(Thread IKs:
dead gay comedy forums)
|
shooting down all those moderator meltdown predictions with an overnight posting meltdown speedrun
|
# ? May 18, 2021 09:15 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 14:54 |
|
Homeless Friend posted:It wasn't an ask lol. On one hand they irrevocably tainted it with cynicism in their handling of it and on the other informed us of how little they think of us. It pwns, I love goons so much. well it's an unfortunate situation all around. somehow i imagine that "please don't call me a pedophile" would not have the desired result in most cases in C-SPAM or another rules-light forum, however, especially not after you've just probated someone's friend for using the wrong language
|
# ? May 18, 2021 09:16 |
|
Ferrinus posted:well it's an unfortunate situation all around. somehow i imagine that "please don't call me a pedophile" would not have the desired result in most cases in C-SPAM or another rules-light forum, however, especially not after you've just probated someone's friend for using the wrong language You use your big boy words and anonymize it and say "For one of our moderators, this issue is actually hurtful, going forward we won't be lenient in punishing this joke" instead they went "ah hell, it just went outta fashion didn't it. It's old!" Now you have two different explanations from the same people. Except one is post-hoc and from a, now, untrusted party because of their behavior and the fact that they lied by omission if we take them on face value. What I'm saying is we need to get mods into communication classes asap lol.
|
# ? May 18, 2021 09:20 |
|
very relevant considering Marxism's problems in real world implementations. medicalizations are useful, but problematic, metaphors
|
# ? May 18, 2021 09:21 |
|
Personally if I was extremely sensitive to jokes where I'm associated by extension with pedophilia, I would not be part of the group with a long history of members turning out to be pedophiles, nazis, nazi pedophiles, and so on.
|
# ? May 18, 2021 09:52 |
|
apropos to nothing posted:lol this is it for me. idgaf about r word, from the start only complained cause of the arbitrary enforcement of rules which 100% were always meted out against posting enemies and ignored by others, applied to the whole "mods are pedophiles" thing too and basically everything in the history of the website. its totally absurd that words like "oval office" are banned in the joke politics forum on a website where 9/11 set to yakety sax was its most significant contribution to the world. i shant post in cspam again because the mods are idiots who punish people for saying oval office and it may be revealed at a later date that some of them have committed crimes of a sexual nature. i shall stick to the pink forum and laugh at you all assuming that i am not banned for this post given the ruling that it is illegal to laugh at the mods now. please organize people around you and at your workplace and dont post online all day about "leftist" politics because it will rot your brain and you will never change anything or organize anyone. if apropros held on for just a few more hours they wouldn't have missed out on this primo content godspeed to the one good Trotskyist
|
# ? May 18, 2021 09:56 |
|
gradenko_2000 posted:godspeed to the one good Trotskyist pretty sure they were just doing a bit
|
# ? May 18, 2021 09:58 |
|
when trotsky doesn't close one door, god doesn't open another
|
# ? May 18, 2021 09:59 |
|
when did trotsky ever close a door the whole world was his stage and never ending revolution his backdrop
|
# ? May 18, 2021 10:03 |
|
this Marx guy had some good ideas, i'm finding that a lot of his frameworks for analyzing societal phenomena still resonate today 200 years later
|
# ? May 18, 2021 10:06 |
|
smarxist posted:this Marx guy had some good ideas, i'm finding that a lot of his frameworks for analyzing societal phenomena still resonate today 200 years later like what
|
# ? May 18, 2021 10:18 |
|
lumpentroll posted:like what boss makes a dollar, I make a dime that's why I post on company time
|
# ? May 18, 2021 10:21 |
|
yr new gurlfrand! posted:when did trotsky ever close a door goddamn
|
# ? May 18, 2021 10:22 |
|
smarxist posted:this Marx guy had some good ideas, i'm finding that a lot of his frameworks for analyzing societal phenomena still resonate today 200 years later https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MF3Hg6FBBSU
|
# ? May 18, 2021 10:23 |
|
lumpentroll posted:like what his conception of labor power and the underlying structure of the relationship wage workers have with employers for one thing, like, how a boss doesn't hire you on to "be productive" to some fixed degree for 8 hours or to fulfill some minimum amount of work, but rather they hire on your potential productivity for an 8-hour period of time, and try to maximize what they extract from you in that time. it's especially stark these days if you've ever worked in a fast paced phones or CS environment with metrics, and had to have "calibration" meetings with a supervisor because one aspect of your performance was a half point off, while you're doubling and tripling up employees in other ways, the fact that you're bringing in a multiple of value over another employee doesn't mean poo poo to them, nor to you, w/r/t recompense or benefits, just hey fix this stat that's out of line or get fired gently caress-o. i remember explaining labor power and how that relationship works to someone on their own lil path to radicalizing and it was super intuitive to them
|
# ? May 18, 2021 10:23 |
i like this gramsci quote Economy and ideology. The claim (presented as an essential postulate of historical materialism) that every fluctuation of politics and ideology can be presented and expounded as an immediate expression of the structure, must be contested in theory as primitive infantilism, and combated in practice with the authentic testimony of Marx, the author of concrete political and historical works.
|
|
# ? May 18, 2021 11:34 |
|
Minrad posted:shooting down all those moderator meltdown predictions with an overnight posting meltdown speedrun ngl i'm taking that a little personally here.
|
# ? May 18, 2021 11:37 |
|
It's really funny that Flavius has once again proved why I find the rules they keep adding so objectionable. You're telling us you guys are trying to fight ableism and toxic language, and you don't even know what words are ableist. Are you loving serious with this poo poo lol.
|
# ? May 18, 2021 11:41 |
|
flavius comes out of probation just to call everyone in the thread a mongoloid
|
# ? May 18, 2021 11:43 |
|
stalking through the sesame street set with an armalite ar-10 carbine gas-powered semi-automatic weapon, a mad and wild-eyed flavius pumps round after round into cookie monster and several other muppets because he saw on tv that today's letter of the day was R.
|
# ? May 18, 2021 12:08 |
|
Fortaleza posted:The source of the problem isn’t gone yet so why should anyone?
|
# ? May 18, 2021 12:54 |
|
|
# ? May 18, 2021 14:11 |
|
Bad words are hurtful everybody, its why we have them, to hurt one another.
|
# ? May 18, 2021 14:40 |
|
Larry Parrish posted:It's really funny that Flavius has once again proved why I find the rules they keep adding so objectionable. You're telling us you guys are trying to fight ableism and toxic language, and you don't even know what words are ableist. Are you loving serious with this poo poo lol.
|
# ? May 18, 2021 14:58 |
|
flaveious ateass voted for trump. hosed up but it's the truth
|
# ? May 18, 2021 15:51 |
|
smarxist posted:his conception of labor power and the underlying structure of the relationship wage workers have with employers for one thing, like, how a boss doesn't hire you on to "be productive" to some fixed degree for 8 hours or to fulfill some minimum amount of work, but rather they hire on your potential productivity for an 8-hour period of time, and try to maximize what they extract from you in that time. it's especially stark these days if you've ever worked in a fast paced phones or CS environment with metrics, and had to have "calibration" meetings with a supervisor because one aspect of your performance was a half point off, while you're doubling and tripling up employees in other ways, the fact that you're bringing in a multiple of value over another employee doesn't mean poo poo to them, nor to you, w/r/t recompense or benefits, just hey fix this stat that's out of line or get fired gently caress-o. Good post what book do you rec to get into Marxism
|
# ? May 18, 2021 16:01 |
|
i have an ear ache and it hurts, did marx ever consider this
|
# ? May 18, 2021 16:05 |
|
The mod(s?) turning low-key anti-communist is a fun piece of evidence for my theory that the obsession with "fyad" and "slurs" among some of the dimmer cspam posters bears more than a passing resemblance to the judeo Bolshevik conspiracy theory in structure and function Not serious at all, just something funny to think about
|
# ? May 18, 2021 16:07 |
tokin opposition posted:i have an ear ache and it hurts, did marx ever consider this No but the IWW did and an injury to one is an injury to all
|
|
# ? May 18, 2021 16:08 |
|
tokin opposition posted:i have an ear ache and it hurts, did marx ever consider this Marx didn’t have ears. not a lot of people know this
|
# ? May 18, 2021 16:10 |
|
My ear aches in solidarity
|
# ? May 18, 2021 16:12 |
|
indigi posted:Marx didn’t have ears. not a lot of people know this That explains why he was so notoriously difficult to troll
|
# ? May 18, 2021 16:16 |
|
flavius sighs as he unsheaths his katana the baka marxists continue to post antique slurs yet he slips up and says one himself there is only one way he may redeem his posting honor
|
# ? May 18, 2021 16:23 |
|
Mr. Lobe posted:That explains why he was so notoriously difficult to troll I thought it was the alcoholism and brutally owning his literary enemies
|
# ? May 18, 2021 16:26 |
|
I'm not smarxists but what smarxist describes is a big part of Marx's Capital vol 1. You can pair that with David Harvey's Companion to Marx's Capital, either in book or free podcast form. There are audiobook versions of the Marx, too. The less you enjoy Capital, the more you can lean on the Harvey, but the first volume of Capital is really fun once you kinda get past the first few chapters and you get into it and notice what a troll Marx is. (I find volumes 2 and 3 much much more difficult.) The Harvey is useful for (a) providing some of the background context, and (b) then linking things to the present like smarxist did in their post. be careful with summaries lol although here is a giant one page summary from a communist https://twitter.com/TomFrome/status/1287973768049065984?s=20
|
# ? May 18, 2021 16:27 |
|
DirtyRobot posted:I'm not smarxists but what smarxist describes is a big part of Marx's Capital vol 1. You can pair that with David Harvey's Companion to Marx's Capital, either in book or free podcast form. There are audiobook versions of the Marx, too. can you just listen to Harvey without reading capital. I don’t want to read capital
|
# ? May 18, 2021 16:31 |
|
yr new gurlfrand! posted:I thought it was the alcoholism and brutally owning his literary enemies It can be more than one thing
|
# ? May 18, 2021 16:34 |
|
Larry Parrish posted:Have you guys noticed that every mod posts on the same obnoxious nerd tone of voice. I remember Video Games not posting like that until they got tapped to mod Games and suddenly always used their shift key and also never posted in imp zone again. So the only question is, do they only make sex criminals mods or is that tendency downloaded in with the whiny loser grammar package. Dongicus posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjH1wCx6Zos Lol!
|
# ? May 18, 2021 16:36 |
|
indigi posted:can you just listen to Harvey without reading capital. I don’t want to read capital Yeah, probably. There are other podcasts that do overviews with framing themselves as a "companion" like the Harvey does: The Fundamentals of Marxism: Intro to Political Economy The Fundamentals of Marxism: Dialectics, Historical Materialism, and Class Struggle
|
# ? May 18, 2021 16:41 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 14:54 |
|
DirtyRobot posted:Yeah, probably. Is Harvey’s companion to capital readable by itself? I haven’t read capital in decades and I was thinking about reading it again, but if Harvey’s book is essentially just capital updated in 21st language/context, then should I just read that alone?
|
# ? May 18, 2021 16:47 |