Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: fart simpson)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Centrist Committee
Aug 6, 2019
I wonder how many drones you can get for an f35

wanna see one of those mass choreographed Chinese propaganda videos as a thousand chad drones swarm the virgin usaf f35

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

indigi
Jul 20, 2004

how can we not talk about family
when family's all that we got?

Centrist Committee posted:

wanna see one of those mass choreographed Chinese propaganda videos as a thousand chad drones swarm the virgin usaf f35

this is honestly the future of war. not necessarily against F-35s, but everything else? way cheaper and probably just as effective

shrike82
Jun 11, 2005

lol if you think the US MIC is decaying, watching the PLA/N going to war would be funny with forces that haven’t seen combat in a generation.

Trying to critique the US military from the left by arguing that they wouldn’t be as effective in conventional combat is a losing argument

I’m reminded of teary eyed leftist podcasters talking about Soleimani and how Iran would have some cunning revenge attack of the perfect proportionality

Junkozeyne
Feb 13, 2012
The US has a losing streak of their Asian destroyers against container ships so I wouldn't be so sure that they are an unstoppable force

shrike82
Jun 11, 2005

arguing the US doesn’t have drone warfare expertise is an interesting perspective for purported leftists to have

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

Ardennes posted:

Then you have the Ford that is still having problems with its catapult (as of March 2021, 4 years after it was commissioned) and it still isn't ready for combat.

quote:

You know the catapult is quite important. So I said what is this? Sir, this is our digital catapult system. He said well, we’re going to this because we wanted to keep up with modern [technology]. I said you don’t use steam anymore for catapult? No sir. I said, “Ah, how is it working?” “Sir, not good. Not good. Doesn’t have the power. You know the steam is just brutal. You see that sucker going and steam’s going all over the place, there’s planes thrown in the air.”

It sounded bad to me. Digital. They have digital. What is digital? And it’s very complicated, you have to be Albert Einstein to figure it out. And I said–and now they want to buy more aircraft carriers. I said what system are you going to be–”Sir, we’re staying with digital.” I said no you’re not. You going to goddamned steam, the digital costs hundreds of millions of dollars more money and it’s no good.


quote:

"Steam's only worked for about 65 years perfectly. And I won't tell you this because it's before my time by a little bit, but they have a $900 million cost overrun on this crazy electric catapult. They want to show — next, next, next. And we all want innovation, but it's too much," Trump told the sailors on Monday.

"I’m going to just put out an order. We’re going to use steam," he said.


Trump was right

Centrist Committee
Aug 6, 2019

shrike82 posted:

arguing the US doesn’t have drone warfare expertise is an interesting perspective for purported leftists to have

thanks obama

shrike82
Jun 11, 2005

can’t wait for leftist Tom Clancy milporn

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020
Lol the VCD of carrier catapults.

Ferrinus
Jun 19, 2003

i'm finding this quite easy, i guess in part because i'm a fast type but also because i have a coherent mental model of the world

gradenko_2000 posted:

Trump was right

the usa is steadily digitizing its navy into being inoperative from what i understand

shrike82
Jun 11, 2005

https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3125238/tokyo-slams-beijings-revamp-electoral-system-hong-kong-japanese

quote:

Tokyo slams Beijing’s revamp of electoral system in Hong Kong, with Japanese firms wary of legislation changes

Japan “cannot overlook” the resolution passed by China’s National People’s Congress on Thursday to change the electoral system in Hong Kong, with Tokyo describing new laws requiring all political candidates to be “patriots” as a major setback to the city’s autonomy.
...
The left-leaning Asahi has also weighed in, saying that the elections held under Japan’s military dictatorship during World War II were more democratic than the elections Beijing is imposing upon Hong Kong.

lol

Ardennes
May 12, 2002
Yeah, the increasingly open apologism going on in Japan for wartime fascists isn’t a great look but also pretty baked in after Kishi took power.

The US military has plenty of punch left but much of that is from modernization of late Cold War equipment, the real boondoggles have been since 2000.

mila kunis
Jun 10, 2011

shrike82 posted:

lol if you think the US MIC is decaying, watching the PLA/N going to war would be funny with forces that haven’t seen combat in a generation.

Trying to critique the US military from the left by arguing that they wouldn’t be as effective in conventional combat is a losing argument

I’m reminded of teary eyed leftist podcasters talking about Soleimani and how Iran would have some cunning revenge attack of the perfect proportionality

the MIC clearly is decaying in some ways, the F35 is a funny debacle, the navy has been consultant-ized into slipping operational standards, overwork and poor morale, but obviously it still packs a punch and is going to likely win conventional wars because the sheer amount of resources poured into it is going to yield results

whether us drone warfare has been caught up to/is counterable by other countries arsenals is something idk about

also what the gently caress is wrong with your stupid poo poo brain that compels you to constantly post agro garbage in this thread taking brave stands against the posting enemies in your head

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

mila kunis posted:

the MIC clearly is decaying in some ways, the F35 is a funny debacle, the navy has been consultant-ized into slipping operational standards, overwork and poor morale, but obviously it still packs a punch and is going to likely win conventional wars because the sheer amount of resources poured into it is going to yield results

Well for the next 10-15 years or so at least. One thing though is we have chronically underestimated both Chinese spending and capabilities by not properly adjusting for PPP. The vast majority of their equipment is either produced locally or bought from the Russians and their soldiers are paid in Yuan. Their costs are naturally going to be lower than ours. Nevertheless, they still spend about half what we do adjusted.

That said, Chinese spending is rapidly increasing and if not gaining. Unfortunately, this also only gives the MIC more ammo to expand budgets in return.

Ardennes has issued a correction as of 02:33 on Mar 13, 2021

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020
F35 is not that bad of a plane, compare to the competition. But China has a AA missile that's twice the range.

Anyway I am very glad Maverick is not flying a F35 in Topgun 2: Electric Boogaloo.

shrike82
Jun 11, 2005

i'm more interested in whether 100 chinese soldiers can beat 100 indian soldiers in the kashmir valley using unarmed combat and bats
what's the over/under on that

VideoTapir
Oct 18, 2005

He'll tire eventually.
China would be better served pouring resources into seawalls

sleep with the vicious
Apr 2, 2010

shrike82 posted:

lol if you think the US MIC is decaying, watching the PLA/N going to war would be funny with forces that haven’t seen combat in a generation.

Trying to critique the US military from the left by arguing that they wouldn’t be as effective in conventional combat is a losing argument

I’m reminded of teary eyed leftist podcasters talking about Soleimani and how Iran would have some cunning revenge attack of the perfect proportionality

It is pretty wild how Iran's only response was accidentally blowing up a passenger airline full of Canadians and then getting one of their premier nuclear scientists assassinated

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

VideoTapir posted:

China would be better served pouring resources into seawalls

how easily can seawalls be destroyed by aerial bombing

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018

shrike82 posted:

lol if you think the US MIC is decaying, watching the PLA/N going to war would be funny with forces that haven’t seen combat in a generation.

Trying to critique the US military from the left by arguing that they wouldn’t be as effective in conventional combat is a losing argument

I’m reminded of teary eyed leftist podcasters talking about Soleimani and how Iran would have some cunning revenge attack of the perfect proportionality

When was the last time the US fought a professional army with roughly the same capabilities?

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

sleep with the vicious posted:

It is pretty wild how Iran's only response was accidentally blowing up a passenger airline full of Canadians and then getting one of their premier nuclear scientists assassinated

I mean there was that US base that got blasted...

Small Gay Planet
Aug 2, 2019

by Fluffdaddy

shrike82 posted:

lol if you think the US MIC is decaying, watching the PLA/N going to war would be funny with forces that haven’t seen combat in a generation.

sry im having a tough time imagining how 30 or so years of nothing but launching bombing missions against hapless brown people on land translates to superior experience and skill in naval combat against an equal rival?? if the usn can’t dodge cargo ships exactly how is it going to dodge a swarm of anti-ship missiles?

shrike82
Jun 11, 2005

lol, comparing militaries with a list of paper capabilities is the same dumb poo poo that the MIC does so lefties should be critiqued for it.
when was the last time the PLA/N engaged in any conflict?

KaptainKrunk
Feb 6, 2006


no one has any experience fighting the kind of conflict that would occur in China vs US and satraps

Small Gay Planet
Aug 2, 2019

by Fluffdaddy

shrike82 posted:

lol, comparing militaries with a list of paper capabilities is the same dumb poo poo that the MIC does so lefties should be critiqued for it.
when was the last time the PLA/N engaged in any conflict?

when was the last time the usn engaged in any conflict against naval forces of equal capability? WWII?

Exactly what conflict are you referring to that demonstrates the usn’s fighting capacity?

shrike82
Jun 11, 2005

ok, so people itt are arguing that china has a navy "of equal capability" to the us?

Small Gay Planet
Aug 2, 2019

by Fluffdaddy

shrike82 posted:

ok, so people itt are arguing that china has a navy "of equal capability" to the us?

dont dodge the question, swine

KaptainKrunk
Feb 6, 2006


it doesn't have an equal navy in terms of its ability to project power or on a ship by ship basis but any plausible scenario of conflict its fighting in its home waters

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

shrike82 posted:

I’m reminded of teary eyed leftist podcasters talking about Soleimani and how Iran would have some cunning revenge attack of the perfect proportionality

don't be vague, I want some podcast recs

shrike82
Jun 11, 2005

the chapo episodes right after solemani got blown up were hilarious - will menaker was weeping about how this was going to presage a wider conflict in the ME, and the interview with the war nerd had him talk ominously about the iranians were well-trained and would have a decisive and exquistely proportioned counterstrike that would make the US pay

and then whoops, they shoot up a passenger plane

KaptainKrunk
Feb 6, 2006


shrike82 posted:

the chapo episodes right after solemani got blown up were hilarious - will menaker was weeping about how this was going to presage a wider conflict in the ME, and the interview with the war nerd had him talk ominously about the iranians were well-trained and would have a decisive and exquistely proportioned counterstrike that would make the US pay

and then whoops, they shoot up a passenger plane

putting your enemy's military on high alert and then them proceeding to accidently shoot something down seems like a pro tactic

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

shrike82 posted:

the chapo episodes right after solemani got blown up were hilarious - will menaker was weeping about how this was going to presage a wider conflict in the ME, and the interview with the war nerd had him talk ominously about the iranians were well-trained and would have a decisive and exquistely proportioned counterstrike that would make the US pay

and then whoops, they shoot up a passenger plane

Dolan was last on chapo in 2019?

the US letting a base get blown up with no response seems pretty extraordinary. I don't know the last time that happened.

shrike82
Jun 11, 2005

I looked it up and it was Felix doing a special pod with Derek Davison, not Dolan

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

shrike82 posted:

lol if you think the US MIC is decaying, watching the PLA/N going to war would be funny with forces that haven’t seen combat in a generation.

Trying to critique the US military from the left by arguing that they wouldn’t be as effective in conventional combat is a losing argument

I’m reminded of teary eyed leftist podcasters talking about Soleimani and how Iran would have some cunning revenge attack of the perfect proportionality

Tell me what's the solution to declining enlistment among the young?

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018

Type of guy who hate listens to chapo and then comes to eurasia megathread to "troll" the lefties

Grapplejack
Nov 27, 2007

it literally doesn't matter how combat ready the troops are because you have nukes, that's the secret sauce. China and the US are invincible because of this. China could have a single hot dog floating in the ocean and would be able to fend off any US attack because of the 400+ ICBMs they have

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

We need someone to report back on a NATO commander giving us his Tom Clancy scenario.
https://twitter.com/mathitak/status/1367843315098341386?s=20

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Grapplejack posted:

it literally doesn't matter how combat ready the troops are because you have nukes, that's the secret sauce. China and the US are invincible because of this. China could have a single hot dog floating in the ocean and would be able to fend off any US attack because of the 400+ ICBMs they have

i think if the USA sends over an invasion force it wold be better to use a nuclear torpedo? i assume china has those, they are easier to make than ICBMs. goodbye carrier group :twisted:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7kgExpYzkE&t=51s

shrike82
Jun 11, 2005

China should put ships full of straw off coastal waters and collect US bombs dropped off them to be reused - call this the zhuge liang stratagem and get some Chinese academics to write books about it

I’m sick of westerners using Greco-Roman parallels (e.g Thucydides trap or the declining Roman core versus periphery), let’s get a bunch of Chinese historical allusions in the mix

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mirello
Jan 29, 2006

by Fluffdaddy
anyone talking about ship vs ship or w/e is braindead. if conflict broke out between china and amerikkka, all life on earth would end. there's no such thing as a limited war between two nuclear powers.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply