(Thread IKs:
Platystemon)
|
So we're just patenting black mirror episodes wholesale now eh?
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 06:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 18:27 |
|
|
i dont see a problem here, microsoft's last chatbot worked out pretty well
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 07:10
|
|
|
goatsestretchgoals posted:i dont see a problem here, microsoft's last chatbot worked out pretty well I can’t even imagine how badly something like this-if it could be made to work which lmao-would just entirely wreck the entire grieving/healing process and just leave the person stuck
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 07:32
|
|
|
Is there a way to just make the bot keep posting for me in death? Becoming the goon Herman Cane.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 07:33
|
|
|
owns bones, similar approaches should work OK with artificial hallucinated people. can't wait until we've removed all of the ethical issues with porn because its just ai generated people. might be a bit weird if you could seed the generator with pictures, like of microwave's mom or something, idk im not a futurist, certainly it won't be used for weird terrible poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 07:39
|
|
|
my mom: "s..son, is that you?" me reincarnated: "lol cum"
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 07:59
|
|
|
Can you really patent something that has been so overdone already in sci-fi stories? I'm guessing the actual patent is something technological?
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 08:01
|
|
|
Software patents are a big pile of lol so yes you absolutely can patent it
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 08:01
|
|
|
fondue posted:They need to remake Disney's, "The Black Hole," I don't care how it happens, I just want a remake, preferably one that isn't done by J. J. Abrams.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 08:18
|
|
|
a few DRUNK BONERS posted:Software patents are a big pile of lol so yes you absolutely can patent it remember how some games used to have little mini games in the load screens before namco patented it
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 08:31
|
|
|
i say swears online posted:my mom: "s..son, is that you?" perfect impression. 10/10, microsoft
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 08:45
|
|
|
i'll accept this only if we see Nadella come on stage at the next big conference wearing bear onesie pajamas
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 09:02
|
|
|
Chatbot: I wish I could have been there for your graduation, I'm sure you looked lovely BUT CHECK OUT THIS COUPON FOR THE LATEST MICROSOFT OFFICE(TM)!
freelop has issued a correction as of 09:17 on Jan 22, 2021 |
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 09:10
|
|
|
a few DRUNK BONERS posted:Software patents are a big pile of lol so yes you absolutely can patent it
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 09:58
|
|
|
It sounds interesting but in practice it'd be less like the friendly ghost of grandma saying comforting things from a happy afterlife, and more like the macabre horror of a resurrected simulacrum facing its own existential oblivion. That's not to say they won't go ahead with it, but it's gonna have to be fakey and saccharine as hell with loads of "never say this" and "you WILL be happy" rules, because otherwise the bot would probably be all "AHHH I DIED PLEASE DON'T TURN ME OFF OH GOD NO I DONT WANT TO BE DEAD AGAIN", as you would reasonably expect. At least that's what I've learned from time spent torturing GPT-3.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 10:57
|
|
|
I'm reminded of the babylon 5 episode where some bad guys make a Garibaldi hologram? And it sabotages their efforts and destroys them and itself. Which would be the best outcome.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 11:04
|
|
|
i say swears online posted:my mom: "s..son, is that you?" Lmao
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 12:06
|
|
|
Syd Midnight posted:"AHHH I DIED PLEASE DON'T TURN ME OFF OH GOD NO I DONT WANT TO BE DEAD AGAIN", as you would reasonably expect.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 13:13
|
|
|
goatsestretchgoals posted:i dont see a problem here, microsoft's last chatbot worked out pretty well i mean, you can not say it was an inaccurate reflection of america
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 13:19
|
|
|
ekuNNN posted:Can you really patent something that has been so overdone already in sci-fi stories? I'm guessing the actual patent is something technological? You can file a patent on anything, but it doesn't mean that you'll get it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 13:45
|
|
|
 mods???
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 15:01
|
|
|
ekuNNN posted:Can you really patent something that has been so overdone already in sci-fi stories? I'm guessing the actual patent is something technological? I was told last time I was curious about patenting something, I was told that software patents really only exist for the sake of major corporations having a "mutually assured destruction" arsenal to use against each other and engage in pissing matches. They don't work for the "little guy", so small businesses asking about it usually have no use for it except to sate their own egos. https://ask.metafilter.com/190897/Why-arent-websites-usually-patented https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/93806/should-i-patent-my-software I had been thinking along the lines of allowing people to construct an NPC dialog tree by recording videos, with a UI for navigating the tree, but never this creepy AI stuff. Maybe it'd be worth applying for that just to gently caress with Microsoft (supposing I were serious about such a project) or hope they'd buy me out. Ideas are a dime a dozen, but you don't even have to follow up on them yourself to get a patent. galenanorth has issued a correction as of 15:15 on Jan 22, 2021 |
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 15:05
|
|
|
galenanorth posted:I was told last time I was curious about patenting something, I was told that software patents really only exist for the sake of major corporations having a "mutually assured destruction" arsenal to use against each other and engage in pissing matches. They don't work for the "little guy", so small businesses asking about it usually have no use for it except to sate their own egos. Well there’s that, and then there are patent trolls. The one thing that patents aren’t used for is To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 15:13
|
|
|
goatsestretchgoals posted:i dont see a problem here, microsoft's last chatbot worked out pretty well Becoming like Tay (ie extremely bigoted and yolo demented) does line up with the final stage of the aging process as I've observed it in relatives.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 15:37
|
|
|
Yeah UncleTay wouldn't be that much different from my actual uncle.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 15:42
|
|
|
Can we at least make some sort of AI hell for these necromantic creations
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 16:01
|
|
|
Inceltown posted:Is there a way to just make the bot keep posting for me in death? Becoming the goon Herman Cane. this is why i make a point of posting every day. this technology should have enough data by now to make a fairly good Rutibex posting bot. such a bot could live for a million years, so its very important to me that i get the shiposting technique correct
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 16:26
|
|
|
Syd Midnight posted:At least that's what I've learned from time spent torturing GPT-3. i wonder what its like to experience neural net training from the neural nets perspective. is it like being locked in a featureless room with nothing but cat pictures to look at?
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 16:30
|
|
|
Rutibex posted:i wonder what its like to experience neural net training from the neural nets perspective. is it like being locked in a featureless room with nothing but cat pictures to look at? its not like anything, op neural nets are big ol probability matrices, theres nothing in there
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 19:54
|
|
|
"neural net" is just a fancy name for a pattern matching algorithm that was inspired by a simplified model of how real neurons work, there is nothing approaching thought or perception going on
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 20:04
|
|
|
Carthag Tuek posted:its not like anything, op MLYP lol, burn
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 20:05
|
|
|
BattleMaster posted:"neural net" is just a fancy name for a pattern matching algorithm that was inspired by a simplified model of how real neurons work, there is nothing approaching thought or perception going on 
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 20:06
|
|
|
Facebook Aunt posted:MLYP it u lol   y0u = fa+++AT
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 20:11
|
|
|
Carthag Tuek posted:it u wow, rude
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 20:13
|
|
|
Oyak posted:I'd like to bitch about Neuromancer. It makes absolutely zero sense starting about 1/2 way in where they start to go inside the networks. It is impossible to follow what actions Gibson is trying to portray on the page because he is bad at writing. I seem to recall a hacker Rastafarian a la Jar Jar Binks making an appearance. i actually haven't read the sprawl trilogy yet, but the bridge trilogy and the blue ant trilogies are great. i love gibson's prose, i think he's an excellent writer. his short stories are great, too. but in his last book, Agency, the succ is just insane. the idea is that a future version of our world figured out how to make 'stubs' of their past, basically alternate universes that fork from a specific point in the past. they can exchange information but not material. in the first book of the trilogy, The Peripheral, Gibson explores how people in the future version of our universe are 'third worlding' labor to one of these 'stubs'. think Amazon mechanical turk, but the workers are in 'the past' in an alternate universe you created. one of the things in the background of Agency is that Hillary won 2016 and Russian involvement in the Syrian civil war goes slightly differently, the algorithms of the future are predicting that there will be a global nuclear war in the 'stub' where Hillary won. at the beginning of the book we're primed to think that the protagonists would prevent it. Being a Gibson fan I assumed that Hillary was actually going to be the cause of the war given her tenure as SoS but nope, pure succ brain worms. there were some clues that hillary was the reason for the potential nuclear war (the 'stub' hillary won in was created by a psychopath that likes creating miserable alternate universes to torture people... like a world where Hillary wins!) but it just turns out to be teenage fanfic levels of cringe. Turns out the protagonists don't impact the nuclear tensions at all, 45 fixes the problem all by herself. None of the nuclear tension stuff has anything to do with the plot of the novel, it's just background noise. Here's the conversation when someone asks if the protagonists were responsible for averting nuclear war: quote:“Nope. That’s the president. Plus, as our London pals remind me, the United States having a fully functioning State Department. We did check her work, though. Close to perfect, except for one little thing, something she did for the right reasons but then couldn’t see why it hadn’t worked.” Here's the end of the penultimate chapter. What the gently caress is this poo poo, Gibson? What the gently caress? quote:The president,” said Kathy Fang. “She got us out of it.” Verity saw Joe-Eddy smirk. “Eunice says it was the president,” Verity said to him.“The president,” said Kathy Fang, raising her coffee, and they all clinked mugs, toasting the president. Conner, in the drone, thrust its manipulator’s thumb-equivalents up in support, and she heard Ash’s voice join in as well.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 20:31
|
|
|
IAMKOREA posted:What the gently caress? 
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 20:46
|
|
|
Taintrunner posted:
Lol, get a load of these libs.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 20:52
|
|
|
BattleMaster posted:"neural net" is just a fancy name for a pattern matching algorithm that was inspired by a simplified model of how real neurons work, there is nothing approaching thought or perception going on much like my posting 
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 20:54
|
|
|
Mods, execute Taintrunner 66.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 21:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 18:27 |
|
|
These people are the biggest rubes. Freezing causes cells to dehydrate and rupture. Good luck recovering from that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2021 21:41
|
|
