|
Idk they're tools clearly purchased for commercial use, seems easy to deny the claim for residential insurance at least on its face E: this is better and more informed Mr. Nice! posted:If he had rental insurance, then yes.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2020 17:44 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 04:34 |
|
IANAL, but generic insurance policies frequently have much lower limits on things like tools, unless you specifically insure the tools. If you have pictures of the tools or any other proof you own them, that would help with the potential claim (even though it sounds like it's probably not covered). You should at least ask your employer to reimburse you for the tools before suing them. Do you have any of the instructions the employer gave you in writing? Small claims courts are usually courts of equity, not courts of law, which isn't to say that you would necessarily win, but it's hard to predict the outcome of a case that's largely subject to the judge's sense of fairness.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2020 19:27 |
|
Not much help now but if your company tells you to get hosed that's your que for
|
# ? Oct 9, 2020 20:31 |
Thanatosian posted:You should at least ask your employer to reimburse you for the tools before suing them. I have, and am awaiting a response quote:Do you have any of the instructions the employer gave you in writing? Not that I've found yet. Best I have are old emails of me sending him tool lists he requested, then the direction must have been verbal I have contemporaneous notes from our meetings for the entire time I've been there (hand written and in the CRM) about nature of those conversations We also met about the burglary on Tuesday morning when we have weekly meetings. Verbally he reiterated having directed me to use my tools, store them in the van, and take the van home with me. When I sent him notes on that meeting (normal practice) via email, his mentioning that was a bullet point There's also the fact that I've been doing the job for 16 months, and now that I'm not bringing tools I can't do the job as described, for lack of tools. I called some of my counterparts at other offices in other states, and many of them are using their own tools, which they were directed to do Of course, this role being completely out of the company's wheel house (sales org trying to do working man poo poo), there are no relevant policy documents or memos pertaining to any of this poo poo Obviously, I know what I can do to reduce my exposure moving forward (I will be getting a renter's insurance policy and inventorying my remaining tools) Luckily, i wasn't bringing many of my tools to work, and most of what I lost I own in duplicate, triplicate, etc. The sticker price is just high bc it was all tradesman quality tools
|
|
# ? Oct 9, 2020 20:48 |
|
Outrail posted:Not much help now but if your company tells you to get hosed that's your que for Shut the gently caress up. Don't steal, people.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2020 20:54 |
|
I was about to say. No matter how much you hate capitalism and companies (and god knows I agree), don't encourage theft. And don't loving steal? In fact, don't break the law, not even gonna qualify it if it ever becomes the case that the law absolutely must be broken for some reason it'll need to be so loving obvious that the fact that I said "don't break the law" isn't going to factor into the decision at all.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2020 20:58 |
|
blarzgh posted:Shut the gently caress up. Yeah, remember that the priority needs to be making sure that the business never faces any sorts of consequences for the morally abhorrent but technically legal behavior.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2020 20:59 |
I don't steal from my employers [e: fine] Also, just as an aside: none of it in writing, but for the entire time I've worked here, I've been begging my boss to buy the loving tools and let me leave the van at work. I even asked like, can I at least take the company tool backpack containing my tools home with me, so that I could leave the van at work and keep access to my property. It's been "coming soon" for 16 months eighty-four merc fucked around with this message at 21:30 on Oct 9, 2020 |
|
# ? Oct 9, 2020 21:00 |
|
For real, you should also delete that most recent post.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2020 21:17 |
homullus posted:For real, you should also delete that most recent post. Good point. It doesn't matter (didn't have to sign one of those) but still yeah, good point
|
|
# ? Oct 9, 2020 21:31 |
|
I have an attractive nuisance question in Oregon. My hypothetical 7 year old and his hypothetical friends frequently play together around our cul de sac and in our front yard. In my yard is a tree about 12' tall. The kids can all grab the lower branches but can't quite climb up due to the shape of the trunk. I was watching my fake son try to climb the tree today and thought that maybe I could nail a board or two into the trunk to facilitate him climbing into the upper branches. It occurred to me however that it was very likely that other kids would want to also climb the tree, and they could potentially fall out and die from a brain contusion in my tulip bed. Questions: 1. Does Oregon have attractive nuisance laws? 2. If so, is there an age cutoff for Oregon? 3. Could I do anything to cover my liability, like posting signs warning the dumb fake kids? 4. Am I missing anything stupid and obvious regarding my liability in this situation?
