|
silence_kit posted:I'm just pointing out that many goons We get it, you needed a yacht to park your yacht in
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 00:03 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 10:07 |
|
The Bloop posted:Rich people like breathing and many people on these forums think that rich people breathing is in fact very very bad it unambiguously is tho
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 00:04 |
|
CharlestheHammer posted:I mean your not really pointing out anything. I'm just pointing out the paradoxical nature & suspected hypocrisy of the statement. Being judgmental about how others spend their money is very common on the SA forums, and is not something that only 'they' or 'the others' do. I suspect flatluigi has no problem with being judgmental about how others spend their money, if the judgment is right, in his or her opinion. silence_kit has a new favorite as of 00:13 on Apr 28, 2021 |
# ? Apr 28, 2021 00:06 |
|
mandatory lesbian posted:it unambiguously is tho It's a huge loving leap to answer "goons want all rich people dead" to the question "what are some things that rich people like which you feel are unfairly maligned on the forums which you are presently posting on."
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 00:07 |
|
Len posted:We get it, you needed a yacht to park your yacht in That's not even a joke those exist. The really rich have even second yacht sized boat follow them around so they have a place to land their helicopter and store their submarine without ruining the view. I'm not really following whatevers being argued about but superyacht money is crazy. Between hundreds of millions in up front costs and multi-thousand dollar a day operating costs it's a lifestyle that mere billionaires couldn't afford.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 00:12 |
|
silence_kit posted:I'm just pointing out the paradoxical nature & suspected hypocrisy of the statement. Being judgmental about how others spend their money is very common on the SA forums, and not something that only 'they' or 'the others' do. No that can’t be your point it makes no sense, even for goons desperate need to own other groups they are usually coherent
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 00:13 |
|
CharlestheHammer posted:No that can’t be your point it makes no sense, even for goons desperate need to own other groups they are usually coherent The fact that it doesn't make sense to you is neither here nor there. If the cosmic test of truth were 'does SA forums poster CharlestheHammer understand this?', then very few things would be true.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 00:24 |
|
A Pack of Kobolds posted:It's a huge loving leap to answer "goons want all rich people dead" to the question "what are some things that rich people like which you feel are unfairly maligned on the forums which you are presently posting on." It was, I thought obviously, a hyperbolic joke answer. A real answer might be homes above a certain arbitrary square footage (It was a joke in the sense that it wasn't really what you were asking. It's still true, though)
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 01:59 |
|
silence_kit posted:The fact that it doesn't make sense to you is neither here nor there. If the cosmic test of truth were 'does SA forums poster CharlestheHammer understand this?', then very few things would be true. No, my fellow goon, you're being vague and general to the point of uselessness, it's like saying "goons sometimes think things are bad, but like other things, isn't that hypocritical?" Pick a concrete example of whatever the hell you're babbling about.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 04:33 |
|
CharlestheHammer posted:I don’t understand, why do they need the NFT at all The internet made putting naked girls on page 3 obsolete.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 05:02 |
|
CharlestheHammer posted:I don’t understand, why do they need the NFT at all
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 05:11 |
|
I just plain don't understand NFTs. You're spending money and computing power on......nothing? The owner of an NFT image or whatever doesn't even get the copyright to it, that's an entirely separate thing. It reminds me of those star registry things. Why should your "ownership" of the NFT matter to anyone other than other people in the NFT market? Maybe I'm just stupid/prematurely old and unable to comprehend new technology.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 07:52 |
|
No, you absolutely get it. That's what makes NFTs so infuriating. Literally everyone who doesn't have brainworms has that same reaction and there is no greater "aha" moment waiting at the end.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 08:05 |
|
NFTs are people either absolutely falling off the end of the Dunning-Kruger highway, or grifters taking the money of the former.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 08:10 |
|
John Murdoch posted:No, you absolutely get it. That's what makes NFTs so infuriating. Literally everyone who doesn't have brainworms has that same reaction and there is no greater "aha" moment waiting at the end. I have a buddy who is a huge tech evangelist. His kids have had their own tablets since they were like... 3 and 5. He thinks tech = good at this point, and I wish I had the opportunity to be like “yoooo, you notice how a lot of this poo poo sucks or has unintended consequences?” But it’s not my place. I’m planning to do a BitCoin/Crypto/NFT presentation for work in a couple weeks and I’ve made no effort to hide that this will be an anti-Crypto/NFT presentation. I can’t wait!
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 08:11 |
For the cherry on top, this is apparently a screenshot of an NFT that sold for $7.2 million.
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 09:03 |
|
silence_kit posted:The fact that it doesn't make sense to you is neither here nor there. If the cosmic test of truth were 'does SA forums poster CharlestheHammer understand this?', then very few things would be true. Although the cosmic test of truth might be "does anyone besides silence_kit understand what silence_kit is trying to say?"
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 09:44 |
|
Zereth posted:For the cherry on top, this is apparently a screenshot of an NFT that sold for $7.2 million. There has absolutely got to be money laundering going on here.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 10:07 |
|
Sucrose posted:I just plain don't understand NFTs. You're spending money and computing power on......nothing? The owner of an NFT image or whatever doesn't even get the copyright to it, that's an entirely separate thing. It reminds me of those star registry things. Why should your "ownership" of the NFT matter to anyone other than other people in the NFT market? The easiest way to explain it is like a certificate of authenticity that can't be forged. It just requires you burn down a couple rainforests to do it
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 12:57 |
|
Sucrose posted:There has absolutely got to be money laundering going on here. Much like with high art, absolutely.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 13:03 |
RagnarokAngel posted:The easiest way to explain it is like a certificate of authenticity that can't be forged. But doesn't guarantee that the person giving you the certificate actually owns the thing.
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 13:24 |
|
Zereth posted:But doesn't guarantee that the person giving you the certificate actually owns the thing. And it 'can't be forged' about as much as you 'can't forge' a convincing copy of a Black Lotus card. Which is to say they're probably gonna be able to pull it off to about 98% of people, and that 2% won't be in a position to scrutinize it close enough. Cleretic has a new favorite as of 13:38 on Apr 28, 2021 |
# ? Apr 28, 2021 13:33 |
|
Zereth posted:But doesn't guarantee that the person giving you the certificate actually owns the thing. The only thing you're buying is the certificate.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 13:34 |
|
Fantastic Foreskin posted:The only thing you're buying is the certificate. But it's a self-authenticating certificate!
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 14:03 |
|
Don't forget the real anti-value add: if you want to change the "owned by" field on the digital certificate you need to pay gas to the network and give a cut to the organization who designed the contract. Unrelated fun ad (do not steal I am still minting the NFT)
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 14:18 |
|
A rare cross post from the college football thread https://twitter.com/espn_billc/status/1387401299822526467?s=21
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 15:09 |
|
Henchman of Santa posted:A rare cross post from the college football thread If the partnership is real this is the proudest I've ever been to be a Gamecock.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 18:32 |
|
Zereth posted:But doesn't guarantee that the person giving you the certificate actually owns the thing. Im not endorsing it. The whole thing is stupid as poo poo. Im just trying to give the best metaphor i can.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 18:40 |
|
RagnarokAngel posted:The easiest way to explain it is like a certificate of authenticity that can't be forged. It's a certificate of authenticity based entirely on a text document containing a url.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 21:17 |
|
It’s a certificate of authenticity verifying that the certificate is indeed an authentic certificate of itself
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 21:33 |
|
The Nintendo Seal of Quality was a better authentication mechanism than that used by NFTs.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 21:38 |
|
Henchman of Santa posted:A rare cross post from the college football thread wrong thread, where's brilliant marketing moves. I miss the days when you could just buy COCKS merchandise willy nilly
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 21:49 |
|
Henchman of Santa posted:A rare cross post from the college football thread I'm Greek, "bird" is used as a word to refer to a dick. This is the closest I've been to being interested in college sports (except for the Jon Bois video about that DeVry basketball game)
|
# ? Apr 28, 2021 23:11 |
|
Platystemon posted:The Nintendo Seal of Quality was a better authentication mechanism than that used by NFTs. I don't know if you're joking but apparently it was in fact a pretty brutal QA testing that they could fail you for if the smallest problem happened, and frequently did. The Nintendo Seal of Quality was actually a great authentication mechanism because it specifically means that a room of angry QA monkeys banged on their controllers enough for Nintendo to endorse it as Probably Ok. You know who is endorsing it and (theoretically) why, and the entity endorsing it is largely trusted to do so.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 01:30 |
|
A comprehensive explanation of nfts, for the uninitiated: Haifisch has a new favorite as of 02:17 on Apr 29, 2021 |
# ? Apr 29, 2021 02:14 |
|
Volmarias posted:I don't know if you're joking but apparently it was in fact a pretty brutal QA testing that they could fail you for if the smallest problem happened, and frequently did. The Nintendo Seal of Quality was actually a great authentication mechanism because it specifically means that a room of angry QA monkeys banged on their controllers enough for Nintendo to endorse it as Probably Ok. You know who is endorsing it and (theoretically) why, and the entity endorsing it is largely trusted to do so. 0.00% of games released today would pass this.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 02:46 |
|
The Lone Badger posted:0.001% of games released today would pass this. Factorio was programed by math wizards
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 02:50 |
|
I like the method Traveler's Tales used to get Sonic 3D Blast to pass Sega's QA tests back in the day: if there's an exception, and the game doesn't know how to deal with it, just dump into level select with text that says "You found a secret!"
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 02:53 |
|
Yeah, it's not exactly surprising that console games have reached a level of sheer complexity that you cannot actually test all the cases, even with massive manpower. That said, nothing excuses Superman 64.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 02:55 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 10:07 |
|
Raised By Birds posted:I like the method Traveler's Tales used to get Sonic 3D Blast to pass Sega's QA tests back in the day: if there's an exception, and the game doesn't know how to deal with it, just dump into level select with text that says "You found a secret!" Even Nintendo themselves did this, with A Link to the Past. If you did something that meant the game couldn't load something properly (the most reliable duplication was basically hitting a specific room warp too fast), it would instead drop you in the Chris Houlihan room, with a secret message and about a hundred rupees. I hope Chris knows how cool this is to nerds like me.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 03:15 |