|
BigBallChunkyTime posted:I read that it may be a reflex to keep a kippah on. Ah, well, that makes sense.
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 00:27 |
|
|
Aruan posted:you must acquit my client because of all the crimes he's committed! constitutional stack overflow
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:10
|
|
|
Oh, I just assumed they had some sort of special hat glue. How do they stay on then
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:11
|
|
|
"Where is the due process?", I scream to the assembled jury of my peers. "How am I to defend myself?", I ask my team of attorneys.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:12
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/sarahkendzior/status/1359245132206374913 that honestly explains alot.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:12
|
|
|
Pick posted:Oh, I just assumed they had some sort of special hat glue. How do they stay on then there's a hairclip sewn inside
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:13
|
|
|
Is Trump gonna be made to take the stand, and if not why not? Because boy oh boy would I like to see him go up there and perjure himself while simultaneously admitting to everything and saying he'll do it again.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:13
|
|
|
Pick posted:Oh, I just assumed they had some sort of special hat glue. How do they stay on then Hair clips or just friction
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:13
|
|
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:https://twitter.com/sarahkendzior/status/1359245132206374913 He finally got to reach his apogee and defend the worst of the worst, the president of the United States of America
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:14
|
|
|
GlyphGryph posted:Is Trump gonna be made to take the stand, and if not why not? No. And because he doesn't want to. Those are, sadly, the actual answers to your questions.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:14
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/1359248615613603841
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:14
|
|
|
feedmyleg posted:No. And because he doesn't want to. Those are, sadly, the actual answers to your questions. Why... why does that matter? I was under the impression the Senate could just... order people to testify? Not that I'm not enjoying the mess we're seeing right now (although maybe enjoyment is the wrong word), but it seems like the easiest way to get people to pay attention would be to give him the chance to admit his guilt live. Anyway, I am really not understanding this Due Process argument. What is the argument they're trying to make here...? Aren't they expressly arguing that Trump must be given the "right" to show up and confront his accusers? What is the due process they are saying Trump didn't get? I can't figure it out. GlyphGryph fucked around with this message at 22:20 on Feb 9, 2021 |
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:17
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Bencjacobs/status/1359250336549076993
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:20
|
|
|
I'm just waiting for one of the lawyers to whip out his cover and sing "I shot the Senate buuuut I didn't shoot the deputyyyy"
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:20
|
|
|
GlyphGryph posted:Why... why does that matter? I was under the impression the Senate could just... order people to testify? Every single word he's uttering about due process is a bad faith argument. This isn't a criminal trial and Trump is owed no due process. Edit: More accurately, the trial itself is the due process. A trial he has expressly refused to attend. Unponderable fucked around with this message at 22:30 on Feb 9, 2021 |
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:21
|
|
|
GlyphGryph posted:Why... why does that matter? I was under the impression the Senate could just... order people to testify? They're not making any arguments. They know their defense doesn't matter and Republicans will acquit regardless. They're just filling time.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:21
|
|
|
He's lying and saying that it's the Dem's fault that the trial didn't happen when Trump was still President wtf. https://twitter.com/jameshohmann/status/1359251097710395398 https://twitter.com/danpfeiffer/status/1359251404213293057 Thom12255 fucked around with this message at 22:24 on Feb 9, 2021 |
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:21
|
|
|
Deteriorata posted:They're not making any arguments. They know their defense doesn't matter and Republicans will acquit regardless. They're just filling time. They're making bad-faith arguments. McConnell wouldn't have taken up the trial until right before the 20th. Edit: All they can do is be dishonest. Full stop.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:22
|
|
|
Deteriorata posted:They're not making any arguments. They know their defense doesn't matter and Republicans will acquit regardless. They're just filling time. The editors at Fox, OANN and Newsmax will just scan through eveything they say for 20 seconds of something that sounds good and just air that and call it a success. Everything else is just there so that it looks like they used their time to give compelling arguments. If they spoke for 5 minutes some of the marks would notice that maybe that doesn't seem right.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:23
|
|
|
Please tell me the trump guy is using the manga carter defence
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:24
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/RadioFreeTom/status/1359251837082161154
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:24
|
|
|
How can Congress not have jurisdiction in a thing that explicitly says it has jurisdiction in?
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:25
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/RameshPonnuru/status/1359251834314096642
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:26
|
|
|
You are extremely biased against the person who tried to get you killed
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:27
|
|
|
"Snap judgement."
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:28
|
|
|
And this guy's ^^^ a loving idiot! 
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:29
|
|
|
Wait, I just came back to this. Was that Mao's Red Book he was holding up?
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:29
|
|
|
I didn't realize they read the USPol threads 
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:30
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/1359253223069126657
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:30
|
|
|
So if we follow this argument that no impeachment can be brought ever because it is inherently a bill of attainder.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:30
|
|
|
GD_American posted:Wait, I just came back to this. Was that Mao's Red Book he was holding up? Looked like it yes. I want a supercut of every time this nerd says "due process."
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:30
|
|
|
Angry_Ed posted:I didn't realize they read the USPol threads Chris Hayes has a C-SPAM piss tape hat. Make of that what you will...
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:31
|
|
|
So am I right in understanding his current argument is that the very concept of impeachment, period, is unconstitutional?
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:31
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/danielsgoldman/status/1359252743651753991
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:31
|
|
|
Why doesn't he just wear a kippah as he evidently does the rest of the time?
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:33
|
|
|
PT6A posted:Why doesn't he just wear a kippah as he evidently does the rest of the time? And get even more death threats from the alt-right?
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:34
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1359254198232170496 He's just throwing as much lying rear end poo poo at the wall and seeing what Rubio loves the most to use as his excuse on Fox.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:34
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/LemieuxLGM/status/1359253399271657472 https://twitter.com/KevinMKruse/status/1359255524232097793 https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/1359255348926906371 https://twitter.com/MEPFuller/status/1359255670181294083 Thom12255 fucked around with this message at 22:40 on Feb 9, 2021 |
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:35
|
|
|
How's the trial going, since I'm not watching it?
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 00:27 |
|
|
Grouchio posted:How's the trial going, since I'm not watching it? It's a smokescreen. The outcome is pre-determined, so why would Trump send anyone but two rubes to go and make fraudulent statements and bad-faith arguments?
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2021 22:43
|
|