|
# ? Oct 10, 2020 01:13 |
|
JMHO, but no matter what the laws say I'd personally just up the liability coverage on the home, and get umbrella if you don't already have it. It's stupid cheap for what you get (like $200 for a 1-2MM policy). Not sure I'd put something up on the tree to encourage that stuff, as stickler as that sounds.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2020 02:32 |
|
It’s not a hypothetical if it’s obvious it’s you I’ve said this 100 times. I could have answered you question too
|
# ? Oct 10, 2020 02:35 |
|
euphronius posted:It’s not a hypothetical if it’s obvious it’s you I don't have any kids. My neighbor just nailed a few boards to his tree. We had a discussion about it. I was being cute. Better up that count to 101 I guess.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2020 02:47 |
|
toplitzin posted:I'd guess its also probably exposing the college to some sort of liability especially if he's storing the data improperly. you could always talk to the department head or the schools legal department and let them deal with it vs fighting the idiot himself. As someone who works with PII, 'mailed to his personal home address on hardcopy' is setting off all the lights and sirens.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2020 15:31 |
|
Is he also asking for bank account numbers and pins for uh, verification purposes? I would absolutely not participate in this and would complain to the administration.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2020 15:33 |
|
Seems like it'd be fine to just lie
|
# ? Oct 10, 2020 15:45 |
|
Harold Fjord posted:Seems like it'd be fine to just lie I'd still escalate because that professor reads as the type who'd treat lying on that assignment as 'academic dishonesty' and try to push for consequences from the administration to salve his pride. Liquid Communism fucked around with this message at 16:33 on Oct 10, 2020 |
# ? Oct 10, 2020 16:21 |
|
Making up fake numbers and presenting them as your real personal finance numbers seems like a venue to open yourself up to bullshit academic dishonesty charges simply by playing their game. Straight up telling them (and social media) that they are running what appears to be a scam and refusing to play their high-stakes/no reward game seems somewhat safer.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2020 16:25 |
|
Harold Fjord posted:Seems like it'd be fine to just lie It is. But if a teacher is forcing students to lie to defend themselves, he should not be a teacher.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2020 16:44 |
|
r/legaladvice posted:This really is so complex and I don't know where to start or how to explain. But let me try.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 09:01 |
|
jesus christ That can't be real but at the same time I suspect it is.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 10:33 |
|
That's a yikes. Also chalk another point into the 'don't ever trust anyone with power over you unless you can verify their claims' column. Jesus.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 12:38 |
|
Is it insider trading if you have inside knowledge that your company is going down the shitter and you buy a bunch of stock in your leading competitor, or does it only apply to buying/selling shares of stock in the company you work for?
|
# ? Oct 20, 2020 04:27 |
|
Sounds like a trade you should clear with your company's legal dept
|
# ? Oct 20, 2020 04:56 |
|
SkunkDuster posted:Is it insider trading if you have inside knowledge that your company is going down the shitter and you buy a bunch of stock in your leading competitor, or does it only apply to buying/selling shares of stock in the company you work for? It’s insider trading but almost impossible to prove. Any time you make a decision based on confidential or non-public information it’s insider trading. But for example if you know Microsoft is going to miss earnings so you short the QQQ there almost 0 chance the SEC will catch you unless you are moving serious volume.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2020 06:43 |
|
pseudanonymous posted:It's insider trading but almost impossible to prove. Any time you make a decision based on confidential or non-public information its insider trading. But for example if you know Microsoft is going to miss earnings so you short the QQQ there almost 0 chance the SEC will catch you unless you are moving serious volume. It does have to be market-sensitive information though. A general understanding that a company is a poo poo-show of mismanagement and a judgement that it is therefore not long for the world probably doesn't cross that threshold (not legal advice don't go to prison because you read this post).
|
# ? Oct 20, 2020 10:38 |
|
Alchenar posted:It does have to be market-sensitive information though. A general understanding that a company is a poo poo-show of mismanagement and a judgement that it is therefore not long for the world probably doesn't cross that threshold (not legal advice don't go to prison because you read this post). Also a fundamental failure to recognize that all management and c-level decisionmaking is a shitshow.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2020 11:12 |
|
Working with C level people is classic, CEOs literally don’t ever do anything. They sit on the calls while everyone else does the work then say thanks. They’re copied on all the emails and every now and then answer with like four words and no signature. The CEO life
|
# ? Oct 20, 2020 13:43 |
|
Don’t forgot quarterly board meetings with their friends.
