|
Holy poo poo I am stealing the gently caress out of this image, because there are too many uses for it
|
# ? May 20, 2021 16:15 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 18:48 |
|
Game good and strongly interesting despite me having trouble understanding the rules for flight on a first pass. More thoughts to follow but more 30 Years Wars should start from someone throwing the new emperor out a window.
|
# ? May 26, 2021 03:44 |
|
Hostile V posted:Game good and strongly interesting despite me having trouble understanding the rules for flight on a first pass. More thoughts to follow but more 30 Years Wars should start from someone throwing the new emperor out a window. The best advice I can give for understanding the flight rules is to just try running a dogfight--even if you just "run" it for yourself, with a single PC plane vs. a generic NPC. The air combat system in Flying Circus is heavily interconnected, and it's really hard to grok how it all fits together (both in terms of the moves interacting with each other and with the actual airplane stats) by just reading all the moves. Also, if you click the Plane Builder Link on any of the planes in the aircraft catalogue, there's an Interactive Dashboard option at the top of the page that pulls up an editable version of the instrument panel that pre-calculates a lot of the math for you, which can be a big help. I think the only thing it doesn't handle are the rules for altitude effects on p. 56 of the core.
|
# ? May 26, 2021 09:57 |
|
I've created a Tabletop Simulator mod that contains working sheets for Flying Circus. It uses tokens instead of pointers for altitude and speed, since TTS can be finnicky with pointers Link To The Mod
|
# ? Jun 8, 2021 19:49 |
|
is gritty mandatory
|
# ? Jun 8, 2021 20:35 |
|
obviously, the rule says its a picture of what you're fighting for
|
# ? Jun 8, 2021 20:57 |
|
spectralent posted:is gritty mandatory I mean, technically you could put any picture there. It's a separate component. I guess you could put your dog there or something, if you really want to
|
# ? Jun 8, 2021 20:58 |
|
Also, a question that pops into my head sometimes: has anyone made a space dogfighters hack of FC? It's probably the best dogfight system I've ever read by a mile so it seems like a great base but if someone has already done that or it's already a future project then it seems pointless to duplicate the effort.
|
# ? Jun 8, 2021 21:25 |
|
TG > Flying Circus: Gritty-inspired Aviation Fantasy
|
# ? Jun 8, 2021 22:05 |
|
spectralent posted:Also, a question that pops into my head sometimes: has anyone made a space dogfighters hack of FC? It's probably the best dogfight system I've ever read by a mile so it seems like a great base but if someone has already done that or it's already a future project then it seems pointless to duplicate the effort. I'm not sure the system would work in space, since it's centered around gravity and the tradeoff of speed vs altitude vs turning.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2021 08:16 |
|
The Lone Badger posted:I'm not sure the system would work in space, since it's centered around gravity and the tradeoff of speed vs altitude vs turning. Oh, for sure, it's absolutely not a hard space sim, but star-wars-y space fights where for some inexplicable reason people are ducking, weaving and diving? I think it'd be fine there. You'd just have to rename altitude to potential or something. Or, don't! Keep it altitude! Space is basically just a WW2 naval battle, right? We know which way is up because it's where all the ships are oriented towards.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2021 20:01 |
|
Anyone got any idea of how to hack this for Battletech? I want an alternate for ATOW that that I don't have to give those thieving bastards over at catalyst money for.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2021 20:59 |
|
spectralent posted:Oh, for sure, it's absolutely not a hard space sim, but star-wars-y space fights where for some inexplicable reason people are ducking, weaving and diving? I think it'd be fine there. You'd just have to rename altitude to potential or something. Or, don't! Keep it altitude! Space is basically just a WW2 naval battle, right? We know which way is up because it's where all the ships are oriented towards. I have a friend who is working on a Star Wars hack specifically that looks amazing, I helped in a few places like coming up with mechanics for shields that feel like the ones in the movies.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2021 23:43 |
|
open_sketchbook posted:I have a friend who is working on a Star Wars hack specifically that looks amazing, I helped in a few places like coming up with mechanics for shields that feel like the ones in the movies. Oh, hell yeah. Is that available anywhere or is it still in private draft form?
