|
MAKE NO BABBYS posted:We live in hellworld. Was this intentionally put on el Día de Muertos for maximum offense to the hispanic community?
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2020 06:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 05:02 |
|
|
Alec Eiffel posted:It owns that Pomona college is in Claremont It was founded in the city of Pomona. But during the first year someone in Claremont donated a building to them. Since they were renting space in Pomona, but now owned something in Claremont they quickly moved. This was in the 1880s. Chirp!
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2020 09:26
|
|
|
Old James posted:It was founded in the city of Pomona. But during the first year someone in Claremont donated a building to them. Since they were renting space in Pomona, but now owned something in Claremont they quickly moved. And Claremonters were assholes ever since!
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2020 17:31
|
|
|
Seeing all the chuds waving their banners and flags over a lot of 91 freeway overpasses made me want to barf. I don't think Ive ever seen anything like this.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 04:42
|
|
Have you seen my apex seals? I seem to have lost them.
|
finally saw a couple houses put out trump signs here in the sac burbs first it was just a few yards with signs for a former CHP chief running for the county board (rich desmond), who we figured was the placeholder "shy republican" guy to root for and sure enough, on sunday one of those houses put out a trump sign and then today their neighbor was emboldened as well the biden signs only showed up here like a week ago, before that it was all "86 45" and "vote" and "anybody but trump" lol
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 07:55
|
|
|
Aeka 2.0 posted:Seeing all the chuds waving their banners and flags over a lot of 91 freeway overpasses made me want to barf. I don't think Ive ever seen anything like this. Still lots of chuds in the IE but Riverside and San Bernardino counties went to Clinton in 2016 and will go blue again this cycle. My shithead congressperson is still gonna win though 
FCKGW fucked around with this message at 08:21 on Nov 3, 2020 |
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 08:18
|
|
|
I have enjoyed flipping off the solo chud overpass person in Escondido. gently caress that guy.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 09:30
|
|
|
VOTE FOR PROP 15 PLEASE
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 10:45
|
|
|
A lot of the drop off ballot boxes around here in Roseville are full and aren’t getting emptied fast enough. I’m going to have to wander around to find one for mine today. Cool.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 16:10
|
|
|
Vote no on 22 you fuckers
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 16:20
|
|
|
H.P. Hovercraft posted:finally saw a couple houses put out trump signs here in the sac burbs
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 17:11
|
|
|
eSporks posted:Come out to Roseville, it's scary. 7:45a in Roseville. Sweet! 
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 17:33
|
|
|
I'm really hoping Prop 22 doesn't pass but I'm not optimistic given how widespread the advertising is for it. I don't think I've seen a single "No on 22" that hasn't come from people online. What time should results be expected and what's a good place to track them?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 17:48
|
|
|
Nanomachine Son posted:I'm really hoping Prop 22 doesn't pass but I'm not optimistic given how widespread the advertising is for it. I don't think I've seen a single "No on 22" that hasn't come from people online. There has been an uptick of NO on 22 ads during sports the past few weeks. Not as many as yes, but some
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 17:52
|
|
|
The Glumslinger posted:Vote no on 22 you fuckers This please, goddamn
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 18:43
|
|
|
I have so little faith yet so much hope for no on 22.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 19:18
|
|
|
The incredibly depressing thing about Prop 22 passing - even above and beyond the fact that it enshrines in our state constitution that we consider gig workers to be a second class of citizens not deserving of basic employment rights - is that it will send the very clear message that any company that doesn't like a law passed by our legislature can just dump a couple hundred million into a voter disinformation campaign that ultimately gets that law overturned at the ballot box.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 19:27
|
|
|
Yeah I feel that CA passes at least one extremely awful prop every 4 years and this time it's 22's time to shine.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 19:36
|
|
|
Lol if you think 22 isn't going to pass. Let me refer you to prop 8.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 19:45
|
|
|
i'm still lolling at the "oh btw amending this prop will require 7/8ths of the leg" part of 22
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 19:57
|
|
|
I'm not as negative on the proposition system as a lot of people in this thread (I'd like to reform it, not eliminate it), but lol that we allow propositions to enact state constitutional amendments without needing like 2/3rds of the vote.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 21:03
|
|
|
WAR CRIME GIGOLO posted:Lol if you think 22 isn't going to pass. Let me refer you to prop 8. yeah there's absolutely no way it isn't passing and best you can hope for is a 55/45 split, could and will likely be even a way worse result than that but it's irrelevant because it's definitely getting some level of a majority vote. there is a whole loving lot of money put into it for like 9 months now with YES ON 22 all over bay area, text spam, ~im a hard working latino poor lgbtq uber driver and i love having the ability to set my own schedule plz dont take that away from me. yes on 22 means wokeness and support of the bipoc working class~ commercials and radio ads and so on. also people love having cheap $5 to get a mish' burrito delivered to their tech office or having $5 rides to get driven to some fancy rum n gin pirate bar to gobble up $19 rum shots. probably the only way its getting fixed is another ballot prop put out, with key wording like "safe employment and fund schools prop!" where it gets rid of independent contracting again but lol there isn't much money in doing that. i suppose legislature could put one on the ballot though. Xaris fucked around with this message at 21:14 on Nov 3, 2020 |
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 21:11
|
|
|
Just btw Uber is forcing drivers to put "YES ON 22" informational in the BACK KF THE CAR SO THE RIDER sees it the entire time gently caress Uber gently caress 22. I use doordash weekly for employees and Uber aswell and guess what I loving hate 22 because it is literally anti worker
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 22:55
|
|
|
This is about a month old but Doordash was also making drivers put food they picked up in "Yes on 22" bags for delivery. I believe Uber and Lyft also both pestered drivers with "Do you support Prop 22???" pop ups that only had a "Yes" option, and if you didn't pick Yes and instead dismissed it by tapping elsewhere on the screen it constantly popped back up over and over until you agreed just to get the dang popup to go away, after which any rider you picked up would get a push notification that their driver supports Prop 22! These companies are evil and beyond exploitative of our terrible labor conditions yet don't even make loving money; they just hoover up endless VC funds on the promise that one day it'll all be autonomous vehicles that squeeze out the marginalized and exploited labor these companies are claiming Prop 22 will help. It is beyond even a caricature of the problems with Capitalism.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 23:14
|
|
|
Sydin posted:This is about a month old but Doordash was also making drivers put food they picked up in "Yes on 22" bags for delivery. I believe Uber and Lyft also both pestered drivers with "Do you support Prop 22???" pop ups that only had a "Yes" option, and if you didn't pick Yes and instead dismissed it by tapping elsewhere on the screen it constantly popped back up over and over until you agreed just to get the dang popup to go away, after which any rider you picked up would get a push notification that their driver supports Prop 22! People that eventually then clicked Yes were then used in advertisements as supporting Yes on 22.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 23:20
|
|
|
lololololololol https://twitter.com/SocialistMMA/status/1323756570937860096?s=20
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2020 23:44
|
|
|
M4A is incredibly popular no matter how much libs and conservatives want to wring their hands about now actually it's misleading wording in polls. So naturally the choice before us tonight is between a guy with zero interest in expanding government funded healthcare, and a guy with zero interest in expanding government funded healthcare.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2020 00:04
|
|
|
Sydin posted:The incredibly depressing thing about Prop 22 passing - even above and beyond the fact that it enshrines in our state constitution that we consider gig workers to be a second class of citizens not deserving of basic employment rights - is that it will send the very clear message that any company that doesn't like a law passed by our legislature can just dump a couple hundred million into a voter disinformation campaign that ultimately gets that law overturned at the ballot box. quote:(c) The Legislature may amend or repeal a referendum statute. The Legislature may amend or repeal an initiative statute by another statute that becomes effective only when approved by the electors unless the initiative statute permits amendment or repeal without the electors’ approval. H.P. Hovercraft posted:i'm still lolling at the "oh btw amending this prop will require 7/8ths of the leg" part of 22 (For anyone who hasn't read it, text here, scroll down to "Article 9. Amendment" on PDF page 8) Ballot Propositions were a mistake, and initiative statutes are an abomination.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2020 00:50
|
|
|
https://calmatters.org/politics/california-election-2020/2020/11/california-election-results-2020/ Nothing set in stone yet obviously but if these results held it would be a decidedly mixed bag of results.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2020 05:37
|
|
|
I though prop 18 would be the least controversial of the bunch. Once again this stupid state continues to surprise me. E: I don't particularly care strongly for it, I just would have guessed it would be a solid "Sure, I guess I don't see anything wrong with that." CopperHound fucked around with this message at 05:47 on Nov 4, 2020 |
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2020 05:45
|
|
|
Rent control going down in flames is a bummer, but not surprising given the amount of flyers I got saying that they were going to make my rent go up. Always from some group named something like Apartment Association of America or whatever the gently caress. Sacramento also rejected a local rent control measure; got plenty of mailers warning me about how it was going to create MORE BUREAUCRACY without ANY OVERSIGHT. Strong mayor didn't pass at least, get hosed Steinberg.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2020 05:53
|
|
|
CopperHound posted:I though prop 18 would be the least controversial of the bunch. Once again this stupid state continues to surprise me. Olds don't want youngs changing things
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2020 05:58
|
|
|
loving california
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2020 06:09
|
|
|
Difficult to understand props for the average person, requiring just 50%+1 approval, and overriding the legislature/governor? I always feel like I'm very much in the minority here, but I do not like the prop system.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2020 06:12
|
|
|
Anyone got that tweet about California props handy that went something similar to "California props be like 'Do you or do you not don't want to not have a thing happen, yes or no?'"
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2020 06:13
|
|
|
Small White Dragon posted:Difficult to understand props for the average person, requiring just 50%+1 approval, and overriding the legislature/governor? It sucks rear end
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2020 06:14
|
|
|
Small White Dragon posted:Difficult to understand props for the average person, requiring just 50%+1 approval, and overriding the legislature/governor? But imagine if you had a shitload of money and wanted some weird law passed.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2020 06:16
|
|
|
Class Warcraft posted:Anyone got that tweet about California props handy that went something similar to "California props be like 'Do you or do you not don't want to not have a thing happen, yes or no?'" Here you go: https://twitter.com/MarkAgee/status/1316583418751148033
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2020 06:30
|
|
|
big win for real estate agents, gig economy industry disruptors, bail bond industry, and dialysis industry tonight 
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2020 06:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 05:02 |
|
|
Can the 7/8th majority in the legislature bit of Prop 22 be challenged in court? That bit seems pretty insane, but I'm not knowledgeable at all on the legal standing of it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2020 06:58
|
|
