|
The funniest part is they didn't even actually get rid of Mr. and Mrs. Potato Head! The /product line/ is now just called "potato head" and Mr. and Mrs. are two of the products in that line. The entire thing is entirely as meaningless as the red Starbucks cups
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2021 20:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 02:38 |
|
|
They did it because the regressive liberals are children who can't associate with anything that doesn't exactly parrot their woke virtue signalling. Meanwhile: 
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2021 20:34
|
|
|
 I prefer to imagine these two coffee shops are neighbors. Dr. Arbitrary fucked around with this message at 05:42 on Feb 27, 2021 |
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2021 20:50
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:They did it because the regressive liberals are children who can't associate with anything that doesn't exactly parrot their woke virtue signalling. Now there's an ad that makes me want to drink that coffee. Fake Edit: Out of curiosity I checked and of course they're charging about 50% more than what my supermarket does for the good stuff. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2021 21:00
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:They did it because the regressive liberals are children who can't associate with anything that doesn't exactly parrot their woke virtue signalling. The two men with identical button down shirts. The girl only wearing foundation but having mid shoulder length hair and a Kmart shirt staring into the middle distance. The 1970s porch aesthetic. This is a church event, isn't it
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2021 21:11
|
|
|
CuddleCryptid posted:The two men with identical button down shirts. The girl only wearing foundation but having mid shoulder length hair and a Kmart shirt staring into the middle distance. The 1970s porch aesthetic. This is a church event, isn't it What church isn't using the same gigantic box of tiny styrofoam cups that somebody bought at Sam's Club in 2003?
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2021 21:32
|
|
|
Sorry I'm falling asleep. Did they get it (freedom as selfishness) backwards, or is it simply mutually exclusive?
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2021 22:35
|
|
|
Honestly most of the stuff the right classifies as freedom is indeed selfishness. Not wearing masks, denying LGBTQ people rights, dismantling any form of social services, and so on.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2021 22:42
|
|
|
Twelve by Pies posted:Honestly most of the stuff the right classifies as freedom is indeed selfishness. Not wearing masks, denying LGBTQ people rights, dismantling any form of social services, and so on. Conservatives: "I can do anything I want and nobody can tell me no, even if it has massive negative repercussions to others" Also conservatives: "letting gay people get married makes me and my religion feel bad so they all need to suffer so I don't feel discomfort (only my religion can do this)"
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2021 23:17
|
|
|
VinylonUnderground posted:I don't let my kid watch Paw Patrol or other forms of copaganda. The only correct answer.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2021 23:35
|
|
|
DarkHorse posted:Also conservatives: "letting gay people get married makes me and my religion feel bad so they all need to suffer so I don't feel discomfort (only my religion can do this)"
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2021 04:04
|
|
|
The claim that it's narcissistic wouldn't mean much to them since they'd claim it's "to protect the children." There's the idea that gay people only exist because "the gay agenda" recruits kids, so a kid seeing two men kiss might be tempted to become gay himself. Not to mention the stuff like "Gay men will be in locker rooms with YOUR KIDS watching them pee and shower!" which of course has been repackaged for transphobia now that gay rights have become more mainstream. We all know they don't actually give a poo poo about kids as evidenced by their shrugging (or outright cheering) keeping kids in concentration camps at the border, or kids being murdered by the IDF, but I don't think it's just an excuse they use to continue being bigoted shitheads. I think they genuinely do believe that outlawing same sex marriage will protect kids. There's a verse where Jesus says that anyone who harms "these little ones" (he's talking about new believers, not literal children) would be better off having a millstone around their neck and thrown into the sea. I think a lot of them take this verse really seriously and that's why they feel they have to be anti LGBTQ.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2021 12:34
|
|
|
Twelve by Pies posted:The claim that it's narcissistic wouldn't mean much to them since they'd claim it's "to protect the children." There's the idea that gay people only exist because "the gay agenda" recruits kids, so a kid seeing two men kiss might be tempted to become gay himself. Not to mention the stuff like "Gay men will be in locker rooms with YOUR KIDS watching them pee and shower!" which of course has been repackaged for transphobia now that gay rights have become more mainstream. I love asking these people "ok, so how old were you when you decided 'I could become gay, but I'm going to be straight instead' ?" So many short-circuited brains
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2021 14:27
|
|
|
DarkHorse posted:I love asking these people "ok, so how old were you when you decided 'I could become gay, but I'm going to be straight instead' ?" In my experience, it becomes "Well you can't CHOOSE to be straight because that's the default setting. It's only a choice if you deviate from that norm."
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2021 15:39
|
|
|
I've tried following up with "well, then become gay. Just for a minute. Choose to be gay for like 60 seconds just to demonstrate the process"
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2021 15:44
|
|
|
I dont think any of you have actually asked that or else youd get punched in the face because thats all these people know.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2021 16:41
|
|
|
Only done it once in person, usually it's my extended family and old high school acquaintances on Facebook.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2021 17:58
|
|
|
the_steve posted:In my experience, it becomes "Well you can't CHOOSE to be straight because that's the default setting. It's only a choice if you deviate from that norm." I got the "compassionate" version of that growing up, where it was "well, okay, it's not a choice, but it's still the result of trauma or being improperly raised, gay people need therapy to get back to normal (straight)." Effectively not that different, since it's all just justification for throwing queer kids into conversion therapy without their consent.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2021 19:04
|
|
|
PhantomOfTheCopier posted:You attribute to them too much thinking about anyone except themselves, in this case the broad body of their sub-sub-religion. Remind them that their true religion is narcissist anarchy: "I can kiss someone in public but those people can't". FWIW, anarchy doesn't mean "chaos" or "no rules," it means "unjustified hierarchies are abolished." I'm not saying that homophobic anarchists don't exist, but I do say that cishet privilege is the kind of unjustified hierarchy that anarchists ought to oppose. (I have also noticed that a lot of online anarchists seem to be queer.) "Rights for me but not for thee" is not anarchy, just garden-variety conservatism.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2021 20:13
|
|
|
TVs Ian posted:I swear, people just mentally add words to "Black lives matter." It doesn't say they matter MORE, or matter over other lives, just that they matter. And they're frequently treated like they don't, which is why it needs to be pointed out so often. The "All Lives" movement is people who saw black people saying that their lives matter and decided to argue with them about it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2021 20:51
|
|
|
Pththya-lyi posted:FWIW, anarchy doesn't mean "chaos" or "no rules," it means "unjustified hierarchies are abolished." I'm not saying that homophobic anarchists don't exist, but I do say that cishet privilege is the kind of unjustified hierarchy that anarchists ought to oppose. (I have also noticed that a lot of online anarchists seem to be queer.) "Rights for me but not for thee" is not anarchy, just garden-variety conservatism. That’s anarchism
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2021 20:58
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2021 03:39
|
|
|
I had no idea the Bible was that recently published!
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2021 04:09
|
|
|
"Behold, for Stewie from Family Guy shall be gay." - Leviticus 18:22
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2021 04:44
|
|
|
I thought Stewie was bi
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2021 04:56
|
|
|
RagnarokAngel posted:I dont think any of you have actually asked that or else youd get punched in the face because thats all these people know. I do it regularly, in various forms. Especially to my whacked out "boss". I hope he loving hits me. He'll get fired, and I'll get his job. And I'll never have to hear him rant about the Secret Obama Race War Squads armed with Man-portable HAARP Death Rayguns again. But, seriously, most of these types talk a big game about hitting "liberals" or whatever...but don't follow through when the moment comes. Maybe it helps to couch it in ignorance? I don't know. It's just fun to pretend like you don't understand racism/homophobia/etc. and make people awkwardly explain it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2021 05:21
|
|
|
Replace someone with chris dorner pls
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2021 06:00
|
|
|
Panfilo posted:I thought Stewie was bi I have no idea but even if he was Jack Chick was the kind of guy to say that bisexual people were just gays trying to hide it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2021 08:16
|
|
|
Devorum posted:I do it regularly, in various forms. Especially to my whacked out "boss". I hope he loving hits me. He'll get fired, and I'll get his job. And I'll never have to hear him rant about the Secret Obama Race War Squads armed with Man-portable HAARP Death Rayguns again. Yeah it's definitely this, they're usually cowards at heart. There's probably a degree of privilege I have in that I'm not generally a persecuted demographic though. And playing dumb and making people explain their bigotry is an excellent way to get them to shut up about it. You deny them the opportunity to feel persecuted from confronting them, they get the awkwardness as they have to explain and justify whatever awful thing they said, you can avoid the whole "pc culture run amok!" discussion, and at worst it makes them shut up and at best you can get them to reconsider.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2021 14:10
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2021 16:45
|
|
|
Morgan Freeman voice: "In reality, no liberals have ever said this."
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2021 16:49
|
|
|
The American flag IS offensive ... to aesthetics. It's much too busy! Give me a simpler one! E: vv  vv
Pththya-lyi fucked around with this message at 16:53 on Mar 1, 2021 |
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2021 16:49
|
|
|
Pththya-lyi posted:The American flag IS offensive ... to aesthetics. It's much too busy! Give me a simpler one! I'd like a cool flag with like a dragon on it or something
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2021 16:52
|
|
|
Pththya-lyi posted:The American flag IS offensive ... to aesthetics. It's much too busy! Give me a simpler one! I'm a little bothered by the fact that any time an american flag flying in someone's yard or a sticker on their car that I can usually assume they're some kind of a CHUD rear end in a top hat.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2021 17:00
|
|
|
BiggerBoat posted:I'm a little bothered by the fact that any time an american flag flying in someone's yard or a sticker on their car that I can usually assume they're some kind of a CHUD rear end in a top hat. Yeah, that too. It's not so much the flag itself as what people are trying to signal using the flag. But also the flag is ugly and we should change it
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2021 17:03
|
|
|
I think the flag looks fine but you are right in that anytime I see anyone with/wearing an american flag they immediately get the side eye.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2021 17:06
|
|
|
Very telling that liberals only care about Muslims and not include every other religion the flag would also offend under that dumb logic.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2021 17:11
|
|
|
BiggerBoat posted:I'm a little bothered by the fact that any time an american flag flying in someone's yard or a sticker on their car that I can usually assume they're some kind of a CHUD rear end in a top hat. I drove past a truck flying the flag on Inauguration Day and my immediate assumption was "they are flying it in protest" instead of "they are celebrating one of the only good things about our political system, the peaceful transfer of power" and I still don't think I was wrong. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2021 17:15
|
|
|
These days there's a decent chance that the chuds don't even have an actual US flag anymore, just some hideous combo of Trump/thin blue line/no step on snek
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2021 17:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 02:38 |
|
|
*spins wheel* [Democrats] are saying the [American flag with the canton replaced with a swastika of making GBS threads dicks] is offensive to [Guatemalans]. Share a link to my redbubble store if you want to buy one
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2021 18:02
|
|