OSHA IV: NO SAFETY - SMOKING FIRST - The Something Awful Forums

The Something Awful Forums > Main > General Bullshit > OSHA IV: NO SAFETY - SMOKING FIRST

BlackIronHeart: Aug 2, 2004; PROCEED

Home builder lost 4 fingers on one hand at the second joints to his jointer, documented the accident and recovery. NO gore, first video is him in the hospital talking to the camera.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8XEQ1XKYNDXTUhEZWcHAPZlpXBu__wui

# ? Feb 21, 2021 03:17

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ? Jun 4, 2024 19:05

Woodsy Owl: Oct 27, 2004

Jet Jaguar posted:

"Yeah, I think we should go..."

https://twitter.com/BAREESTHETICSCO/status/1363234729680465920

loving terrifying, not a mask to be seen.

# ? Feb 21, 2021 04:01

mostlygray: Nov 1, 2012; BURY ME AS I LIVED, A FREE MAN ON THE CLUTCH

Zopotantor posted:

Nice. I wasn�t much older when they taught me to drive big-rear end trucks in the army.

I was a bit younger when I learned to operate farm equipment. Combines, tractors, etc. Once I could reach the pedals, I could drive the two ton, IHR grain truck. Basically a deuce if one uses military terminology.

Single rear axle. We didn't have any trucks with a tag axle. We'd just hook up a drying wagon. 26,000 lbs for the loaded truck, 14,000lbs for the loaded trailer. The windshield was smashed right in your vision so you had to poke your head out the window. The rear view mirror on that side was broken too. The axle only worked in high range so It was really hard to get the truck moving. Also, it only ran on 6.5 cylinders out of 8. It had no power steering. The hydraulics leaked like crazy.

It worked though. Just not easy. It did have a functioning cigar lighter. Starter worked fine. The choke also was easy and you didn't have to fight with it. The headlights worked so that was nice. Radio didn't work, but it was cool to have the key on the left side and the starter was a button.

# ? Feb 21, 2021 04:50

Sagebrush: Feb 26, 2012; ERM... Actually I have stellar scores on the surveys, and every year students tell me that my classes are the best ones they’ve ever taken.

SubNat posted:

it still produced ~400 kW/h of power

Kilowatts already include time in the unit. It generated 400 kilowatts of power and that's a continuous figure, every minute, every hour. If it produced 400 kilowatts for one hour that is 1.44 gigajoules of energy (or 400 kilowatt-hours).

:spergin:

a kitten posted:

More demon core

https://twitter.com/tech_yuuta/status/1363078036946493440?s=20

I think the LED should fade in and out as the halves close and open

Sagebrush fucked around with this message at 05:28 on Feb 21, 2021

# ? Feb 21, 2021 05:15

Alkydere: Jun 7, 2010; Capitol: A building or complex of buildings in which any legislature meets.
Capital: A city designated as a legislative seat by the government or some other authority, often the city in which the government is located; otherwise the most important city within a country or a subdivision of it.

https://twitter.com/Bran_the_Onion/status/1363095934637273089

# ? Feb 21, 2021 05:25

Memento: Aug 25, 2009; Bleak Gremlin

Sagebrush posted:

Kilowatts already include time in the unit. It generated 400 kilowatts of power and that's a continuous figure, every minute, every hour. If it produced 400 kilowatts for one hour that is 1.44 gigajoules of energy (or 400 kilowatt-hours).

And it produced vastly more than that. From this article it ran for around 3 days (jan 14-17 1998) at 720rpm, which is the right speed to provide 60hz AC. Calculations put that at around 375kW.

# ? Feb 21, 2021 05:31

Megillah Gorilla: Sep 22, 2003; If only all of life's problems could be solved by smoking a professor of ancient evil texts.; Bread Liar

Traxis posted:

Yikes

https://twitter.com/michaelagiulia/status/1363241125495136267?s=19

https://twitter.com/petemuntean/status/1363234750626955265?s=19

Bound for Honolulu. Thankfully it didn't happen over the Pacific

Found the other half of the video:

https://i.imgur.com/8i0HtgO.mp4

# ? Feb 21, 2021 05:53

GotLag: Jul 17, 2005; 食べちゃダメだよ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04Lgdll4akE

# ? Feb 21, 2021 06:02

Dirk the Average: Feb 7, 2012; "This may have been a mistake."

Sagebrush posted:

Kilowatts already include time in the unit. It generated 400 kilowatts of power and that's a continuous figure, every minute, every hour. If it produced 400 kilowatts for one hour that is 1.44 gigajoules of energy (or 400 kilowatt-hours).

Nah, it's clearly producing 400kW/h, or 400kW after 60 minutes, 800kW after 120 minutes...

# ? Feb 21, 2021 06:11

French Canadian: Feb 23, 2004; Fluffy cat sensory experience

Megillah Gorilla posted:

Found the other half of the video:

https://i.imgur.com/8i0HtgO.mp4

That's amazing

# ? Feb 21, 2021 06:14

The Lone Badger: Sep 24, 2007

French Canadian posted:

That's amazing

As someone pointed out in another thread, the fire is exactly where it's supposed to be. The problem is that you can see it.

