|
He has very soft hands. Moisturizes regularly. That moisturizer cost adds up. Aw gently caress.
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2020 23:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 12, 2024 16:52 |
|
|
Gargamel Gibson posted:Why the hell does an HJ cost more than a BJ?!?!?!?!? HJ doesn't involve teeth.
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2020 01:59
|
|
|
Oh, honey. You've been paying for some poo poo-tier BJs.
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2020 10:40
|
|
|
Thanks to this thread I've just watched Death Becomes Her. Holy poo poo, what a movie. Exactly the right kind of bonkers. And bruce willis' eulogy at the end had me howling with laughter. Just fantastic.
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2020 12:10
|
|
|
Blowjobs so bad they make you cry poo poo tears.
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2020 13:50
|
|
|
Pope Corky the IX posted:Blowjobs so bad they make you cry poo poo tears. Out of your penis?
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2020 14:02
|
|
|
poonchasta posted:Out of your penis? Sort of. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2020 14:39
|
|
|
You guys need to have your loving pipes checked, something is definitely wrong.
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2020 14:41
|
|
|
There's a weird missed opportunity in Deadpool that bothers me. During the big killing montage, Wade is chasing down all of Francis's henchmen to find out where he is, all while shouting "Francis! Where's Francis!" I fully expected them to then have a scene with Weasel along the lines of: Weasel: Wait...you're asking them all where Francis is? Wade: Yeah...that's his name, cum for brains. Weasel: But...like...didn't you say he goes by Ajax because he hates hid real name? Maybe all those people you killed didn't know his name was Francis. Wade:...oh, son-of-bitch! But it's not addressed. Not that it HAS to be, but the whole "through line" of Francis constantly taunting Wade with that, "What's my name?" line sort of indicates that maybe they would have that cheap joke in there. I mean...they've got plenty of OTHER cheap jokes, what's one more? And another thing...Wade forgets all his guns in the trunk of the cab, but also, Dopinder mentions that he has his cousin tied up in the trunk and wants to kill him...how did Wade not notice a tied up man in the trunk when he put the guns back there?
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2020 19:57
|
|
|
But... on the other hand, why would Wade care there was a dude in the trunk?
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2020 20:06
|
|
|
Maybe Wade was shouting 'Where's Francis?' at everyone so that they (if they lived) knew their boss' name (which he was trying to hide) was Francis? yes, I know it's a stretch
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2020 20:16
|
|
|
Wait, was Francis a Stripes joke? I guess he does say, "lighten up Francis" at one point. You have to admire their dedication to a 30 year old throw away joke.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2020 20:24
|
|
|
Oh I just assumed that Wade yelling the wrong name at all the henchmen was why he never got anywhere with them and that was the joke. Just not one they outright stated.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2020 21:06
|
|
|
I appreciate how hard they tried to edit TJ Miller out of the second one. He just completely disappears at one point.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2020 22:01
|
|
|
still think it would have been a masterstroke to just replace tj miller's character with christopher plummer and not have it be acknowledged it at all
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2020 04:14
|
|
|
Deadpool is a crazy person, is probably the joke.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2020 05:03
|
|
|
God Hole posted:still think it would have been a masterstroke to just replace tj miller's character with christopher plummer and not have it be acknowledged it at all Yeah but it's a Deadpool movie so we would need multiple scenes where Ryan Reynolds explains the joke and riffs on it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2020 05:23
|
|
|
I remember in hobbs and shaw when Ryan Reynolds shot all his scenes in that one diner.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2020 07:15
|
|
|
The sequel to "Now You See Me" is called "Now You See Me 2". It should obviously be "Now You Don't"!!!! What is this, amateur hour?
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2020 09:18
|
|
|
SimonChris posted:The sequel to "Now You See Me" is called "Now You See Me 2". Dude,where’s my cards?
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2020 12:19
|
|
|
SimonChris posted:The sequel to "Now You See Me" is called "Now You See Me 2". Studio executive: "How will people know it's a sequel?" And they'd be right for about 30% of people.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2020 13:27
|
|
|
They could've added it as a subtitle
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2020 13:41
|
|
|
My problem with the first Now You See Me is that it wants to pretend that all the tricks are just stage magic but then throws in realistic holograms at the end. Also there's the whole thing about how the heroes have been running around getting revenge for something that happens off screen to a character that does not appear in the movie other than as a picture in a newspaper. This makes it difficult to feel like the revenge is justified at some points like with Morgan Freeman's character, who gets framed for robbing a bank even though his whole involvement was just that he exposed how a magician's tricks were done and he is kind of a jerk. The movie tries to say that it was his fault that said magician then did a dangerous trick that ended up with him dying but was it?
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2020 14:17
|
|
nexus6 posted:They could've added it as a subtitle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Now_You_See_Me_2 posted:The sequel was thought to be titled Now You See Me: Now You Don't,[12] with the director pushing for that name,[13] but the studio call announced in November 2014 was that the film had changed its title to Now You See Me: The Second Act. Turns out they actually tried that.
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2020 14:27
|
|
|
SimonChris posted:The sequel to "Now You See Me" is called "Now You See Me 2". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXdHBP6mgdE I don't like Dan Harmon, but this was pretty funny
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2020 14:40
|
|
|
Ravenfood posted:Oh I just assumed that Wade yelling the wrong name at all the henchmen was why he never got anywhere with them and that was the joke. Just not one they outright stated. That is definitely what it is but Deadpool doesn't do subtle well so I guess it's understandable people could miss it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2020 14:45
|
|
|
muscles like this! posted:My problem with the first Now You See Me is that it wants to pretend that all the tricks are just stage magic but then throws in realistic holograms at the end. Also there's the whole thing about how the heroes have been running around getting revenge for something that happens off screen to a character that does not appear in the movie other than as a picture in a newspaper. This makes it difficult to feel like the revenge is justified at some points like with Morgan Freeman's character, who gets framed for robbing a bank even though his whole involvement was just that he exposed how a magician's tricks were done and he is kind of a jerk. The movie tries to say that it was his fault that said magician then did a dangerous trick that ended up with him dying but was it? The entire revenge plot was dumb as gently caress. Why would you blame the lock safe company for their lock not loving opening under water? Would be a lovely lock if all you had to do was sink it for the thing to open!
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2020 03:16
|
|
|
Its the safe company's fault that he tried to use their safe in a magic trick that it was definitely not designed to do and he apparently never actually tested to see if it would work in the first place.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2020 03:24
|
|
|
The thing that bothers me the most about the now you see me movies is that everyone takes Woody Harrelson's character seriously. Mentalism is the dumbest form of "magic". also they really overdid that thing that I can't really concisely explain, but the thing where they all walk around in different directions as the camera zooms in on them while they say their spiel at the beginning of the shows. They did it in that always sunny high school reunion episode too before they did their dance thing. It's such a IIMM that i can't even adequately describe what it is or what annoys me about it. yeah I eat ass has a new favorite as of 03:33 on Dec 3, 2020 |
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2020 03:28
|
|
|
This isn't exactly their fault since other movies do it too but he also practices the movie magic version of hypnotism where he says one word to someone while touching them and they are under his complete control.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2020 03:31
|
|
|
muscles like this! posted:Morgan Freeman's character, who gets framed for robbing a bank even though his whole involvement was just that he exposed how a magician's tricks were done and he is kind of a jerk. The movie tries to say that it was his fault that said magician then did a dangerous trick that ended up with him dying but was it?
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2020 04:04
|
|
|
I haven't seen the second movie (because, you know, I thought the first was bad) but it sounds like they were trying to replicate the twist of the first one where the entire movie Mark Ruffalo's character has been chasing the magicians because he's a cop and then at the end of the movie he reveals that he actually set everything up and that he was using them to get revenge for his father (the previously mentioned dead magician.)
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2020 04:25
|
|
|
Cage posted:I never saw either movie but I just looked up both plot summaries and in the 2nd one its revealed Morgan Freeman was the dead guys friend/partner the whole time, and also the leader of the secret real magician crew. Wikipedia doesn't really say why he was cool with being framed in the earlier movie. I didn't see either movie so I'm hoping by "real magic" you mean literal sorcery and not just a more legit version of stage magic.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2020 05:43
|
|
|
Baron von Eevl posted:I didn't see either movie so I'm hoping by "real magic" you mean literal sorcery and not just a more legit version of stage magic. Yuuup
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2020 06:02
|
|
|
I kind of zoned out half way through the first film but it would have annoyed me less if they were supposed to be using real magic because I don't think a single trick they did was actually possible 
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2020 06:06
|
|
|
Was it the same movie where one of the douchebag-looking stars uses a deck of cards and a handkerchief to beat down an FBI assault team and a bunch of agents? I rolled my eyes so hard on that part that I still need to wear special prescription glasses.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2020 17:41
|
|
|
God Hole posted:still think it would have been a masterstroke to just replace tj miller's character with christopher plummer and not have it be acknowledged it at all There's a blink-and-you'll-miss-it News ticker during Deadpool 2 that says "Christopher Plummer turns down role in Deadpool 2" which I thought was a great gag.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2020 18:20
|
|
|
Along the lines of "poorly names sequels," Wreck it Ralph 2: Ralph BREAKS the Internet? I know the movie came out after all those God-awful "Break the internet with this picture of [celebrity]!" memes/PR stunts, but seriously, it's right there, Ralph Wrecks the Internet. Why would you even dream of doing anything other than that?
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2020 19:31
|
|
|
DrBouvenstein posted:Along the lines of "poorly names sequels," How about Rambo: First Blood 2 when "Second Blood" was right there? Or "IT: Chapter 2" instead of IIT?
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2020 20:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 12, 2024 16:52 |
|
|
Or how the first season of the anime was still called Lupin the 3rd. Get it together, Japan.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2020 20:16
|
|
