oct 2, 2020 18:05 |
|
If they started showing up on FlightAware or the like that would be interesting, but as folks have mentioned they’re not exactly stealth aircraft. I should have noticed it was an ADS-B exchange screenshot.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 20:14 |
|
Warbird posted:If they started showing up on FlightAware or the like that would be interesting Why would that be interesting? Flightaware has the same data ADSB-E uses, they just filter their output for inexplicably stupid reasons
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 20:54 |
|
These planes do the same poo poo as everyone else in Class A airspace. Stop trying to find conspiracy bullshit. They squawk, they talk to ATC, they use callsigns anyone could recognize. They self-report on all the same poo poo as everyone else because it's required. Years ago the AWACS fleet almost got loving grounded because the RVSM upgrade was behind schedule. Same rules apply until airspace is shut the hell down 9/11 style.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 21:02 |
|
SeaborneClink posted:Why would that be interesting? Flightaware has the same data ADSB-E uses, they just filter their output for inexplicably stupid reasons No I mean it would be for that exact reason. “Huh, I guess they stopped filtering that stuff. That’s interesting.” Rich folk paying to not have details surfaced doesn’t really bother me but I do wish they’d show the military stuff or that ASSB-E would get a phone app or something.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2020 05:56 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 08:09 |
|
Sagebrush posted:of course, that's just what they want you to believe Thankfully the E-4Bs are much harder to spot on ADS-B exchange - they just show up as B742s with a weird callsign. Every so often a B-52H with the callsign DOOM## will be flying over/around the south and that's kinda .
|
# ? Oct 3, 2020 06:32 |