|
# ? Jun 12, 2021 00:02 |
|
spectralent posted:Oh, hell yeah. Is that available anywhere or is it still in private draft form? Still private as I understand it, I'll make sure to post it the moment I can!
|
# ? Jun 12, 2021 10:26 |
|
I hate to double-post, but Flying Circus' print on demand version is finally up on DriveThruRPG! About time really. https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product/310013/Flying-Circus--Core-Rulebook
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 00:38 |
|
starting a pbp (again) fingers crossed for a whole routine this time! https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3976165#post516899682
|
# ? Aug 12, 2021 08:31 |
|
Heyyyyyyyy my physical copy arrived. Now to try and find time and people
|
# ? Aug 22, 2021 02:46 |
|
I'm having a pretty hard time finding a place to ask this so I'll do it here. Does the Farmer Move "You came in that thing?" disable the Worker move "Old Reliable"? quote:You Came in That Thing?: After you’ve flown a plane three times, you can roll on the Used chart and take the penalty. In exchange, select another of the penalties and apply its inverse. Restoring the plane to New doesn’t remove the advantageous modifications. quote:Old Reliable: After 3 Routines in the same plane, without it being modified or upgraded, the plane gains +8 Toughness and +3 Reliability. This is once per plane, and the bonus is removed if the plane is modified. It doesn't say it's a modification or an upgrade but there's disagreement in the group about whether it disables it or not.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2022 16:02 |
|
it is an advantageous modification.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2022 00:23 |
|
Just chiming in to say the game looks amazing, I have my physical copy and am trying desperately to trawl up enough people for a game (such is life). Is there something wrong with me if I admit I had an easier time wrapping my head around this gameplay than any other PBA?
|
# ? Sep 9, 2022 22:59 |
|
OscarDiggs posted:I'm having a pretty hard time finding a place to ask this so I'll do it here. sleepy.eyes posted:Just chiming in to say the game looks amazing, I have my physical copy and am trying desperately to trawl up enough people for a game (such is life). Is there something wrong with me if I admit I had an easier time wrapping my head around this gameplay than any other PBA?
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 14:44 |
|
just in case people were wondering how the land combat expansion is going
|
# ? Jan 10, 2024 02:36 |
|
Love to see experimental forms of ground transport that are just as weird as experimental planes.
|
# ? Jan 10, 2024 16:53 |
|
Glazius posted:Love to see experimental forms of ground transport that are just as weird as experimental planes. And, by the look of it, equally unreliable and dangerous.
|
# ? Jan 11, 2024 00:25 |
|
Oh hey, yeah, I forgot. Flying Circus: Chariots of Steel, the completely loving deranged expansion I've been working on for the last three years, is out. It adds tanks to the plane game, and its longer than the original book. https://opensketch.itch.io/chariots-of-steel https://www.drivethrurpg.com/en/product/481374/Flying-Circus--Chariots-of-Steel
|
# ? May 22, 2024 10:00 |
|
I think one of the things I like about your work is that you do a really good job of making the reason the heroes are interesting or cool be how limited they are. Like, a lot of RPGs are power fantasies, where it's pretty easy to deal with stuff, but in the case of Patrol, Flying Circus, and Chariots of Steel, the mechanics spend a lot of time telling you things you can't do, or at least establishing costs for those things which eat into your dwindling resources. It's often a design associated with horror games, and I've used "logistical horror" to describe Patrol to friends before, but in Flying Circus (and, from the looks, Chariots), it's used to show how cool and daring the characters are instead - you're fiddling with engines, swooping in and out of furballs, and taking your hands off the wheel to fix one of your wings. All of which are things that're badass because you're in a flying deathtrap. Chariots has a similar feature with the deeply foundational status of "having to actually see out of your tank", which really highlights the fact you're stuck in a big metal box and hoping for the best. That willingness to center problems rather than what you can do is why I feel like your games are so interesting. Also, mandatory "so this is the alpha for patrol 2 then" joke.
|
# ? May 22, 2024 11:48 |
|
spectralent posted:I think one of the things I like about your work is that you do a really good job of making the reason the heroes are interesting or cool be how limited they are. Like, a lot of RPGs are power fantasies, where it's pretty easy to deal with stuff, but in the case of Patrol, Flying Circus, and Chariots of Steel, the mechanics spend a lot of time telling you things you can't do, or at least establishing costs for those things which eat into your dwindling resources. It's often a design associated with horror games, and I've used "logistical horror" to describe Patrol to friends before, but in Flying Circus (and, from the looks, Chariots), it's used to show how cool and daring the characters are instead - you're fiddling with engines, swooping in and out of furballs, and taking your hands off the wheel to fix one of your wings. All of which are things that're badass because you're in a flying deathtrap. Chariots has a similar feature with the deeply foundational status of "having to actually see out of your tank", which really highlights the fact you're stuck in a big metal box and hoping for the best. That willingness to center problems rather than what you can do is why I feel like your games are so interesting. the funny thing is, there actually *is* an alpha for patrol 2; i've been testing it by running a helldivers quest on Sufficient Velocity, of all things, and its leaning super hard into this angle by heavily amping up both the gear porn angle and the inventory management side of things. so now, instead of just affecting your marching speed, your combat load affects the cost of literally every single action you take... but in exchange, there's more detail and emphasis involved in using that gear, more cool poo poo it does and more concrete ways to affect the battle with it. there's a strong middle-ground shooting action where you feel like you're putting rounds downrange with purpose even in intense firefights and if you set it up right you can knock down whole squads with automatic fire. your RTO isn't just abstractly begging for artillery, you have a VANCIAN CASTING SYSTEM for air support. and all of it just feeds into a big wheel on your sheet that just says SUCK on it and the more cool stuff you carry the more it degrades your capabilities, your body, and your loving spirit under the sheer mass of it all. so you've got all these incredibly cool tools, and they have all these rules for how cool they are, and the one that actually matters to you most 99% of the time is how many kilograms it weighs. i think its best summarized by the fact that the gunplay is now detailed enough to model different firing rates and 'one in the chamber' when reloading on a partially empty magazine... and does so by punishing you with extra costs to retain your magazine or work the action!
|
# ? May 22, 2024 23:46 |
|
open_sketchbook posted:the funny thing is, there actually *is* an alpha for patrol 2; i've been testing it by running a helldivers quest on Sufficient Velocity, of all things, and its leaning super hard into this angle by heavily amping up both the gear porn angle and the inventory management side of things.
|
# ? May 23, 2024 02:08 |
|
Stoked to see Chariots out, even though I have a hard time getting anyone to play anything that isn't bog standard DnD. I enjoy just reading the books and looking at neat illustrations.
|
# ? May 23, 2024 04:07 |
|
open_sketchbook posted:the funny thing is, there actually *is* an alpha for patrol 2; i've been testing it by running a helldivers quest on Sufficient Velocity, of all things, and its leaning super hard into this angle by heavily amping up both the gear porn angle and the inventory management side of things. jesus christ
|
# ? May 23, 2024 04:12 |
|
Well, now I want to know when the kickstarter is.
|
# ? May 23, 2024 09:06 |
|
sleepy.eyes posted:Stoked to see Chariots out, even though I have a hard time getting anyone to play anything that isn't bog standard DnD. I enjoy just reading the books and looking at neat illustrations. i'm genuinely really glad to see that people like the art. the reason the game took so goddamn long was because my body quite literally broke down trying to do it all; if my hand had held up it would have been out in late 2022
|
# ? May 23, 2024 10:49 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 18:48 |
|
Man, the universal modifications' doodles are just loving fantastic. Really sorry to hear about your health.
|
# ? May 23, 2024 20:23 |