|
spacetoaster posted:What are you? Some kind of non-coffee drinker?? She's a tea-man
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 14:48 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 13:56 |
|
Meet me in the waffle house parking lot right now if you want a coffee drinking. That sounded a lot funnier in my head.
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 14:53 |
|
spacetoaster posted:Meet me in the waffle house parking lot right now if you want a coffee drinking. Yougotbeans?
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 14:53 |
|
coconut milk goes really nicely with espresso for less milky mixes
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 16:36 |
|
The problem with capitalism is that all the talented and/or influential opponents either get killed or co-opted. Even Harley Quinn: https://twitter.com/besf0rt/status/1316426258893463552 Edit: Now I have that drat song stuck in my head, and you will too. PhilippAchtel has issued a correction as of 18:25 on Oct 14, 2020 |
# ? Oct 14, 2020 18:19 |
|
Kitfox88 posted:or do the real proletariat energy booster and take methamphetamines brb, raiding my partner's addy stash
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 18:35 |
|
T-man posted:Goons I just had a great idea, THC infused nice tasting cheese give me your many millions of bitcoin dollars and I will make this dream real There's no way this doesn't already exist, and if it doesn't do it and make fat stacks.
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 18:38 |
|
If you actually wanna watch the Shell, uh, thing for some reason: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxS9ascNqy8 I've watched 30 seconds and I already hate it. One of the cars is hydrogen (which currently comes entirely from fossil fuels, so that's fine) and the other is an electric car that can't go very fast and can't go very far and if you drive it people will think you're gay.
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 18:42 |
|
Oh man this is hilarious actually Wow I can't believe we easily and conveniently found this SHELL™ brand Hydrogen Refueling Station, courteously provided by SHELL™ to ensure the future of our energy independence! Gosh, we got done filling up the hydrogen tank in just a few minutes, how easy and convenient!! Oh no!!! The electric car has to SIT AND WAIT at the conspicuously un-branded fast charging station while the people driving it talk about how much time they're wasting! What a nightmare!!
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 18:47 |
|
For every Comrade Britney, capitalism gifts us with a Kaley Cucko.
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 18:49 |
|
Next they must find the lowest CO2 emissions option for an excursion. The suggestions are "walking", "bicycling", "zip-line", "ATV", "airplane" The actual thing they get is... an electric boat and an electric dune buggy. The electric dune buggy gets stuck in the sand and has to call a fossil fuel burning tow truck running on SHELL™ brand Quality Diesel Fuel.
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 18:54 |
|
They get recumbent electric-assist bikes, but ugh bicycling is so TIRING!! Luckily they just happen to find a bus powered by clean, all-american SHELL™ brand natural gas!
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 19:02 |
|
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 19:18 |
|
Crosspostin' from the 'pos A manager wearing an oculus headset breathlessly wanks himself while telling Barry to pack up his things and be off the property within 30 minutes for the 80th time today
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 19:21 |
|
https://twitter.com/cnnbrk/status/1316434108374020096
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 19:22 |
|
I mean honestly that's exactly the kind of dumb poo poo I would have done to get free money to buy drugs with in college.
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 19:24 |
|
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 19:26 |
|
Shame Boy posted:Crosspostin' from the 'pos lol also lol
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 21:31 |
|
i bet the college wants a cut of the action somehow
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 21:51 |
|
Shame Boy posted:Oh man this is hilarious actually my sister is a chemist and worked at GM for a short while on hydrogen fuel cells for cars. she said at the time GM expects the cars to be fully on the market in 5 years. that was in 2006
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 23:57 |
|
Anyone know why traditional battery EVs became more popular than hydrogen fuel cell vehicles? It seems like they don't suffer from the same charge time problems as EVs and would nominally be just as clean (i.e. depending on the electrical source for hydrolysis), maybe even cleaner if you're not mining as much lithium. Is there a safety issue with transporting large amounts of hydrogen to fuel centers?
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 00:11 |
|
1. hydrogen has to be made, usually from fossil sources. We COULD have enormous sea-based nuclear plants making gigawatts of power and cracking seawater but the nuclear board won't return my calls anymore. 2. hydrogen is dangerous is new and novel ways. 3. Litium batteries are better developed and understood by virtue of being in everything, whereas fuel cells are still mostly in fancy space tech or specialist use.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 00:16 |
|
also you can right now charge an ev anywhere there is an electrical outlet
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 00:18 |
|
T-man posted:1. hydrogen has to be made, usually from fossil sources. We COULD have enormous sea-based nuclear plants making gigawatts of power and cracking seawater but the nuclear board won't return my calls anymore. yeah let's dump more heat into the ocean
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 00:21 |
|
Hydrogen is way superior to EVs, assuming the energy grid in which it is manufactured is not carbon based. It's definitely not dagerous in novel ways, that's just pure bullshit. It's safer than any other kind of power platform for vehicles. Of course he best way forward would be to phase out personal vehicles altogether.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 00:26 |
|
steinrokkan posted:Hydrogen is way superior to EVs, assuming the energy grid in which it is manufactured is not carbon based. It's definitely not dagerous in novel ways, that's just pure bullshit. It's safer than any other kind of power platform for vehicles. Of course he best way forward would be to phase out personal vehicles altogether. thats the thing we can't just swap the fleet to either EVs or Hydrogen and meet our climate goals we have to reduce miles driven per person.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 00:34 |
|
Trabisnikof posted:thats the thing we can't just swap the fleet to either EVs or Hydrogen and meet our climate goals we have to reduce miles driven per person. Yes, of course, as long as owning pointless cars is aspirational and not owning a car is seen as a failure, any reform is fundamentally doomed to fail to produce the results needed. But here the challenge is cultural, not technological. But all things being equal, hydrogen is better than EVs.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 00:40 |
|
What would be even better is if we could bind the hydrogen to something chemically, to make the energy density way higher. Something that could be stored as a liquid, so it would be easy to pump and transport. Maybe something using carbon, so we could take CO2 out of the air and use it for the fuel. Like some kind of, I don't know, hydrogencarbon. Look I'm just the ideas guy.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 00:41 |
|
Shame Boy posted:What would be even better is if we could bind the hydrogen to something chemically, to make the energy density way higher. Something that could be stored as a liquid, so it would be easy to pump and transport. Maybe something using carbon, so we could take CO2 out of the air and use it for the fuel. Like some kind of, I don't know, hydrogencarbon. Look I'm just the ideas guy. This is a really stupid argument that can be used against any source of power other than gas. It's less convenient, less efficient, etc. Woke petroleum industry messaging.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 00:45 |
|
steinrokkan posted:This is a really stupid argument that can be used against any source of power other than gas. It's less convenient, less efficient, etc. Woke petroleum industry messaging. I don't think the petroleum industry makes gas out of CO2 from the air but ok sure.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 00:48 |
|
steinrokkan posted:This is a really stupid argument that can be used against any source of power other than gas. It's less convenient, less efficient, etc. Woke petroleum industry messaging. lol
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 00:50 |
|
Shame Boy posted:I don't think the petroleum industry makes gas out of CO2 from the air but ok sure. I'm sorry I thought you were doing the "hydrogen is just hydrocarbons done wrong" thing I've seen before. Isn't hydrocarbon production from atmospheric CO2 still in baby steps and really inefficient, though? Like maybe a supplementary source of fuel at best, I will admit I read the last article on the topic few years ago.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 00:56 |
|
T-man posted:1. hydrogen has to be made, usually from fossil sources. We COULD have enormous sea-based nuclear plants making gigawatts of power and cracking seawater but the nuclear board won't return my calls anymore. I think 2 and 3 are valid, but 1 is the exact same issue that EVs face.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 01:22 |
|
Gods_Butthole posted:Anyone know why traditional battery EVs became more popular than hydrogen fuel cell vehicles? It seems like they don't suffer from the same charge time problems as EVs and would nominally be just as clean (i.e. depending on the electrical source for hydrolysis), maybe even cleaner if you're not mining as much lithium. Is there a safety issue with transporting large amounts of hydrogen to fuel centers? In addition to all the other points, there's the infrastructure problem. There's a fuckton of gas stations across the country, and there's a huge power distribution grid. There's all the other nodes that allow gas stations to operate, transportation, storage, refining, etc. Hydrogen has none of that, and none of the existing infrastructure is compatible in the way that installing an EV charging station is compatible with the electric grid. The major auto manufactures have had hydrogen vehicles on display at the auto show here for a few years. The fill station map shows about 3 stations in northern California. You'd have to build a huge infrastructure network for a power source that's worse than it's two main competitors.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 01:25 |
|
indigi posted:yeah let's dump more heat into the ocean This but unironically. Direct heating of the ocean by powerplant heat exchangers is nothing compared to the multiplicative effect that greenhouses gases have on the all-natural radiation coming from everyone’s favourite fusion reactor, the Sun. Every square kilometre of Earth’s surface effectively has two megawatts of heating applied perpetually thanks to industrial greenhouse gases.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 01:54 |
|
steinrokkan posted:I'm sorry I thought you were doing the "hydrogen is just hydrocarbons done wrong" thing I've seen before. Isn't hydrocarbon production from atmospheric CO2 still in baby steps and really inefficient, though? Like maybe a supplementary source of fuel at best, I will admit I read the last article on the topic few years ago. Depends on how you make it but yeah it still sucks. It's about as industrially developed as, well, non-fossil-fuel based hydrogen And I was poking fun at hydrogen a bit too but like "hydrogen is stupid just use oil" is obvious bullshit, yeah.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 02:00 |
|
Steam reformation of methane is stupid. Just use methane.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 02:01 |
|
Platystemon posted:This but unironically. The nuclear power plant in south Florida has a website where they make a big deal of how all the heat they dump into the fragile ecosystem is actually Very Good for the local wildlife, here look at this adorable baby endangered crocodile, they live in the coolant water discharge sluice system because they like the warmth, do you want him to die huh? huh?? Also the coal plant here in Tampa has a friendly manatee viewing platform with a fun cartoon manatee right next to the coal ash slurry pond, cuz the manatees like to hang out by the coolant water discharge. Please do not look at the massive toxic coal ash slurry pond, look only at the adorable manatees. Thank you.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 02:04 |
|
Platystemon posted:Steam reformation of methane is stupid. Just use methane. Finally, a way to monetise my voluminous farts
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 02:07 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 13:56 |
|
The real solution is communism
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 02:14 |