Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
GD_American
Jul 21, 2004

LISTEN TO WHAT I HAVE TO SAY AS IT'S INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT!
Ah, my best friend in the Army was an employee there. Then he became a guest.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Dr. Quarex
Apr 18, 2003

I'M A BIG DORK WHO POSTS TOO MUCH ABOUT CONVENTIONS LOOK AT THIS

TOVA TOVA TOVA

Delorence Fickle posted:

I gotta find something that wont leave my mind a burning husk at the end of the day. I'm dying to find a KISS job now.
I hear you; I do not regret many things, but quitting my sweet federal job for its lack of Telework in late 2019 is fairly regrettable

Rakeris posted:

Well lucky for you we have ~150 locations, https://www.bop.gov/locations/ some are waaaay worse than others so pick your number out of a hat carefully. If they have a 10-25% salary incentive for taking a job at that location, there is a very good reason for that...
:stare:

Well I DO have a criminal justice degree hiding in my endless shower of degrees

REMEMBER SPONGE MONKEYS
Oct 3, 2003

What do you think it means, bitch?

Dr. Quarex posted:

I hear you; I do not regret many things, but quitting my sweet federal job for its lack of Telework in late 2019 is fairly regrettable

:stare:

Well I DO have a criminal justice degree hiding in my endless shower of degrees

Would you say it’s a golden shower?

Dream Weaver
Jan 23, 2007
Sweat Baby, sweat baby
But do they have 0346/0343 logistics management or Contracting jobs? In the GS 11/12/13 range?

Rakeris
Jul 20, 2014

White Chocolate posted:

But do they have 0346/0343 logistics management or Contracting jobs? In the GS 11/12/13 range?

Not sure on the 0346/0343s specifically, but there is at least one contract management dude/dudet at every prison and a few in the ROs and a whole lot at GP and DC. Not sure on all the ladders but the peeps I work with are 11/12/13s. I've never really got into that side of things, but from talking to them it seems to be a lot of getting/approving bids and jobs that go into 7+ digits, and sometimes going to where the thing is and making sure that things™ are happening?

Midjack
Dec 24, 2007



Not sure if this would be good or not but it's different, I guess: https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/10/perspectives/public-service-private-sector-minnesota/index.html

Howard Phillips
May 4, 2008

His smile; it shines in the darkest of depths. There is hope yet.

Good for him but he we don't necessarily need everyone to go into government.

Dr. Quarex
Apr 18, 2003

I'M A BIG DORK WHO POSTS TOO MUCH ABOUT CONVENTIONS LOOK AT THIS

TOVA TOVA TOVA
Sure we do. 100% employment! Keep your downtown clean for minimum wage. Perfect

Xelkelvos
Dec 19, 2012

Dr. Quarex posted:

Sure we do. 100% employment! Keep your downtown clean for minimum wage. Perfect

We could always use more people sweeping the forests.

Ignatius M. Meen
May 26, 2011

Hello yes I heard there was a lovely trainwreck here and...

Public works campaigns to build/rebuild infrastructure that is bad or non-existent would be awesome; you get infrastructure that makes the society work better for everyone long term, and in the short term you get jobs for people who lost them so they have income to keep the economy going through a rough patch. What's not to like about that?

Midjack
Dec 24, 2007



Ignatius M. Meen posted:

Public works campaigns to build/rebuild infrastructure that is bad or non-existent would be awesome; you get infrastructure that makes the society work better for everyone long term, and in the short term you get jobs for people who lost them so they have income to keep the economy going through a rough patch. What's not to like about that?

Well you see the last time we did that it was part of the New Deal and that makes it simply unacceptable to half the country since that one lady in Congress has a Green New Deal and that’s some loving socialism I tell you what hgalghalghalgh :freep:

REMEMBER SPONGE MONKEYS
Oct 3, 2003

What do you think it means, bitch?
I was thinking the other night how a CCC would be great right now but politically/economically I’m not sure if it could really get off the ground. Private companies do most/all civil construction these days and would fight tooth and nail, plus where would the gov’t get their people and expertise? I imagine the idea would be to have them be gov’t employees, contracting everything out kinda misses the point but maybe that’s just the spirit of the thing.

Ignatius M. Meen
May 26, 2011

Hello yes I heard there was a lovely trainwreck here and...

Midjack posted:

Well you see the last time we did that it was part of the New Deal and that makes it simply unacceptable to half the country since that one lady in Congress has a Green New Deal and that’s some loving socialism I tell you what hgalghalghalgh :freep:

The way that anything that does not exclusively or primarily help old white people gets rebranded as "sochulisms!!1!" is a disease and will destroy this country someday if it's left untreated. Already feels like it's broken the place pretty hard.

REMEMBER SPONGE MONKEYS posted:

I was thinking the other night how a CCC would be great right now but politically/economically I’m not sure if it could really get off the ground. Private companies do most/all civil construction these days and would fight tooth and nail, plus where would the gov’t get their people and expertise? I imagine the idea would be to have them be gov’t employees, contracting everything out kinda misses the point but maybe that’s just the spirit of the thing.

It'd be better to have people be hired by the government directly, but this doesn't feel nearly as intractable as the above problem. Doing this right is a 50 state project, and while I'm sure there's a boatload of companies ready to develop for, say, New York, the profit motive isn't there for a lot of smaller places with fewer people which would open up the opportunity for more fed-direct hiring.

Seamonster
Apr 30, 2007

IMMER SIEGREICH
We can New Deal this and New Deal that but there was another recession in '37 and employment didn't fully recover until the war...

REMEMBER SPONGE MONKEYS
Oct 3, 2003

What do you think it means, bitch?
So we need us a good war is what you’re saying?! :patriot:

GD_American
Jul 21, 2004

LISTEN TO WHAT I HAVE TO SAY AS IT'S INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT!

Seamonster posted:

We can New Deal this and New Deal that but there was another recession in '37 and employment didn't fully recover until the war...

8 years after the largest economic crash in history seems like a normal business cycle.

Fritzler
Sep 5, 2007


Thanks for help everyone. Had my first day today, seems like I do really have a job now. I had a question on FERS military buy back. There's no benefit if you don't retire/receive a FERS annuity? So I want to start the (very long seeming) process as soon as I am confident I want to retire through FERS?

Terror Ninja
Oct 23, 2008

Fritzler posted:

Thanks for help everyone. Had my first day today, seems like I do really have a job now. I had a question on FERS military buy back. There's no benefit if you don't retire/receive a FERS annuity? So I want to start the (very long seeming) process as soon as I am confident I want to retire through FERS?

You only need 5 years of civilian service to earn a FERS pension. Whatever you buy back will be added onto this. Good thing is the buyback rate of 3% is lower than the current pension rate. You have two years to buyback before they start adding interest. I would just start the process now and do a small amount per pay period towards it, worst case you can always request a refund of your fers contributions and buyback.

Evil SpongeBob
Dec 1, 2005

Not the other one, couldn't stand the other one. Nope nope nope. Here, enjoy this bird.
Start it now. "Next pay period" turns into 10 plus years mighty fast.

Howard Phillips
May 4, 2008

His smile; it shines in the darkest of depths. There is hope yet.

Fritzler posted:

Thanks for help everyone. Had my first day today, seems like I do really have a job now. I had a question on FERS military buy back. There's no benefit if you don't retire/receive a FERS annuity? So I want to start the (very long seeming) process as soon as I am confident I want to retire through FERS?

Also you can pay with a credit card and earn those sweet points. Time to sign up for a promotion on a card with a spend requirement.

PneumonicBook
Sep 26, 2007

Do you like our owl?



Ultra Carp

Evil SpongeBob posted:

Start it now. "Next pay period" turns into 10 plus years mighty fast.

Hi it's me, the guy that's been a fed employee for 5 years and keeps saying I'll start payments next week.

Evil SpongeBob
Dec 1, 2005

Not the other one, couldn't stand the other one. Nope nope nope. Here, enjoy this bird.
I started paying as soon as I got the payoff amount because there was some guy in my office who never did. He gave up 8 or 9 years because the interest was too high.

I ran the numbers and I'd get my payoff amount back in the increased percentage in six months of pension payment.

Fritzler
Sep 5, 2007


Evil SpongeBob posted:

I started paying as soon as I got the payoff amount because there was some guy in my office who never did. He gave up 8 or 9 years because the interest was too high.

I ran the numbers and I'd get my payoff amount back in the increased percentage in six months of pension payment.
Well I easily ran numbers on how much money it is if I retire, and it is 100% worth it.

Terror Ninja posted:

You only need 5 years of civilian service to earn a FERS pension. Whatever you buy back will be added onto this. Good thing is the buyback rate of 3% is lower than the current pension rate. You have two years to buyback before they start adding interest. I would just start the process now and do a small amount per pay period towards it, worst case you can always request a refund of your fers contributions and buyback.
I didn't realize you only needed 5 years. OK going to do it. Started the buy back process today, which is starting with learn how to fax something in TYOOL 2021.

PneumonicBook
Sep 26, 2007

Do you like our owl?



Ultra Carp

Fritzler posted:

Well I easily ran numbers on how much money it is if I retire, and it is 100% worth it.

I didn't realize you only needed 5 years. OK going to do it. Started the buy back process today, which is starting with learn how to fax something in TYOOL 2021.

For most people I'd imagine it's worth it. If I actually bought my ten back I could leave in 5 with 20% and actually make money in the private sector.

Howard Phillips
May 4, 2008

His smile; it shines in the darkest of depths. There is hope yet.
Only downside is that your deferred pension isn't inflation adjusted. Meaning whatever it's set at based on high-3, it will be that when you start withdrawing at 62. Say it's $10,000. In 20 years that is only worth $5,536.76 in today's dollar value. (assuming 3% inflation rate).

Depending on how many years you have until deferred retirement, I would compare the expected pension against investing the buyback amount.

Dr. Quarex
Apr 18, 2003

I'M A BIG DORK WHO POSTS TOO MUCH ABOUT CONVENTIONS LOOK AT THIS

TOVA TOVA TOVA
That is why I just want to get back into the game already, because five years of investing in my my TSP caught up with like ten years of investing in my Roth IRA, so clearly they know what they are doing far more than I do.

On that note, USCIS hiring freeze extended to at least March 31. Hurry up bro

Dr. Quarex
Apr 18, 2003

I'M A BIG DORK WHO POSTS TOO MUCH ABOUT CONVENTIONS LOOK AT THIS

TOVA TOVA TOVA
Posting again to see if the thread will tell me "just go for it!" even here

Long story short, I interviewed for an intelligence research specialist position about a month ago, whose requirements seemed within the usual "yeah, I can claim that" tier. Then today I get an e-mail seemingly both confirming I advanced to the next level and also saying I have to also have these new requirements in order to request the next round of interviews:

The Air Force Lol posted:

Required knowledge, skills, and abilities:  

1. Knowledge of all aspects of operational security for worldwide sensitive air support and employment mission requirements, including fixed wing, ground refueling, air refueling, navigation and offensive/defensive employment operations for air assets.
2. Knowledge of developing, implementing and employing Air Force deception plans while conducting training and real world missions.
3. Knowledge of joint special operations doctrine to include domestic and overseas command relationships.
4. Knowledge of DoD and USAF policies on special access programs controls and procedures, document control and accountability.
5. Ability to analyze and evaluate aircraft movements to achieve a tasked objective, while ensuring mission safety and security.
6. Ability to communicate effectively both orally and in writing.
5. Ability to analyze and evaluate aircraft movements to achieve a tasked objective, while ensuring mission safety and security.
Needless to say, a social science Ph.D. who worked for an immigration agency does not, in fact, have five of these six"seven" requirements, even though I definitely had most of the ones in the original posting.

What is going on here? Besides "USAJobs!" Did they just realize they posted the wrong requirements and decide nobody would mind if they changed them? Considering the reasons jobs have had to be reposted in the past, I am very confused that this is apparently just a thing they can do

Dr. Quarex fucked around with this message at 05:40 on Feb 21, 2021

Midjack
Dec 24, 2007



Make them tell you no, it’s not like you’re blacklisted from federal employment for a bad interview. I will note that if you had any qualms about the ICE mission you may end up with misgivings about what JSOC does but you’re going to have to figure that out on your own.

PneumonicBook
Sep 26, 2007

Do you like our owl?



Ultra Carp

Howard Phillips posted:

Only downside is that your deferred pension isn't inflation adjusted. Meaning whatever it's set at based on high-3, it will be that when you start withdrawing at 62. Say it's $10,000. In 20 years that is only worth $5,536.76 in today's dollar value. (assuming 3% inflation rate).

Depending on how many years you have until deferred retirement, I would compare the expected pension against investing the buyback amount.

This is something I never thought about.

Government until 62 then.

Yay.

GD_American
Jul 21, 2004

LISTEN TO WHAT I HAVE TO SAY AS IT'S INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT!

Midjack posted:

Make them tell you no, it’s not like you’re blacklisted from federal employment for a bad interview. I will note that if you had any qualms about the ICE mission you may end up with misgivings about what JSOC does but you’re going to have to figure that out on your own.

At least the families that JSOC destroys are nominally accidents and not policy.

I'd go full "that ties in to my experience doing this" for every question. No candidate is ever 100% qualified, or they wouldn't be a candidate, they'd have a job already. :)

pmchem
Jan 22, 2010


GD_American posted:

No candidate is ever 100% qualified, or they wouldn't be a candidate, they'd have a job already. :)

that's very much not the case for federal hires. it may be that the hiring agency does not have direct hire authority for the position, so they have to list it on USAJobs, but there's some contractor who is currently doing the job and is a perfect fit for the position who they want to convert to the open civil servant slot. heck, the candidate could be an ex-civil servant or ex-military and still have to jump through those hoops. in fact, depending on the position, it could be a current fed who's doing the job in an acting role but the job still has to be listed on USAJobs.

saintonan
Dec 7, 2009

Fields of glory shine eternal

Yeah I disagree with that as well. In our agency we often have people who are doing the job already and just want to relocate. There have been a couple of hiring decisions where all the finalists have demonstrated experience doing the exact job that was bid.

Howard Phillips
May 4, 2008

His smile; it shines in the darkest of depths. There is hope yet.

Dr. Quarex posted:

Posting again to see if the thread will tell me "just go for it!" even here

Long story short, I interviewed for an intelligence research specialist position about a month ago, whose requirements seemed within the usual "yeah, I can claim that" tier. Then today I get an e-mail seemingly both confirming I advanced to the next level and also saying I have to also have these new requirements in order to request the next round of interviews:

Needless to say, a social science Ph.D. who worked for an immigration agency does not, in fact, have five of these six"seven" requirements, even though I definitely had most of the ones in the original posting.

What is going on here? Besides "USAJobs!" Did they just realize they posted the wrong requirements and decide nobody would mind if they changed them? Considering the reasons jobs have had to be reposted in the past, I am very confused that this is apparently just a thing they can do

These are very specific requirements that only someone previously in uniform deep within Air Force operational and administrative bureaucracy would know. They probably realized that they didn't make the requirements specific enough.

Dr. Quarex
Apr 18, 2003

I'M A BIG DORK WHO POSTS TOO MUCH ABOUT CONVENTIONS LOOK AT THIS

TOVA TOVA TOVA

Midjack posted:

Make them tell you no, it’s not like you’re blacklisted from federal employment for a bad interview. I will note that if you had any qualms about the ICE mission you may end up with misgivings about what JSOC does but you’re going to have to figure that out on your own.

Howard Phillips posted:

These are very specific requirements that only someone previously in uniform deep within Air Force operational and administrative bureaucracy would know. They probably realized that they didn't make the requirements specific enough.
This seems to cover the entire spectrum of whether to respond or absolutely never respond.

Thinking back on the interview some more over the last day, the interviewers mentioned that they were doing a national search and had no information to give me about the office as they did not know which office the job might be out of; this might have actually also meant "we have no idea what the job details will actually be either" and somewhat explain this absurd change of pace. Now I feel like I should definitely respond if only to make sure it does not somehow trigger a "candidate no longer interested in this posting" switch flip disqualifying me from other possible outcomes from this posting? Probably overthinking, but it is not like I have anything else to do

I do like that USAJobs has changed the pending application system though; now as far as I can tell the only possible status fields are "accepting applications," "reviewing applications," "canceled," and "hiring complete." Well and I guess there is probably a "hired" in there somewhere

GD_American
Jul 21, 2004

LISTEN TO WHAT I HAVE TO SAY AS IT'S INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT!
It was a joke guys

Betazoid
Aug 3, 2010

Hallo. Ik ben een leeuw.

Dr. Quarex posted:

I do like that USAJobs has changed the pending application system though; now as far as I can tell the only possible status fields are "accepting applications," "reviewing applications," "canceled," and "hiring complete." Well and I guess there is probably a "hired" in there somewhere

This is for the job I started a month ago. I still haven't been "hired."

Only registered members can see post attachments!

Alucard
Mar 11, 2002
Pillbug

Betazoid posted:

This is for the job I started a month ago. I still haven't been "hired."



They probably close it out on USAJobs when the whole cert is closed. Any idea if that was a multiple position thing or just a single spot?

Betazoid
Aug 3, 2010

Hallo. Ik ben een leeuw.

Alucard posted:

They probably close it out on USAJobs when the whole cert is closed. Any idea if that was a multiple position thing or just a single spot?

Definitely a single spot. Can't share more, but it was one role, and I'm it, so somebody just hasn't ticked the box that I'm it and people are out there thinking "November ain't too bad.".

Yeah. It closed. God I hate govt hiring. So glad to be in after literally applying for 10 years.

Edit to add: I exported my USAJobs history. Between March 2019 and October 2020, I applied to 92 federal jobs. I got one video screen, two round 1 interviews, two round 2 interviews, and one offer. It's bananas.

Betazoid fucked around with this message at 05:07 on Feb 22, 2021

Dr. Quarex
Apr 18, 2003

I'M A BIG DORK WHO POSTS TOO MUCH ABOUT CONVENTIONS LOOK AT THIS

TOVA TOVA TOVA
I would brag about how many applications I put in before being hired, but I remember my total only being about half of someone else's here.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Midjack
Dec 24, 2007



Dr. Quarex posted:

I would brag about how many applications I put in before being hired, but I remember my total only being about half of someone else's here.

So then don’t talk yourself out of whatever one you’re applying to now.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply