Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: fart simpson)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
BaldDwarfOnPCP
Jun 26, 2019

by Pragmatica

Some Guy TT posted:

you might be in the wrong subforum friend

oh i know

i just don't want to see someone die out of stupidity

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

BaldDwarfOnPCP posted:

i just don't want to see someone die

than maybe you want less american carrier groups in the world?

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/05/10/21/philippines-receives-193050-doses-of-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine

The Philippines just received its first allocation of Pfizer vaccines - 193,050 doses

These were acquired through the COVAX initiative

BaldDwarfOnPCP
Jun 26, 2019

by Pragmatica

Rutibex posted:

than maybe you want less american carrier groups in the world?

i would like america to not instigate any war

not participate in one that doesn't have a good rasin debt

BaldDwarfOnPCP
Jun 26, 2019

by Pragmatica
and yes bail on the military prison industrial complex entirely

that'll be any day now due to our fierce and independent thinking leadership

mila kunis
Jun 10, 2011
https://twitter.com/ComradeLin_/status/1391718205689798659

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy
that karl marx unboxing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71Vfn8KbDnI&t=1393s

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

BaldDwarfOnPCP posted:

didn't the falkland islands kind of prove having a big fat fleet was not always a good idea?

i don't want to see anything bad happen to an american carrier group but they're vulnerable to tech that is much older than drones

It proved they are vulnerable at least which is why there has been an escalating arms race to build faster anti-ship missiles/better CIWS systems. Both Russia and China have hypersonic missiles that maybe able to penetrate US defenses. It is why a war with either of them, besides the nuclear competent, would be pretty ugly.

As far as drones, I do think they will change warfare but at the same time, they are perhaps hyped a bit much. I would say the biggest problem they would give would be to non-state actors (which already has been happening for over a decade at this point) and to more poorly armed states such as Armenia, that simply doesn't have the resources to design countermeasures. In the case of Armenia it was a case of both a lack of funding and just a complete lack of leadership.

I am less convinced that larger powers won't be able to design cost effective counter-measures (remember these drones are going pretty slow/have a limited range compared to something like a hypersonic missile.)

tractor fanatic
Sep 9, 2005

Pillbug

Ardennes posted:

I am less convinced that larger powers won't be able to design cost effective counter-measures (remember these drones are going pretty slow/have a limited range compared to something like a hypersonic missile.)

Cheap drones aren't fast and naval actions occur over hundreds of miles of open sea. A CBG can probably avoid a drone swarm by just leisurely steaming away from it.

Stairmaster
Jun 8, 2012

Maintaining a safe distance from shore-assets also constrains the striking power of the carrier airgroup though. Even if F-35s got the range, longer missions mean lower sortie rates.

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

Ardennes posted:

I would say the biggest problem they would give would be to non-state actors (which already has been happening for over a decade at this point)

i'm actually surprised we haven't seen more assassination attempts than just a couple

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020
Small and mid sized drones are very cheap replacement of attack helicopters. We are not talking about high level competition between great powers. We are not there yet.

Also the current anti air artilleries are not design against small drones.

There is drone warfare between UAE brought Chinese UAV and Turkish drones recently in Syria? Right now the state of drone air to air warfare is like pre WW1 primitive level.

stephenthinkpad has issued a correction as of 21:56 on May 10, 2021

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

tractor fanatic posted:

Cheap drones aren't fast and naval actions occur over hundreds of miles of open sea. A CBG can probably avoid a drone swarm by just leisurely steaming away from it.

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008


lmao



Amazing.

crepeface
Nov 5, 2004

r*p*f*c*

mila kunis posted:

are there any thoughts on


- drone hacking
- drones enabling the smallest and shittiest states to maintain power far easier than before/do they make it easier to beat insurgencies

i think radio war nerd talked about this briefly on chapo.

i imagine it actually would have the opposite effect, insurgencies with a cheap way of loving up infrastructure on a new level makes them way more of a threat.

