|
He's probably just pissy that the main menu doesn't change like in some Final Fantasy and Metal Gear Solid games after it's done.
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2020 19:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 04:14 |
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2020 05:01
|
|
|
Nani?!
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2020 05:07
|
|
|
Fire this new QA tester immediately for questioning my decisions.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2020 05:19
|
|
|
the dev is a goon and reading this thread, he just noticed that the dimension he's in houses NEET
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2020 05:21
|
|
|
Slumpy posted:the dev is a goon and reading this thread, he just noticed that the dimension he's in houses NEET Can't be, he has a neet doll on his desk
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2020 05:58
|
|
|
TheAardvark posted:Fire this new QA tester immediately for questioning my decisions.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2020 06:13
|
|
|
Someone call OSHA, that cord is a tripping hazard
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2020 06:16
|
|
|
This nii guy has an eye for detail, real promotion material
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2020 08:45
|
|
|
SniperWoreConverse posted:This nii guy has an eye for detail, real promotion material The most innocent developments in NEET's life (like submitting a report, eating a bowl of soup) fill me with anxiety. I'm half expecting his recommendation to be rejected, hurling him into a spiral of doom that ends in a suicide bombing.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2020 11:03
|
|
|
So uh, did he write the report in pen, scan it in, and then email it to the devs?
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2020 13:08
|
|
|
Hot Stunt posted:So uh, did he write the report in pen, scan it in, and then email it to the devs? I see you aren't familiar with the hyper-efficient ways of a Japanese office.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2020 16:02
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2020 17:26
|
|
|
i really like that this branch has occasions that actually make me smile.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2020 17:29
|
|
|
"He's working hard, that one" translation: this loving pendantic rear end in a top hat keeps nitpicking my code, he needs to gently caress off
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2020 20:03
|
|
|
CodfishCartographer posted:"He's working hard, that one" translation: this loving pendantic rear end in a top hat keeps nitpicking my code, he needs to gently caress off He also did the pushing up the glasses thing that happens before someone gets hosed up. Also kinda looks like hes powering up, you can see his chi outline
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2020 20:15
|
|
|
Lmao at the anime glasses push.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2020 08:00
|
|
|
SirSamVimes posted:Lmao at the anime glasses push. Just according to keikaku* *Keikaku means plan
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2020 10:34
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2020 15:38
|
|
|
Helios Grime posted:Just according to keikaku* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paTW3wOyIYw&t=10s
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2020 15:45
|
|
|
That's a very polite bug report.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2020 20:07
|
|
|
That's how I write my bug reports. Oh God, I'm NEET!
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2020 21:52
|
|
|
Can't imagine a world where a tester writes "thank you" in a bug, unless it's passive aggressively in a comment
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2020 00:01
|
|
|
It's not a bug report. It's a request.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2020 00:08
|
|
|
To be fair, it's also hard to imagine a non-lead/manager tester submitting a suggestion and not having it closed on the spot lmao
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2020 00:21
|
|
|
He forgot to ask the dev to do the needful. Amateur.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2020 00:40
|
|
|
i think it's just standard japanese politeness in the request. for all we know all bug tickets have a prefilled "thank you for your consideration" or whatever
Space Kablooey fucked around with this message at 00:53 on Dec 23, 2020 |
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2020 00:49
|
|
|
Space Kablooey posted:i think it's just standard japanese politeness in the request. for all we know all bug tickets have a prefilled "thank you for your consideration" or whatever Yeah that's what I figured. Still funny looking at it from an American tester point of view, where the qa and dev teams are often in direct opposition with each other lmao
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2020 03:24
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2020 08:55
|
|
|
Does Quality Assurance literally only entail bug testing? There must be tons of ergonomic or human-machine-interface standards and best practices that should be checked for compliance. Like making sure that there are sufficient presets for different kinds of colorblindness, that subtitles are legible, that your game doesn't trigger seizures (CDPR excluded), and so on. There is an entire industry devoted to human factors engineering. Does that fall under the umbrella of dev or qa?
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2020 11:07
|
|
|
Most action I've seen in a long time
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2020 15:36
|
|
|
Lord Stimperor posted:Does Quality Assurance literally only entail bug testing? There must be tons of ergonomic or human-machine-interface standards and best practices that should be checked for compliance. Like making sure that there are sufficient presets for different kinds of colorblindness, that subtitles are legible, that your game doesn't trigger seizures (CDPR excluded), and so on. There is an entire industry devoted to human factors engineering. Does that fall under the umbrella of dev or qa? Highly variable across companies; historically that poo poo only got done if someone somewhere in the team had a personal interest in it. If it were an industry standard, CDPR wouldn't have happened over a decade out from pokemon seizures.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2020 16:08
|
|
|
Lord Stimperor posted:Does Quality Assurance literally only entail bug testing? There must be tons of ergonomic or human-machine-interface standards and best practices that should be checked for compliance. Like making sure that there are sufficient presets for different kinds of colorblindness, that subtitles are legible, that your game doesn't trigger seizures (CDPR excluded), and so on. There is an entire industry devoted to human factors engineering. Does that fall under the umbrella of dev or qa? There's a joke I've heard among QA teams that the job shouldn't be called Quality Assurance, but rather Functional Assurance. In theory, it's QA's job to not just point out bugs, but also point out parts of the game that aren't user friendly, parts where the difficulty or balance feel off, and really anything that would make the game "better". Unfortunately though, in many (most?) companies QA is just there to ensure that the game is functionally sound. There are many reasons for this - animosity between QA and dev teams, QA not starting in full on projects until it's too late to make major changes, the stigma that QA teams are filled with underpaid labor that doesn't care about their job and thus shouldn't be trusted with game design decisions, etc. The ironic part is that the companies that will take QA suggestions seriously are often the ones that need them the least, since it shows their upper management and dev teams are taking others into consideration so they probably already have a good eye for user friendly design. So to directly answer your question, it falls under the devs to design the user experience to be as friendly as possible. QA can write up tickets with suggestions for improvement, but these are often ignored by devs, closed by leads/producers before getting to devs, or entirely discouraged from the start.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2020 16:30
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2020 18:12
|
|
|
Awww, look at him go!
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2020 18:52
|
|
|
Whoops that quick code change caused 400 regressions that won't get retested before release.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2020 19:31
|
|
|
Sir Bobert Fishbone posted:Whoops that quick code change caused 400 regressions that won't get retested before release. Or Tohru has to regression test all those cases again.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2020 19:40
|
|
|
azurite posted:Or Tohru has to regression test all those cases again. Oh that's even better 
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2020 19:48
|
|
|
azurite posted:Or Tohru has to regression test all those cases again. If he does they might give him a picture in the credits. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2020 19:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 04:14 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2020 06:30
|
|