euphronius fucked around with this message at 13:59 on Oct 20, 2020 |
# ? Oct 20, 2020 13:57 |
|
Alchenar posted:It does have to be market-sensitive information though. A general understanding that a company is a poo poo-show of mismanagement and a judgement that it is therefore not long for the world probably doesn't cross that threshold (not legal advice don't go to prison because you read this post). What makes it public knowledge? Like if I work for coke and know for a fact that they're about to do something that isn't illegal but will destroy their share price (eg: intentionally let the coke trademark lapse for some reason) so I dump my half a million bucks of stock that's insider trading. But if I post on my public twitter account (with five followers) or write a letter to CNN telling them and they dismiss it as a crackpots ramblings can I say 'look I tried, it's in the public sphere, not my fault nobody took it seriously' and walk away (and probably get fired and sued by coke for violating my NDA)?
|
# ? Oct 20, 2020 14:04 |
|
Outrail posted:What makes it public knowledge? Like if I work for coke and know for a fact that they're about to do something that isn't illegal but will destroy their share price (eg: intentionally let the coke trademark lapse for some reason) so I dump my half a million bucks of stock that's insider trading. But if I post on my public twitter account (with five followers) or write a letter to CNN telling them and they dismiss it as a crackpots ramblings can I say 'look I tried, it's in the public sphere, not my fault nobody took it seriously' and walk away (and probably get fired and sued by coke for violating my NDA)? My impression is that's the sort of thing an appeals court decides while you're enjoying three hots and a cot.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2020 03:06 |
|
Captain von Trapp posted:My impression is that's the sort of thing an appeals court decides while you're enjoying three hots and a cot. Legal questions of questionable legality it is then.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2020 03:12 |
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:Working with C level people is classic, CEOs literally don’t ever do anything. They sit on the calls while everyone else does the work then say thanks. They’re copied on all the emails and every now and then answer with like four words and no signature. The CEO life Any CEO that does any actual work is terrible, it's their job to set direction and priorities not actually do work. Also picking which calls to sit in on is a shockingly important skill to develop for any manager.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2020 17:59 |
|
So I have an interesting question regarding tenancy laws in Seattle, especially for small businesses. Hopefully someone can give me a direction I might head? Without giving too much information, here's the gist: I've been a sole proprietor running a mental health practice out of office space rented by a national company (think WeWork, but not WeWork). I renewed my lease last May, but in August I moved out because the spouse of a former client was so unhappy with the services provided that they made threatening phone calls and texts to me. I documented these and filed a police report but because my address was public knowledge (and this person referenced that in their texts), I absolutely did NOT feel safe going to that office. I let this company know that I intended to move out, and cited local law that says that anyone who is the victim of domestic violence or stalking threats has the legal right to break their lease. I provided copies of the police report and expected that would suffice, but the building manager presented the case to their corporate office in Chicago and basically came back and said "yeah, we don't want to let you out of your lease." Because I was already loving exhausted from months of threats and now dealing with something related and also legal, I moved out into my new office anyway. I paid the lease for September and October, but at this point I'm wondering if it would be useful at all to speak with an attorney and try to fight for this company to let me out of the rest of my lease, or if I hosed myself by moving out of the space, even though I'm still paying rent. Any thoughts would be appreciated. I emailed one lawyer who didn't get back to me, so I feel like pretty small fish here to most people. MEIN RAVEN fucked around with this message at 21:34 on Oct 21, 2020 |
# ? Oct 21, 2020 20:06 |
|
Yes, it is in fact legally possible to speak to an attorney in your area about this.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2020 20:13 |
|
UnSmith posted:So I have an interesting question regarding tenancy laws in Seattle, especially for small businesses. Hopefully someone can give me a direction I might head? Without giving too much information, here's the gist: Would you say you're a sole trader Seattle treader space truant spouse treater? Who sold taters?
|
# ? Oct 21, 2020 21:08 |
|
You know I was sober when I wrote that too.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2020 21:35 |
|
I’m 90% sure a CEO’s job is just to poo poo on the CFO at all times.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2020 22:36 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 04:34 |
|
God drat
|
# ? Oct 21, 2020 23:58 |