Farmer Crack-Ass
Jan 2, 2001

this is me posting irl

BaldDwarfOnPCP posted:

didn't the falkland islands kind of prove having a big fat fleet was not always a good idea?

i don't want to see anything bad happen to an american carrier group but they're vulnerable to tech that is much older than drones

the british navy at the falklands was nowhere near what an american carrier group is packing

like, the us navy has known for decades that the soviet plan was to swamp a carrier group with a shitload of missiles. "i'm gonna just throw a shitload of cheap missiles" is playing the game exactly the way they've planned for.


Rutibex posted:

day 1 of Real War every single american aircraft carrier group is getting a nuclear torpedo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZ8K651EqCA

yeah sure if you start slinging nuclear weapons around any military formation is going to eat poo poo. but now that means the americans are going to feel free to retaliate in kind.

Flavahbeast
Jul 21, 2001


crepeface posted:

i think radio war nerd talked about this briefly on chapo.

i imagine it actually would have the opposite effect, insurgencies with a cheap way of loving up infrastructure on a new level makes them way more of a threat.

he actually talks about this in one of his older articles: https://pando.com/2014/02/13/the-war-nerd-googles-big-new-dog/

At least for bigger powers he seems to think the opposite, that cheap, ubiquitous drones will neuter insurgencies

crepeface
Nov 5, 2004

r*p*f*c*

Flavahbeast posted:

he actually talks about this in one of his older articles: https://pando.com/2014/02/13/the-war-nerd-googles-big-new-dog/

At least for bigger powers he seems to think the opposite, that cheap, ubiquitous drones will neuter insurgencies

that seems to be more focused on boston dynamics type robots as an occupying force. not sure it fully applies to drones.

here's that bit on his appearance on chapo:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZmLgB5cWdc&t=957s

crepeface
Nov 5, 2004

r*p*f*c*

mila kunis posted:

make an auspol thread in cspam instead? gently caress d&d

i just made a c-spam auspol thread: https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3967382

crepeface has issued a correction as of 04:24 on May 11, 2021

Agrajag
Jan 21, 2006

gat dang thats hot

Farmer Crack-rear end posted:

the british navy at the falklands was nowhere near what an american carrier group is packing

like, the us navy has known for decades that the soviet plan was to swamp a carrier group with a shitload of missiles. "i'm gonna just throw a shitload of cheap missiles" is playing the game exactly the way they've planned for.


you do know this has been proven to be pretty effective at taking out carrier groups right?

there was a pretty infamous war game that proved it

they literally had to have a do over cause carrier groups are amazingly dumb useless garbage against low cost swarm tactics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Challenge_2002

quote:

After the war game was restarted, its participants were forced to follow a script drafted to ensure a Blue Force victory. Among other rules imposed by this script, Red Force was ordered to turn on their anti-aircraft radar in order for them to be destroyed, and was not allowed to shoot down any of the aircraft bringing Blue Force troops ashore.

Agrajag has issued a correction as of 04:12 on May 11, 2021

Rent-A-Cop
Oct 15, 2004

I posted my food for USPOL Thanksgiving!

Millennium Challenge is the Jordan Peterson of Clancychat.

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

Missiles is the only game anyone wants to play. That's why China launches them into the South China Sea and that's the new US Navy's great new idea is to put a bunch of batteries all over the first island chain.

Farmer Crack-Ass
Jan 2, 2001

this is me posting irl

Agrajag posted:

you do know this has been proven to be pretty effective at taking out carrier groups right?

there was a pretty infamous war game that proved it

they literally had to have a do over cause carrier groups are amazingly dumb useless garbage against low cost swarm tactics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Challenge_2002

the general who pulled it off relied on some pretty unrealistic assumptions


even without that the persian gulf is a relatively confined area to operate in compared to most other oceans

Some Guy TT
Aug 30, 2011

https://mobile.twitter.com/dlshadothman/status/1391201706332020736

this communism thing ive been hearing about just keeps sounding better and better

Charles 2 of Spain
Nov 7, 2017

Rahm's the ambassador to Japan lmao

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020
So I kind of want to give some support to the people of India fighting Covid, particularly the left leading local governments like Kerala. Does any South Asia goon know anyway to donate through paypal/Amazon/US credit cards?

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
i don't know if the Naxalites take paypal donations

mawarannahr
May 21, 2019
Probation
Can't post for 5 hours!

Farmer Crack-rear end posted:

the general who pulled it off relied on some pretty unrealistic assumptions

Examples? I’ve read the same opinion in D&D but haven’t seen anything to back it up.

Maximo Roboto
Feb 4, 2012

https://twitter.com/cgtnamerica/status/1391847789441728516

Zedhe Khoja
Nov 10, 2017

sürgünden selamlar
yıkıcılar ulusuna
eh he relied on some unrealistic models of couriers and stuff, but nothing really on the scale of the Blue Team fuckery. It was an all around crappy simulation but alot of the weaknesses exposed were pretty real and Blue Team did just go whining to mods to have them ignored so America could win.

genericnick
Dec 26, 2012

mawarannahr posted:

Examples? I’ve read the same opinion in D&D but haven’t seen anything to back it up.

He thought sunk carriers can't refloat op.

Though frankly more than any particular weakness of that exercise I'd note that it was a long rear end time ago. Maybe among all the grift someone figured something out.

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020

stephenthinkpad posted:

So I kind of want to give some support to the people of India fighting Covid, particularly the left leading local governments like Kerala. Does any South Asia goon know anyway to donate through paypal/Amazon/US credit cards?


Actually this official site work. I wasn't sure why it ask for my phone and email because if this is a Chinese payment option it would verify my tel number first. But no, it didn't send anything to my phone/email, just let me straight up use my US credit card as an international credit card. I use a travel card to avoid foreign transaction fee.

indigi
Jul 20, 2004

how can we not talk about family
when family's all that we got?

stephenthinkpad posted:

Also the current anti air artilleries are not design against small drones.

yeah I wonder what the strategy is to defend against an attack of like 750+ cheapo drones with staggered arrival times each with a shaped charge and a proximity detonator

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

indigi posted:

yeah I wonder what the strategy is to defend against an attack of like 750+ cheapo drones with staggered arrival times each with a shaped charge and a proximity detonator

a big net?

indigi
Jul 20, 2004

how can we not talk about family
when family's all that we got?
they will have net avoidance software

OhFunny
Jun 26, 2013

EXTREMELY PISSED AT THE DNC
https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/26/europe/uk-aircraft-carrier-strike-group-asia-intl-hnk-scli-ml/index.html

Since no one's mentioned it: The United Kingdom will be sailing a large naval armada though the South China Sea. The aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth with two destroyers, two anti-submarine frigates, one submarine and two auxiliary supply ships as escort en route to Japan and South Korea.

Fleetwood
Mar 26, 2010


biggest hochul head in china

that's untreated gonorrhoea

Southpaugh
May 26, 2007

Smokey Bacon


Basically all naval groups are longing to be sank by cheap anti ship missiles. And when it happens the MIC boys will all be agog muh muh doctrine

Junkozeyne
Feb 13, 2012
Would be a better show of force if it would have functioning planes as well but you gotta play the hand you're dealt

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Danann
Aug 4, 2013

indigi posted:

yeah I wonder what the strategy is to defend against an attack of like 750+ cheapo drones with staggered arrival times each with a shaped charge and a proximity detonator

IIRC, electronic warfare first to degrade command and control (something as simple as forcing drones to fly home is a success, and cheapness ultimately means having to cut down on quality); dropping ordinance on the local operators via artillery or your own airpower (again cheapness means accepting lesser capabilities such as the distance from which drones can be operated); and finally actually shooting down the drones with air defense.

The preferred type of weaponry will probably be lasers and autocannons because unlike missiles these weapon systems have a bigger pool of ready ammunition compared to missiles. Of course it's only as good as its sensors so it's no silver bullet and people are going to be using whatever they have on hand or taking cover instead.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply