Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Oh Snapple!
Dec 27, 2005

Particularly when

Pamela Springstein posted:

lol

but also, given they reregged and were posting for months without issues, they could probably be unperma'd without much trouble

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018

cumshitter posted:

is he still releasing lula? is this like an ongoing process?

Lula has since been freed. Not sure what you are trying to get at here but it's an immense win for the left in Brazil.

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018

Pamela Springstein posted:

these unfunyn misspellings must end. mods? do something.





what's that? it's all performative and no one cares?

Lol at trying to call out the guy who actually puts efforts into the majority of his posts and is liked by the threads he posts in.

RealityWarCriminal
Aug 10, 2016

:o:

Apraxin posted:


which kind of ties in to the issue that none of the admins have much interaction or familiarity with one of SA's most populous forums and can have difficulty telling what constitutes normal daily posting here or when things have gone wrong, or unpicking what old inter-forum or inter-thread grievances are at play in a given drama eruption and if people are posting in good faith. don't know if there's a solution to that though, i don't think forcing one of them to have regular interaction with a noisy politics forum they don't personally gel with is gonna help much :shrug:

I think this thread is an attempt to do that, and that's a good thing

Cpt_Obvious
Jun 18, 2007

Seriously, if you want to extend an open hand to cspam then unbanning the many users who were banned due to long forgotten grudges would go a long way.

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

I think people can read two threads on games. one in cspam and one in games. in fact even games has many different threads on games and different games sub forums

RealityWarCriminal
Aug 10, 2016

:o:

AnimeIsTrash posted:

Lol at trying to call out the guy who actually puts efforts into the majority of his posts and is liked by the threads he posts in.

not calling anyone out. I like Gradenko. they're a better poster than me. just pointing out that statements that trump misspellings need to be removed ring hollow.

Zurtilik
Oct 23, 2015

The Biggest Brain in Guardia

croup coughfield posted:

my hope - however naive and optimistic - is that the more egregiously unfunny idiots will be less likely to post in the rest of cspam, because its more distant and their brain parasites reduce fine motor control so its harder to make that many clicks. i used to enjoy cspam quite a bit some years ago, and its been disappointing to see what threads like the trump thread turned it into

Just out here literally dehumanizing people for posting wrong. Wild stuff.

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

AnimeIsTrash posted:

Lol at trying to call out the guy who actually puts efforts into the majority of his posts and is liked by the threads he posts in.

i like his posts and I enjoy his phillipines posts when he chooses to post about it as well because not a lot of people post about that region.

Smythe
Oct 12, 2003
plinkey is a saint. that’s my feedback.

TheMightyBoops
Nov 1, 2016

euphronius posted:

I think people can read two threads on games. one in cspam and one in games. in fact even games has many different threads on games and different games sub forums

While we’re at it please more people post in the Falcom thread.

Cao Ni Ma
May 25, 2010



Josh Christ posted:

Free benghazi 2

(USER WAS PERMABANNED FOR THIS POST)

Free him

ram dass in hell
Dec 29, 2019



:420::toot::420:

her

Harold Stassen
Jan 24, 2016

Cpt_Obvious posted:

Seriously, if you want to extend an open hand to cspam then unbanning the many users who were banned due to long forgotten grudges would go a long way.

Literally make them all IKs. We need a total turnover first and then let's see if any other changes need to be made :colbert:

Jazerus
May 24, 2011


croup coughfield posted:

its possible - ive also changed a lot over that time and im sure that plays into it. however, the chats threads and the trump thread in particular flooded this forum with people who not only had no actual political ideas or ideals, but aren't interested in developing any. its just aesthetics and spectator sport - noise - and its tiresome. that poo poo doesn't belong as a primary thread focus in a political forum. they can have the exact same conversations about their rgb funko pops or whatever the gently caress they talk about in the chat forum, where no one will mistakenly open the thread expecting a discussion of anti-capitalist politics

croup coughfield posted:

like why the gently caress is there a thread about casting spells in a politics forum

personally i think you don't understand the trump thread or the subforum as a whole, if you think we have a bunch of threads that are "apolitical" or "non-leftist"

my take on literally every change to the forums structure proposed so far is that it's just meddling for meddling's sake. nobody is being hurt by the way the forum has been organized for years now. these suggestions are just a good way to make people unhappy and create divisions in the community where none existed before.

however to pick up on what a few other people have said, there are bans and permas still in place that were deeply lovely and the product of the previous administration flailing around as it died. i couldn't give you a full list of folks and i know some people like crazycloud have returned, but it might be worth asking around for candidate cases to review

Cao Ni Ma
May 25, 2010




Sorry, Free her.

Korean Boomhauer
Sep 4, 2008

Smythe posted:

plinkey is a saint. that’s my feedback.

:hai:

Smythe
Oct 12, 2003

Jazerus posted:

personally i think you don't understand the trump thread or the subforum as a whole, if you think we have a bunch of threads that are "apolitical" or "non-leftist"

my take on literally every change to the forums structure proposed so far is that it's just meddling for meddling's sake. nobody is being hurt by the way the forum has been organized for years now. these suggestions are just a good way to make people unhappy and create divisions in the community where none existed before.

however to pick up on what a few other people have said, there are bans and permas still in place that were deeply lovely and the product of the previous administration flailing around as it died. i couldn't give you a full list of folks and i know some people like crazycloud have returned, but it might be worth asking around for candidate cases to review

seems like a perfect opportunity to use the upcoming FOrums Court feature. You have my axe. :dota101:

Horseshoe theory
Mar 7, 2005

Make Avshalom an admin.

ram dass in hell
Dec 29, 2019



:420::toot::420:

Jazerus posted:

personally i think you don't understand the trump thread or the subforum as a whole, if you think we have a bunch of threads that are "apolitical" or "non-leftist"

my take on literally every change to the forums structure proposed so far is that it's just meddling for meddling's sake. nobody is being hurt by the way the forum has been organized for years now. these suggestions are just a good way to make people unhappy and create divisions in the community where none existed before.

however to pick up on what a few other people have said, there are bans and permas still in place that were deeply lovely and the product of the previous administration flailing around as it died. i couldn't give you a full list of folks and i know some people like crazycloud have returned, but it might be worth asking around for candidate cases to review

mormonpartyboat was one of the finest posters not only of cspam but the whole site, he did nothing wrong and tried to help deescalation and clarification during all the bullshit that went down, and then self-permabanned out of frustration because of lowtax. I don't know if he'd even want to come back, but it's the top of my list for outstanding unjustified permaban candidates. He's smart and funny and gets it and does good photoshop work and cspam is poorer for his absence.

also can someone push the button to let me actually re reg? Jeff said I'm not permabanned and I've been posting all year and it's been lovely, but I still can't have my screen name back? Idgi.

Homeless Friend
Jul 16, 2007

Jeffrey of YOSPOS posted:

Carving up the forum into one for big and small threads feels like changing something just to change it. Strictly categorizing threads does not seem very c-spam. The best answer might be making the button to sort by thread creation time more prominent.

Absolutely, but also Squizzle was hyping having total forum control so let's do something cool imo

cumshitter
Sep 27, 2005

by Fluffdaddy

AnimeIsTrash posted:

Lula has since been freed. Not sure what you are trying to get at here but it's an immense win for the left in Brazil.

i only engaged with you about greenwald because i wanted to take a nap and my white noise machine is broken. greenwald is boring

Happy Thread
Jul 10, 2005

by Fluffdaddy
Plaster Town Cop
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what they are going to have for lunch. Historically that tends to be the environment that is provided for soliciting feedback about one subforum among other competing subforums.

Jazerus
May 24, 2011


ram dass in hell posted:

mormonpartyboat was one of the finest posters not only of cspam but the whole site, he did nothing wrong and tried to help deescalation and clarification during all the bullshit that went down, and then self-permabanned out of frustration because of lowtax. I don't know if he'd even want to come back, but it's the top of my list for outstanding unjustified permaban candidates. He's smart and funny and gets it and does good photoshop work and cspam is poorer for his absence.

absolutely. can't count how many pieces of classic cspamalia were the product of mpb and other posters lost at that time and they were good, well-liked members of the community

Smythe posted:

seems like a perfect opportunity to use the upcoming FOrums Court feature. You have my axe. :dota101:

hell yeah :synpa:

Jazerus has issued a correction as of 21:05 on Jun 26, 2021

mastershakeman
Oct 28, 2008

by vyelkin

euphronius posted:

I think people can read two threads on games. one in cspam and one in games. in fact even games has many different threads on games and different games sub forums

I post about Yakuza like in like 5 different forums. It's fine, who cares if I get confused which one im in

Irony.or.Death
Apr 1, 2009


Athanatos posted:

[*]People who deserve recognition for being great here and adding to the community. Forums are nothing without worth-a-poo poo people, who is under-recognized and deserves some props?

Hello I am here from the climate change thread to support doomposting, because it is the only informed stance on the issue thus a necessary component of any sane conversation, and also to say that Perry Mason Jar does occasional cool roundups of news about extreme weather events that those of us in the thread appreciate. Some props are due there.

mastershakeman
Oct 28, 2008

by vyelkin

Athanatos posted:

While a lot of Politics Forums reports are Misc (no action), we have had issues in the past where people refuse to report anything for whatever reason. It lead to things horrible things just sitting in threads for weeks and people going "Why wasn't anything done about this?"

I don't want to discourage people from reporting things and get into that situation again.

Then they should post about it and other people that care can chime in; if no one does than oh well

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


croup coughfield posted:

like why the gently caress is there a thread about casting spells in a politics forum

c'mon, no need for bad faith

say, many unions around the world have (or used to have) many community activities that didn't have anything to do with organizing, like weekly football matches, hobby classes like cooking or gardening available to anyone in the member's family, so on and on. Having those activities were important to build solidarity, which meant much better organization.

of course, cspam is not an union, it is an internet forum. Still, it remains a relevant comparison: we must avoid to become so narrowminded about the political (where the only thing that matters is politics and theory) because, as it turns out, this very strict focus only serves to harm the much more important factor of having a community that can foster socialist politics. Someone may come across something very interesting in the trump thread and go to the Marxism thread to learn more about. It already happened more than several times. This organic, relational approach is one of the best ways to actually advance leftist causes; if the concern with political relevance is the main issue, what do we truly gain, in the purest and concrete political sense, by being sanctimonious about how and why people should interact with one another?

Bearjew
Apr 18, 2017



ram dass in hell posted:

mormonpartyboat was one of the finest posters not only of cspam but the whole site, he did nothing wrong and tried to help deescalation and clarification during all the bullshit that went down, and then self-permabanned out of frustration because of lowtax. I don't know if he'd even want to come back, but it's the top of my list for outstanding unjustified permaban candidates. He's smart and funny and gets it and does good photoshop work and cspam is poorer for his absence.

also can someone push the button to let me actually re reg? Jeff said I'm not permabanned and I've been posting all year and it's been lovely, but I still can't have my screen name back? Idgi.

this

Smythe
Oct 12, 2003
i like the cspam forum and think the mods are doing a great job. honest and 100% earnest post lol. Thank you mods and posters.

docbeard
Jul 19, 2011

Forums jubilee. Erase all bans and permabans and welcome all our prodigal sons and daughters back with forgiveness and open arms except the actual pedophiles I guess. Hit the big ol' reset button and see what happens next.

(I am honestly not sure if I'm joking about this or not.)

Anyway, on the megathread topic, I'm generally a believer in not disrupting existing threads without a really loving good reason for doing so, because that's going to cause a lot of chaos and hurt feelings, and the benefit would have to be really massive for it to be worth it. "I would be more comfortable if every thread fit into its proper box" is not what I would consider a really loving good reason, nor really is "a few people from this thread are generating complaints elseforum". I think the monthly reboots of the Trump Thread As Was worked well enough.

I've fallen away from the current chat thread though I used to post regularly enough in the old Trump Threads, but that's okay, people seem to like it, and I don't see that as a bad thing. (Also I think the line between 'focused topical thread' and 'chat thread' is a lot blurrier than some might like to think, and may even just be 'do I approve of this thread and its posters or not' in some cases.)

Brain Candy
May 18, 2006

Jazerus posted:

absolutely. can't count how many pieces of classic cspamalia were the product of mpb and other posters lost at that time and they were good, well-liked members of the community

amnesty for all cspam political exiles, it would be a positive ameliorative to the post quality question instead of a negative one

a Loving Dog
May 12, 2001

more like a Barking Dog, woof!

croup coughfield posted:

its possible - ive also changed a lot over that time and im sure that plays into it. however, the chats threads and the trump thread in particular flooded this forum with people who not only had no actual political ideas or ideals, but aren't interested in developing any. its just aesthetics and spectator sport - noise - and its tiresome. that poo poo doesn't belong as a primary thread focus in a political forum. they can have the exact same conversations about their rgb funko pops or whatever the gently caress they talk about in the chat forum, where no one will mistakenly open the thread expecting a discussion of anti-capitalist politics

yup

mastershakeman
Oct 28, 2008

by vyelkin

croup coughfield posted:

like why the gently caress is there a thread about casting spells in a politics forum

Because 2e is the superior d&d system and it has to be explained over and over that movement took place throughout combat (baldurs gate style) and not purely turned based. Frankly this should be stickied

croup coughfield
Apr 8, 2020
Probation
Can't post for 74 days!

Red Baron posted:

that’s a pretty extreme way to phrase it, but ignoring that let me ask you a question that I think naturally extends from the first ideological standpoint I listed:

if this forum is to be just about leftist politics it will naturally attract leftists (and other people, of course) and those leftists will want to congregate and talk about things other than just politics with their new leftist pals. under the “CSPAM is just for leftist politics” understanding, where should those people go to post and congregate that isn’t just the general forums for those things?

I ask because there clearly seems to be an appetite for posting about games and cooking and other things with people that you can somewhat safely assume share some of your overall leanings in political thought—and presumably other things as well. if the place for that kind of congregation is not here, then where?

a concrete example of leftists congregating to discuss an ostensibly non-political subject in a political light is pener's games thread. it started out pretty great, discussing something a lot of people are interested in specifically from a standpoint of how cultural artifacts reflect politics and ideology. i havent read it in awhile so i dont know if its still that way, but that to me is what a "non-political" subject being discussed in a political forum should look like. it should have a specific subject of discussion that is directly linked to actual politics, even if the subject itself is not necessarily political. chat threads start out off-topic in a non-chat forum.

if you need a special place to post what you had for breakfast where you have been assured it will only be read and responded to by people who share your views on tree law then you dont need a forum, you need a doctor.

Nonsense posted:

You're not doing poo poo.

shut up you dumb bitch

HookedOnChthonics
Dec 5, 2015

Profoundly dull


Horseshoe theory posted:

Make Avshalom an admin.


and yeah the only good argument for moving the trump thread would be to give every single one of its posters buttons without interfering with the rest of c-spam

unfortunately i just don't think theres anything systemic to be done about a bunch of individual posters convinced that their style of posting and preferred hangs are the main attraction of a forum that has very much more to offer. i mean its literally been shown that they do keep it more to themselves, proportionally, than any other thread except the brand-new UTC+10 one lmao. don't pull those posters to be mods but they shouldn't be put out in the cold; postin with the boys isn't a crime

Plinkey
Aug 4, 2004

by Fluffdaddy

croup coughfield posted:

its possible - ive also changed a lot over that time and im sure that plays into it. however, the chats threads and the trump thread in particular flooded this forum with people who not only had no actual political ideas or ideals, but aren't interested in developing any. its just aesthetics and spectator sport - noise - and its tiresome. that poo poo doesn't belong as a primary thread focus in a political forum. they can have the exact same conversations about their rgb funko pops or whatever the gently caress they talk about in the chat forum, where no one will mistakenly open the thread expecting a discussion of anti-capitalist politics

yeah, I mean, there are people who aren't really what you'd call political in a constantly plugged in way, but they pick up poo poo by posting in those threads and feel like they have found a place in those threads because of how easy going they are and it's good to have those people who vaguely know that poo poo sucks, but might pick up some more of the why and history, driving them out because they don't know that the VP doesn't vote on a 50:50 tie on a vote to bring a bill to a debate/vote in the senate would be completely the wrong move

if you want a hard-core politics only thread on a specific subject (1000 words per post minimum, double spaced, times new roman) in CSPAM, go ahead and make one

cumshitter
Sep 27, 2005

by Fluffdaddy

HookedOnChthonics posted:

and yeah the only good argument for moving the trump thread would be to give every single one of its posters buttons without interfering with the rest of c-spam

unfortunately i just don't think theres anything systemic to be done about a bunch of individual posters convinced that their style of posting and preferred hangs are the main attraction of a forum that has very much more to offer. i mean its literally been shown that they do keep it more to themselves, proportionally, than any other thread except the brand-new UTC+10 one lmao. don't pull those posters to be mods but they shouldn't be put out in the cold; postin with the boys isn't a crime

HookedOnChthonics posted:

jazerus, i understand why you might have this perception, but i want to challenge it--as an extremely unscientific measure i just copied the top posters lists from the top 6-7 threads in cspam rn into a notepad doc and started doing ctrl-f with big names from the trump thread leaderboard, and there's not a lot of overlap!

and yeah if you did the full social graph maybe it's a core group of very prolific thread-specific posters and then everyone who doesn't post that much is a generalist, but it's not at all an inaccurate statement, i think, to say that the trump/chat thread 'core group' is pretty insular

just to disclose my own biases i kept up with trump thread pretty closely from the primaries on and then a few months ago was subjected to the phrase 'former lurker Child A' one too many times and had the scales fall from my eyes

post poorly formatted pictures of your excel spreadsheet notepad doc

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

croup coughfield posted:

a concrete example of leftists congregating to discuss an ostensibly non-political subject in a political light is pener's games thread. it started out pretty great, discussing something a lot of people are interested in specifically from a standpoint of how cultural artifacts reflect politics and ideology. i havent read it in awhile so i dont know if its still that way, but that to me is what a "non-political" subject being discussed in a political forum should look like. it should have a specific subject of discussion that is directly linked to actual politics, even if the subject itself is not necessarily political. chat threads start out off-topic in a non-chat forum.

if you need a special place to post what you had for breakfast where you have been assured it will only be read and responded to by people who share your views on tree law then you dont need a forum, you need a doctor.

shut up you dumb bitch

Just make the threads you want.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



Lol why does it always come back to calling a huge group of people ill in some way because they post casually sometimes. Theres no need to pathologize your distaste for threads that arent sufficiently on topic of stuff you consider proper, doubly so since you in fact that those threads already

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply