Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
ogarza
Feb 25, 2009

HermanCain posted:

Guys guys guys I don't get it, I already paid for this gun and I can totally earn back those costs by robbing people at gunpoint!
Hm what ethical arguments and environmental issues no but guuuuys I can earn money!!!
Money! For meeeee

lol

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

CaptainSarcastic
Jul 6, 2013



xtal posted:

Yeah, that seems to be the sticking point here. The thing is that "crime" ranges from being gay to using drugs to exposing USA war crimes depending on the jurisdiction.

I'm not sure if you're just doubling down on being disingenuous here or are just that desperately brainwormy for buttcoins.

strange feelings re Daisy
Aug 2, 2000

Bitcoin specifically can't do useful calculations but crypto coins can be earned arbitrarily and don't have to be mined at all. Bananocoin is a meme cryptocurrency rewarded for doing Folding@Home protein research for example. There are others rewarded for CGI rendering or file storage.

QuarkJets
Sep 8, 2008

strange feelings re Daisy posted:

Bitcoin specifically can't do useful calculations but crypto coins can be earned arbitrarily and don't have to be mined at all. Bananocoin is a meme cryptocurrency rewarded for doing Folding@Home protein research for example. There are others rewarded for CGI rendering or file storage.

Cryptocurrencies can be earned arbitrarily, but cryptocurrency networks ultimately need miners contributing computational resources to the network in order to survive. Bananocoin is no different in this regard; at the end of day its transactions are performed by an army of hardware doing pointless busy work, the network just happens to also donate cryptocurrency to people who are contributing computational power to worthwhile projects like folding@home. That's just a stapled-on feature; the proof of work hardware running the Bananocoin network is unable to contribute to folding@home

Hammerite
Mar 9, 2007

And you don't remember what I said here, either, but it was pompous and stupid.
Jade Ear Joe

CaptainSarcastic posted:

I'm not sure if you're just doubling down on being disingenuous here or are just that desperately brainwormy for buttcoins.

that guy is a gimmick poster whose gimmick is to insist that cryptocurrency is actually left-wing (against all the evidence showing that the bitcoin community is exclusively populated by right-libertarians) and that it will lead to the downfall of capitalism or some poo poo like that.

Winged Orpheus
May 21, 2010

Domine, Dirige Nos

ogarza posted:



Considering the hashpower from already paid-for cards, this will pay for itself in a month, anyone claiming GPU mining is not worth it today has clearly not done the math. There is a reason it is so hard to buy them retail.

This is why we call home miners stupid, because none of you know how to do the math either. You can't include the hash rate from your already purchased cards, because you already had those and presumably would have continued to kill the planet with them anyway. When figuring out if this addition is profitable, you have to only consider the additional hash rate/profit from adding this card. You also have to decide whether you're selling the crime pogs as you accrue them, or holding onto them like gollum in the hopes that you can make even more money. That's also not taking into account EIP 1559, which will cut mining income by a pretty hefty amount. You also have to consider the marginal cost of the electricity to power this additional card. If any of those factors pushes this card negative, you will have net LOST money buying this compared to doing nothing.

Also gently caress you for being a large part of the reason cards are so hard to find at retail.

Hammerite
Mar 9, 2007

And you don't remember what I said here, either, but it was pompous and stupid.
Jade Ear Joe

Winged Orpheus posted:

This is why we call home miners stupid, because none of you know how to do the math either. You can't include the hash rate from your already purchased cards, because you already had those and presumably would have continued to kill the planet with them anyway. When figuring out if this addition is profitable, you have to only consider the additional hash rate/profit from adding this card.

lmao i didn't even notice that part when i skimmed over that post

hey I did the math and it turns out every time i add a new card it is even more efficient than the last! once I add my hundredth card it will be earning me a million dollars per hour and i can retire rich!!!

Hello Sailor
May 3, 2006

we're all mad here

ogarza posted:



Considering the hashpower from already paid-for cards, this will pay for itself in a month, anyone claiming GPU mining is not worth it today has clearly not done the math. There is a reason it is so hard to buy them retail.

Jfc, take a business 101 class and learn about equipment depreciation.

The Sausages
Sep 30, 2012

What do you want to do? Who do you want to be?

xtal
Jan 9, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
That totally sucks. I propose we ask the oil seeking slave state to put an end to it.

Collateral Damage
Jun 13, 2009

The rise of socialism will come when we drag the crypto mining bourgeoisie to the gallows and redistribute the GPUs to the gaming proletariat.

xtal
Jan 9, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
E: excessive posting

kw0134
Apr 19, 2003

I buy feet pics🍆

xtal posted:

Weird hearing this analogy since crypto is a vanguard party and nocoiners are lumpen.
I want to memorialize this stupidity for all time on the immortal postchain.

Rufio
Feb 6, 2003

I'm smart! Not like everybody says... like dumb... I'm smart and I want respect!
*leaves computer running for a long time*

Just doing my revolutionary duty!

The Sausages
Sep 30, 2012

What do you want to do? Who do you want to be?

xtal posted:

That totally sucks. I propose we ask the oil seeking slave state to put an end to it.

listen here buddy I'm from oil seeking slave state and I say kill em all

xtal
Jan 9, 2011

by Fluffdaddy

Rufio posted:

*leaves computer running for a long time*

Just doing my revolutionary duty!

C. F. Tor exit nodes.

xtal
Jan 9, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
Of course, a thread full of bootlickers probably doesn't want free speech in China either. After all, it's criminal.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Doctor_Fruitbat
Jun 2, 2013


xtal posted:

Of course, a thread full of bootlickers probably doesn't want free speech in China either.

:allears: This should be fun.

Stanley Pain
Jun 16, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

QuarkJets posted:

Lots of people have managed to not lose sleep over some truly abhorrent poo poo, don't assume that your lack of guilty feelings must mean that what you're doing is fine.

"Well at least it's not as bad as eating meat" is maybe the laziest counterargument imaginable for this. It's practically an admission that you know what you're doing is actually terrible but that you also just don't care

That's not what I'm saying. If you have a problem with the environmental impact of butts but aren't doing other things to minimize you're environmental impact, lol. It's just a strange hill to die on since there are other, much more impactful things you can do. If you actually care about the environment and aren't arguing from some asinine point.

Fried Watermelon
Dec 29, 2008


xtal posted:

C. F. Tor exit nodes.

hello CIA

xtal
Jan 9, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
Nocoiners disguising their bootlicking fetish as environmentalism is quite approximate to anti lockdown people appropriating mental health concerns

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

xtal posted:

Of course, a thread full of bootlickers probably doesn't want free speech in China either. After all, it's criminal.

Your posts are making me reconsider my stance on free speech. I think China is onto something.

Doctor_Fruitbat
Jun 2, 2013


Why no, crypto isn't a cult, now let me tell you about the ignorant nocoiner hordes and how their every word is brainwashed lies.

Stanley Pain
Jun 16, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
I have some bad news for some of you about cash. That too can be used for criminal enterprise. That convivence store down the road could also be used to launder money. Your laundromat might be owned by organized crime, etc.

Jose Valasquez
Apr 8, 2005

Stanley Pain posted:

I have some bad news for some of you about cash. That too can be used for criminal enterprise. That convivence store down the road could also be used to launder money. Your laundromat might be owned by organized crime, etc.

lmao going with the "you can kill someone with a hammer so giving everyone guns is good actually" approach

Doctor_Fruitbat
Jun 2, 2013


"I think we should improve our energy consumption somewhat".

"And yet your corporeal form uses energy. Curious! I am very smart".

Stanley Pain
Jun 16, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Doctor_Fruitbat posted:

"I think we should improve our energy consumption somewhat".

We absolutely should. Haven't really seen anyone say otherwise.

Jose Valasquez posted:

lmao going with the "you can kill someone with a hammer so giving everyone guns is good actually" approach

Sure, if that's what you get from the conversation. Nuance hasn't really been this threads strong point though.

Doctor_Fruitbat
Jun 2, 2013


Stanley Pain posted:

We absolutely should. Haven't really seen anyone say otherwise.

You, repeatedly, defending cryptofucking.

Blotto_Otter
Aug 16, 2013


I think the "cryptocurrency helps facilitate crimes" argument is a bad argument, because it makes it sound like there's a practical use case when there isn't. Here's the thing: it's not even particularly good for that use. Most cryptos are pseudonymous, not anonymous, which is a really loving lousy trait in a currency being used for illicit transactions. Physical cash is safer than cryptos if you want to do crimes and not get caught at some point.

Cryptos are not even particularly great for illicit and criminal use cases! The only use cases where cryptos work well are "purely speculative 'investments'" and "scamming gullible internet users"!

Stanley Pain posted:

That's not what I'm saying. If you have a problem with the environmental impact of butts but aren't doing other things to minimize you're environmental impact, lol. It's just a strange hill to die on since there are other, much more impactful things you can do. If you actually care about the environment and aren't arguing from some asinine point.
You understand that cuts both ways, right? It's also really loving weird to die on the hill of cutting meat from your diet while defending cryptocurrency mining, which is arguably even more impactful and a much easier change for a person to make. Most folks would find it much easier to turn a box off than to commit to completely throwing out a diet they've had a lifetime to get used to.

salt shakeup
Jun 27, 2004

'orrible fucking nights
Yeah except for the cryptos that are completely anonymous. Crypto is insanely good for crime lol it's like the only thing they're good for, apart from speculation.

Stanley Pain
Jun 16, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Blotto_Otter posted:

I think the "cryptocurrency helps facilitate crimes" argument is a bad argument, because it makes it sound like there's a practical use case when there isn't. Here's the thing: it's not even particularly good for that use. Most cryptos are pseudonymous, not anonymous, which is a really loving lousy trait in a currency being used for illicit transactions. Physical cash is safer than cryptos if you want to do crimes and not get caught at some point.

Cryptos are not even particularly great for illicit and criminal use cases! The only use cases where cryptos work well are "purely speculative 'investments'" and "scamming gullible internet users"!

You understand that cuts both ways, right? It's also really loving weird to die on the hill of cutting meat from your diet while defending cryptocurrency mining, which is arguably even more impactful and a much easier change for a person to make. Most folks would find it much easier to turn a box off than to commit to completely throwing out a diet they've had a lifetime to get used to.


Doctor_Fruitbat posted:

You, repeatedly, defending cryptofucking.

Not defending it at all. Re-read my first posts. But I'll spell it out again here for the sake of being as clear as I can.

Large scale crypto mining is absolutely a problem from an environmental perspective.

Dumb fucks like me mining a few hours a day are not. People crying about dumb fucks like me mining while not doing anything else to better the environment are hypocritical at best. GPU mining in someone's spare time is a drop of water in the ocean by comparison.

spunkshui
Oct 5, 2011



Blotto_Otter posted:

I think the "cryptocurrency helps facilitate crimes" argument is a bad argument, because it makes it sound like there's a practical use case when there isn't. Here's the thing: it's not even particularly good for that use. Most cryptos are pseudonymous, not anonymous, which is a really loving lousy trait in a currency being used for illicit transactions. Physical cash is safer than cryptos if you want to do crimes and not get caught at some point.

Cryptos are not even particularly great for illicit and criminal use cases! The only use cases where cryptos work well are "purely speculative 'investments'" and "scamming gullible internet users"!

You understand that cuts both ways, right? It's also really loving weird to die on the hill of cutting meat from your diet while defending cryptocurrency mining, which is arguably even more impactful and a much easier change for a person to make. Most folks would find it much easier to turn a box off than to commit to completely throwing out a diet they've had a lifetime to get used to.

Its way loving easier to text someone some numbers then put a bunch of cash in a duffel bag and get it on a plane.

spunkshui
Oct 5, 2011



Stanley Pain posted:

Not defending it at all. Re-read my first posts. But I'll spell it out again here for the sake of being as clear as I can.

Large scale crypto mining is absolutely a problem from an environmental perspective.

Dumb fucks like me mining a few hours a day are not. People crying about dumb fucks like me mining while not doing anything else to better the environment are hypocritical at best. GPU mining in someone's spare time is a drop of water in the ocean by comparison.

Does your mining help cryptocurrency move from one location to the other at all?

Blotto_Otter
Aug 16, 2013


Stanley Pain posted:

Not defending it at all. Re-read my first posts. But I'll spell it out again here for the sake of being as clear as I can.

Large scale crypto mining is absolutely a problem from an environmental perspective.

Dumb fucks like me mining a few hours a day are not. People crying about dumb fucks like me mining while not doing anything else to better the environment are hypocritical at best. GPU mining in someone's spare time is a drop of water in the ocean by comparison.

"Large scale industrial farming is absolutely a problem from an environmental perspective. Dumb fucks like me eating a couple of burgers a day are not. People crying about dumb fucks like me earring a burger while not doing anything else to better the environment are hypocritical at best. Me eating a burger is a drop of water in the ocean by comparison."

You see the problem here?

spunkshui posted:

Its way loving easier to text someone some numbers then put a bunch of cash in a duffel bag and get it on a plane.
Of course it is. It's also way easier for the cops prove you paid for a crime when you text those numbers on a public loving ledger!
edit: and since nobody actually uses butts as money, you've still got to launder those butts back into cash, which means you're still dealing with a lot of the problems involved in illicit uses of cash, but only after memorializing your criminal conspiracy on a loving blockchain. Not sure that's worth the trade off versus paying some dipshit mule to run cash across the border!

Blotto_Otter fucked around with this message at 15:49 on Mar 19, 2021

LordSaturn
Aug 12, 2007

sadly unfunny

"re-read my posts" has got to be the worst argument of all time

EDIT: "maybe THIS time you won't notice how dumb of a poo poo I am"

The Sausages
Sep 30, 2012

What do you want to do? Who do you want to be?

xtal posted:

Nocoiners disguising their bootlicking fetish as environmentalism is quite approximate to anti lockdown people appropriating mental health concerns
coiners disguising their ancap-ism as whatboutism is quite approximate to diarrhea from both ends

Stanley Pain
Jun 16, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Blotto_Otter posted:

"Large scale industrial farming is absolutely a problem from an environmental perspective. Dumb fucks like me eating a couple of burgers a day are not. People crying about dumb fucks like me earring a burger while not doing anything else to better the environment are hypocritical at best. Me eating a burger is a drop of water in the ocean by comparison."

You see the problem here?

Of course it is. It's also way easier for the cops prove you paid for a crime when you text those numbers on a public loving ledger!

No because factory farming has significantly more environmental impact. If you got rid of all crypto tomorrow the world would still be hosed environmentally.

If we just use CO2 as a benchmark here.

Butts cause about 22 million tonnes per year.

Factory farming is in the hundreds of millions of tonnes per year.

Factory farming also has the added benefit of millions of tons of methane output (agruably worse than CO2 from a GHG perspective), land destruction, etc.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/science/bitcoin-use-causing-huge-co2-emissions-study/articleshow/69821838.cms
https://fullycrypto.com/carbon-emissions-from-farms-dwarfs-bitcoin-mining-output


Which one of these things do you think is a good target to tackle from an environmental perspective?


edit: Bonus reading material ;)

https://www.humanesociety.org/sites...agriculture.pdf

EorayMel
May 30, 2015

WE GET IT. YOU LOVE GUN JESUS. Toujours des fusils Bullpup Français.
shitcoin

ymgve
Jan 2, 2004


:dukedog:
Offensive Clock
how about we tackle the one that's used by like a handful of people and didn't exist fifteen years ago, seems like it would be easier to tackle than eating livestock meat which has been part of almost every human's experience for over 10000 years

(also we can tackle both at the same time)

ymgve fucked around with this message at 16:06 on Mar 19, 2021

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Stanley Pain
Jun 16, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

ymgve posted:

(also we can tackle both at the same time)

Let's do this then. I've already started 30 years ago though.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply