|
Tree Goat posted:a slav is a featherless biped
|
# ? Jul 7, 2021 16:51 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 13:06 |
|
Edgar Allen Ho posted:my slavic experience is everyone chain smokes and slams vodka shots at dinner, but somehow have iron livers and steel lungs. Well, there IS a clear evolutionary pressure to withstand those poisons.
|
# ? Jul 7, 2021 17:00 |
|
rofl
|
# ? Jul 7, 2021 20:36 |
|
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 02:13 |
|
Falukorv posted:I think you can make the case that genuine Jämtlandic is different enough to merit some mention, being closer related to the neighbouring old norwegian dialects up there. But it is in a similar situation as elfdalinan as in not that many speak it and all of them speak standard swedish just fine. Still, jämtlandic is imo more intelligible than elfdalian for a middle swede. Compare some of Allan Edwalls songs that he sang in that dialect. Yeah, I poked around a bit on the wikipedia page for Jämtska, and it does seem quite different from standard Swedish, but by just knowing modern Norwegian and Swedish I could still understand just about everything when it was written down, which I certainly can't with Elfdalian. So while I would rather call it a dialect from the borderlands than its own language I guess an argument could at least be made that it can call itself a language. Scanian is super ridiculous though. I guess a couple of linguists at the University of Lund might come up with a list of some words and grammatical quirks that differentiate it from regular Swedish, but that does not make it a language. Also, which Scanian dialect gets to decide how this supposed language is written? If they go with the stereotypical MFF-Skånska, the simple word "ja" could end up being spelled "jaoeåh" if they're not careful! Here in Värmland I can instantly think of at least two dialects that would look very different from standard Swedish if anyone were to write down how people speak and call it a language. Those are the dialects in Sunne and Ekshärad, or Su-un and Ekshär as the locals call them respectively. People in Ekshärad might as well speak French with how many letters in some words they don't pronounce.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 03:48 |
|
Scanian is just Swedish with wonky Rs. It's about as much of a language as a Cockney accent is. Probably a lot less of a language than Cockney since at least the rhyming slang has lead to a lot of words and phrases that are entirely incomprehensible to outsiders.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 04:14 |
|
You're all being remarkably cavalier about how Scania came to be what it is today, but I guess cultural genocide is fine if you can look down on the descendants as backwards southerners.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 05:47 |
|
Scandinavian languages all being very much mutually intelligible casts some doubt on whether or not they should all be counted as separate languages anyway.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 07:51 |
|
A Buttery Pastry posted:You're all being remarkably cavalier about how Scania came to be what it is today, but I guess cultural genocide is fine if you can look down on the descendants as backwards southerners. I'm still hunting for it, but there's an article about Danish Skåne in Språktidningen consisting mainly of letters from parish priests complaining to their colleagues back in Copenhagen about how bad the locals were at learning Danish. Randarkman posted:Scandinavian languages all being very much mutually intelligible casts some doubt on whether or not they should all be counted as separate languages anyway. I learned Swedish as an adult, and until I actually took a university course in the Norwegian language, I couldn't tell the difference between it and some of the western dialects of Swedish. I just saw that they started putting subtitles under it. Groda fucked around with this message at 08:38 on Jul 8, 2021 |
# ? Jul 8, 2021 08:36 |
|
Groda posted:I'm still hunting for it, but there's an article about Danish Skåne in Språktidningen consisting mainly of letters from parish priests complaining to their colleagues back in Copenhagen about how bad the locals were at learning Danish. I'd like to read it, if you can find it! I found this article, which seems to say the opposite: https://spraktidningen.se/2010/02/skaningarna-bytte-aldrig-sprak/ Priests who used Danish after 1680 were forced to use Swedish, and the common people were educated in Swedish via the catechism (in my own genealogy, I've used katekismilängder that sometimes list whether each person was "Danish" or "Swedish"). Some quotes about commoners (in my translation): - "Annoyed parishioners complained that they were forced a new language, despite being 'neither German nor heathen', as the populace of Gässie expressed." - "No matter how much the Scanians exerted themselves, they 'could not remember or understand' [Swedish], as a church inspector reported in 1686." The article goes on to argue that the efforts were largely ineffective, and that the major changes to Scanian happened with industrialization in the 1800s, and that it began in the towns (to be expected, what with more traffic from other parts of the country — merchants, tradesmen, etc).
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 10:24 |
|
The top one looks like a bad fantasy map, especially if you rotate it so east is on the top. "In land seas, really?"
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 10:40 |
|
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 11:03 |
|
FreudianSlippers posted:incomprehensible to outsiders. Bonnagilled posted:På bored står där en spiddekaga
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 11:30 |
|
As a Scanian myself, it's clear that what I speak is basically a regional variation of Swedish. However, as I read that the late and great Peps Persson said, no one in these days is speaking "true" Scanian anymore, just Swedish with a Scanian accent. I mean I still had relatives living late in the 20th century who said "alligevel" instead of "ändå". For example, the example I posted above and this is, I think, more equal to "real" Scanian. I would still classify that as Swedish though. Konec Hry fucked around with this message at 11:40 on Jul 8, 2021 |
# ? Jul 8, 2021 11:38 |
|
Pacific basin getting some top-tier dome from the south Atlantic.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 11:46 |
|
Konec Hry posted:As a Scanian myself, it's clear that what I speak is basically a regional variation of Swedish. However, as I read that the late and great Peps Persson said, no one in these days is speaking "true" Scanian anymore, just Swedish with a Scanian accent. Those examples are neat! Here's an example of the East-Danish Bornholm dialect from 1869, with a contemporary translation to Standard Danish (rigsdansk): But yeah, to be sure, I agree that Scanian isn't a Danish dialect anymore & was never a separate language.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 12:07 |
|
Vasukhani posted:The top one looks like a bad fantasy map, especially if you rotate it so east is on the top. It just messes with my head seeing a different projection of the northeast like that, although it totally makes sense to arrange everything at like a 45 degree angle so that the coastline and the St. Lawrence river either go totally vertical or horizontal. Oswego! to New York.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 15:32 |
|
Konec Hry posted:As a Scanian myself, it's clear that what I speak is basically a regional variation of Swedish. However, as I read that the late and great Peps Persson said, no one in these days is speaking "true" Scanian anymore, just Swedish with a Scanian accent. Carthag Tuek posted:Those examples are neat! Here's an example of the East-Danish Bornholm dialect from 1869, with a contemporary translation to Standard Danish (rigsdansk): This is very cool, there's lots of interesting parallels between the different non-standard dialects of all the Scandinavian languages that I've noticed. Some sort of parallel evolution going on here and there maybe.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 15:43 |
|
Scandigoons talking about scandinavian languages in english, the most scandinavian thing in the world
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 15:54 |
|
SlothfulCobra posted:It just messes with my head seeing a different projection of the northeast like that, although it totally makes sense to arrange everything at like a 45 degree angle so that the coastline and the St. Lawrence river either go totally vertical or horizontal. This gives me a headache.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 15:57 |
|
Edgar Allen Ho posted:Scandigoons talking about scandinavian languages in english, the most scandinavian thing in the world That's just for politeness, we all speak our own languages in Skanditråden
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 16:40 |
|
A hosed up Mercator. I know people intellectually understand that projections are hosed but i particularly like this as an example of that because you can say "where's India?" and watch people's heads melt. Muscle Tracer fucked around with this message at 16:47 on Jul 8, 2021 |
# ? Jul 8, 2021 16:45 |
|
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 17:16 |
|
what is that, madrid to christchurch?
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 17:25 |
|
Carthag Tuek posted:what is that, madrid to christchurch? Alaejos to Wellington http://rwoodley.org/?p=1654
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 17:36 |
|
Grevling posted:This is very cool, there's lots of interesting parallels between the different non-standard dialects of all the Scandinavian languages that I've noticed. Some sort of parallel evolution going on here and there maybe. Speaking of parallel evolutions in Germanic languages, here's another nifty one: the rhotic shift. English used to have a clear alveolar r (which is stereotypically associated with Scots these days) but it began to turn into the approximant r before consonants and at the end of words before taking over all instances, and the r disappearing altogether at word ends and in pre-consonant positions over the course of the 19th century (which is why US English retained the approximant in all positions except in Southern US English and the closely related AAVE). Now, Norwegian, Swedish and (Northern) Dutch are going through the same cycle, where the previously clear alveolar r is turning into approximants in pre-consonant positions and/or in word endings. The only thing that's throwing a spanner in the works is the steady spread of the uvular r, which is now co-standard in Dutch and standard in both German and Danish. Slightly amusing sidenote: I took two years of Norwegian as an optional course at uni, and some drunk college kid in Norway thought I was a Dane when I was trying to speak Norwegian with him, then felt despondent when I switched to English, stating that he was "such a rural bumpkin from Nor-Norge that even that Dane couldn't understand my Norwegian". Truth was I had simply run out of words and I am very obviously not Danish, but I do speak Norwegian with a uvular r because switching between an alveolar r and an approximant fucks me up (I use neither in my native language).
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 17:45 |
|
Platystemon posted:Alaejos to Wellington heh, not too far off!
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 18:00 |
|
All the ladies and mens know it's better.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 18:37 |
|
Pope Hilarius II posted:Speaking of parallel evolutions in Germanic languages, here's another nifty one: the rhotic shift. English used to have a clear alveolar r (which is stereotypically associated with Scots these days) but it began to turn into the approximant r before consonants and at the end of words before taking over all instances, and the r disappearing altogether at word ends and in pre-consonant positions over the course of the 19th century (which is why US English retained the approximant in all positions except in Southern US English and the closely related AAVE). Meanwhile in Australia, they are just moving the Rs around. Norrrrrr, I live in Austaliar, we don't say the aaaah
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 18:46 |
|
Edgar Allen Ho posted:Meanwhile in Australia, they are just moving the Rs around. Norrrrrr, I live in Austaliar, we don't say the aaaah that's an intrusive r which is probably rather on-brand for, you know, Australia
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 19:23 |
|
Carthag Tuek posted:Those examples are neat! Here's an example of the East-Danish Bornholm dialect from 1869, with a contemporary translation to Standard Danish (rigsdansk): Is there a reason why Rigsdank is printed in Antiqua and Bornholm dialect in Fraktur? In German of that time you’d see Antiqua normally only for non-German texts and vocabulary, but in this case both texts are at least nominally Danish
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 20:59 |
|
System Metternich posted:Is there a reason why Rigsdank is printed in Antiqua and Bornholm dialect in Fraktur? In German of that time you’d see Antiqua normally only for non-German texts and vocabulary, but in this case both texts are at least nominally Danish Other way around, the Rigsdansk text is the one printed in fraktur, which was still the standard at the time (though progressives were starting to shift to antiqua by then). Antiqua was similarly used for foreign texts here, and its use for the Bornholm dialect is probably an intentional commentary. Carthag Tuek fucked around with this message at 21:35 on Jul 8, 2021 |
# ? Jul 8, 2021 21:23 |
|
Muscle Tracer posted:
I mean, India's easy, its right there! A harder one would be say South Sudan, or other countries in the middle of Africa.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2021 22:22 |
|
I wonder what kind of bizarre climate there would be around the Atlantic+Indian ocean if Africa was on the north pole like that.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2021 02:02 |
|
Kennel posted:I wonder what kind of bizarre climate there would be around the Atlantic+Indian ocean if Africa was on the north pole like that. Well, we currently have one land pole and one ocean pole, so it might not be as different as you'd think if they were just flipped N-S. The big differences that we see in paleoclimate tend to be warmer climates associated with having two ocean poles (I can't think of a time when there were two continental poles, but I suspect that'd be much colder) and no continents in the way of an equatorial ocean current, also warmer. There's a lot of continents there on what would be the equatorial line, but the Great Southern Ocean is wide open to a degree we don't have. That would have a bigger impact but I'm not enough of a climatologist to predict what it would be after just one undergrad course years ago. EDIT: Oh, specifically in the Atlantic-Indian? Not sure there either, that's almost an enclosed basin as regards to the sort of E-W currents that drive climate. Interesting thought.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2021 02:10 |
|
Muscle Tracer posted:
This would be a cool rear end alt-history world. Something like a second Mediterranean in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, with all the continents relatively accessible to each other. E: I guess the Med, CAA, Caribbean and Indonesia et. al. all form their own little communities. PittTheElder fucked around with this message at 03:22 on Jul 9, 2021 |
# ? Jul 9, 2021 03:20 |
|
Kennel posted:I wonder what kind of bizarre climate there would be around the Atlantic+Indian ocean if Africa was on the north pole like that. PittTheElder posted:This would be a cool rear end alt-history world. Something like a second Mediterranean in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, with all the continents relatively accessible to each other. There's an old website I've always liked that explores some of these what-if worlds by means of repainted globes. One of them is, by chance, very close to the map in question, with the north pole in Africa. The climate and geography stuff the author discusses is really interesting; I just wish he'd stopped short of drawing the various kinds of furries that might have evolved on these worlds. Oh, which reminds me, a few of those furry drawings might be slightly , so be warned.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2021 03:54 |
|
Kennel posted:This gives me a headache. reminds me of the tabula peutingeriana
|
# ? Jul 9, 2021 04:26 |
|
https://twitter.com/cnut_real/status/1412984159287451651?s=21 Forza azzurri
|
# ? Jul 9, 2021 04:34 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 13:06 |
|
we just don't know
|
# ? Jul 9, 2021 05:55 |