# ? Feb 21, 2021 06:16

Fuck You And Diebold: Sep 15, 2004; by Athanatos

I mean, I don't think it should be that wobbly either, but I am not a plane

# ? Feb 21, 2021 06:20

EvenWorseOpinions: Jun 10, 2017

There is a vibration monitor to measure the vibration of the engine in inches per second. If the monitor is still attached, it is probably reading a little high

# ? Feb 21, 2021 06:22

Jet Jaguar: Feb 12, 2006; Don't touch my bags if you please, Mr Customs Man.

GotLag posted:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04Lgdll4akE

This is some Final Destination poo poo, at least some of these. My god.

# ? Feb 21, 2021 06:23

May Contain Nuts: Sep 12, 2007; but still delicious

Dirk the Average posted:

Nah, it's clearly producing 400kW/h, or 400kW after 60 minutes, 800kW after 120 minutes...

That's not how you measure power. It's an instantaneous measurement. A 60w bulb doesn't use 60 watts every hour, it requires 60 watts every instant to keep it illuminated and uses it uses 60 watt-hours every hour.

If it is putting out 400kW then after an hour it will have put out 400kWh

Imagine it was a horse putting out 1 horsepower. (If we assume a horse puts out 1hp) The amount of power the horse produces is 1hp. In an hour at capacity the horse will have produced 1hp for one hour, but at any given moment the it was producing 1hp.

Electrical power is amps x volts and amps is Coulombs (a very large number of electrons) per second, so the power figure already is [other variables]/time. Your utility is billed by kWh, cancelling out the time variable and essentially charging you for the number of electrons you used at a specific voltage.

May Contain Nuts fucked around with this message at 06:44 on Feb 21, 2021

# ? Feb 21, 2021 06:33

DR FRASIER KRANG: Feb 4, 2005; "Are you forgetting that just this afternoon I was punched in the face by a turtle now dead?

May Contain Nuts posted:

Thats not how you measure power. It's an instantaneous measurement. A 60w bulb doesn't use 60 watts every hour, it requires 60 watts every instant to keep it illuminated and uses it uses 60 watt-hours every hour.

If it is putting out 400kW then after an hour it will have put out 400kWh

Imagine it was a horse putting out 1 horsepower. (If we assume a horse puts out 1hp) The amount of power the horse can produce is 1hp. In an hour at capacity the horse will have produced 1hp for one hour, but at any given moment the it was producing 1hp.

ONE HORSE POWER HOUR is a good name for something. Mods?

# ? Feb 21, 2021 06:36

Turrurrurrurrrrrrr: Dec 22, 2018; I hope this is "battle" enough for you, friend.

The Lone Badger posted:

As someone pointed out in another thread, the fire is exactly where it's supposed to be. The problem is that you can see it.

Yeah, I read an internet forum post and that's normal and just like it should be.

# ? Feb 21, 2021 06:38

Dirk the Average: Feb 7, 2012; "This may have been a mistake."

May Contain Nuts posted:

Thats not how you measure power. It's an instantaneous measurement. A 60w bulb doesn't use 60 watts every hour, it requires 60 watts every instant to keep it illuminated and uses it uses 60 watt-hours every hour.

If it is putting out 400kW then after an hour it will have put out 400kWh

Imagine it was a horse putting out 1 horsepower. (If we assume a horse puts out 1hp) The amount of power the horse can produce is 1hp. In an hour at capacity the horse will have produced 1hp for one hour, but at any given moment the it was producing 1hp.

It was a joke. 400kW/h is effectively an acceleration of energy, or a velocity of power. It would mean that the rate of power is linearly increasing by 400kW every hour.

# ? Feb 21, 2021 06:40

Sagebrush: Feb 26, 2012; ERM... Actually I have stellar scores on the surveys, and every year students tell me that my classes are the best ones they’ve ever taken.

May Contain Nuts posted:

Thats not how you measure power. It's an instantaneous measurement. A 60w bulb doesn't use 60 watts every hour, it requires 60 watts every instant to keep it illuminated and uses it uses 60 watt-hours every hour.

If it is putting out 400kW then after an hour it will have put out 400kWh

Imagine it was a horse putting out 1 horsepower. (If we assume a horse puts out 1hp) The amount of power the horse can produce is 1hp. In an hour at capacity the horse will have produced 1hp for one hour, but at any given moment the it was producing 1hp.

I believe Dirk the Average is pointing out that 400kW/h is a measure of the rate of change of power, so perhaps the engine starts out at 0kW and then ramps up to 400kW after one hour, 800kW after two hours, 1200kW after three, and so on. The instantaneous power figure is constantly changing and the total energy production can be calculated through integration.

e: yeah

# ? Feb 21, 2021 06:43

Sagebrush: Feb 26, 2012; ERM... Actually I have stellar scores on the surveys, and every year students tell me that my classes are the best ones they’ve ever taken.

Also a horse can hit a maximum power output of around 15 horsepower. One horsepower was originally an estimate of how much power a horse could produce continuously over the course of a workday, for easy comparison to steam engines. Top human athletes can peak at around one horsepower, or sustain 80-120 watts for many hours.

:eng101:

# ? Feb 21, 2021 06:45

May Contain Nuts: Sep 12, 2007; but still delicious

Ah yes, the elusive Exponential Motion Machine. Has thermodynamics disproved that yet?

# ? Feb 21, 2021 06:47

Elviscat: Jan 1, 2008; Well don't you know I'm caught in a trap?

OSHA IV: FUN WITH THERMODYNAMICS!!!

What's y'all's favorite equation? Mine's using the delta-m of the fission fragments from their parent nucleus to find the resultant energy release, simply multiply by the speed of light squared.

Fuckin' Nerds.

Elviscat fucked around with this message at 07:05 on Feb 21, 2021

# ? Feb 21, 2021 06:59

FCKGW: May 21, 2006

Doorbell cam of airplane parts littering the neighborhood. Sound on.

https://twitter.com/mattmauronews/status/1363332067577094144?s=21

# ? Feb 21, 2021 07:11

Zero One: Dec 30, 2004; HAIL TO THE VICTORS!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7-zh7Sebr8

ATC from the 777

# ? Feb 21, 2021 07:27

MisterOblivious: Mar 17, 2010; by sebmojo

Sagebrush posted:

Also a horse can hit a maximum power output of around 15 horsepower. One horsepower was originally an estimate of how much power a horse could produce continuously over the course of a workday, for easy comparison to steam engines. Top human athletes can peak at around one horsepower, or sustain 80-120 watts for many hours.

That's rather outdated. A lovely cyclist can sustain 100 watt output with the pros over 300 with peaks much higher.

# ? Feb 21, 2021 07:32

Platystemon: Feb 13, 2012; BREADS

I can sustain one hundred watts, thermal, just sitting here.

# ? Feb 21, 2021 07:40

Elviscat: Jan 1, 2008; Well don't you know I'm caught in a trap?

Platystemon posted:

I can sustain one hundred watts, thermal, just sitting here.

Yeah, but once you factor in efficiency that ain't poo poo for powrr

# ? Feb 21, 2021 07:46

Memento: Aug 25, 2009; Bleak Gremlin

FCKGW posted:

Doorbell cam of airplane parts littering the neighborhood. Sound on.

https://twitter.com/mattmauronews/status/1363332067577094144?s=21

I think the pipe at 0:20 is this thing

# ? Feb 21, 2021 08:11

Tochiazuma: Feb 16, 2007

MisterOblivious posted:

That's rather outdated. A lovely cyclist can sustain 100 watt output with the pros over 300 with peaks much higher.

The 'sustain' number might be low, but saying a pro peaks at 1hp = roughly 750W isn't outdated. Here's a cyclist powering a 700W toaster... briefly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4O5voOCqAQ

# ? Feb 21, 2021 09:42

j.peeba: Oct 25, 2010; Almost Human; Nap Ghost

poo poo POST MALONE posted:

ONE HORSE POWER HOUR is a good name for something. Mods?

I�m more of a POWER KHAN or Bigger Longer More Times More Sperms guy myself

# ? Feb 21, 2021 11:04

YerDa Zabam: Aug 13, 2016

Tochiazuma posted:

The 'sustain' number might be low, but saying a pro peaks at 1hp = roughly 750W isn't outdated. Here's a cyclist powering a 700W toaster... briefly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4O5voOCqAQ

Something something, leg day.

# ? Feb 21, 2021 11:19

Platystemon: Feb 13, 2012; BREADS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJbc7Vk9h0k

# ? Feb 21, 2021 12:03

NoneMoreNegative: Jul 20, 2000; GOTH FASCISTIC
PAIN MASTER

shit wizard dad

Tochiazuma posted:

The 'sustain' number might be low, but saying a pro peaks at 1hp = roughly 750W isn't outdated. Here's a cyclist powering a 700W toaster... briefly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4O5voOCqAQ

Is it a quad toaster?

Ouch, it certainly is!

# ? Feb 21, 2021 12:41

zedprime: Jun 9, 2007; yospos

Elviscat posted:

OSHA IV: FUN WITH THERMODYNAMICS!!!

What's y'all's favorite equation? Mine's using the delta-m of the fission fragments from their parent nucleus to find the resultant energy release, simply multiply by the speed of light squared.

Fuckin' Nerds.

I remembered the word fugacity in the shower the other day, along with my eternal disappointment that it ends in -ity yet it's an equation tidying concept instead of an apparent physical property or force. Getting to fugacity in physical chemistry like finally, an English word, and it ends in -ity. Bet it's real obvious! Haha, ofc not, nothing is obvious in physical chemistry besides the end of anything with organization or a form.

# ? Feb 21, 2021 13:23