|
Ruffian Price posted:yeah the real question is are these all FB profiles or just the ones that were consciously created That tweet was a bit misleadingly worded. It's not "all facebook accounts have been leaked". Rather, the original post was "533 million fb phone numbers have been leaked and the cracker is selling them", and that more recent tweet was "All 533 from that leak are now available for free".
|
# ? Apr 4, 2021 02:36 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 15:53 |
|
Sundae posted:Someone else probably did. Remember the old phone book app you could install on FB to turn it into a Rolodex? No, I don't. Is there an haveIbeenPwned for numbers?
|
# ? Apr 4, 2021 02:46 |
|
You had/have to add your phone number to Facebook to use TFA. In the sense that using it for SMS TFA also added it to your profile (but you could hide it). And I think you also need a backup phone number when using authenticator app, so this applies even if you don't use SMS TFA.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2021 03:04 |
|
Facebook winning that case was correct and the non-insane world outcome. The guy suing facebook was arguing for an interpretation of the law where any device that can both store numbers and dial them (read: every single smartphone in existence) is illegal. The thing the guy was suing about was that someone used his phone number in a facebook account and they sent him 2FA texts. As interpreted in that case “equipment which has the capacity — (A) to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator; and (B) to dial such numbers.” means it has to include a RNG or call sequential numbers. Spam calls don't work that way anymore, but the definition of the banned thing has never been changed since 1991
|
# ? Apr 4, 2021 03:26 |
|
Facebook deserved to win that case (I cannot believe I am typing that) because that plaintiff’s case was batshit, but it was totally possible to fix the statute without banning all cellphones.quote:The phrase could describe the manner in which the telephone numbers are to be called, regardless of how they are stored, produced, or generated. The Seventh Circuit ruling considers this as possibility ‘D’ and rejects it because no one had advanced this interpretation in the lower courts and because of the presence of a comma. Hardly dealbreakers.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2021 09:06 |
|
Mister Facetious posted:No, I don't. Is there an haveIbeenPwned for numbers? If there is, it's going to just be a static site with "YES" in 72pt impact font.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2021 21:03 |
|
https://twitter.com/David3141593/status/1378466886770434049
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 01:47 |
|
The old joke that an IT security expert only has 2 pieces of technology in his home, a printer and a gun for if the printer makes strange noises..
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 02:26 |
|
pentyne posted:The old joke that an IT security expert only has 2 pieces of technology in his home, a printer and a gun for if the printer makes strange noises.. My wife and I are house hunting right now and neither her nor the real estate agent believe me when I say we should be suspicious of any ring doorbell.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 02:30 |
|
you say that but I know multiple computer touchers that have IoT stuff. techbro flavoraid is strong stuff.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 03:19 |
|
There is an indescribable amount of distance between computer toucher and security expert
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 03:58 |
|
There's also questions of risk tolerance. They may be aware that something like Ring is a garbage heap sledding down a hill of burning turds, but think that it's still worth it.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 04:03 |
|
Well, having all your data stolen is bad, but it's nothing compared to seeing a black person walking their dog!
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 04:10 |
|
packetmantis posted:Well, having all your data stolen is bad, but it's nothing compared to seeing a black person walking their dog! If our data gets stolen enough will the data bubble burst?
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 04:13 |
|
HootTheOwl posted:If our data gets stolen enough will the data bubble burst? I'm sorry, but your data is too big to fail. We'll need you to make more of it so we can give it to Facebook to bail them out.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 05:19 |
|
pentyne posted:The old joke that an IT security expert only has 2 pieces of technology in his home, a printer and a gun for if the printer makes strange noises.. Not an expert on security but I work in IT and I am more technophobic now than 20 years ago. Our TV is just a TV. No IoT stuff, don't even use streaming services. Kinda starting to turn into a luddite, really. Only exception is medical science, that's 100% good.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 07:38 |
|
His Divine Shadow posted:Not an expert on security but I work in IT and I am more technophobic now than 20 years ago. Our TV is just a TV. No IoT stuff, don't even use streaming services. I feel the same way. Having worked in IT for over 15 years, I have only become more distrustful of any technology that isn't fully under my control. If it cannot function properly without an always-on connection, I don't want it. The only real IoT we had in the house was our radiator thermostats, which could be programmed and controlled via ~The Cloud~, something I bought and installed in a moment of weakness ("how much harm can anyone really do with simple control of our heating?"). Those have now been replaced with simpler versions that are standalone and can only be accessed for programming via a temporary BT connection that you have to initiate with a button press on the device itself and a PIN. That is maximum amount of smarts I will tolerate.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 10:43 |
|
KozmoNaut posted:I feel the same way. Having worked in IT for over 15 years, I have only become more distrustful of any technology that isn't fully under my control. If it cannot function properly without an always-on connection, I don't want it. As a computer toucher who wanted to have home automation I went with Home Assistant and zwave switches/thermostat/sensors. None of it touches the internet. There is no cloud. All the switches work like a switch, the thermostats work like thermostats. They can just be activated by the automation as well. Something goes wrong? Turn off the box running the software. You're left with a fully functional house.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 14:18 |
|
Motronic posted:As a computer toucher who wanted to have home automation I went with Home Assistant and zwave switches/thermostat/sensors. None of it touches the internet. There is no cloud. All the switches work like a switch, the thermostats work like thermostats. They can just be activated by the automation as well. Something goes wrong? Turn off the box running the software. You're left with a fully functional house. We did pretty much the same thing - light controls that all go back to being "dumb" bulbs or switches when the internet goes out or some service goes down. Voice controlled lights - particularly with some useful presets that span rooms - are just insanely convenient.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 14:26 |
|
I personally don’t even see the point of home automation, at least for me. I read all of these use cases that people have set up and yeah, it’s cool and all, but I just don’t care. One less goddamn tech thing to janitor in my life.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 15:01 |
|
devmd01 posted:I personally don’t even see the point of home automation, at least for me. I read all of these use cases that people have set up and yeah, it’s cool and all, but I just don’t care. One less goddamn tech thing to janitor in my life. There's not a single "need" in my home automation. It's more a halfassed hobby than anything else. You could do most of it with timers and light sensors.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 15:03 |
|
devmd01 posted:I personally don’t even see the point of home automation, at least for me. I read all of these use cases that people have set up and yeah, it’s cool and all, but I just don’t care. One less goddamn tech thing to janitor in my life. I have three little automated plugs to turn my plant lights on and off on a timer. That's about it. They don't appear to touch the network except when you're configuring them based on my poking. None of the rest of it really makes any sense to me.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 15:05 |
|
Wallet posted:None of the rest of it really makes any sense to me. Automation can be useful particularly when you get shades, HVAC, etc involved. These aren't necessary or reasonable solutions for an 800 sq foot apartment, so a lot of people just don't have any use cases that make sense.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 15:13 |
|
Don Gato posted:Google glass was super useful when i would get into fights and have to find out the other guy's power level, I never once got surprised by a saiyan warrior pretending to be a normal human when I had my Google Glass (TM). so what was his power level?
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 15:26 |
|
devmd01 posted:I personally don’t even see the point of home automation, at least for me. I read all of these use cases that people have set up and yeah, it’s cool and all, but I just don’t care. One less goddamn tech thing to janitor in my life. I automated a solar collector I built for the shop to reduce the amount of electric heating needed, but this was just putting together a thermostat and a power source. Nothing high-tech.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 15:34 |
|
Google v Oracle Reimplementing someone else's API is fair use. Only took 11 years and hundreds of millions of dollars
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 18:50 |
|
Could have been potentially disastrous had the court decided otherwise. gently caress Oracle.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 20:21 |
|
Motronic posted:Automation can be useful particularly when you get shades, HVAC, etc involved. These aren't necessary or reasonable solutions for an 800 sq foot apartment, so a lot of people just don't have any use cases that make sense. Yeah, it's a 1200 sq ft. condo which is basically half of a house build in ~1900. It's all mini-splits but they don't have any networking stuff despite being new. Based on my conversations with energy auditors most performant way to use them in test houses was basically to set a reasonable temperature and leave them the gently caress alone.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 21:04 |
|
devmd01 posted:I personally don’t even see the point of home automation, at least for me. I read all of these use cases that people have set up and yeah, it’s cool and all, but I just don’t care. One less goddamn tech thing to janitor in my life. You probably have lots of automation in your home. Thermostats, garage door openers, dishwashers, and even self-closing spring hinges are “home automation” in some sense. It’s just that when a particular piece of automation is really useful and relatively cheap, it stops being “home automation technology” and starts being part of the baseline for what we expect in a home.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 21:48 |
|
Space Gopher posted:You probably have lots of automation in your home. Thermostats, garage door openers, dishwashers, and even self-closing spring hinges are “home automation” in some sense. It’s just that when a particular piece of automation is really useful and relatively cheap, it stops being “home automation technology” and starts being part of the baseline for what we expect in a home. Home automation usually refers to internet-connected "IoT" devices, not offline thermostats.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 22:05 |
|
Space Gopher posted:You probably have lots of automation in your home. Thermostats, garage door openers, dishwashers, and even self-closing spring hinges are “home automation” in some sense. It’s just that when a particular piece of automation is really useful and relatively cheap, it stops being “home automation technology” and starts being part of the baseline for what we expect in a home. I just need the Pee Wee Herman breakfast making machine from his movie.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 22:09 |
|
Foxfire_ posted:Google v Oracle Another example of why the legal system is broken unless you can afford the same size legal department as your opponent.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 22:35 |
|
Is there good synopsis of what would've been affected had the court ruled the other way?
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 23:13 |
|
Agents are GO! posted:Is there good synopsis of what would've been affected had the court ruled the other way? It would mean that, for code, copyright applies to concept rather than implementation.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 23:23 |
|
Somfin posted:It would mean that, for code, copyright applies to concept rather than implementation. Could that mean that Age of Conan game would own the copyright to code dicks?
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 23:53 |
|
MickeyFinn posted:Could that mean that Age of Conan game would own the copyright to code dicks? To answer the question posed by this seriously, it'd mean things like ReactOS would be illegal in the US, since it's a reimplementation of the Windows API.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2021 23:57 |
|
Rea posted:To answer the question posed by this seriously, it'd mean things like ReactOS would be illegal in the US, since it's a reimplementation of the Windows API. And more importantly, Wine, the Windows API on Linux that is the basis for getting many games to run on Linux. Or even Linux itself, could mean SCO suddenly has a case.
|
# ? Apr 6, 2021 00:00 |
|
Fame Douglas posted:And more importantly, Wine, the Windows API on Linux that is the basis for getting many games to run on Linux. Or even Linux itself, could mean SCO suddenly has a case. poo poo, not just Linux, even, any POSIX-compliant OS (the BSDs, macOS, etc.) would be at risk.
|
# ? Apr 6, 2021 01:54 |
|
C Standard API shouldn’t apply because it’s ANSI but did SCO buy the original UNIX APIs too? E: To be clear I’m not talking about POSIX but the actual OG C language APIs that were invented at Bell Labs and...everything is based on. goatsestretchgoals fucked around with this message at 03:54 on Apr 6, 2021 |
# ? Apr 6, 2021 03:51 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 15:53 |
|
In this Year of Our Cerf 51, Facebook is still interviewing on "culture fit". Surprise, surprise, all the black candidates mysteriously fail, because guess what you get when white interviewers are looking for people who subconsciously "feel like me". A Black recruiter just quit and told all.
|
# ? Apr 6, 2021 17:33 |