|
Tankakern posted:i once set up openssh through cygwin on a windows machine maybe 10 years ago there's a native SSH server in windows these days i have no idea where tho, it was in services on my old install, now it isn't. probably have to click something 17 screens into settings
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2021 23:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 18:26 |
|
|
Truga posted:there's a native SSH server in windows these days windows key -> "manage optional features"  your .sshd_config file will be in %ProgramData%\ssh
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 00:03
|
|
|
sshing into a box and getting powershell is definitely a spit take for me
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 02:52
|
|
|
like what do you even do after you ssh into a windows machine. lol check it out i can run 'dir' OVER THE INTERNET how complete is their ssh server? can you do reverse port maps? tunneling? scp transfers? or is it "yeah baby look at that prompt. linus start your photocopier"
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 02:54
|
|
|
windows releaed a server product with no gui with 2012 I think, I'm sure you can do everything
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 03:00
|
|
|
doesn't support tunnelling yet but it does scp, sftp, and ssh-agent stuff just fine
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 03:14
|
|
|
fair nuff. baby steps. go microsoft! You'll get to the level of functionality of a 2003 debian cd eventually, we're all rooting for you. hang in there
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 03:14
|
|
|
my stepdads beer posted:windows releaed a server product with no gui with 2012 I think, I'm sure you can do everything according to the grey forums there’s still tons of things that won’t work on server core for basically no good reason
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 03:18
|
|
|
server core was really meant for running a hyper-v host and that's about it, the idea being that you'd have a bunch of headless hyper-v host with no need to RDP into them running server core, and then you would buy and use system center
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 03:23
|
|
|
openssh on windows only exists for backwards compat with legacy systems
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 03:35
|
|
|
I once administered a OSS proto-VDI solution that baked a cygwin sshd service into the base windows image so the controller process could ssh in and do bootstrap customization. It was not robust.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 03:55
|
|
|
windows is very bad, which is why microsoft loves linux now
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 16:30
|
|
|
when was the last time microsoft created a successful product that wasn't just them buying someone else's rails or electron app for billions of dollars
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 16:33
|
|
|
vs code?
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 17:16
|
|
|
Jeoh posted:vs code? a lot of that is atom work from github though. it is a kind of badly put question though. sure, microsoft doesn't come out with a whole lot of singular "products" often anymore, but new stuff is frequently added to e.g. the o365, azure and xbox umbrellas
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2021 18:00
|
|
|
vs code is legit great i would argue m365 has been a pretty solid slam dunk too
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2021 03:48
|
|
|
and my whole career has been based on distaste for ms
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2021 03:48
|
|
|
Windows 10 steadily started improving as soon as satya stopped looking at the dev team with intent of satyaing up the project
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2021 06:57
|
|
|
nthing that vscode is the poo poo. the new windows terminal is quite nice. I use it for ssh now instead of putty since it’s xterm compliant and poo poo
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2021 06:59
|
|
|
Cybernetic Vermin posted:a lot of that is atom work from github though. vs code is from way before ms bought github
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2021 21:45
|
|
|
i have no idea what im doing
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2021 15:58
|
|
|
Kazinsal posted:Windows 10 steadily started improving as soon as satya stopped looking at the dev team with intent of satyaing up the project windows 10 would be ok if it actually had one settings panel, they started migrating to the new one in windows 8 which was released 9 YEARS AGO
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2021 16:21
|
|
|
Dear Mister “I don’t route or bridge my LANs” This will be the last frame I ever send your rear end I’ve sent six ARPs and still no word, I don't deserve it? I know you got my last two packets, I wrote the addresses on 'em perfect
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2021 02:14
|
|
|
my homie dhall posted:Dear Mister “I don’t route or bridge my LANs” *drops mic onto infosec team’s heads*
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2021 16:11
|
|
|
my career has become go templating
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2021 05:55
|
|
|
Bored Online posted:my career has become go templating have u ever heard of "The First Noble Truth"
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2021 07:13
|
|
|
my homie dhall posted:Dear Mister “I don’t route or bridge my LANs”
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2021 10:12
|
|
|
today i accidentally got one of our transit providers to give me transit over their peering exchange, oops
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2021 11:08
|
|
|
my stepdads beer posted:today i accidentally got one of our transit providers to give me transit over their peering exchange, oops nice
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2021 11:42
|
|
|
Bored Online posted:my career has become go templating Full time yaml architect over here
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2021 14:06
|
|
|
my stepdads beer posted:today i accidentally got one of our transit providers to give me transit over their peering exchange, oops time to accidentally leak some routes
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2021 14:09
|
|
|
does anyone have experience with HA VIPs in a L3 ECMP environment? I know there is glb director which is supposed to solve this, but it looks like it's a bit complicated to set up, was wondering if there are any other projects/reading I should look at before I try to implement a hopefully more dumb + simple POC using something like conntrackd what I want is tcp over anycast that can survive a change of paths/endpoints
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2021 00:19
|
|
|
Is that a mandatory requirement due to long lived flows? Resilient hashing works decently well and there's not a huge state penalty. Other more complex approaches: Facebook Shiv/Proxygen - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxhYNfFeVF4 Fastly - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_49Q_wDF0zQ
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2021 18:13
|
|
|
my homie dhall posted:does anyone have experience with HA VIPs in a L3 ECMP environment? I know there is glb director which is supposed to solve this, but it looks like it's a bit complicated to set up, was wondering if there are any other projects/reading I should look at before I try to implement a hopefully more dumb + simple POC using something like conntrackd Maybe I'm naive, but I wouldn't expect TCP to survive changing endpoints (changing path's should be fine though) however on the application side you should be able to identify the same user session so that a drained endpoint doesn't disrupt the front end.
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2021 18:44
|
|
|
yeah typically the app has to have some shared state to accommodate the VIP changing between nodes
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2021 00:42
|
|
|
i just do support tickets im not qualified to advise but joao is a genius and it sucks he doesnt still work here. that talk is good
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2021 00:46
|
|
|
tortilla_chip posted:Is that a mandatory requirement due to long lived flows? Resilient hashing works decently well and there's not a huge state penalty. not long-lived flows, just a fairly dynamic network so flows would be breaking all the time without resilient/consistent hashing or some other mechanism. and unfortunately (although imo probably correctly) network guys have so far refused to put anything smart into the network and something like this would require them enabling it everywhere. will check these vids out after work though, thanks!
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2021 01:00
|
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:Maybe I'm naive, but I wouldn't expect TCP to survive changing endpoints (changing path's should be fine though) however on the application side you should be able to identify the same user session so that a drained endpoint doesn't disrupt the front end. my stepdads beer posted:yeah typically the app has to have some shared state to accommodate the VIP changing between nodes yeah, what I'd like to have is a proxy/VIP service that lives across multiple nodes and have traffic be able to land on any of them and get forwarded to correct service. normally traffic for a single flow/connection will always take the same path in a network, even in ECMP environments, but this is a result of the way l3 ecmp is implemented. at every hop the 5-tuple (sport, sip, dip, dport, proto) is hashed into buckets equal to however many next hops are available to determine what the next hop should be. so if network is completely static, a given flow/connection will always wind up at the same place (because the 5-tuple doesn't change and the number of buckets are not changing at each hop along the way) and this would be easy. our network changes all the time though, which breaks this behavior because whenever it happens a bunch of flows that were previously going along one path and ending up at one endpoint are going to be reshuffled to a different path/endpoint and break the connection because the new endpoint won't know about it
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2021 01:14
|
|
|
Broken connections are baked into the design of anycast services. This is a fundamental attribute. Your application either needs to be written to detect and recover from it quickly (most modern services are) or use UDP. edit; further, you should almost certainly be using GSLB instead of dodgying it up with anycast.
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2021 01:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 18:26 |
|
|
What kind of service are you running on those VIPs? This is probably better accomplished at the application layer to direct traffic to different IPs rather than this "anycast TCP" at the network layer. Your network peeps are correct to 
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2021 01:29
|
|
