Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
josh04
Oct 19, 2008


"THE FLASH IS THE REASON
TO RACE TO THE THEATRES"

This title contains sponsored content.

Beaker people or bust, naturally.

The idea is ridiculous but presumably if you were a fascist making a blood and soil argument against your all-too-German monarchs then you'd have some wild pseudoscience for that in hand.

josh04 fucked around with this message at 13:48 on Mar 10, 2021

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018
https://twitter.com/gavreilly/status/1369603546186997761?s=19

Just lol at the continued meltdown.

Also, "being alone with Piers Morgan's opinions" is isomorphic with "condemned to hell"

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Rumda posted:

It's really bizarre how leftists who normally decry racism and nationalism will suddenly get all blood and soil to dunk on the monarchy
It's the same as how leftists will laugh at Klansmen who find out that they have 1% African blood or conservative pastors who get caught blowing escorts in motel rooms. There's nothing wrong with having 1% African blood or blowing escorts in motel rooms, but their own hosed up worldviews make a huge deal about that sort of thing, so it's funny when they fail to meet their own metrics.

ThomasPaine posted:

E: I've never understood how ethnonationalism was so easily adopted in the context of the European monarchies, when their very existence is proof that it's garbage.
Volkish nationalism was often a reaction against the idea of a rootless elite that doesn't care about the ordinary folk. This historically has never led anywhere terrible.

Necrothatcher posted:

please define this

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

Now fill that 6in deep with gristly gravy and the metaphor is complete

Surprise T Rex
Apr 9, 2008

Dinosaur Gum

knox_harrington posted:

Adults with ADHD for instance wait years to get seen while they're trying to hold their lives together.

This is something that's been on my mind lately.

Possible helpful advice: I've read that if you speak to a doctor and ask them to refer you to "Psychiatry UK" or something under the "Right To Choose" thing, you can get seen much faster, but as it's a private company and apparently ADHD assessments usually cost around £500 through them, I assume that costs the NHS a lot of extra money over waiting for an NHS assessment.

I assume "Right to Choose" is one of those American-style euphemistic laws that serves to undermine and slowly bankrupt/steal from the NHS, but in this sort of case it might legitimately be helpful if adult ADHD is affecting your life.

I've often thought that I have adult ADHD to be honest, but it's one of those things where I don't want to hear about it on the internet and assume I have it, but a lot of things really hit home.

- Short-term/working memory problems like forgetting to do something before bed if it's something Mrs Trex mentions to me while I'm gaming or something, but no long-term memory problems even for trivial stuff - I can still remember the WiFi password of pretty much every house I've lived in for the last decade.
- Organisation of spaces in fine, but organisation of my time is just chaos. I never know whether there's something planned for this weekend, or this month, or whatever.
- Constant restless legs and hands while working at my desk.
- Interrupting people in conversations, to an extent where I notice it myself and have to apologise a lot.
- Ultimate inability to focus and/or procrastination mode on anything important but boring, whereas something completely negligible but interesting can absorb my attention for hours, and I'll lose all track of time.
- Picking up hobbies and hyper-focusing on them for like 3 months - I'll watch youtube, find streamers, spend all my time browsing reddit/SA threads and thinking about the thing, but not really like, do the thing very much because I'll be waiting on "the perfect idea" or "a good time to do it" then a few months later it's like a switch flips and I just... stop all of that. I basically cycle through being obsessed with photography, games, and game development multiple times per year.

A lot of those sorts of things come up in ADHD symptom lists, but it's always like "...doesn't this stuff happen to everyone though?" so I never know whether it's worthwhile getting checked out.

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

Surprise T Rex posted:


- Short-term/working memory problems like forgetting to do something before bed if it's something Mrs Trex mentions to me while I'm gaming or something, but no long-term memory problems even for trivial stuff - I can still remember the WiFi password of pretty much every house I've lived in for the last decade.
- Organisation of spaces in fine, but organisation of my time is just chaos. I never know whether there's something planned for this weekend, or this month, or whatever.
- Constant restless legs and hands while working at my desk.
- Interrupting people in conversations, to an extent where I notice it myself and have to apologise a lot.
- Ultimate inability to focus and/or procrastination mode on anything important but boring, whereas something completely negligible but interesting can absorb my attention for hours, and I'll lose all track of time.
- Picking up hobbies and hyper-focusing on them for like 3 months - I'll watch youtube, find streamers, spend all my time browsing reddit/SA threads and thinking about the thing, but not really like, do the thing very much because I'll be waiting on "the perfect idea" or "a good time to do it" then a few months later it's like a switch flips and I just... stop all of that. I basically cycle through being obsessed with photography, games, and game development multiple times per year.

A lot of those sorts of things come up in ADHD symptom lists, but it's always like "...doesn't this stuff happen to everyone though?" so I never know whether it's worthwhile getting checked out.

FWIW I do all of this, plus other things like listening to a song hundreds of time in a row, or having minor internal crises if objects are moved by a few inches.

I don't care though, because I am a fairly functional (and sexy) member of human society

Josef bugman
Nov 17, 2011

Pictured: Poster prepares to celebrate Holy Communion (probablY)

This avatar made possible by a gift from the Religionthread Posters Relief Fund

Must admit, I think this pool looks cool and fun!

Necrothatcher
Mar 26, 2005




Josef bugman posted:

Must admit, I think this pool looks cool and fun!

I regret to inform you the pool is racist.

Spangly A
May 14, 2009

God help you if ever you're caught on these shores

A man's ambition must indeed be small
To write his name upon a shithouse wall

knox_harrington posted:

The thing with the NHS is it's pretty good if you are seriously ill with some somatic problem, but if you don't meet the invisible threshold and are just a bit ill, or have gender dysphoria, or a sporting injury, there is just nothing there at all. Adults with ADHD for instance wait years to get seen while they're trying to hold their lives together.

Presumably the key issue is not enough money but under a centralised system it also needs good governance and People In Charge to decide disorder X is something that needs to be taken seriously.

There's nowt to disagree with wrt MHS and such being obvious examples of the more general deliberate collapse, for the purpose of privatisation, of various NHS bodies. I've replied to you before about watching SLaM collapse and take out my treatment plan with it, leaving me with just enough amphetamine to make self-medication counterproductive. The difference with GICs is that, where I'm in no doubt that everyone involved in my ADHD treatment was genuinely sympathetic and wanted me to have a positive outcome, there are obviously elements of the nhs, and individuals in positions of authority, who absolutely loving hate trans people and use that authority to punish them for existing.

Before the guardian became an explicit right-wing propaganda outlet, they covered the access to fertility cases involving Kent and Medway CCG. Knowing people who wanted fertility treatment before undergoing any surgical elements to their transition, and through that knowing about the legal actions before they were news, I don't feel it's in any way comparable to the difficulties that various friends and family, and myself, have experienced with MHS. The CCG categorically denied all trans people the right to any fertility treatments, were utterly hostile to any communication or appeals, and outright demanded that people sue them if they felt anything unlawful was happening. So they got sued, and they lost heavily, and were explicitly ordered by the courts to provide trans people with access to fertility treatments. They appealed, it went up the ranks, losing each and every time. When their final appeal was done and they were told they were behaving unlawfully, their response was to demand each and every trans person sue them, all the way through, for each and every case. They did not ever provide any fertility treatments in the cases they lost.

There's no plausible way, imo, of suggesting this is anything other than a deliberate example of direct discrimination, done in the name of open prejudice. For a start, they kept admitting it. Best as I can tell (I havent been involved for years, and havent spoken to any of the organisations involved for years either), the sole response by any government body was to shut down multiple GICs while increasing regulation, which massively reduces the number of people who can easily make a case with the support of medical professionals. All this stuff predates the terf invasions of the mainstream and social media circles. Nobody ever seized custody of the children of friends with ADHD because it made them unfit to be near children, either. Centralised provision without centralised funding is definitely a part of this, but I don't think it can make sense without viewing it as primarily an issue of discrimination.

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting
Yeah me too. It was clever of them to paint the roof ventilation pipes the same as the flume. Makes you think there's lots more flume than there really is.

ThomasPaine
Feb 4, 2009

We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.

Guavanaut posted:

Volkish nationalism was often a reaction against the idea of a rootless elite that doesn't care about the ordinary folk. This historically has never led anywhere terrible.

Yeah, the bit I don't understand is how that nationalism can be harnessed in support of the 'rootless elite', as has happened with much of the British far right.

E: for all its fash connotations 'rootless elite' is an honest description of the aristocratic, and later capitalist, class. You've got this whole demographic nakedly exerting class power across Europe and spending their lives backing up the interests of their relatives to maintain control and domination over the population, and people somehow looked at this and said 'ahh no see it's the Jews who are the problem' not our good and just king who's spent the summer frolicking at court in Paris while we starve.

Spangly A
May 14, 2009

God help you if ever you're caught on these shores

A man's ambition must indeed be small
To write his name upon a shithouse wall

Surprise T Rex posted:

This is something that's been on my mind lately.

Possible helpful advice: I've read that if you speak to a doctor and ask them to refer you to "Psychiatry UK" or something under the "Right To Choose" thing, you can get seen much faster, but as it's a private company and apparently ADHD assessments usually cost around £500 through them, I assume that costs the NHS a lot of extra money over waiting for an NHS assessment.


I'm seeing psych UK for my first appointment with them tomorrow (it was not a choice) and my impression so far is that they aren't remotely fit to provide any kind of services. Their system doesnt know how to differentiate between diagnostic appointments and ongoing treatment, for a start, and they've repeatedly made that claim when I ask why they *keep loving asking* that I self-assess for ADD and cardiac issues in case they want to prescribe a drug I've taken since I was 5.

e; just so this isn't solely a "your options are bad" post - if a condition is impacting your ability to live a normal life and your options are this vs nothing, then I'll point out that I am actually going to this appt. The issue is that ADD has to be managed long term with a variety of therapies and working strategies so you develop coping mechanisms that let you deal with normal life poo poo over long periods of time. Amphetamines are a fantastic treatment for ADD but you will develop a tolerance for them, they do have both physical and behavioural side effects that include causes for immediate discontinuation/contraindication, and they have a low ceiling. You want to be having those treatments before the medication starts to lose its impact, because they massively promote habit formation, and you want to lock yourself into good habits before you get trapped in bad ones.

Spangly A fucked around with this message at 14:21 on Mar 10, 2021

Comrade Fakename
Feb 13, 2012


Since we're talking about monarchy stuff, I should say that I heavily recommend watching The Crown on Netflix. I was very sceptical to say the least, but after the Tories getting upset about the most recent season last year, and the fact that I didn't have anything else to watch I decided to give it a go. Got to say, it was one of the best TV shows I've watched in a while. Excellently written an acted (though there is some hilariously clunky exposition sometimes). And ultimately it's about a group of people in an exceptionally weird situation and so is kind of inherently interesting.

Politically though, I'd say that the show is quietly anti-monarchist. It's not like it comes out of the gate with a full-throated condemnation or anything. But as the episodes accumulate, you are shown over and over again that these people are completely detached from the people they are nominally supposed to represent and know basically nothing about the British people (not even to mention the Commonwealth). They are constantly consumed by dramas that no real people actually give a poo poo about. The Queen is generally an okay person but also an a mundanely unimpressive woman thrown into this role that overwhelms her, and she's weirdly unemotional as time goes on. For everyone else it seems like the pressure of royalty pretty much ruins their lives.

There's an episode set in the 70s about this documentary that Phil put together as a fly-on-the-wall thing as yet another modernising effort. It's a disaster, because the public hates seeing the Royals be all boring and normal. They say that the problem is that the documentary demystified the family - but then you realise that the entire Netflix show is also demystifying the monarchy, the very thing that they themselves think will destroy them.

Anyway, it's good and you should watch it.

ThomasPaine
Feb 4, 2009

We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.

Comrade Fakename posted:

Since we're talking about monarchy stuff, I should say that I heavily recommend watching The Crown on Netflix.

Me and my partner watched this quite drunk and were cheering when mountbatten got blown up by the 'ra and I'm really not sure we're the target audience lol

Rumda
Nov 4, 2009

Moth Lesbian Comrade

Spangly A posted:

I'm seeing psych UK for my first appointment with them tomorrow (it was not a choice) and my impression so far is that they aren't remotely fit to provide any kind of services. Their system doesnt know how to differentiate between diagnostic appointments and ongoing treatment, for a start, and they've repeatedly made that claim when I ask why they *keep loving asking* that I self-assess for ADD and cardiac issues in case they want to prescribe a drug I've taken since I was 5.

I haven't had that bad an experience with them to be honest I got referred to them back in October and aside from getting pedantic about blood pressure they've been pretty good and the psychiatrist I saw was incredibly trans inclusive and since the appointment went quickly we started talking about the over medicalisation of the trans experience for a while

Nybble
Jun 28, 2008

praise chuck, raise heck
Random observation/question about The Crown / The Queen (2006), both with Peter Morgan creating or writing: They both use a story about a stag hunt in relation to Diana. In the Crown when Diana arrives, a stag arrives, she goes on a hunt and helps take it down. In The Queen, which is about the days after Diana's death, there's a stag that was being hunted, but eventually dies away from the royal grounds.

Was this a real story and/or is there some sort of symbolism that I'm not quite understanding? (If it helps, I'm an American so maybe there's something in this that I'm missing that might have made more sense to UK Goons)

Nybble fucked around with this message at 14:24 on Mar 10, 2021

Spangly A
May 14, 2009

God help you if ever you're caught on these shores

A man's ambition must indeed be small
To write his name upon a shithouse wall

Rumda posted:

I haven't had that bad an experience with them to be honest I got referred to them back in October and aside from getting pedantic about blood pressure they've been pretty good and the psychiatrist I saw was incredibly trans inclusive and since the appointment went quickly we started talking about the over medicalisation of the trans experience for a while

my shrink seems perfectly qualified so I'm not expecting the individual professionals to be bad, but compared to the maudsley a few weeks before it collapsed, their organisation is an absolute joke. I'm also very bitter about the whole thing in general tbh.

Necrothatcher
Mar 26, 2005




Nybble posted:

Random observation/question about The Crown / The Queen (2006), both with Peter Morgan creating or writing: They both use a story about a stag hunt in relation to Diana. In the Crown when Diana arrives, a stag arrives, she goes on a hunt and helps take it down. In The Queen, which is about the days after Diana's death, there's a stag that was being hunted, but eventually dies away from the royal grounds.

Was this a real story and/or is there some sort of symbolism that I'm not quite understanding? (If it helps, I'm an American so maybe there's something in this that I'm missing that might have made more sense to UK Goons)

Diana in Greek mythology is a hunter and generally associated with a stag.

e:

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

ThomasPaine posted:

Me and my partner watched this quite drunk and were cheering when mountbatten got blown up by the 'ra and I'm really not sure we're the target audience lol

:same:

The Crown is an enjoyable watch, but it is (a) very badly written [my missus is a script editor and development exec and the show drives her absolutely mental at least once per episode], and (b) it is decidedly a masterpiece of pro-Royal propaganda.

Essentially, it functions as a kind of "limited hangout" like the CIA used to do/still does. It concedes certain horrible and indefensible behaviour by certain Royals, or in fact that certain, specific Royals are horrible. But it does so in service of a larger narrative - that the Royals as a whole are human beings who are concerned with the maintenance of national stability and the managed decline of a glorious Empire. That is simply, empirically not true, and you should not become addicted to ideology here.

For examples, look at how the show handles all of the Edward abdication and Marburg stuff, vs how it treats Philip's family history.

Personally, I am convinced that Peter Morgan works as a de facto member of the Royal PR team, and does a pretty decent job of achieving its aims despite his serious limitations as a showrunner.

Enjoyable watch though - Jonathan Franzen described it as being like watching an aquarium and he was totally right, plus the production values are insanely good.

Failed Imagineer fucked around with this message at 14:31 on Mar 10, 2021

Lobster God
Nov 5, 2008

Nybble posted:

Random observation/question about The Crown / The Queen (2006), both with Peter Morgan creating or writing: They both use a story about a stag hunt in relation to Diana. In the Crown when Diana arrives, a stag arrives, she goes on a hunt and helps take it down. In The Queen, which is about the days after Diana's death, there's a stag that was being hunted, but eventually dies away from the royal grounds.

Was this a real story and/or is there some sort of symbolism that I'm not quite understanding? (If it helps, I'm an American so maybe there's something in this that I'm missing that might have made more sense to UK Goons)

Humanoid lizards primary source of sustenance is Stags (at least when they're on the surface rather than inside the hollow earth). Stags are therefore intimately connected to the royal family.

Necrothatcher
Mar 26, 2005




Lobster God posted:

Humanoid lizards primary source of sustenance is Stags (at least when they're on the surface rather than inside the hollow earth). Stags are therefore intimately connected to the royal family.

yeah sorry I was lying about the greek mythology thing it's actually this

Nybble
Jun 28, 2008

praise chuck, raise heck

Necrothatcher posted:

Diana in Greek mythology is a hunter and generally associated with a stag.

Ah, right, that makes sen...

Lobster God posted:

Humanoid lizards primary source of sustenance is Stags (at least when they're on the surface rather than inside the hollow earth). Stags are therefore intimately connected to the royal family.

Oh. OH.

Jaeluni Asjil
Apr 18, 2018

Sorry I thought you were a landlord when I gave you your old avatar!
Just had my covid vaccination first appointment letter come through for next week. Hurrah.
It'll be the Pfizer.
Now I've just got to figure out how to get to Cwmbran!

Kaal
May 22, 2002

through thousands of posts in D&D over a decade, I now believe I know what I'm talking about. if I post forcefully and confidently, I can convince others that is true. no one sees through my facade.

Nybble posted:

Random observation/question about The Crown / The Queen (2006), both with Peter Morgan creating or writing: They both use a story about a stag hunt in relation to Diana. In the Crown when Diana arrives, a stag arrives, she goes on a hunt and helps take it down. In The Queen, which is about the days after Diana's death, there's a stag that was being hunted, but eventually dies away from the royal grounds.

Was this a real story and/or is there some sort of symbolism that I'm not quite understanding? (If it helps, I'm an American so maybe there's something in this that I'm missing that might have made more sense to UK Goons)

So Diana did hunt a stag with Prince Charles at one point, and was involved in a story where she wounded the deer rather than killing it and then swore to never go hunting again. But there's also the mythology of Diana Goddess of the Hunt, who transformed an unwanted suitor into a stag who was then hunted by his own hounds. Stags are also strongly symbolic animals, being both emblematic of the monarchy (due to the history of the aristocracy reserving the right to hunt them) as well as being signs of wild independence and youth. I'd assume that the writers of these sorts of stories are broadly aware of all of that, and that's why they show up again and again.

https://thetab.com/uk/2020/11/17/did-prince-philip-actually-take-diana-deer-stalking-in-scotland-the-crown-182473

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diana_and_Actaeon

KitConstantine
Jan 11, 2013

Kaal posted:

So Diana did hunt a stag with Prince Charles at one point, and was involved in a story where she wounded the deer rather than killing it and then swore to never go hunting again. But there's also the mythology of Diana Goddess of the Hunt, who transformed an unwanted suitor into a stag who was then hunted by his own hounds. Stags are also strongly symbolic animals, being both emblematic of the monarchy (due to the history of the aristocracy reserving the right to hunt them) as well as being signs of wild independence and youth. I'd assume that the writers of these sorts of stories are broadly aware of all of that, and that's why they show up again and again.

https://thetab.com/uk/2020/11/17/did-prince-philip-actually-take-diana-deer-stalking-in-scotland-the-crown-182473

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diana_and_Actaeon

There's also the fact that they are an animal hounded, hunted down, and eventually killed which ties in to her death.

Kaal
May 22, 2002

through thousands of posts in D&D over a decade, I now believe I know what I'm talking about. if I post forcefully and confidently, I can convince others that is true. no one sees through my facade.

KitConstantine posted:

There's also the fact that they are an animal hounded, hunted down, and eventually killed which ties in to her death.

Right. Like any good symbol they are also associated with the inverse of their meaning. The wild independence of the hart is conflated by the tragic conquering of the same. And in Diana's case the mythologic parallels of a free creature who is pursued to their death are pretty clear.

Kaal fucked around with this message at 14:53 on Mar 10, 2021

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

#SackChrisWhitty is currently trending, it can't be as dumb as I think it is, can it?

https://twitter.com/OpenUpBritain/status/1369429617635979272?s=19

No no, it absolutely is.

Chubby Henparty
Aug 13, 2007


of course the royals don't want to be anywhere near good, british, mythological stag people https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZZz2I10me4

Josef bugman
Nov 17, 2011

Pictured: Poster prepares to celebrate Holy Communion (probablY)

This avatar made possible by a gift from the Religionthread Posters Relief Fund

Necrothatcher posted:

I regret to inform you the pool is racist.

Oh no.

Comrade Fakename
Feb 13, 2012


Failed Imagineer posted:

:same:

The Crown is an enjoyable watch, but it is (a) very badly written [my missus is a script editor and development exec and the show drives her absolutely mental at least once per episode], and (b) it is decidedly a masterpiece of pro-Royal propaganda.

Essentially, it functions as a kind of "limited hangout" like the CIA used to do/still does. It concedes certain horrible and indefensible behaviour by certain Royals, or in fact that certain, specific Royals are horrible. But it does so in service of a larger narrative - that the Royals as a whole are human beings who are concerned with the maintenance of national stability and the managed decline of a glorious Empire. That is simply, empirically not true, and you should not become addicted to ideology here.

For examples, look at how the show handles all of the Edward abdication and Marburg stuff, vs how it treats Philip's family history.

Personally, I am convinced that Peter Morgan works as a de facto member of the Royal PR team, and does a pretty decent job of achieving its aims despite his serious limitations as a showrunner.

Enjoyable watch though - Jonathan Franzen described it as being like watching an aquarium and he was totally right, plus the production values are insanely good.

It absolutely isn't pro-Royal propaganda, not only does it show all the awful poo poo they've personally done, it also constantly undermines the idea that the monarchy has any real connection to the people of the country. Over and over again their talk of hallowed tradition is shown to be absurd.

And of course the royals are shown to be humans, this is the fundamental concept of drama, and also literally true? Unless you're going David Icke on us they are actually human beings. And there's no reason to think that their conscious beliefs aren't that they are dutifully serving the country. It's bollocks of course, but it is what they believe. They're not moustache-twirling villains who do this because they just loving hate the poor so much, at least not consciously.

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

Comrade Fakename posted:

It absolutely isn't pro-Royal propaganda, not only does it show all the awful poo poo they've personally done, it also constantly undermines the idea that the monarchy has any real connection to the people of the country. Over and over again their talk of hallowed tradition is shown to be absurd.

And of course the royals are shown to be humans, this is the fundamental concept of drama, and also literally true? Unless you're going David Icke on us they are actually human beings. And there's no reason to think that their conscious beliefs aren't that they are dutifully serving the country. It's bollocks of course, but it is what they believe. They're not moustache-twirling villains who do this because they just loving hate the poor so much, at least not consciously.

Disagree with every single word of this, but I've already made my point.

a pipe smoking dog
Jan 25, 2010

"haha, dogs can't smoke!"

Bobby Deluxe posted:

#SackChrisWhitty is currently trending, it can't be as dumb as I think it is, can it?

https://twitter.com/OpenUpBritain/status/1369429617635979272?s=19

No no, it absolutely is.

lol literally thinking if they can't see it it isn't real and can't hurt them.

radmonger
Jun 6, 2011

ThomasPaine posted:

How do you get to blood and soil nonsense - English are inherently different to the French at a fundamental level, for example - from hero worshipping a ruling family that's related to every other ruling family on the continent?

Monarchism and nationalism are fundamentally different ideologies that sometimes avoid restarting a civil war over that fact.

radmonger
Jun 6, 2011

ThomasPaine posted:


E: for all its fash connotations 'rootless elite' is an honest description of the aristocratic, and later capitalist, class. You've got this whole demographic nakedly exerting class power across Europe and spending their lives backing up the interests of their relatives to maintain control and domination over the population, and people somehow looked at this and said 'ahh no see it's the Jews who are the problem' not our good and just king who's spent the summer frolicking at court in Paris while we starve.

That is only true if you define class on a genetic basis. An aristocrat is, literally, someone with feudal ancestors. With the arguable exception of the Duke of Atholl, there is no one actually currently living as a feudal lord in the mainland UK. And so no _current_ economic difference between an aristocrat acting as a landlord or capitalist, and anyone else, of whatever ancestry, in those economic classes.

And if you look at the actual current royals, and not their genetic predecessors, they are clearly _not_ rootless. As Meghan and William have just demonstrated by being unable to move between countries without changing socioeconomic class.

Inexplicable Humblebrag
Sep 20, 2003

radmonger posted:

As Meghan and William have just demonstrated by being unable to move between countries without changing socioeconomic class.

the scandals never cease...

Jaeluni Asjil
Apr 18, 2018

Sorry I thought you were a landlord when I gave you your old avatar!
Corbyning is trending on twitter:

https://twitter.com/0Calamity/status/1369610577845366788?s=20

Microplastics
Jul 6, 2007

:discourse:
It's what's for dinner.
Wendover finally posted a video about something other than planes, and I immediately thought of this thread

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlTq8DbRs4k

The Question IRL
Jun 8, 2013

Only two contestants left! Here is Doom's chance for revenge...

Failed Imagineer posted:

https://twitter.com/gavreilly/status/1369603546186997761?s=19

Just lol at the continued meltdown.

Also, "being alone with Piers Morgan's opinions" is isomorphic with "condemned to hell"

I saw this on Twitter and is done so well.

https://twitter.com/OFalafel/status/1369218572065640452?s=19

The Perfect Element
Dec 5, 2005
"This is a bit of a... a poof song"
The Crown depicts the royal family as being out of touch, incompetent, self-interested and just out and out loving weird. The latest series with Diana is genuinely harrowing, because all of them, even the good ones like Ann, are just like "stfu and get on with it" as she descends deeper and deeper into depression and self harm.

Given that Tories are asking for content warnings and disclaimers to be added to it, I really struggle to believe that it can be construed as pro-royal propaganda.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

kingturnip
Apr 18, 2008
I did decide to do a lateral flow test today based on feeling unwell for the first time in over a year.
It was negative, but doesn't exactly bode well.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply