Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: dead gay comedy forums)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Ferrinus
Jun 19, 2003

i'm finding this quite easy, i guess in part because i'm a fast type but also because i have a coherent mental model of the world

Ferrinus posted:

i didn't see that as a problem with black legend, in part because i'd already read Ludo Martens' "Another View of Stalin", and that book goes into the ongoing frequent sabotage in much more depth. that said i didn't think losurdo's book really swung that heavily on the sabotage since it had so much else to say about both internecine left conflicts and the general historical context at the time (comparing stalin to churchill and fdr, for instance)

and to add on a bit i think losurdo's book is less about how stalin was justified in whatever repression and more about how that "furious faith" was actually part of the popular soviet will at the time, justified or otherwise

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

namesake
Jun 19, 2006

"When I was a girl, around 12 or 13, I had a fantasy that I'd grow up to marry Captain Scarlet, but he'd be busy fighting the Mysterons so I'd cuckold him with the sexiest people I could think of - Nigel Mansell, Pat Sharp and Mr. Blobby."

Ferrinus posted:

i didn't see that as a problem with black legend, in part because i'd already read Ludo Martens' "Another View of Stalin", and that book goes into the ongoing frequent sabotage in much more depth. that said i didn't think losurdo's book really swung that heavily on the sabotage since it had so much else to say about both internecine left conflicts and the general historical context at the time (comparing stalin to churchill and fdr, for instance)

Ferrinus posted:

and to add on a bit i think losurdo's book is less about how stalin was justified in whatever repression and more about how that "furious faith" was actually part of the popular soviet will at the time, justified or otherwise

The sabotaging was just the clearest example I remembered thinking was completely unsupported in the book. It seems to be a massive oversight to not even reference something which covers it more thoroughly as you did and that was my general take away from it - an assumed understanding, bolstered with some anecdotes, between author and reader that conditions were such that Stalins freedom of action was limited to such a degree that his actual actions were the best available and then quotes from rivals to demonstrate their intent (with their capacity to follow through assumed to be true) or from Stalin showing some capacity for reflection in a general sense. If it is best as a companion work with other more evaluative books then more obvious referencing would have helped immensely.

The comparisons to the UK and USA are fair but trying to argue that the USSRs actions were on a similar footing to them seems to me to be ignoring the incredibly obvious point that they were bourgeois imperialist states and the USSR was created to not be that. If we are to say that Stalin is just another Churchill of the time then he's on the level with an alcoholic racist who botched a number of command decisions, it's a pisspoor rehabilitation. Perhaps it's true but it's not a change in character that I would get excited over, it's certainly of no political advantage at this moment. Worse still if popular soviet socialist will goads on such characters.

I guess as a rebuttal to Arendts totalitarianism concept it's fine, plenty of evidence to show contradictory criticisms of Stalin and the USSR changing to fit exterior political needs but I just found it very hard to get to grips with what that then validated about Stalin himself.

Ferrinus
Jun 19, 2003

i'm finding this quite easy, i guess in part because i'm a fast type but also because i have a coherent mental model of the world
well the book took a two-pronged approach in comparing stalin to his contemporaries, it pointed out on the one hand that (on the specific topic of antisemitism and hitler/stalin as "twin monsters") that hitler's views on the jews were actually completely mainstream and held by all the rest of the big liberal world leaders, and on the other hand that not only stalin but the soviet state generally actually had a programmatic commitment to combating antisemitism basically unseen in the western world, whatever the issues in implementation were. the general idea of a society on the whole reacting to conditions on the ground rather than one dumb crazy guy who's philosophically committed to evil is threaded to the general questions of the universal vs. the particular (which i agree was the best part of the book and most interesting to me, since i'd read all the particular historical apologism from people like martens and furr elsewhere) but also more specific institutions like the gulags, the '30s purges, etc

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

https://twitter.com/ericfish85/status/1400845981097381888?s=20

someone hook me up with some pure socialism

elaboration
Feb 21, 2020

lmao

Victory Position
Mar 16, 2004


oh yeah? word?

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

Truga posted:

i read the first 20 or so pages today and it also challenges a bunch of super common bullshit myths about stalin in the beginning, so if people read just those bits that'd be pretty nice

anyway, https://twitter.com/MacoAlgo/status/1400826568335888388lmfao
some deep ancient platonist wisdom itt

Hodgepodge
Jan 29, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 215 days!

its largely adulterated with liberalism, its hard to find any that hasn't been stepped on a few dozen times along the supply chain

The Voice of Labor
Apr 8, 2020

splifyphus posted:

nice username/post combo.

but seriously tho psychedelics as a political supplement has been tried - by the cia, and their acid supply helped destroy the solidarity and momentum of the '68 movement. psychedelics do not produce politically effective or active subjects or even necessarily somehow more 'empathic' people, they produce hippies. and charles manson.

yes, this thing would have been totally bad even if the cia didn't corrupt it and gently caress it over and neuter it just like the american left and the black power movement. why is psilocybin being researched for its therapeutic value? why were lsd and mdma researched for the same thing before being demonized? why did so many indigenous south american cultures figure out so many different ways of doing dmt? why is peyote a legally recognized sacrament?

The Voice of Labor
Apr 8, 2020

Centrist Committee posted:

they also produced steve jobs

woz did all the acid and just described it to jobs who took all the credit. rod holt, who was their dealer, invented one of the most crucial and overlooked components in modern electronic devices.

Centrist Committee
Aug 6, 2019

The Voice of Labor posted:

yes, this thing would have been totally bad even if the cia didn't corrupt it and gently caress it over and neuter it just like the american left and the black power movement. why is psilocybin being researched for its therapeutic value? why were lsd and mdma researched for the same thing before being demonized? why did so many indigenous south american cultures figure out so many different ways of doing dmt? why is peyote a legally recognized sacrament?

ur ignoring the social relations that make native medicines so valuable. sorry to be the bearer of bad news but you live in a capitalist dystopia and you can’t trip your way to revolution.

The Voice of Labor
Apr 8, 2020

real tripping to a revolution has never been tried

The Voice of Labor
Apr 8, 2020

the stoned ape hypothesis is real. we tripped our way to sapience we can trip our way past it

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

machine elves are proletarian

https://youtu.be/bIt_Di_nYOc

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


The Voice of Labor posted:

real tripping to a revolution has never been tried

this was a major credo of a looooot of agitation in the sixties, tho

even the diggers, who were pretty much in agreement to that, eventually started getting pissed off with others who thought communalism happened like magic through drugs and got the freeloaders to either bust a move or gtfo

Private Cumshoe
Feb 15, 2019

AAAAAAAGAGHAAHGGAH

The Voice of Labor posted:

yes, this thing would have been totally bad even if the cia didn't corrupt it and gently caress it over and neuter it just like the american left and the black power movement. why is psilocybin being researched for its therapeutic value? why were lsd and mdma researched for the same thing before being demonized? why did so many indigenous south american cultures figure out so many different ways of doing dmt? why is peyote a legally recognized sacrament?

come on man you're really harshing my buzz, just roll with it

indigi
Jul 20, 2004

how can we not talk about family
when family's all that we got?
do I think that directed psychedelic therapy could lead to more solidarity and a revolutionary consciousness? sure. that’s not really the same as tripping and about as likely as a GCU showing up in orbit

where’s Zakalwe when you need him smh

Lightningproof
Feb 23, 2011

i was gonna abolish the value form
but i got high

Yossarian-22
Oct 26, 2014

didn't timothy leary work with the cia or some poo poo?

wynott dunn
Aug 9, 2006

What is to be done?

Who or what can challenge, and stand a chance at beating, the corporate juggernauts dominating the world?
i was gonna eliminate class before I got high

Epitope
Nov 27, 2006

Grimey Drawer
It's too powerful and dangerous, that's why only the shaman takes it. If the whole crew gets hosed up the crew will be hosed up. Anyone can do anything is capital propaganda

The Voice of Labor
Apr 8, 2020

anyone can do anything is the point of communism, to fish in the morning, fill potholes in the afternoon, write socialist critique in the evening, rave all night and make out with your dad the next morning before going out fishing again

mycomancy
Oct 16, 2016

The Voice of Labor posted:

anyone can do anything is the point of communism, to fish in the morning, fill potholes in the afternoon, write socialist critique in the evening, rave all night and make out with your dad the next morning before going out fishing again

Specialization is for insects

The Voice of Labor
Apr 8, 2020

division of labor disenfranchises everyone and steals their praxis and turns them into cogs in the machine. the only thing more central to the core of capitalism is prohibiting mind expanding substances

Epitope
Nov 27, 2006

Grimey Drawer

mycomancy posted:

Specialization is for insects

Anyone can be a biochemist

mycomancy
Oct 16, 2016

Epitope posted:

Anyone can be a biochemist

No, but biochemists should also know how to build a structure, cook, raise kids, run a small business affair, and read philosophy. It's not that everyone can be something, it's that everyone should be many things.

Epitope
Nov 27, 2006

Grimey Drawer
I was just joshing ya, since 10 minutes ago you were giving that guy a hard time for daring to think he could dabble in your specialization

MLSM
Apr 3, 2021

by Azathoth

yr new gurlfrand! posted:

i was gonna eliminate class before I got high

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xxz2m7BFBrU

The Voice of Labor
Apr 8, 2020

denouncing stalin because he lied about being able to bring aeris back to life

tokin opposition
Apr 8, 2021

I don't jailbreak the androids, I set them free.

WATCH MARS EXPRESS (2023)
Marx smoked weed

mycomancy
Oct 16, 2016

Epitope posted:

I was just joshing ya, since 10 minutes ago you were giving that guy a hard time for daring to think he could dabble in your specialization

Is this gangstalking?

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005


much more relevant lyrics

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbHLj7xt5Rw

Epitope
Nov 27, 2006

Grimey Drawer

mycomancy posted:

Is this gangstalking?

I'm probably misunderstanding your joke, but i meant this https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3368821&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=159#post515249553 which i see is actually yesterday not ten minutes ago. Time is capitalist propaganda and psylocibin is a divine gift

Victory Position
Mar 16, 2004

I'm with the mushroom guy arguing with the mushroom guy

mawarannahr
May 21, 2019

I’m pretty sure the only Bolshevik who may have done pot or psychedelics would have been Trotsky. The results are plain to see.

Lightningproof
Feb 23, 2011

Bogdanov, Lunacharsky, and Radek were absolutely all 24/7 blazed

indigi
Jul 20, 2004

how can we not talk about family
when family's all that we got?
based on what (little) I know of her there’s no way Kollontai didn’t try drugs. Trotsky seems like he’d be stuck up about it.

mawarannahr
May 21, 2019

wasn’t kollontai a bit of a prude? idk. I think Trotsky could have in Mexico to impress a woman.

Trash Ops
Jun 19, 2012

im having fun, isnt everyone else?

mawarannahr posted:

wasn’t kollontai a bit of a prude? idk.

no

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Algund Eenboom
May 4, 2014

All the marxists i like would have all the personal qualities that i approve of, and they would all be my friends

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply