Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Martian
May 29, 2005

Grimey Drawer

golden bubble posted:

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazin..._campaign=share

A pretty good article that covers the only true analog we have to the worst case scenario, the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum. It's maddening that human industrial capacity can reverse 50 million years of natural climate change and bring back atmosphere CO2 levels not seen since the first primordial horse ancestor evolved in the scorching wet forests of primordial America.

Thanks, this is pretty great reading.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Martian
May 29, 2005

Grimey Drawer
Atlantic Ocean circulation at weakest in a millennium, say scientists

quote:

The Atlantic Ocean circulation that underpins the Gulf Stream, the weather system that brings warm and mild weather to Europe, is at its weakest in more than a millennium, and climate breakdown is the probable cause, according to new data.

Further weakening of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) could result in more storms battering the UK, and more intense winters and an increase in damaging heatwaves and droughts across Europe.

Scientists predict that the AMOC will weaken further if global heating continues, and could reduce by about 34% to 45% by the end of this century, which could bring us close to a “tipping point” at which the system could become irrevocably unstable. A weakened Gulf Stream would also raise sea levels on the Atlantic coast of the US, with potentially disastrous consequences.


E: a good opinion article:

https://twitter.com/dwallacewells/status/1364979937808121856?s=19

I am... not having an optimistic day.

Martian fucked around with this message at 20:11 on Feb 25, 2021

The Oldest Man
Jul 28, 2003

. NM

Walton Simons
May 16, 2010

ELECTRONIC OLD MEN RUNNING THE WORLD

quote:

the Electric Reliability Council of Texas’ worst-case scenario planning used a 2011 cold snap that was a one-in-10-year weather event. It wasn’t even the worst cold Texas experienced in living memory: in 1989 temperatures and electricity generation (as a percentage of peak demand) dropped even further than they did in 2011. Texas hadn’t just failed to prepare for the far future. It failed to prepare for the recent past.

gently caress's sake.

SplitSoul
Dec 31, 2000

.

Sjs00
Jun 29, 2013

Yeah Baby Yeah !
well how many more times is the polar Jetstream going to divert wildly

VideoTapir
Oct 18, 2005

He'll tire eventually.
All the time please I am currently in the tropics and hate hot weather.

Acerbatus
Jun 26, 2020

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

VideoTapir posted:

All the time please I am currently in the tropics and hate hot weather.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/mar/08/global-heating-tropical-regions-human-livability

Well, at least it won't be a problem for long. :v:

LionArcher
Mar 29, 2010


So where in the USA is smart to live for the next 40 years? In terms of disasters and what not. Assuming you have resources and money. North Washington? Idaho? Minnesota?

BIG HEADLINE
Jun 13, 2006

"Stand back, Ottawan ruffian, or face my lumens!"

LionArcher posted:

So where in the USA is smart to live for the next 40 years? In terms of disasters and what not. Assuming you have resources and money. North Washington? Idaho? Minnesota?

PNW slightly east of I-5 so a Cascadia subduction quake/tsunami can't really do a lot to you (but forest fires sure as gently caress can) as well as anywhere along the Great Lakes. Stay out of the breadbasket states since it's a near-certainty another Dust Bowl's coming eventually.

People seem to like Michigan/Wisconsin/Minnesota but I'd honestly say upstate NY would be better simply because you're closer to the oceans/ports. Baltimore, Boston, and New York are still going to be around for a good long time and be trading/shipping hubs.

yaffle
Sep 15, 2002

Flapdoodle

LionArcher posted:

So where in the USA is smart to live for the next 40 years? In terms of disasters and what not. Assuming you have resources and money. North Washington? Idaho? Minnesota?

Nowhere in the USA is smart to live, write your representative and demand they purchase Greenland.

Ferdinand Bardamu
Apr 30, 2013
If you're an American, see if you can qualify for a visa to New Zealand. I'm working on mine, as my niche field is in need there. Also, don't sleep on Finland, and their computer toucher recruitment drives.

LionArcher
Mar 29, 2010


BIG HEADLINE posted:

PNW slightly east of I-5 so a Cascadia subduction quake/tsunami can't really do a lot to you (but forest fires sure as gently caress can) as well as anywhere along the Great Lakes. Stay out of the breadbasket states since it's a near-certainty another Dust Bowl's coming eventually.

People seem to like Michigan/Wisconsin/Minnesota but I'd honestly say upstate NY would be better simply because you're closer to the oceans/ports. Baltimore, Boston, and New York are still going to be around for a good long time and be trading/shipping hubs.

I’m PNW currently west of the fault in the same valley as the big fire this last fall. From what I can see fire is our main concern. The area is very good for growing things though. Eventually water too is a concern, but that’s gonna be everywhere.

Freakazoid_
Jul 5, 2013


Buglord
Washington State's only water issue will be when the federal government forces us to sell our water to California.

porfiria
Dec 10, 2008

by Modern Video Games

LionArcher posted:

So where in the USA is smart to live for the next 40 years? In terms of disasters and what not. Assuming you have resources and money. North Washington? Idaho? Minnesota?

Cheyenne Mountain.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

LionArcher posted:

So where in the USA is smart to live for the next 40 years? In terms of disasters and what not. Assuming you have resources and money. North Washington? Idaho? Minnesota?

Preferably Washington State so you can quickly make it into Canada if you're a very savvy person you'll learn another language so that you can emigrate from Canada to the rest of the world easily without dealing with a possible fascist us not allowing anyone to travel

BIG HEADLINE
Jun 13, 2006

"Stand back, Ottawan ruffian, or face my lumens!"
If/when the US goes full fashy the only place to hide will be somewhere that has nothing the fascists want (this includes food). Canada's lousy with extremely valuable natural resources and a fascist US would forcibly annex the country in half a heartbeat.

In short, if/when the US goes full fashy there'll be nowhere to hide where that won't be actively complicating and/or ruining your way of life.

FistEnergy
Nov 3, 2000

DAY CREW: WORKING HARD

Fun Shoe

LionArcher posted:

So where in the USA is smart to live for the next 40 years? In terms of disasters and what not. Assuming you have resources and money. North Washington? Idaho? Minnesota?

Great Lakes adjacent, large plot of hilly land in a quiet area with good access to canadian border

Grouchio
Aug 31, 2014

China aims to be carbon neutral by 2060. Its new 5-year plan won’t (quite) cut it. For now.

quote:

0n Friday, China released a draft summary of its 14th Five-Year Plan, the all-important document that not only guides the country’s economic development but also has huge consequences for global carbon dioxide emissions and climate change. The new plan’s 2025 emissions goals reflect an ongoing contradiction between China’s short-term and long-term climate goals.

In the long run, China has expressed a strong commitment to climate action. President Xi Jinping surprised the world last September when he announced that China would aim to reach carbon neutrality by 2060. Climate scientists have called for countries to hit that goal by 2050, but it was still a significant step forward for China — the first time the country made any formal commitment to zeroing out its emissions.

And yet, even as Xi made that announcement, CO2 emissions in China were soaring. Like the rest of the world, the pandemic had initially caused economic activity to plummet in China in early 2020. But after swiftly bringing the pandemic under control within its borders, the Chinese government funneled stimulus dollars into the heavily polluting construction and manufacturing sectors, stoking steel and cement production. As a result, China’s emissions rose an estimated 1.5 percent in 2020, even accounting for the initial drop.

“China’s economic recovery from the pandemic so far has been anything but green,” Li Shuo, a senior global policy adviser for Greenpeace East Asia, said during a press conference on Monday. Now, with the release of the 14th Five-Year Plan targets, the Chinese government is signaling that the country’s emissions growth will likely slow slightly from recent months, but continue for at least the next five years, according to analysts.

On the one hand, the growing emphasis on green development in China’s plans, rather than the historical single-minded focus on GDP, shows that the Communist Party sees a strong national interest in reducing emissions over time. However, these latest climate targets do not rise to the level the global scientific consensus calls for.

Gucci Loafers
May 20, 2006

Ask yourself, do you really want to talk to pair of really nice gaudy shoes?


LionArcher posted:

So where in the USA is smart to live for the next 40 years? In terms of disasters and what not. Assuming you have resources and money. North Washington? Idaho? Minnesota?

The Midwest.

But I wouldn't look at it from primarily a geographical level because absolutely no where on this planet will be safe. The best way to be safe is to live in a place with a supportive community and well run governments. Individual can't survive this on their own, you need people to work together.

Essentially, if the all of the corrupt Republicans in Florida suddenly flipped their State into with massive climate change safety nets from UBI to Flood Protection programs that'd honestly might be better than even living in a land locked State like South Dakota where you are pretty much on your own.

BIG HEADLINE
Jun 13, 2006

"Stand back, Ottawan ruffian, or face my lumens!"
The Midwest is going to either be a dust bowl or a marsh, with storm/tornado season getting earlier and lasting longer each year.

Again, if you HAVE to stay in the US, upstate NY. If you have to stay in the US and enjoy having the ability to potentially defend yourself, although it pains me to say this, Ohio or Wisconsin.

Gucci Loafers
May 20, 2006

Ask yourself, do you really want to talk to pair of really nice gaudy shoes?


The Midwest will be still be the Midwest just with shittier weather and additional random crazy weather. It's not going to turn into a giant dustbowl or marsh. At least, not in our lifetimes or our kids but maybe great-great-great-great-great grandkids.

Zeta Taskforce
Jun 27, 2002

LionArcher posted:

So where in the USA is smart to live for the next 40 years? In terms of disasters and what not. Assuming you have resources and money. North Washington? Idaho? Minnesota?

I'm from Vermont and my parents still live there. I think they would do as well as anywhere else that people have mentioned. They are starting from a cool, humid climate to begin with and a few degrees of warming might make most of the year more pleasant. There is already a culture of sustainability, buying local and eating local, and precipitation tend to be steady year round. There are lots of lakes and rivers. They have an effective government, currently a moderate Republican governor, a Democrat and Democratic Socialist senators. On just about every measure Vermont has had the best COVID response of any state.

But the correct answer is if we are talking about mass movements of climate refugees, then all of us are screwed. That will mean wide areas of the world will be uninhabitable. There will be places that will remain very habitable like New Zealand, Vermont and the rest of Northern New England, Ireland, Canada etc but these places can't absorb millions or billions of climate refugees. What will likely happen in marginally livable areas is anyone with means will get out or get to high ground. The poor and marginalized will either stay put or be pushed into those areas and they have to put up with heat, storms, drought, floods and nuisance tides, and have to do so while living in poverty, desperation, and violence or even war.

Getting back to Democratic Socialist senators, lots of people laughed at Bernie in 2016 when he said that climate change contributed to the war in Syria, but if you actually thought about it you realize he was right. If half the world turns into Syria, then the other half won't be that much better off. Vermont will not be a bubble of civic pride and farmers markets, even if the climate remains comfortable.

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

WAR CRIME GIGOLO posted:

Preferably Washington State so you can quickly make it into Canada if you're a very savvy person you'll learn another language so that you can emigrate from Canada to the rest of the world easily without dealing with a possible fascist us not allowing anyone to travel

I don't understand why more Americans don't avail of the foreign passport options at their disposal. I get not everyone has the resources, but for a lot of countries it doesn't take much at all, maybe just a processing fee.

As an Irish person I'm kinda glad that the tens of millions of Americans eligible for an Irish passport aren't doing so, but I would if the situation were reversed because the window of opportunity is going to be closed at some point in the future. And an Irish passport entitles you to live and work in the 26 other EU countries as well as the UK

silicone thrills
Jan 9, 2008

I paint things
When I had nothing and lived in TN the 115$ for a passport felt pretty insane. Picture fee. Processing fee. Etc. I actually ended up getting one then it got stolen in less than a year. Had to go through the poo poo nasty process of declaring it missing 5 years later and then paying again :(

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018
Yeah again, I get it's not possible for everyone, and I guess there is some additional hassle like making sure you can prove your grandpa was an Irish citizen, but it's still under-used in a way which I feel reflects a lack of concern for the future trajectory of the US (or maybe the same people are also not convinced of the future stability of the EU, which is fair I guess)

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

The best place to survive climate change is the place where you have strong community ties, where you have friends and family, where you are part of the in-group, not the out-group.

Because everywhere will face dire impacts from climate change, some more than others, but community resilience is a bigger source of stability and survivability than local resource availability.

Moving to the great lakes or ireland doesn't help if you die alone in a shack because no one trusts you enough to let you borrow enough flour to survive over the winter. Better to be with the in-group you can leverage your social knowledge and existing connections instead of in a "perfect" location.

So it still will be better to be amongst your community, even in a big city like LA or DFW. Even if your resource shortages become dire, it will be the ones with strong community resilience who survive.

Better to be the organized raider than the loner with a stockpile, etc.

Sjs00
Jun 29, 2013

Yeah Baby Yeah !
I already have systems in place to be the loner raider with a stockpile though?

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018
Yeah that's fair enough. I see a second passport more like a bug-out bag, neither will probably be much use in reality but nice to have regardless

Sjs00
Jun 29, 2013

Yeah Baby Yeah !
No offense but do you goons suggesting leaving the US intend to rejoin families abroad and such? I wouldn't ever leave my few remaining folks here in USA when it goes fash unless they also had a plan to gtfo.

Zeta Taskforce
Jun 27, 2002

Trabisnikof posted:

The best place to survive climate change is the place where you have strong community ties, where you have friends and family, where you are part of the in-group, not the out-group.

Good point. Hopefully I'm never a climate refugee, but if I am the correct answer for me is Vermont. The correct answer for someone else might be Ontario. We will pull through as a community.

No one benefits from hoarding supplies. In fact if you did stockpile 3 years worth of food and fuel in some far off place where you don't know anyone you will have a target on your back if it's a time of shortages and you have no community to support you. If you're lucky the local government will requisition your stuff, if you're unlucky a vigilante mob will.

Sjs00
Jun 29, 2013

Yeah Baby Yeah !
You seem to be very convinced of how people are going to behave. Personally I'm going to be doing my best impersonation of a cardboard box on top of some Wendy's or something with a mirror pointed to the road where I will take note of every group that passes my radius size, level of organization, type of vehicles, proficiency, etc all while not moving a muscle in my little shade in the corner above the drive thru window with my guns loaded and tire popping devices spread the gently caress everywhere on the ground below
I'm looking forward stalking and shadowing a mob and witnessing them tear themselves apart

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

Sjs00 posted:

You seem to be very convinced of how people are going to behave. Personally I'm going to be doing my best impersonation of a cardboard box on top of some Wendy's or something with a mirror pointed to the road where I will take note of every group that passes my radius size, level of organization, type of vehicles, proficiency, etc all while not moving a muscle in my little shade in the corner above the drive thru window with my guns loaded and tire popping devices spread the gently caress everywhere on the ground below
I'm looking forward stalking and shadowing a mob and witnessing them tear themselves apart

:yikes:

Sjs00
Jun 29, 2013

Yeah Baby Yeah !

:yikes:

jeeves
May 27, 2001

Deranged Psychopathic
Butler Extraordinaire
I always remember some scifi book from the 70s about a comet hitting earth and a tidal wave knocking out most of the west coast— some upper middle class astronomy professor main character is like “there are tons of supplies up at the observatory where I spend one a week a year! Let’s go there! We will be safe and can wait it out!”

Then by the time they get there tons of locals and like anyone with half a brain had already invaded the place, looted it, or were squatting and saying “get lost whatcha gonna do call the cops?”

Every time I think of preppers and hoarders I think of that. Or the end of Day of the Triffids where a warlords just marches into the main characters completely sustainable farm and declares it his because he has guns and a tank.

I guess the morale of the story is either join up a warlord or become one ASAP?

Conspiratiorist
Nov 12, 2015

17th Separate Kryvyi Rih Tank Brigade named after Konstantin Pestushko
Look to my coming on the first light of the fifth sixth some day
Preppers also make a big deal out of fleeing cities towards the obviously safer (and minority-free) countryside, when historically during societal breakdowns it is urban centers that end up the focus of efforts to maintain stability, while the periphery is left to decay and raided for resources.

Oracle
Oct 9, 2004

Conspiratiorist posted:

Preppers also make a big deal out of fleeing cities towards the obviously safer (and minority-free) countryside, when historically during societal breakdowns it is urban centers that end up the focus of efforts to maintain stability, while the periphery is left to decay and raided for resources.

Preppers always think they’re going to be the raiders, not the raidees.

The Oldest Man
Jul 28, 2003

Oracle posted:

Preppers always think they’re going to be the raiders, not the raidees.

A lot of preppers also entertain fantasies of fully justified self defense castle law killing sprees against "those people" in their preferred end of days scenario.

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.

Conspiratiorist posted:

Preppers also make a big deal out of fleeing cities towards the obviously safer (and minority-free) countryside, when historically during societal breakdowns it is urban centers that end up the focus of efforts to maintain stability, while the periphery is left to decay and raided for resources.

Not from the history I've read? During societal breakdowns cities shrink and the population flees to the countryside (not with great results for them perhaps) and central authority declines, so it's not as capable of this robbing the periphery anyway. See roman decline and bronze age collapse for instance. This doesn't work for preppers because they are not from those places, don't integrate into those places and don't join the community, they have a very city-person view of the whole thing and completely miss the point, that these small places are tightly knit communities who will join together and hoard resources in a more communal way, instead of fighting each other (disclaimer: maybe different in the UK/US, you're a screwed up and classist society in a lot of ways).

So likely they are likely to be outside the communities they are trying to hide in and fail in their efforts, likely they will be raided by their neighbors who will redistribute their stores to the community. If they are lucky they'll get to join in like anyone else. Also nowadays at least in Finland, the country side has had an increasing percentage of minorites since the 80s, which has been nice as it offsets the population drain.

His Divine Shadow fucked around with this message at 08:12 on Mar 13, 2021

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BIG HEADLINE
Jun 13, 2006

"Stand back, Ottawan ruffian, or face my lumens!"
You know, everyone in the mid-Atlantic and Northeast US is waiting for the cicadas to come back in May, and I just had a depressing thought that "at least we'll see some insects." I cannot remember the last time I had to clean bug guts off my windshield, even after driving on the interstate for 60+ minutes.

Then I thought "what if they're already dead and they just don't come out of the ground at all?"

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply