|
So now the Bucs officially have every starter returning next season, including the kicker and punter. Also, the entire coaching staff. Can't imagine that's happened before in the FA era.
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 16:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 19:14 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/fieldyates/status/1375475535934017537?s=21
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 17:00
|
|
|
Who did they add that's new?
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 17:02
|
|
|
Why is the Run it Back stuff held against the Chiefs anyway? They were the best team in the league going 14-2 with one of those loses being a throw away in week 17. Then they cruised through the playoffs until yes they lost the Super Bowl but that happens.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 17:10
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:Why is the Run it Back stuff held against the Chiefs anyway? They were the best team in the league going 14-2 with one of those loses being a throw away in week 17. Then they cruised through the playoffs until yes they lost the Super Bowl but that happens. Not my team is acting happy, gently caress them!
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 17:15
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:Why is the Run it Back stuff held against the Chiefs anyway? They were the best team in the league going 14-2 with one of those loses being a throw away in week 17. Then they cruised through the playoffs until yes they lost the Super Bowl but that happens. It was their motto after winning the Super Bowl. Bucs didn't want to copy that so they came up with a different, lame, motto. But people keep saying Run It Back in regards to what the Bucs are doing and it doesn't make sense.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 17:20
|
|
|
The Bucs used it as an opportunity to create chalkboard material as if it was directed at them somehow and then just did the same thing with their own upcoming season only wording it differently. It's fine but Buc fans caring about it as if there is some kind of rivalry between them and the Chiefs is weird.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 17:22
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Raiders/status/...04%2Fframe.html
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 17:23
|
|
|
The Raiders went 7-9 in 2019 and 8-8 in 2020 so mission accomplished.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 17:29
|
|
|
By my count they have about six more years of running it back left.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 17:30
|
|
|
kiimo posted:The Bucs used it as an opportunity to create chalkboard material as if it was directed at them somehow and then just did the same thing with their own upcoming season only wording it differently. It's fine but Buc fans caring about it as if there is some kind of rivalry between them and the Chiefs is weird. The Chiefs are going to be perennial contenders for a decade and the Bucs are a season or two from being a 7 win team in search of a QB so if I were a Chiefs fan I’d happily lean into that rivalry.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 17:32
|
|
|
Bucs fans literally do not care about the Chiefs and have no reason to. The media just tried to tie a stupid catch phrase that the Chiefs used last year and Arians was like nah, we'll do us. It's pretty much a non story.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 17:35
|
|
|
YOLOsubmarine posted:The Chiefs are going to be perennial contenders for a decade and the Bucs are a season or two from being a 7 win team in search of a QB so if I were a Chiefs fan I’d happily lean into that rivalry. Yeah I expect Brady to leave after his age 45 season and go win a Super Bowl with the 49ers.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 17:36
|
|
|
I feel like the Chiefs biggest rivals at the moment are the Bills and Ravens. Hard to have an NFC rival
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 17:37
|
|
|
Pron on VHS posted:I feel like the Chiefs biggest rivals at the moment are the Bills and Ravens. Hard to have an NFC rival Ravens have gotten embarrassed by the Chiefs every time. There’s no rivalry.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 17:38
|
|
|
The Ravens got embarrassed by the chiefs once. The other 2 games were tight contests in KC, one of which went to overtime. I know Football is all about small sample size but the idea the Chiefs have been this juggernaut and the Ravens a kid brother not ready to compete are really weird given what's happened over the past few years.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 17:42
|
|
|
Pron on VHS posted:I feel like the Chiefs biggest rivals at the moment are the Bills and Ravens. Hard to have an NFC rival Yeah, you can't really have a rivalry with a team you play once every 4 years.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 17:43
|
|
|
Kalli posted:Yeah, you can't really have a rivalry with a team you play once every 4 years. Maybe so, but there's something that happens with fanbases of two teams that face each other in the Super Bowl. They get really prickly with each other for like five years or so.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 17:50
|
|
|
Impossibly Perfect Sphere posted:Maybe so, but there's something that happens with fanbases of two teams that face each other in the Super Bowl. They get really prickly with each other for like five years or so. Can confirm with 49er fans
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 17:55
|
|
|
e: wrong thread
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 18:08
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:The Raiders went 7-9 in 2019 and 8-8 in 2020 so mission accomplished. More accurate to say 10-6 and 11-5 against NFL teams. I know the league still hates Al for being awesome, but they can't apply a -3 ref modifier every year (they can).
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 18:12
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:Ravens have gotten embarrassed by the Chiefs every time. There’s no rivalry. this isn't even true but go off
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 18:12
|
|
|
e: nm Covered in the N/V thread.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 18:17
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/_SportsTrust/status/1375524516710002704?s=19 Nice! https://twitter.com/FieldGulls/status/1375522966201630727?s=19 I feel far less good about this!
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 20:16
|
|
|
the chiefs are going for two
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 20:20
|
|
|
AB to Seattle to implode by week 3 and Fitz to the Bucs.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 20:26
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1375579367695380483?s=20
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 23:46
|
|
|
Sammy Watkins hasn't played a full season since 2016. Hope he can stay healthy and productive in Baltimore.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 23:48
|
|
|
Sammy's feet are hosed up and I doubt he ever plays a full season.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 23:57
|
|
|
well finally somethingGonz posted:Sammy Watkins hasn't played a full season since 2016. Hope he can stay healthy and productive in Baltimore. the Ravens may not be the Chargers but they still have bad luck with injuries and Sammy is made of glass, so...
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 23:57
|
|
|
kiimo posted:Sammy's feet are hosed up and I doubt he ever plays a full season. Could've turned that into a positive by putting a bunch of NLTBE playtime requirements in his contract. Doesn't seem like they did. If he can be a good #2 WR for 8 weeks of the season and the playoffs it's well worth the 5 million. Big if though.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2021 00:02
|
|
|
kiimo posted:Sammy's feet are hosed up and I doubt he ever plays a full season. He'll be fine in Baltimore. They run like five pass plays a game. I'm sure his feet will hold up just fine run blocking all the time.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2021 00:11
|
|
|
Has he got bone spurs?
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2021 00:18
|
|
|
He runs on the outsides of his feet is the rumor so he's always hosed up. He had seven pedal foot injuries since he went pro (and plenty of other injuries). Of course he's a huge reason the Chiefs won the SB and the entire offense played better when he was in
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2021 00:24
|
|
|
Gonz posted:Sammy Watkins hasn't played a full season since 2016. Hope he can stay healthy and productive in Baltimore. We'll make sure to keep him safe by not using him. Honestly I'm only like half kidding. And when he's hurt always have our usual options. It's not like we have a *bad* offense and we're hoping he saves it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2021 00:38
|
|
|
I wonder if it was the Ravens or Watkins who preferred the 1 year deal over a 2 or 3 year. Personally, if I'm Baltimore, I'd want to sign him to the 3 year at 6 APY loaded up with not likely to be earned benchmarks. As long as you guarantee 12 of that it's hard to see why Watkins wouldn't want the security. And Baltimore gets to buy low on a good talent who is still young. My guess is Watkins is thinking about the typical bet on yourself year to get back into FA with a possible big contract next year. That's optimistic given his injury history and Baltimore's offensive style. Feels like a missed opportunity for both sides. Still, if only for this year, upgrade over Willie Snead if he ever sees the field. E: Oh yeah, is Sammy still totally batshit crazy?
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2021 00:44
|
|
|
The Puppy Bowl posted:I wonder if it was the Ravens or Watkins who preferred the 1 year deal over a 2 or 3 year. Personally, if I'm Baltimore, I'd want to sign him to the 3 year at 6 APY loaded up with not likely to be earned benchmarks. As long as you guarantee 12 of that it's hard to see why Watkins wouldn't want the security. And Baltimore gets to buy low on a good talent who is still young. My guess is Watkins is thinking about the typical bet on yourself year to get back into FA with a possible big contract next year. That's optimistic given his injury history and Baltimore's offensive style. Feels like a missed opportunity for both sides. Sammy is certified nuts yes.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2021 00:48
|
|
|
Hmm. Hoped something had changed for the better there. Suppose that was wishful thinking seeing as he takes frequent blows to the head for a living. E:https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2889029-what-sammy-watkins-believes From less than a year ago. Pretty wild stuff. Like maybe paranoid schizophrenia. So okay, I can get behind a 1 year deal. The Puppy Bowl fucked around with this message at 00:57 on Mar 27, 2021 |
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2021 00:52
|
|
|
ok https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1375623830845161473
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2021 03:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 19:14 |
|
|
God I keep forgetting they have Joe Lombardi as OC.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2021 03:56
|
|