Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Dolphin
Dec 5, 2008

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

gradenko_2000 posted:

It's not about whether "cultural genocide" is or isn't a thing

The issue is that China is being accused of the literal, Holocaust type of genocide regardless
it does sound like the ccp at least gives you the option to denounce your heritage

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Dustcat
Jan 26, 2019

gradenko_2000 posted:

It's not about whether "cultural genocide" is or isn't a thing

The issue is that China is being accused of the literal, Holocaust type of genocide regardless

This is why it might be helpful to just start explicitly saying "cultural genocide" from now on, to keep people from flipping out, thinking you're getting your information from zenz or whatever memes they post on Parler these days.

F Stop Fitzgerald
Dec 12, 2010

Herstory Begins Now posted:

bunches of innocent people getting swept up merely for having some kind of suspected association to someone assumed to be guilty is definitionally collective punishment though

oh my bad i thought you were referring to the claims of indiscriminately rounding up all uighurs for the sins of a few

genericnick
Dec 26, 2012

Deified Data posted:

The reason I brought that up is the two definitions can't be decoupled. The reason we're talking about Xinjiang right now is because this is a thread dedicated to deciding whether posters who disagree with western narratives on Xinjiang are essentially Nazis or not. We would not be discussing it if all China was being accused of was cultural chauvinism. We wouldn't be discussing it if we were just trying to decide if their treatment of Uyghurs was problematic or not. The accusation can't be "just" one of those, it's coupled with the dominant narrative, that China is physically exterminating a minority population. We both know that to concede on one is to concede to the other, and the narrative was designed that way intentionally. The greater population has no desire to apply the same nuance to this issue that we do, they want a verdict - guilty or innocent - and the entire western world is telling them China is guilty.

That is why I'm frankly not interested in debating whether what's going on is cultural genocide or not - that's not the conversation the world is having. Xinjiang truthers can't be expected to forward this narrative without answering for the dominant narrative that is, intentionally, the harder one to prove - one that has to account for millions of alleged dead. If all you want to have is a conversation on China's cultural chauvinism (and that would be a valid conversation!), I don't think this is the place for it, and it would be disingenuous to insist it is

Yeah, I started typing up something like this, but that is much more succinct than my version would have been. The emotional content of the genocide claim is absolutely smoke stacks and Auschwitz. More importantly, in popular discourse it is also something you have TO DO SOMETHING about.

F Stop Fitzgerald posted:

collective punishment isnt whats happening, its more like they are using even the most tenuous ties to potential terrorists to try to stop more people getting radicalized. obviously this is going to lead to numbers of innocent people getting swept up, having their lifes ruined, who knows what else.

Eh, seems absolutely fair to call it collective punishment to flood a region with police to check if your praying wrong. Like in the absolute best case you'll still get a lot skulls cracked by police batons.

THS
Sep 15, 2017

Throatwarbler posted:

Hey guys as a former resident of the XUAR and one with close family ties to the region, I just want to point out that there are no restrictions on travel or tourism to any area in Xinjiang. All the arguments here about whether this or that mosque was demolished or whether this or that building is this or that seem very dumb to me because someone could just...walk over there and check it out? It's like people in China who have never read a thing about America having some drawn out debate over the American genocide in Baltimore, MD based on images from Google Earth, because Baltimore, MD is a black hole of information?

Also please visit Xinjiang, the economy especially in Uyghur areas is heavily dependent on tourism and there's a lot of food and culture to be enjoyed. Just off the top of my head, There are several museums in Turpan that have great exhibits documenting an ancient system of underground irrigation used by the Uyghurs that used to be common in central Asia but were deliberately destroyed by Genghis Khan in his crushing of the Kwarizm empire that it basically never recovered in most areas. For Europeans, Emirates and Qatar have daily flights to Urumuqi and Yinchuan from their hubs in Dubai and Doha.

Finding an English link to it is a bit hard but this description seems broadly in line with what I saw.

https://www.farwestchina.com/travel/turpan/uyghur-karez-wells/

Flying-PCP
Oct 2, 2005

Throatwarbler posted:

Hey guys as a former resident of the XUAR and one with close family ties to the region, I just want to point out that there are no restrictions on travel or tourism to any area in Xinjiang. All the arguments here about whether this or that mosque was demolished or whether this or that building is this or that seem very dumb to me because someone could just...walk over there and check it out? It's like people in China who have never read a thing about America having some drawn out debate over the American genocide in Baltimore, MD based on images from Google Earth, because Baltimore, MD is a black hole of information?

Also please visit Xinjiang, the economy especially in Uyghur areas is heavily dependent on tourism and there's a lot of food and culture to be enjoyed. Just off the top of my head, There are several museums in Turpan that have great exhibits documenting an ancient system of underground irrigation used by the Uyghurs that used to be common in central Asia but were deliberately destroyed by Genghis Khan in his crushing of the Kwarizm empire that it basically never recovered in most areas. For Europeans, Emirates and Qatar have daily flights to Urumuqi and Yinchuan from their hubs in Dubai and Doha.

Finding an English link to it is a bit hard but this description seems broadly in line with what I saw.

https://www.farwestchina.com/travel/turpan/uyghur-karez-wells/

Too far, I can't afford it.

Dustcat
Jan 26, 2019

Deified Data posted:

The reason I brought that up is the two definitions can't be decoupled. The reason we're talking about Xinjiang right now is because this is a thread dedicated to deciding whether posters who disagree with western narratives on Xinjiang are essentially Nazis or not. We would not be discussing it if all China was being accused of was cultural chauvinism. We wouldn't be discussing it if we were just trying to decide if their treatment of Uyghurs was problematic or not. The accusation can't be "just" one of those, it's coupled with the dominant narrative, that China is physically exterminating a minority population. We both know that to concede on one is to concede to the other, and the narrative was designed that way intentionally.

This is not true. There's a strong thread consensus that there's clearly cultural genocide going on, but no physical extermination.

THS
Sep 15, 2017

Dustcat posted:

This is not true. There's a strong thread consensus that there's clearly cultural genocide going on, but no physical extermination.

this is not my experience with nearly any discussion outside of cspam. you are assuming nuance in the popular discourse. there is little to none

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

Dustcat posted:

How else would one read this though:


I think your "I am not deflecting" must be a language barrier issue because obviously I wasn't accusing you of deflecting from the atrocities committed by the United States.

Fine, I guess it could be some projection on my part since I live in Canada.

Here cultural genocide is a cudgel to use on your enemies, to accuse them of racism and bigotry. It's entirely performative and the first nations are still oppressed by settlers and nobody really cares.

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
NGL I was planning on going to Urumqi back in 2019 because the flights were cheap and China Daily made the place look amazing in the winter

Then Covid happened

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>

gradenko_2000 posted:

It's not about whether "cultural genocide" is or isn't a thing

The issue is that China is being accused of the literal, Holocaust type of genocide regardless

there are two aspects being talked about in this thread as far as I can tell,

1) what is the baseline way to talk about the large-scale system of detention of uighurs that is (pretty much unanimously agreed afaict?) to be happening in China and what terms are appropriate to use referring to that.

and

2) which of the more extreme claims can be substantiated or not

I'm posting about #1

Dolphin
Dec 5, 2008

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
how do y'all feel about tiananmen square, forgivable oopsie by a younger ccp or state department fabrication?

as i recall the ccp said the protestors were terrorists

Dustcat
Jan 26, 2019

THS posted:

this is not my experience with nearly any discussion outside of cspam. you are assuming nuance in the popular discourse. there is little to none

Yes but this is a cspam thread discussing moderation in cspam. Have a little faith in your fellow posters, please.

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018

Throatwarbler posted:

Hey guys as a former resident of the XUAR and one with close family ties to the region, I just want to point out that there are no restrictions on travel or tourism to any area in Xinjiang. All the arguments here about whether this or that mosque was demolished or whether this or that building is this or that seem very dumb to me because someone could just...walk over there and check it out? It's like people in China who have never read a thing about America having some drawn out debate over the American genocide in Baltimore, MD based on images from Google Earth, because Baltimore, MD is a black hole of information?

Also please visit Xinjiang, the economy especially in Uyghur areas is heavily dependent on tourism and there's a lot of food and culture to be enjoyed. Just off the top of my head, There are several museums in Turpan that have great exhibits documenting an ancient system of underground irrigation used by the Uyghurs that used to be common in central Asia but were deliberately destroyed by Genghis Khan in his crushing of the Kwarizm empire that it basically never recovered in most areas. For Europeans, Emirates and Qatar have daily flights to Urumuqi and Yinchuan from their hubs in Dubai and Doha.

Finding an English link to it is a bit hard but this description seems broadly in line with what I saw.

https://www.farwestchina.com/travel/turpan/uyghur-karez-wells/

Thanks for bringing this up again, I remember someone earlier on mentioned that journalists weren't allowed in the region and I completely forgot to respond.

There have been journalists that have gone to the region and reported back. Carl zha was one of these people and was interviewed by Mark Ames and John Dolan about it. They also had another guest on another episode talking about the same thing but their name escapes me at this time.

https://podcastaddict.com/episode/77636485

Deified Data
Nov 3, 2015


Fun Shoe

Good Soldier Svejk posted:

It still seems to me like the defenses boil down to "Well the US is doing/has done worse", "it's not actual genocide, just cultural genocide", and "You're only paying attention to this because the state department wants you to".

But none of those things seem to serve to actually diminish the fact that was is happening is an atrocity.

I mean I would argue does China require a defense here? That's how I've been treating it - as a case that has to be made. The west, as the accusers, are attempting to prove that China has exterminated millions of Uyghurs and is failing to do that. I can't speak for other skeptics (is that even the right word?) but I at least am not moving goalposts on my "defense" of China, rather it's the accusers who are moving the goalposts as their central accusation gets shakier and shakier. Genocide becomes cultural genocide becomes an unnamed "atrocity", but if you can prove at least one of these you may as well have proven them all in the public discourse. The west is telling us what they're trying to prove here, we should take them at their world. They do not require advocates to make this case, or they wouldn't if they had the evidence they claim to have.

THS
Sep 15, 2017

Dustcat posted:

Yes but this is a cspam thread discussing moderation in cspam. Have a little faith in your fellow posters, please.

i feel like discussing the media narrative, the language used, and the “manufacturing consent” occurring within our culture and social media. is that a problem? it seems like it falls under the topic of the thread

thotsky
Jun 7, 2005

hot to trot

Dolphin posted:

i do think china is missing a massive opportunity to point out our black prison population

Do you read much Chinese state media? Because they're not missing that opportunity.

studio mujahideen
May 3, 2005

Good Soldier Svejk posted:

It still seems to me like the defenses boil down to "Well the US is doing/has done worse", "it's not actual genocide, just cultural genocide", and "You're only paying attention to this because the state department wants you to".

But none of those things seem to serve to actually diminish the fact that was is happening is an atrocity.

conflating criticisms of the reporting with defenses of the thing being reported on isn't really helpful

the reason those things keep getting brought up is

1 and 3) lots of the posters are american, and have a vested interest in the hypocrisy of their elected officials, especially if that hypocrisy serves to build a case for a second cold war

2) because actually trying to dig out what is real and what is propaganda is pretty important to people!! this thread isn't prescriptive at all, and I think lots of people are learning more about the situation in china than you could learn anywhere else on the forum

Dolphin
Dec 5, 2008

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

thotsky posted:

Do you read much Chinese state media? Because they're not missing that opportunity.
no i only read cspam

Flavius Aetass
Mar 30, 2011

Dolphin posted:

how do y'all feel about tiananmen square, forgivable oopsie by a younger ccp or state department fabrication?

as i recall the ccp said the protestors were terrorists

ugh please don't

Deified Data
Nov 3, 2015


Fun Shoe

Dustcat posted:

This is not true. There's a strong thread consensus that there's clearly cultural genocide going on, but no physical extermination.

I would wager "I don't know wtf is going on in Xinjiang" is probably the thread consensus

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

Dolphin posted:

how do y'all feel about tiananmen square, forgivable oopsie by a younger ccp or state department fabrication?

as i recall the ccp said the protestors were terrorists

what is even the debate/argument about tianamen square that that one poster keeps keeping getting probated about? that nothing happened in the square and everyone had a very nice day?

Yinlock
Oct 22, 2008

Dolphin posted:

how do y'all feel about tiananmen square, forgivable oopsie by a younger ccp or state department fabrication?

as i recall the ccp said the protestors were terrorists

what does this have to do with the current topic

I don't think anyone's denying that happened, if that's what you're implying

Dustcat
Jan 26, 2019

THS posted:

i feel like discussing the media narrative, the language used, and the “manufacturing consent” occurring within our culture and social media. is that a problem? it seems like it falls under the topic of the thread

Certainly not, but just like I have decided to spell out "cultural genocide" from now on when that's what I mean, I think everyone should spell out "physical genocide" when they mean things like death camps, to avoid confusing the issue.

e: I hope that doesn't come out as flippant because it's both a core issue that's causing this to be such a heated issue, and a convenient conflation point for propagandists on both sides.

Oh Snapple!
Dec 27, 2005

Deified Data posted:

I would wager "I don't know wtf is going on in Xinjiang" is probably the thread consensus

yeah thread consensus seems to largely be "idk what the gently caress is going on, and i don't trust people like zenz and the US state department to inform me in a way that doesn't end with baying for chinese blood"

F Stop Fitzgerald
Dec 12, 2010

Raskolnikov38 posted:

what is even the debate/argument about tianamen square that that one poster keeps keeping getting probated about? that nothing happened in the square and everyone had a very nice day?

according to the Reuters correspondent who was there at the time there was in fact no massacre in tianenman square, all the fighting and deaths happened elsewhere around beijing

Yinlock
Oct 22, 2008

Deified Data posted:

I would wager "I don't know wtf is going on in Xinjiang" is probably the thread consensus

besides the cia's dolphin mascot, this about sums it up

Dolphin
Dec 5, 2008

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Flavius Aetass posted:

ugh please don't
oh don't be a baby

MY INEVITABLE DEBT
Apr 21, 2011
I am lonely and spend most of my time on 4Chan talking about the superiority of BBC porn.

Good Soldier Svejk posted:

It still seems to me like the defenses boil down to "Well the US is doing/has done worse", "it's not actual genocide, just cultural genocide", and "You're only paying attention to this because the state department wants you to".

But none of those things seem to serve to actually diminish the fact that was is happening is an atrocity.

I'm not seeing these as a defense of what China is doing. "the US is worse" is pretty valid when people will point the finger at a foreign country but turn a blind eye to what's happening in their own country (and Yemen). cultural vs actual genocide seems to be an important distinction to make, one is clearly much worse than the other, and cultural genocide is pretty fuckin bad. the state department poo poo is about getting people on your side. when it's convenient to say "oh it's terrible what's happening over there" to stir up some anti-china hate, it comes up. the state department isn't reporting on human rights violations out of a sense of morality or desire to do the right thing. the genocide we are perpetrating in Yemen is currently the most obvious example of that.

im with the iraq war flashback posters. how can i just trust the US after that?

Poniard
Apr 3, 2011



Deified Data posted:

I don't know wtf is going on in Xinjiang

Good Soldier Svejk
Jul 5, 2010

Varinn posted:

conflating criticisms of the reporting with defenses of the thing being reported on isn't really helpful

the reason those things keep getting brought up is

1 and 3) lots of the posters are american, and have a vested interest in the hypocrisy of their elected officials, especially if that hypocrisy serves to build a case for a second cold war

2) because actually trying to dig out what is real and what is propaganda is pretty important to people!! this thread isn't prescriptive at all, and I think lots of people are learning more about the situation in china than you could learn anywhere else on the forum

Eh, those are fair points. I don't know whether it's fundamentally because I am american or just a rugged individualist but I find debating the gradations of claims less important than granting that even if we are talking about something as "minimal" as cultural assimilation that I still think forcible assimilation is... sufficiently terrible to condemn outright, in all forms.

I get that that is a point of contention among leftists of various disciplines and maybe that's not the point here but I feel like maybe underneath everything else this is an undercurrent to the argument that the assimilation is in some way absolutely necessary and unavoidable or else something... communism will not be able to flourish?

Xaris
Jul 25, 2006

Lucky there's a family guy
Lucky there's a man who positively can do
All the things that make us
Laugh and cry

Throatwarbler posted:

Hey guys as a former resident of the XUAR and one with close family ties to the region, I just want to point out that there are no restrictions on travel or tourism to any area in Xinjiang. All the arguments here about whether this or that mosque was demolished or whether this or that building is this or that seem very dumb to me because someone could just...walk over there and check it out? It's like people in China who have never read a thing about America having some drawn out debate over the American genocide in Baltimore, MD based on images from Google Earth, because Baltimore, MD is a black hole of information?

Also please visit Xinjiang, the economy especially in Uyghur areas is heavily dependent on tourism and there's a lot of food and culture to be enjoyed. Just off the top of my head, There are several museums in Turpan that have great exhibits documenting an ancient system of underground irrigation used by the Uyghurs that used to be common in central Asia but were deliberately destroyed by Genghis Khan in his crushing of the Kwarizm empire that it basically never recovered in most areas. For Europeans, Emirates and Qatar have daily flights to Urumuqi and Yinchuan from their hubs in Dubai and Doha.

Finding an English link to it is a bit hard but this description seems broadly in line with what I saw.

https://www.farwestchina.com/travel/turpan/uyghur-karez-wells/
good reminder. i would like to do a big tour around china at some point here when the world isn't burning down (lol). some east-asian -stan countries, georgia, and armenia (i'm armenian) are on my list at some point

oxsnard
Oct 8, 2003

Yinlock posted:

what does this have to do with the current topic

I don't think anyone's denying that happened, if that's what you're implying

yeah it's off topic and irrelevant to this discussion
Though, hilariously there's been a long standing feud between two big chinese subreddits and one of them is clearly modded by the CCP. They delete or ban anyone who ever talks about it and a few of the mods are tienammen square deniers and post in the non CCP reddit about it

Dolphin
Dec 5, 2008

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Yinlock posted:

what does this have to do with the current topic

I don't think anyone's denying that happened, if that's what you're implying
well we were just talking about the boy who cried wolf, i was interested in its sister fable, "the boy who smashed countless children with tanks"

Cao Ni Ma
May 25, 2010



Dolphin posted:

how do y'all feel about tiananmen square, forgivable oopsie by a younger ccp or state department fabrication?

as i recall the ccp said the protestors were terrorists

see where do you find yourself in THIS particular spectrum

Do you think that the CCP initiated Han genocide and ran over the dude standing in front of the tank or do you think nothing happen?

I think you are closer to one of these extremes than any one else in this thread is to the other

The Oldest Man
Jul 28, 2003

Good Soldier Svejk posted:

It still seems to me like the defenses boil down to "Well the US is doing/has done worse", "it's not actual genocide, just cultural genocide", and "You're only paying attention to this because the state department wants you to".

But none of those things seem to serve to actually diminish the fact that was is happening is an atrocity.

Does "the US state department is actively sponsoring a disinformation campaign about this atrocity in service of creating a pretext for military action against China" count as genocide denial to you?

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

F Stop Fitzgerald posted:

according to the Reuters correspondent who was there at the time there was in fact no massacre in tianenman square, all the fighting and deaths happened elsewhere around beijing

so quibbling about the location of corpses? sounds like a wonderful use of time

Dolphin
Dec 5, 2008

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Cao Ni Ma posted:

see where do you find yourself in THIS particular spectrum

Do you think that the CCP initiated Han genocide and ran over the dude standing in front of the tank or do you think nothing happen?

I think you are closer to one of these extremes than any one else in this thread is to the other
as i recall that particular dude got black bagged

F Stop Fitzgerald
Dec 12, 2010

Raskolnikov38 posted:

so quibbling about the location of corpses? sounds like a wonderful use of time

well also the number of them, and how they're split between protesters and PLA

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Yinlock
Oct 22, 2008

Dolphin posted:

well we were just talking about the boy who cried wolf, i was interested in its sister fable, "the boy who smashed countless children with tanks"

this implies that the boy who cried wolf, the cia, is also the boy who smashed children with tanks

in which case: accurate

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply