|
sorry correction, Marvel didn't own the rights to him, he entered the public domain
|
# ? May 22, 2021 08:57 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 01:16 |
|
danbanana posted:I had never read any of the Alan Davis run but I think it is being criminally overlooked when people talk about the worst X-periods. Coming in blind, I had no idea how much the loving Skrulls would play in this story. Also, he created what I am insisting is the most offensive x-character of all time. Dude I completely agree. My brother and I used to laugh about how bad that run was and when people would bring up Chuck Austen etc I’d always think sure yes but the Davis run needs to be in contention too. Davis is of course a talented guy so maybe the poor quality of that run was due to editorial interference, which as I understand it, was a big problem in that whole period between Claremont and Morrison. Which reminds me, I have a soft spot for the truncated Kelly/Seagle era, which no one ever talks about.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 11:20 |
|
This is also one of those weird cases of there being a loose concept of "Man wearing all white and a fedora and a surgical mask who is called Doctor [Something] that has since been established as the same character". Doctor Nemesis in the handful of Golden Age/Ace Comics appearances is basically your standard Shadow/Batman masked vigilante who by day is a clean cut surgeon and by night is a clean cut vigilante who invented a truth serum to get the truth out of criminals and/or war saboteurs. Doctor Death was the Roy Thomas adaptation, who claims to have helped build the Human Torch with Phineas Horton and when he didn't receive enough credit decided to ally with Hitler to make sure the Invaders/the United States never join World War II. His plan was to (while flying the Nazi flag) cause an Earthquake to destroy California and then unleash a poison gas attack to kill most of the western half of the country. I'm not sure how what seems like a blatant attack on the United States would keep it from wanting to declare war on Nazi Germany, but I'm not a doctor. Eventually some of the other members of the Battle-Axis who I guess were only Nazi sympathizers/America Firsters turned on him and killed him before he could wipe out half of America. And then yes, Matt Fraction brought him back as the character who is currently in the X-Books. His personality, speaking style, and his position on Nazis (anti-) are all new to his X-Books appearance, but he does wear all white and a surgical mask in each iteration.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 12:11 |
|
nemesis_hub posted:
Our reading only covered one story from this (Hunt for Xavier) but it's been my favorite thing so far. I googled how long their tenure was and... Way too short is the answer, especially since it was Davis who took over after them.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 12:45 |
|
Edge & Christian posted:All of this is fundamentally correct, but it's worth noting because of how many times this seems to happen to him, Mark Waid took over Avengers with issue #400. Issue #401 was an Onslaught tie-in, and #402 was the final issue before Heroes Reborn. It's not even like his Captain America run that got cut off after ten issues for Heroes Reborn, he really seemed to just being told he can have one of his dream jobs for three issues to do janitorial work between The Crossing and Heroes Reborn. Was Waid supposed to have a longer X-Men run? nemesis_hub posted:Dude I completely agree. My brother and I used to laugh about how bad that run was and when people would bring up Chuck Austen etc I’d always think sure yes but the Davis run needs to be in contention too. Davis is of course a talented guy so maybe the poor quality of that run was due to editorial interference, which as I understand it, was a big problem in that whole period between Claremont and Morrison. The weird thing with Davis is we know he can write fun books, like his Excalibur run which is probably the book's best.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 14:10 |
|
He was initially brought in to draw a short run, and was eventually sort of just pressed into writing as well. The impression I have gotten over the years is that for the most part he was being handed plots and told to just get them on paper-- there was an editorial push to tie up longstanding plot-lines which didn't in practice translate into super readable comics. Here's a little quote from Chris Bachalo about the working relationship between the writers and editorial during the Seagle/Kelly period: quote:While Steve Seagle and Joe Kelly were writing the main X-Men books, “the editorial climate at the time was extremely poor,” according to artist Chris Bachalo in Comics Creators On X-Men. “They kept changing story directions from issue to issue. They’d have the meeting, decide on a direction and change their minds a few months later. I think it was all very frustrating for Steve (Seagle) and Joe Kelly, the writers at the time. They were having their differences with the editorial group and I think they got completely burned out after a year. I don’t know if they were fired or if they left, but it was just a horrible situation. And it made drawing the book really difficult. We’d get working on the storyline, and then it would change and go in another direction. Steve’s last issue was also my last issue. To this day, I don’t know why I was moved.” Joe Kelly chiming in: quote:X-Men writer Joe Kelly commented on the change of direction and why he left the book in Wizard #90: “If somebody told me from Day One, “We’re going to work out the story and hand it to you, and you just plot it and dialogue it,” I’d have no problem with that, because it’s very up-front. When that evolves over time, it becomes frustrating.” And finally Alan Davis himself: quote:“After Kelly and Seagle left X-Men, Bob (Harras) took me aside and asked who I would choose to write it,” Chris Claremont revealed in Comics Creators On X-Men. “I suggested Alan Davis. I remember we asked him to do both books for about six months. That six-month gig turned into two years.” I don't begrudge him getting paid and under the circumstances I feel like it would be very difficult to actually make great comics. But yeah, they're a pretty dire stretch of issues. How Wonderful! fucked around with this message at 14:55 on May 22, 2021 |
# ? May 22, 2021 14:50 |
|
I don't remember anything about Claremont's F4, but that might be because I didn't read it
|
# ? May 22, 2021 15:06 |
|
Gologle posted:I don't remember anything about Claremont's F4, but that might be because I didn't read it It's all late stage Claremont and not very interesting, although I think that's where we get Valeria Richards from.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 15:37 |
|
Dawgstar posted:Was Waid supposed to have a longer X-Men run? quote:Mark Waid -- citing incompatability with fellow writer Scott Lobdell -- has decided to leave the X-Men after a six issue stint. Lobdell apparently escalated things up to "scathing comments about Waid" in some 1996-1997 interviews I can't find, and the Waid ones I can find mostly just allude to how Waid gave Lobdell his first writing gig in comics when Waid was a DC editor in the late 1980s and how much he regrets that decision. Even though this interview keeps calling him "Scott Lobell", Waid is being circumspect but clearly has hard feelings towards Lobdell/Harras. I also did not realize until going back to look for more specifics how Waid was brought in after Fabian Nicieza resigned from the X-Men books citing how he felt burnt out and while it was "monetarily rewarding" writing X-Men, it was creatively draining and he wanted to do something he actually enjoyed. Nicieza would later go on to say he was fired for not being a good creative fit with Lobdell and wasn't given any specifics, but was "allowed" to say he was leaving of his own decision. The ongoing pattern of people (except Lobdell) leaving the X-Books when Bob Harras was running them because they just weren't working out is kind of impressive looking back on it, especially with the knowledge that eventually Harras would end up in power at DC in the 2000s and bring in Lobdell repeatedly there, too.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 15:55 |
|
Edge & Christian posted:Yes and no? From the contemporary announcement/article in Wizard #60: I was just looking for those interviews, I feel like in the early aughts they were referenced fairly often and I feel like I have to have read them at some point, but yeah, they're weirdly tricky to hunt down in 2021!
|
# ? May 22, 2021 16:24 |
|
rantmo posted:Is anyone else reading Dr. Nemesis in Way of X with the voice of Dr. Krieger or is it just me? Yes, always have, glad to not be alone in this.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 16:37 |
|
General X-question: Can mutants have non-mutant kids or are they 100% guaranteed mutants?
|
# ? May 23, 2021 07:37 |
|
TwoPair posted:General X-question: Can mutants have non-mutant kids or are they 100% guaranteed mutants? Yes. Mystique and Sabretooth’s kid isn’t a mutant. Quicksilver and Crystal’s daughter too but that one gets complicated with her mother being an inhuman and Quicksilver retconned. At the time, it was said her parents canceled each other out. It’s canonically very rare. Aphrodite fucked around with this message at 08:00 on May 23, 2021 |
# ? May 23, 2021 07:50 |
|
Aphrodite posted:Quicksilver and Crystal’s daughter too but that one gets complicated with her mother being an inhuman and Quicksilver retconned. At the time, it was said her parents canceled each other out. And apparently Luna has powers now. I'm not sure how, I just heard it happened in Slott's FF so my interest in finding out more is less than great.
|
# ? May 23, 2021 13:14 |
|
Dawgstar posted:And apparently Luna has powers now. I'm not sure how, I just heard it happened in Slott's FF so my interest in finding out more is less than great.
|
# ? May 23, 2021 13:29 |
|
She was in the last issue
|
# ? May 23, 2021 17:30 |
|
Codependent Poster posted:She was in the last issue
|
# ? May 23, 2021 17:59 |
|
So is it just that it turns out she's inhuman after all, or...?
|
# ? May 23, 2021 18:15 |
|
Aphrodite posted:So is it just that it turns out she's inhuman after all, or...? Sort of. Inhuman enough for the Mists to proc her powers, anyway.
|
# ? May 24, 2021 00:36 |
|
I never actually read the book where it was retconned that Pietro and Wanda weren't Magneto's kids, what are they if they aren't mutants? Inhumans? something else?
|
# ? May 24, 2021 02:41 |
|
Skwirl posted:I never actually read the book where it was retconned that Pietro and Wanda weren't Magneto's kids, what are they if they aren't mutants? Inhumans? something else? First it was that the High Evolutionary did it, but it's been re-retconned that Wanda was born with innate magic talent and the High Evolutionary just boosted it. Quicksilver seems to be entirely a result of High Evolutionary though (or nobody bothered to update his Wikipedia lol.) So officially Mutate since that's everything that's a human with powers in Marvel.
|
# ? May 24, 2021 02:49 |
|
In fairness, that part with Wanda is pretty close to the MCU explanation as well, just with the Mind Stone filling in for ol' Evvy.
|
# ? May 24, 2021 03:29 |
|
I honestly suspect in the next 5 years Pietro and Wanda will become Magneto's kids again
|
# ? May 24, 2021 03:37 |
|
it'll happen once krakoa is dead and gone for a while, so probably more like 10 years.
|
# ? May 24, 2021 12:29 |
|
I really hope not because I really want to see Magneto try to explain to Wanda why he let a bunch of kids be indoctrinated into seeing her as their Satan figure.
|
# ? May 25, 2021 03:52 |
|
"Why does no one mention that the only reason I lost control was because you killed Pietro?!" "Why does no one mention that time Xavier molested Moonstar when they talk about how evil I am? People don't mention a lot of things, Wanda."
|
# ? May 25, 2021 05:20 |
|
I love the heavily early 90s art references in X-Men #17. It my got me right in the nostalgia.
|
# ? May 25, 2021 09:04 |
|
Rick posted:I love the heavily early 90s art references in X-Men #17. It my got me right in the nostalgia. Reminder that Brett Booth is a bad person. https://www.comicsxf.com/2021/01/26/why-comicsxf-is-not-covering-brett-booths-comics/
|
# ? May 25, 2021 14:37 |
|
was anyone else disappointed that when Legion came back, he didn't talk to Proteus (or what passes for speech between two Scots anyways)? or Kevin could have objected to Chuck's justification for breaking "Krakoa Is For All Mutants" because everything Chuck said applies to him as well
|
# ? May 26, 2021 08:47 |
|
Great stuff today, really like new mutants. Also, bring on the inferno.
|
# ? May 26, 2021 14:34 |
|
why does karma still have a prosthetic leg?
|
# ? May 26, 2021 14:36 |
|
Jesus Christ, Charles. Could you try being less of an rear end in a top hat?
|
# ? May 26, 2021 14:45 |
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:Jesus Christ, Charles. Could you try being less of an rear end in a top hat? Sure doesn't sound like Charles.
|
# ? May 26, 2021 14:49 |
|
oh my god oh my god oh my god we're finally kicking things into gear the books at the end are Destiny's diaries of future events
|
# ? May 26, 2021 15:04 |
|
Quotey posted:the books at the end are Destiny's diaries of future events I read that spoiler even though I'm a few weeks behind on books and YESSSSSSSS. The Mystique-related things are 2nd only to Moira in terms of things I want all Krakoa stories to be about. Also, the original discovery of those (in THE SHATTERING storyline, which sucks) is one of the most anti-climactic things in X-history.
|
# ? May 26, 2021 15:14 |
|
danbanana posted:I read that spoiler even though I'm a few weeks behind on books and YESSSSSSSS. The Mystique-related things are 2nd only to Moira in terms of things I want all Krakoa stories to be about. yeah, you're going to love xmen 20 when you get to it then. Quotey fucked around with this message at 15:29 on May 26, 2021 |
# ? May 26, 2021 15:18 |
|
Protagorean posted:was anyone else disappointed that when Legion came back, he didn't talk to Proteus (or what passes for speech between two Scots anyways)? or Kevin could have objected to Chuck's justification for breaking "Krakoa Is For All Mutants" because everything Chuck said applies to him as well He is one of the 5 so he is beyond all the rules
|
# ? May 26, 2021 18:20 |
|
https://twitter.com/ComicsXF/status/1397629812693512198?s=19 gently caress. And. Yes.
|
# ? May 26, 2021 20:15 |
Well that was an oopsie-daisie. On a lot of levels.
|
|
# ? May 26, 2021 21:05 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 01:16 |
|
It begins
|
# ? May 26, 2021 21:34 |