Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Olympic Mathlete
Feb 25, 2011

:h:


The design of a truck lends itself PERFECTLY to wedge more battery capacity in though, especially considering a modern truck is so loving big. You could absolutely produce produce a 'standard' range one for all those bellends that only tootle to the shops in them as well as a double/triple pack version for people who actually use them for truck stuff. Look how nice and flat a Tesla battery pack is, just layers those fuckers up and let's go truckin'

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

priznat
Jul 7, 2009

Let's get drunk and kiss each other all night.
NiMh battery EVs , wow. All the rechargeable tools I’ve ever had with that battery type have been terrible and the batteries seem to just die at the worst time so I am kinda amazed they had that in cars/trucks.

Kia Soul Enthusias
May 9, 2004

zoom-zoom
Toilet Rascal

priznat posted:

NiMh battery EVs , wow. All the rechargeable tools I’ve ever had with that battery type have been terrible and the batteries seem to just die at the worst time so I am kinda amazed they had that in cars/trucks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_encumbrance_of_large_automotive_NiMH_batteries

FlapYoJacks
Feb 12, 2009
nope

FlapYoJacks fucked around with this message at 21:36 on Apr 6, 2022

cursedshitbox
May 20, 2012

Your rear-end wont survive my hammering.



Fun Shoe
Counterpoint? EREV hybrid trucks using ideas from the volt and locomotive industry.
Huge battery capacity under the deck, be it 5' homegamer or 20' box truck
small 2-3l generator engine coupled to a generator head. Onboard 80kW power supply, onboard range extender, etc.

Technically the lego exists now to be able to build such a thing in class 4-7 trucks.

Bone Crimes
Mar 7, 2007

Olympic Mathlete posted:

The design of a truck lends itself PERFECTLY to wedge more battery capacity in though, especially considering a modern truck is so loving big. You could absolutely produce produce a 'standard' range one for all those bellends that only tootle to the shops in them as well as a double/triple pack version for people who actually use them for truck stuff. Look how nice and flat a Tesla battery pack is, just layers those fuckers up and let's go truckin'

I was just going to say exactly this , It seems like this is just a failure of imagination, you could upsell the 'towing' battery pack that can also power your trailer for 4 days. Or power all your tools and welder just by plugging in at night.

I also don't understand why there aren't small cargo evs worth anything. I mean like if gm made that old school pickup from bolt drivetrain components, even if it only went like 150miles it would sell hugely. Is it a safety thing? Or just that they don't want to compete with their cash cows?

Ola
Jul 19, 2004

Shamino posted:

I genuinely don't understand why all legacy automakers (other than Ford) are basically sitting on their balls with an electric truck. I mean Toyota or GM could announce an electric Tacoma or Colorado at $40k and steal the thunder of Tesla and Rivian.

The Venn diagram overlap between the traditional truck-buying demographics and the EV buying demographics is narrow enough to be described as "no man's land between trenches".

Clayton Bigsby
Apr 17, 2005

Bone Crimes posted:

I also don't understand why there aren't small cargo evs worth anything. I mean like if gm made that old school pickup from bolt drivetrain components, even if it only went like 150miles it would sell hugely. Is it a safety thing? Or just that they don't want to compete with their cash cows?

While they aren't pickups, we have a plethora of small cargo EVs here in Sweden. Thanks to the climate these are more practical year round than a pickup. Dacia's tiny "Spring" will apparently be available in a baby cargo van config as well, should land under 20k EUR.


Maxus "e-Deliver". 52kWh battery and up to around 300km range.



There's also the EV80, around 200km range but decent load capacity.



There's the Nissan e-NV200:



The Renault Kangoo ZE:



Opel Vivaro-E:



Mercedes e-Vito:



VW e-Caddy:



VW e-Crafter:



VW e-Transporter:

Elmnt80
Dec 30, 2012


The eTransporter looks like panel version of an astro van.

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy
These make a lot of sense IMO as they'd tend cover a few hundred km per day around cities, delivering lighter stuff like flowers or food, not bricks.

mobby_6kl fucked around with this message at 20:51 on Mar 13, 2021

Clayton Bigsby
Apr 17, 2005

mobby_6kl posted:

These make a lot of sense IMO as they'd tend cover a few hundred km per day around cities, delivering lighter stuff like flowers or food, mot bricks.

I see local contractors using them too. They can carry around 1000kg / 2200 lbs which is enough for most.

Shamino
Mar 14, 2008

I am weary of loitering about Britain. There is much we could be accomplishing! Where hast thou been, anyway?

Ola posted:

The Venn diagram overlap between the traditional truck-buying demographics and the EV buying demographics is narrow enough to be described as "no man's land between trenches".
Cybertruck has a million preorders and fleet operators who don't give a gently caress and just care about TCO would beg to differ.

Shamino
Mar 14, 2008

I am weary of loitering about Britain. There is much we could be accomplishing! Where hast thou been, anyway?
Ooops

Ola
Jul 19, 2004

Shamino posted:

Cybertruck has a million preorders and fleet operators who don't give a gently caress and just care about TCO would beg to differ.

The vast majority of those preorders have never bought a truck before, are uncommitted because they know it's easy to cancel and are also:

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

Clayton Bigsby posted:

I see local contractors using them too. They can carry around 1000kg / 2200 lbs which is enough for most.

Yeah the capacity is fine, I think the issue for a wider audience is that the range would go down the drain quickly with weight. Which again realistically probably isn't an issue for most people who'd just get some materials from the nearby hardware store. But I'm sure the typical truck buyer will insist that they have to tow their 1 ton boat for 10 hours straight every week or something.

VideoGameVet
May 14, 2005

It is by caffeine alone I set my bike in motion. It is by the juice of Java that pedaling acquires speed, the teeth acquire stains, stains become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my bike in motion.

mobby_6kl posted:

Yeah the capacity is fine, I think the issue for a wider audience is that the range would go down the drain quickly with weight. Which again realistically probably isn't an issue for most people who'd just get some materials from the nearby hardware store. But I'm sure the typical truck buyer will insist that they have to tow their 1 ton boat for 10 hours straight every week or something.

Weight doesn't necessarily hurt EV range as much as one would guess because of Regen.

Aero is a different story.

Shamino
Mar 14, 2008

I am weary of loitering about Britain. There is much we could be accomplishing! Where hast thou been, anyway?

Ola posted:

The vast majority of those preorders have never bought a truck before, are uncommitted because they know it's easy to cancel and are also:



I didn't know Elon musk also ran Rivian. That's cool.

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy
Not yet, but he does run the cybertruck

VideoGameVet posted:

Weight doesn't necessarily hurt EV range as much as one would guess because of Regen.

Aero is a different story.
IIRC, the increased rolling resistance would still eat up most of the benefits: https://youtu.be/S4W-P5aCWJs

Clayton Bigsby
Apr 17, 2005

mobby_6kl posted:

Yeah the capacity is fine, I think the issue for a wider audience is that the range would go down the drain quickly with weight. Which again realistically probably isn't an issue for most people who'd just get some materials from the nearby hardware store. But I'm sure the typical truck buyer will insist that they have to tow their 1 ton boat for 10 hours straight every week or something.

It'd make a lot more sense for people to accept that they might need to rent a vehicle very occasionally in order to haul something bigger. Renting a trailer once every month or so, or maybe even an entire van to haul some big furniture, is a small expense and lets you drive a more reasonably sized vehicle the rest of the time.

Wayne Knight
May 11, 2006

Yeah I live like <5min from a Lowes, there's a U-haul in the same parking lot. Rented a truck for $20/hr, bought big heavy thing at Lowes, took it home, took it back, didn't bother putting any gas in it. $20 and an extra half hour of time (filling out rental paperwork and drop off) for a once a year event is no big deal. And even then it's just because I'm antisocial and don't want to bother my neighbors to either let me borrow theirs or give me a ride.

That said I'd absolutely buy a 90s ranger/s-10 sized EV truck. After I ride the spark into the ground, I think the right thing to do is to have one respectable, functional EV and one silly, less practical EV. So a sedan/SUV EV with 300+ mi range and like a converted suzuki samurai or the cheapest thing possible, but with like a bunch of pumpkins on a vinyl full car wrap or a nice 80s brown macco paint job with blinding chrome hubcaps.

Wibla
Feb 16, 2011

We have a couple of those Maxus EV's at work and they suck rear end.

Clayton Bigsby
Apr 17, 2005

RZA Encryption posted:

Yeah I live like <5min from a Lowes, there's a U-haul in the same parking lot. Rented a truck for $20/hr, bought big heavy thing at Lowes, took it home, took it back, didn't bother putting any gas in it. $20 and an extra half hour of time (filling out rental paperwork and drop off) for a once a year event is no big deal. And even then it's just because I'm antisocial and don't want to bother my neighbors to either let me borrow theirs or give me a ride.

That said I'd absolutely buy a 90s ranger/s-10 sized EV truck. After I ride the spark into the ground, I think the right thing to do is to have one respectable, functional EV and one silly, less practical EV. So a sedan/SUV EV with 300+ mi range and like a converted suzuki samurai or the cheapest thing possible, but with like a bunch of pumpkins on a vinyl full car wrap or a nice 80s brown macco paint job with blinding chrome hubcaps.

I'm going for the ID4 practical vehicle + Miata ICE car combo myself.

Tyro
Nov 10, 2009

Clayton Bigsby posted:

I'm going for the ID4 practical vehicle + Miata ICE car combo myself.

I'm leaning the same way (but replace the miata with a motorcycle).

My local dealer just got their id4 tester and emailed me to set up a test drive, but I'm out of the country for a few months for work. Bummer.

GlassEye-Boy
Jul 12, 2001

DoomTrainPhD posted:

Because making a brand new electric vehicle from scratch is incredibly difficult to do? The entire drivetrain and electrical system are different than ICE cars, let alone the safety regulations. You also need new assembly lines to make the electric motors and other things that make up that system.

THEN you have the mountains of code that programmers have to create to handle all of these brand new sensors, including traction control which is entirely different from ice cars, and all of them are paid a ton of money from Tesla, Rivian, or Lucid.

And THEN, you still need to procure all of the batteries and essential components for all of the circuit boards, and there is a massive global chip shortage right now.

I am saying that it takes a LOT of time and effort to bring all of those things together. It's not just “throw some batteries and an electric motor in a car.”

That's how you end up with a 60k entry price or whatever Rivian trucks are priced at. Not everything has to be bespoke and optimized for maximum performance. Surely there are more off the shelf solutions.

ilkhan
Oct 7, 2004

I LOVE Musk and his pro-first-amendment ways. X is the future.

Clayton Bigsby posted:

It'd make a lot more sense for people to accept that they might need to rent a vehicle very occasionally in order to haul something bigger. Renting a trailer once every month or so, or maybe even an entire van to haul some big furniture, is a small expense and lets you drive a more reasonably sized vehicle the rest of the time.
Really depends on how often you do it and how much that time/effort is worth to you.

A lot people have done that math (explicitly or implicitly) and decided they'd rather have the truck in their driveway than rent.

A lot of things are cheaper to rent once or twice a year, but people keep buying for reasons.

Kia Soul Enthusias
May 9, 2004

zoom-zoom
Toilet Rascal

GlassEye-Boy posted:

That's how you end up with a 60k entry price or whatever Rivian trucks are priced at. Not everything has to be bespoke and optimized for maximum performance. Surely there are more off the shelf solutions.

Legacy automakers can adapt EV tech to their ICE platforms, but my 2017 Kia Soul EV, which doesn't have any advanced self-driving like features, has an air-cooled 27kwh battery, still had an MSRP of ~37k in 2017. There's no one simple trick to make things cheaper, though yeah, it would be better if you could get off the shelf solutions for driving aids from Bosch or whomever.

Godzilla07
Oct 4, 2008

Clayton Bigsby posted:

It'd make a lot more sense for people to accept that they might need to rent a vehicle very occasionally in order to haul something bigger. Renting a trailer once every month or so, or maybe even an entire van to haul some big furniture, is a small expense and lets you drive a more reasonably sized vehicle the rest of the time.

In the US, there are no hard incentives to push back against buying the biggest vehicle possible such as CO2 tax, fuel costs, or the physical size of the average parking space.

Speleothing
May 6, 2008

Spare batteries are pretty key.
Has everyone here forgotten about the goddamn F-150?

Wibla
Feb 16, 2011


Obviously! :v:

GlassEye-Boy
Jul 12, 2001

Charles posted:

Legacy automakers can adapt EV tech to their ICE platforms, but my 2017 Kia Soul EV, which doesn't have any advanced self-driving like features, has an air-cooled 27kwh battery, still had an MSRP of ~37k in 2017. There's no one simple trick to make things cheaper, though yeah, it would be better if you could get off the shelf solutions for driving aids from Bosch or whomever.

That's just it, why does a EV need driving aids? I know automakers make all their profits from these add ons, but there is no inherent reason why we need to stuff all this tech into a EV.

Guess I just don't get some of the decisions the auto industry is making. The new Jeep Wagoneer is over a 100k.

GlassEye-Boy fucked around with this message at 04:04 on Mar 14, 2021

Godholio
Aug 28, 2002

Does a bear split in the woods near Zheleznogorsk?

GlassEye-Boy posted:

That's just it, why does a EV need driving aids? I know automakers make all their profits from these add ons, but there is no inherent reason why we need to stuff all this tech into a EV.

Guess I just don't get some of the decisions the auto industry is making. The new Jeep Wagoneer is over a 100k.

I mean...

GlassEye-Boy
Jul 12, 2001

Godholio posted:

I mean...

Hah yea...

Elviscat
Jan 1, 2008

Well don't you know I'm caught in a trap?

GlassEye-Boy posted:

That's just it, why does a EV need driving aids? I know automakers make all their profits from these add ons, but there is no inherent reason why we need to stuff all this tech into a EV.

Guess I just don't get some of the decisions the auto industry is making. The new Jeep Wagoneer is over a 100k.

It's because big nerds are the primary market for EVs right now, and big nerds like techy poo poo.

If anyone ever makes an affordable "crate" EV system maybe I'll just swap my Ranger myself.

Godholio
Aug 28, 2002

Does a bear split in the woods near Zheleznogorsk?
I'm annoyed GM hasn't released their prices yet.

SpannerX
Apr 26, 2010

I had a beer with Stephen Harper once and now I like him.

Fun Shoe
Well there's the Citroen Ami if you don't want any tech, and no speed or range...

MrYenko
Jun 18, 2012

#2 isn't ALWAYS bad...


Comon Ford, have the balls to not have a grille.

Tenchrono
Jun 2, 2011


Cool new Model 3 hatchback photo leaks just dropped:




Interesting choice they took with the rear design.

Godzilla07
Oct 4, 2008

GlassEye-Boy posted:

That's just it, why does a EV need driving aids? I know automakers make all their profits from these add ons, but there is no inherent reason why we need to stuff all this tech into a EV.

Guess I just don't get some of the decisions the auto industry is making. The new Jeep Wagoneer is over a 100k.

The problem is that buyers who would be satisfied without the fluff are priced out of EVs right now, as turning an ICE vehicle into a BEV plus the Level 2 charger required for BEV ownership turns a $20,000 car into a $35,000 car before state incentives. You can't sell a $35,000 car with a plastic steering wheel and cloth seats, so you have to tart it up from there.

The auto industry focuses on the high end because that's where the money's at. Everyone wants to be Porsche, who makes an average profit of $17,000 per car.

Bone Crimes
Mar 7, 2007

Clayton Bigsby posted:

While they aren't pickups, we have a plethora of small cargo EVs here in Sweden. Thanks to the climate these are more practical year round than a pickup. Dacia's tiny "Spring" will apparently be available in a baby cargo van config as well, should land under 20k EUR.


Maxus "e-Deliver". 52kWh battery and up to around 300km range.



There's also the EV80, around 200km range but decent load capacity.



There's the Nissan e-NV200:



The Renault Kangoo ZE:



Opel Vivaro-E:



Mercedes e-Vito:



VW e-Caddy:



VW e-Crafter:



VW e-Transporter:



Huh, all these vans and not a single ev van for the US. Thx for this long list, I had only seen like 3 of these previously

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

KYOON GRIFFEY JR
Apr 12, 2010



Runner-up, TRP Sack Race 2021/22
Back in the day in say like, the 1970s or 1980s, you were lucky to get 100k miles out of a car without a failure that was non-economical to repair. If anything, cars were even more disposable than they are now. The car lifecycle was basically - sell new to someone who would either A) drive in to the ground or B) keep until 50-70k miles and flip to used market, with a single cycle on the used market until the car rusted to its component atoms (within 10 years of production) and or had a failure that was not economical to repair. Cars are relatively cheaper, and more cheaply made in many ways, and because of a lack of real long life used cars pretty much everyone buys new cars up and down the income ladder.

Now, cars are relatively expensive, but they're a lot more durable and long lasting. A five year old car is perfectly fine and will probably give you another five years with mainly routine maintenance, maybe a timing belt or a water pump and some suspension bits. A ten year old car is likely to be pretty reliable and provide good service regardless of brand if you put a thousand bucks in to it. Plus, for your money, instead of getting some new shitbox Chevette, or Versa Note, you can get a perfectly good late model Altima, which although not a spectacular car is a lot nicer than the new alternatives. So the market has shifted - what would formerly be covered by super cheap low end cars is now primarily covered by long-life high quality used cars.

There are no margins in the low end of the market for new cars, so OEMs continue to push upward because that's where the money is. When you release something like the Fit or the Fiesta or the Accent it gets loving crushed by a five year old CR-V, Escape, or Tucson. Why bother? It costs the same amount to develop a new Fit as it does to develop a new CR-V. Not everyone can be Porsche, but if you can go from $300/car net profit to $600 per car, even if you sell fewer cars, you are much better off as a business.

The low end of the EV market is probably not unit profitable based on battery costs alone, and decontenting a car will only save you a little bit of money. In order for EVs to get down below new vehicle ATPs we need cheaper batteries. Fortunately that is happening over time as capacity increases and tech gets better.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply