|
PERPETUAL IDIOT posted:You believe in the "horseshoe theory." No, I believe in certain personalities being completely unable to exist in a space without being contrarians, not that far left = far right. I'm saying these people see someone on the far left and contrive reasons to believe their leftism is actually problematic.
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 19:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 00:39 |
|
|
PERPETUAL IDIOT posted:You believe in the "horseshoe theory." 
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 19:17
|
|
|
^ I can get behind that one
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 19:17
|
|
|
Brain Candy posted:i know it will never happen but mods & admins should be elected and recal|able instead of completely unaccountable and as long as that's true you'll have Love Democracy Or Else combined with banning to win fights You dont need this, there should just be a better way to remove lovely mods than "make enough noise in QCS that Jeffrey/admins comes down off the mountain and hems and haws enough to do something". And good luck if that admins in a bad mood lol.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 19:21
|
|
|
drat, Richard Wolff is losing his cool.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 19:23
|
|
|
the most basic rule of forums moderation is "don't punish people for making fun of you", it's insane how often people don't follow it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 20:00
|
|
|
really queer Christmas posted:You dont need this, there should just be a better way to remove lovely mods than "make enough noise in QCS that Jeffrey/admins comes down off the mountain and hems and haws enough to do something". And good luck if that admins in a bad mood lol. you need something, some lever to get people with power to do what you want. karening only works if the people on the other end care that you are complaining. nominally this is a comedy website so being funny was a valiant effort, but in the QCS thread HF was banned for making a joke this what the immortal science predicts and what do you think happened? admin reads a truly hilarious thread, later finds that the sass was actually correct, and then bans a poster for joking and correctly says to everyone that they don't have to care what other people think
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 20:30
|
|
|
Halloween Jack posted:drat, Richard Wolff is losing his cool. frankly it's amazing he has maintained it for as long as he has
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 20:45
|
|
|
dick wolff tell us what u really think
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 20:46
|
|
|
Brain Candy posted:you need something, some lever to get people with power to do what you want. karening only works if the people on the other end care that you are complaining. nominally this is a comedy website so being funny was a valiant effort, but in the QCS thread HF was banned for making a joke i think the selection process of having to shame mods into recompense, and that mods select new mods, eventually ends up with a staff full of shameless dunderheads or people who get way too invested into their forums position. burnout claims everyone else, not counting those who are sane enough to never accept the position in the first place. it also doesn't help that while there's people who gives sane feedback, there's absolutely ludicrous people that form stalking clubs over getting dinged at all which also plays towards filtering any given moderation team to dysfunction. there was a series of interviews done with the mods at r/askhistorians where they talked about people sending them like, eight hundred threatening messages over deleting a pun (and ten times worse if they're outed as not a cishet white guy). it seems like a remarkably unpleasant gig and its probably not conductive, systemically, that it is treated as vital enough to imbune with expectations of trust and duty but also something you expect done for free.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 21:11
|
|
|
a forum cop is someone who enforces their bad decisions and doesnt tolerate sass even when the community overwhelmingly tells them they suck rear end (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 21:18
|
|
|
Tiler Kiwi posted:i think the selection process of having to shame mods into recompense, and that mods select new mods, eventually ends up with a staff full of shameless dunderheads or people who get way too invested into their forums position. burnout claims everyone else, not counting those who are sane enough to never accept the position in the first place. yeah this insightful too, the lese majeste is the recompense for the stupid garbage and handling insane people. here's another crazy idea, pay people (could be coffee money, just depends on how much time it takes) for thread janitoring
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 21:33
|
|
|
comedyblissoption posted:a forum cop is someone who enforces their bad decisions and doesnt tolerate sass even when the community overwhelmingly tells them they suck rear end hey squizzle this is incredibly loving lame
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 21:34
|
|
|
comedyblissoption posted:a forum cop is someone who enforces their bad decisions and doesnt tolerate sass even when the community overwhelmingly tells them they suck rear end good lord the mods of this subforum suck rear end
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 21:34
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 21:38
|
|
|
Looking at the button labeled If I Push This Button Im A loving Moron And Everyone Hates Me, sweating bullets
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 21:38
|
|
|
comedyblissoption posted:a forum cop is someone who enforces their bad decisions and doesnt tolerate sass even when the community overwhelmingly tells them they suck rear end Mods rear end
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 21:39
|
|
|
comedyblissoption posted:a forum cop is someone who enforces their bad decisions and doesnt tolerate sass even when the community overwhelmingly tells them they suck rear end squizzle sux at comedy
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 21:56
|
|
|
i hear that before you can become a cspam mod they put you through an exacting battery of tests to ensure that they only pick people who will always make the dumbest possible decision in every conceivable situation
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 22:03
|
|
|
Harry Potter on Ice posted:Mods rear end 
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 22:03
|
|
|
a Loving Dog posted:good lord the mods of this subforum suck rear end
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 22:03
|
|
|
THS posted:hey squizzle this is incredibly loving lame a Loving Dog posted:good lord the mods of this subforum suck rear end
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 22:05
|
|
|
comedyblissoption posted:a forum cop is someone who enforces their bad decisions and doesnt tolerate sass even when the community overwhelmingly tells them they suck rear end lol just close cspam and get it over with already
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 22:13
|
|
|
comedyblissoption posted:a forum cop is someone who enforces their bad decisions and doesnt tolerate sass even when the community overwhelmingly tells them they suck rear end THS posted:hey squizzle this is incredibly loving lame
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 22:14
|
|
|
comedyblissoption posted:a forum cop is someone who enforces their bad decisions and doesnt tolerate sass even when the community overwhelmingly tells them they suck rear end lmao even with the charitable interpretation that was a joke that's lame you freaks. one of you just got credibly caught defending pedophilia, and people are getting probed for not agreeing with the us government, we'll call you pedos all we want
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 22:28
|
|
|
the cspam mods would prefer that we use the phrase 'ephebophile mods' to stop people fighting over syntax,
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 22:31
|
|
|
just merge CSPAM with D&D at this point the mods basically govern the same way
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 22:41
|
|
|
a Loving Dog posted:good lord the mods of this subforum suck rear end
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 22:51
|
|
|
comedyblissoption posted:a forum cop is someone who enforces their bad decisions and doesnt tolerate sass even when the community overwhelmingly tells them they suck rear end what the gently caress Squizzle, gently caress that poo poo darling, if that is considered "sass" worthy of probation, how in the gently caress you handle some real lip in your faces with that skin being thinner than a jellyfish's?
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 23:05
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/commieactivity/status/1372278922897993734
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 23:06
|
|
|
in terms of Americans he’s probably, very depressingly, correct
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 23:09
|
|
|
Remember when gg reposted terf propaganda and defended a book that argues that lesbians are being wipes out by trans men or some equally insane poo poo
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 23:10
|
|
|
yeah but he makes the blue haired people so MAD, so it's fun to say he's good, like David Duke, or Hitler
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 23:12
|
|
|
Vaush has his problems but I will always love how mad he makes the worst people.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 23:17
|
|
|
Brain Candy posted:i know it will never happen but mods & admins should be elected and recal|able instead of completely unaccountable and as long as that's true you'll have Love Democracy Or Else combined with banning to win fights There is a transparency in guessing the number that is completely lacking in the current system of mod appointments.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 23:20
|
|
|
say what you will about vaushites but no vietcong ever called me a tankie
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 23:20
|
|
|
Ruzihm posted:say what you will about vaushites but no vietcong ever called me a tankie lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 23:21
|
|
|
Tesseraction posted:Vaush has his problems but I will always love how mad he makes the worst people. interesting.. what problems do you speak of
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 23:22
|
|
|
comedyblissoption posted:a forum cop is someone who enforces their bad decisions and doesnt tolerate sass even when the community overwhelmingly tells them they suck rear end this keeps happening for some odd reason 
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 23:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 00:39 |
|
|
THS posted:interesting.. what problems do you speak of well first of all he's a cat person
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2021 23:24
|
|