|
Gaz-L posted:I think they've gone back and forth as to if it was Jim who killed Hitler, or Bucky. Bucky definitely claimed to have done it at one point. It was just one line in Bendis' Avengers. I don't think it's ever really been followed up on. Hammod killing Hitler has been referenced multiple times. Edit Edit: yeah, according to Tom Brevoort Bucky was just joking. Air Skwirl fucked around with this message at 21:32 on Apr 17, 2021 |
# ? Apr 17, 2021 21:25 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 06:53 |
Skwirl posted:It was just one line in Bendis' Avengers. I don't think it's ever really been followed up on. Hammod killing Hitler has been referenced multiple times.
|
|
# ? Apr 17, 2021 21:30 |
|
Vince MechMahon posted:He had the infinity gauntlet and the plan in his head before he started. What makes you think his first stop in that new universe with Peggy wasn't killing Thanos before he could become a threat? Do you want Cosmic Ghost Rider? Cuz that's how you get Cosmic Ghost Rider.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2021 21:52 |
|
Macdeo Lurjtux posted:Do you want Cosmic Ghost Rider? Cuz that's how you get Cosmic Ghost Rider. Why do we even have a What If series if not for tremendously bad wonderful ideas like that?
|
# ? Apr 17, 2021 21:56 |
|
The Cosmic Ghost Rider books are a lot of fun.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2021 22:05 |
|
Cosmic ghost rider is the only good thing cates has done
|
# ? Apr 17, 2021 22:07 |
|
twistedmentat posted:Who said this? Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely, the writers of all 3 Cap movies, Infinity War and Endgame. It's not really up to them so if it's not confirmed on screen it's not confirmed, but that's what they said.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2021 22:37 |
|
That's weird, since that's the one scenario it explicitly cannot be according to the rest of the movie they wrote
|
# ? Apr 17, 2021 22:38 |
|
They said you can't change the future because it's already happened (it's your past). Old Cap was already Peggy's husband so he wasn't changing anything by going back in time and marrying her. It's weird cyclical logic that implies almost a level of destiny but it's what we got. Now Loki changes the past by escaping but he gets picked up by the TVA and called a Variant. So it seems like Cap changing a bunch of poo poo would get the same treatment. I know everyone says "not my Steve Rogers" but now that we know Bucky talked to Cap about his trip maybe he convinced him not to try and save him. Also Cap knows better than to gently caress with the stones on his way to returning them, you guys are thinking of Tony.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2021 01:21 |
|
Yeah I absolutely think Bucky, being a pretty pragmatic dude who is a little addicted to his own suffering, would look at how narrowly they were able to achieve victory over Thanos and tell Steve "I'm about to ask you for the hardest favor you'll ever have to give a friend, but I need you to not go after me when you get back to the old days. We'll need every tool in the box for when Thanos comes, and I don't know what happens if you change things. I won't hold it against you. Just live the life you've earned."
|
# ? Apr 18, 2021 07:07 |
|
Half the stones are on Earth, they could pool their resources and destroy the time stone.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2021 07:20 |
|
I always assumed the timeline Steve retired too was the same one the Thanos they fought and killed in Endgame left, given his main mission was to return the stones and Thor's Hammer to that timeline. As long as he allows the Time Heist to play out how it did, he doesn't have to worry about Thanos. That said, it does limit what he could do before the Heist.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2021 20:04 |
|
Aphrodite posted:Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely, the writers of all 3 Cap movies, Infinity War and Endgame. Okay, its not just some rando or hanger on saying it, but it would be nice to have something offical. Arist posted:That's weird, since that's the one scenario it explicitly cannot be according to the rest of the movie they wrote Yea exactly.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2021 17:57 |
|
https://twitter.com/Variety/status/1384575090747080704 They're lining up a really fancy cast for this one.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2021 19:37 |
|
Aphrodite posted:https://twitter.com/Variety/status/1384575090747080704 Sam Jackson will do anything, he's the only bona-fide movie star that appeared on Agents of Shield. Didn't know about Olivia Colman though, that's cool.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2021 19:52 |
Will Emilia Clarke be the skrull queen due to her familiarity with playing genocidal royals?
|
|
# ? Apr 20, 2021 19:53 |
|
Aphrodite posted:https://twitter.com/Variety/status/1384575090747080704
|
# ? Apr 20, 2021 20:07 |
|
CapnAndy posted:I mean, it makes sense that the Skrulls would want to be really pretty. But would also be accurate if they cast some total cows.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2021 20:11 |
|
Vince MechMahon posted:Will Emilia Clarke be the skrull queen due to her familiarity with playing genocidal royals? Hey, Olivia Coleman is right there and fits the criteria as well.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2021 20:50 |
|
Colman is busy playing the Skrull who gets wasted and pisses herself in a children's restaurant ballpit
|
# ? Apr 20, 2021 21:04 |
|
Mameluke posted:Colman is busy playing the Skrull who gets wasted and pisses herself in a children's restaurant ballpit TIL I'm a Skrull
|
# ? Apr 20, 2021 21:15 |
|
I'm assuming the rights to Jessica Drew are still the full time job of like 300 lawyers so if she's a good guy maybe it's Mockingbird time.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2021 23:10 |
|
theironjef posted:I'm assuming the rights to Jessica Drew are still the full time job of like 300 lawyers so if she's a good guy maybe it's Mockingbird time. Jessica Drew is 100% owned by Marvel/Disney. She just has a super complicated backstory and has a power set of poo poo other people in the MCU already do and creepy pheremone poo poo that isn't very televisual and is kinda rapey.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2021 23:17 |
|
theironjef posted:I'm assuming the rights to Jessica Drew are still the full time job of like 300 lawyers so if she's a good guy maybe it's Mockingbird time. It that this is really predictive of anything going forward, but Adrianne Palicki already played Mockingbird.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2021 23:22 |
|
Hmm the guess would be Emilia Clarke as Veranke...but Princess Morrat (Teddy's mom) is also possible. Or maybe she's the younger version of Mar-Vell. Anything goes!
|
# ? Apr 20, 2021 23:23 |
|
BrianWilly posted:Hmm the guess would be Emilia Clarke as Veranke...but Princess Morrat (Teddy's mom) is also possible. Or maybe she's the younger version of Mar-Vell. Anything goes! Sue Storm.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2021 23:34 |
|
Medullah posted:TIL I'm a Skrull Let's talk
|
# ? Apr 20, 2021 23:38 |
|
Normally you wouldn't cast Emilia Clarke for what feels like it must be a one season TV show appearance but she may not necessarily want to do more than that, so who knows.Skwirl posted:Jessica Drew is 100% owned by Marvel/Disney. She just has a super complicated backstory and has a power set of poo poo other people in the MCU already do and creepy pheremone poo poo that isn't very televisual and is kinda rapey. Yeah Sony wouldn't just have the rights to her because of the Spider name. She has nothing to do with him. The complication with her is that Sony definitely would have Ultimate Jessica Drew though. I feel like if Marvel wants to use her Sony would agree for some minor exchange back and just change the name if they ever decide to do a female Spider-Man clone story.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2021 23:51 |
If I was Clarke I woke be vary weary of anything I can't read the entire script for up front. It's like they had a career seeking missile aimed directly at her with that fuckin GoT poo poo.
|
|
# ? Apr 21, 2021 00:12 |
|
Vince MechMahon posted:If I was Clarke I woke be vary weary of anything I can't read the entire script for up front. It's like they had a career seeking missile aimed directly at her with that fuckin GoT poo poo. Ehh, I think it's just they had no loving clue what to do after they couldn't crib from GRR Martin's notes. Has she done anything (and I kinda hate this term but it's useful) "non-genre" her big movie was the third or fourth terrible Terminator sequal.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2021 00:18 |
|
I kind of hate the term too because I never know what genres specifically fall under the umbrella of "genre" in this sense, but she was in a pretty popular holiday romcom, Last Christmas, at the very end of 2019. It looks like post-GoT she has mostly been focusing on sort of.... mid-lockdown theatre? She was in a Zoom performance of Noel Coward's Private Lives in 2020 and was set to be in a fairly high-profile The Seagull in London just before COVID really came rampaging in. How Wonderful! fucked around with this message at 00:27 on Apr 21, 2021 |
# ? Apr 21, 2021 00:23 |
|
How Wonderful! posted:I kind of hate the term too because I never know what genres specifically fall under the umbrella of "genre" in this sense, but she was in a pretty popular holiday romcom, Last Christmas, at the very end of 2019. I forgot about that one. Generally "genre" films are sci-fi/fantasy that's more popular with men than women. Like Last Christmas has a ghost as a main character, but I wouldn't call it a genre film, I'd call it a romance (was it a comedy? I didn't actually see it, going off plot descriptions)
|
# ? Apr 21, 2021 00:28 |
|
Vince MechMahon posted:If I was Clarke I woke be vary weary of anything I can't read the entire script for up front. It's like they had a career seeking missile aimed directly at her with that fuckin GoT poo poo. I mean, she was a total unknown before that so even with the terrible ending it made her career.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2021 00:32 |
|
If anything that ending was a gift to her career. If the ending was her becoming the great, beautiful, benevolent ruler she probably might have more to be worried about being typecast.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2021 00:34 |
|
Skwirl posted:I forgot about that one. Yeah, it just bugs me that something as broadly taxonomical as "genre" is weirdly gendered in that way, but I guess people generally know what it conveys as a short-hand. It was a comedy but not a super duper funny one. It's one of those movies with a pretty unfunny script that is occasionally elevated by talented character actors (Rob Delaney and Patti Lupone are both good in it).
|
# ? Apr 21, 2021 00:36 |
|
How Wonderful! posted:Yeah, it just bugs me that something as broadly taxonomical as "genre" is weirdly gendered in that way, but I guess people generally know what it conveys as a short-hand. It was a comedy but not a super duper funny one. It's one of those movies with a pretty unfunny script that is occasionally elevated by talented character actors (Rob Delaney and Patti Lupone are both good in it). The other reason I don't call it a rom-com is based on the description no one tried to ruin someone else's life.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2021 00:40 |
|
The main character outs her gay sister out of spite in a really weird scene so rom-com away!
|
# ? Apr 21, 2021 00:42 |
|
How Wonderful! posted:The main character outs her gay sister out of spite in a really weird scene so rom-com away! Oh yeah, definitely a rom com now. Apologize for earlier doubts.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2021 00:44 |
|
The "genres" are sci-fi, fantasy and horror. Basically the ones that usually have their own specific section of a comic convention floor.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2021 00:47 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 06:53 |
|
I assume Clarke's a red herring for Veranke. Like, they'll talk about the Skrull queen for the whole show and Clarke will be acting all sketchy in her scenes, and whoops, she was working for Fury the whole time and really she's... *rolls d100 on big Table o' Heroes* Spitfire. And then it turns out Colman is the real villain and gets to chew scenery.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2021 00:53 |