(Thread IKs:
dead gay comedy forums)
|
|
# ? May 27, 2021 17:24 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 02:03 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2021 17:26 |
|
Sonics 30th anniversary thrown into disarray after rerelease of classic racing game causes moderator to probate the entire sonic team staff.
|
# ? May 27, 2021 17:29 |
|
cspam communism thread survives flavius and pain maineframe well done comrades
|
# ? May 27, 2021 17:29 |
|
welcome back king
|
# ? May 27, 2021 17:30 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2021 17:32 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2021 17:34 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2021 17:34 |
|
i was just thinking that meltdown may has been kinda quiet this year, but apparently it just decided to backload all the good stuff
|
# ? May 27, 2021 17:40 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2021 17:44 |
|
pressing R to pay Respects to da mods
|
# ? May 27, 2021 17:44 |
|
thread title needs to be changed so that mods stop being so dang interested in it!!!
|
# ? May 27, 2021 18:04 |
|
yr new gurlfrand! posted:thread title needs to be changed so that mods stop being so dang interested in it!!! "marxism thread of age"
|
# ? May 27, 2021 18:06 |
|
UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES will we permit ANYONE to engage in the HORRIFIC SLANDER of mentioning the one thing the mod staff keep getting caught out on and defend constantly
|
# ? May 27, 2021 18:15 |
|
Oh no! The two mods with fecal Midas-touch are gone! Edit: not twoday Cpt_Obvious has issued a correction as of 22:53 on May 27, 2021 |
# ? May 27, 2021 18:42 |
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:lmao painframe and two day were the other two I'm loving crying hahahahahaha
|
# ? May 27, 2021 18:58 |
|
change the thread title to "over 18s only" and we'll never be modded again
|
# ? May 27, 2021 19:04 |
|
i believe the thread deserves atleast a triple kill title for its participation in the epic of arfjason the modslaya
|
# ? May 27, 2021 19:31 |
|
...What's going on? I only irregularly check in on this forum and it looks like people are being randomly probated?
|
# ? May 27, 2021 19:41 |
|
its the forum revolution. its finally begun, suck my dick doctor nick
|
# ? May 27, 2021 20:00 |
|
bury me with my loli
|
# ? May 27, 2021 20:01 |
|
Buck Wildman posted:bury me with my loli bury my loli at wounded post
|
# ? May 27, 2021 20:08 |
|
Ah hah, I see, we're at THAT point in the meltdown.
|
# ? May 27, 2021 20:09 |
|
R essurect the other actually ancient and senile thread, cowards
|
# ? May 27, 2021 20:14 |
|
i see this thread is about me now
|
# ? May 27, 2021 20:47 |
|
if arf keeps getting kills he's gonna be an ace mod killer
|
# ? May 27, 2021 20:57 |
|
he’s one star and 20 minutes from achieving “ace in a day”
|
# ? May 27, 2021 21:03 |
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:he’s one star and 20 minutes from achieving “ace in a day” lmao
|
# ? May 27, 2021 21:06 |
|
one more mod posting cp and jeff adds to arf's lightning tattoo
|
# ? May 27, 2021 21:07 |
|
all I have to say is that arfjason is a true posting master
|
# ? May 27, 2021 21:12 |
|
turns out posting was praxis after all
|
# ? May 27, 2021 21:13 |
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:he’s one star and 20 minutes from achieving “ace in a day” give him the fallen mods stars. you keep what you kill
|
# ? May 27, 2021 21:16 |
|
Populon posted:give him the fallen mods stars. you keep what you kill star silhouettes on his avatar
|
# ? May 27, 2021 21:21 |
|
yr new gurlfrand! posted:turns out posting was praxis after all Posting was always praxis, quoth the grandmaster Karl Marx, Capital posted:This has allowed the illusion to arise that all commodities can simultaneously be imprinted with the stamp of direct exchangeability, in the same way that it might be imagined that all Catholics can be popes... This philistine utopia is depicted in the socialism of Proudhon, which, as I have shown elsewhere, does not even possess the merit of originality, but was in fact developed far more successfully long before Proudhon by Gray, Bray, and others. Even so, wisdom of this kind is still rife in certain circles under the name of 'science.' No school of thought has thrown around the word 'science' more haphazardly than that of Proudhon. economists, again big karl posted:Truly comical is M. Bastiat, who imagines that the ancient Greeks and Romans lived by plunder alone. For if people live by plunder for centuries there must, after all, be something there to plunder; in other words, the objects of plunder must be continually reproduced. It seems, therefore, that even the Greeks and Romans had a process of production, hence an economy, which constituted the material basis of their world as much as the bourgeois economy constitutes that of the present-day world. Or perhaps Bastiat means that a mode of production based on the labour of slaves is based on a system of plunder? In that case he is on dangerous ground. If a giant thinker like Aristotle could err in his evaluation of slave-labour, why should a dwarf economist like Bastiat be right in his evaluation of wage-labour? stop this man, he is about to do a savagery posted:Classical economy always loved to conceive social capital as a fixed magnitude of a fixed degree of efficiency. But this prejudice was first established as a dogma by the arch-Philistine, Jeremy Bentham, that insipid, pedantic, leather-tongued oracle of the ordinary bourgeois intelligence of the 19th century. Bentham is among philosophers what Martin Tupper is among poets. Both could only have been manufactured in England.
|
# ? May 27, 2021 21:23 |
|
Arfjason has accomplished more with one letter than Stalin with all his battallions.
|
# ? May 27, 2021 21:30 |
|
quote:Bentham is among philosophers what Martin Tupper is among poets. Both could only have been manufactured in England. lmao get all of their asses
|
# ? May 27, 2021 21:37 |
|
After thus proving clearly, that even if capitalist production had no existence, still it would always exist, Mill is consistent enough to show, on the contrary, that it has no existence, even when it does exist. “And even in the former case” (when the workman is a wage labourer to whom the capitalist advances all the necessaries of life, he the labourer), “may be looked upon in the same light,” (i.e., as a capitalist), “since, contributing his labour at less than the market-price, (!) he may be regarded as lending the difference (?) to his employer and receiving it back with interest, &c.” [12] In reality, the labourer advances his labour gratuitously to the capitalist during, say one week, in order to receive the market price at the end of the week, &c., and it is this which, according to Mill, transforms him into a capitalist. On the level plain, simple mounds look like hills; and the imbecile flatness of the present bourgeoisie is to be measured by the altitude of its great intellects.
|
# ? May 27, 2021 21:39 |
|
The GOAT is that footnote in the chapter on the Law of Capitalist Accumulation where Marx goes off on Malthus and the other Protestant parson bourgeois economists. It's one of the times in Capital when his footnote runs on for like 3 pages uninterrupted lolquote:If the reader reminds me of Malthus, whose “Essay on Population” appeared in 1798, I remind him that this work in its first form is nothing more than a schoolboyish, superficial plagiary of De Foe, Sir James Steuart, Townsend, Franklin, Wallace, &c., and does not contain a single sentence thought out by himself. The great sensation this pamphlet caused, was due solely to party interest. The French Revolution had found passionate defenders in the United Kingdom; the “principle of population,” slowly worked out in the eighteenth century, and then, in the midst of a great social crisis, proclaimed with drums and trumpets as the infallible antidote to the teachings of Condorcet, &c., was greeted with jubilance by the English oligarchy as the great destroyer of all hankerings after human development. Malthus, hugely astonished at his success, gave himself to stuffing into his book materials superficially compiled, and adding to it new matter, not discovered but annexed by him. Note further: Although Malthus was a parson of the English State Church, he had taken the monastic vow of celibacy — one of the conditions of holding a Fellowship in Protestant Cambridge University: “Socios collegiorum maritos esse non permittimus, sed statim postquam quis uxorem duxerit socius collegii desinat esse.” (“Reports of Cambridge University Commission,” p. 172.) This circumstance favourably distinguishes Malthus from the other Protestant parsons, who have shuffled off the command enjoining celibacy of the priesthood and have taken, “Be fruitful and multiply,” as their special Biblical mission in such a degree that they generally contribute to the increase of population to a really unbecoming extent, whilst they preach at the same time to the labourers the “principle of population.” That's like only a quarter of the footnote
|
# ? May 27, 2021 23:12 |
|
a lot of leadup when marx mostly wanted to remind people who fucks
|
# ? May 28, 2021 01:53 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 02:03 |
|
malthusian thought was probably just an attempt to explain away his virginity
|
# ? May 28, 2021 01:54 |