|
But how
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 18:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 05:46 |
|
|
1000 microservices is enough that you're back up to a milliservice.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 21:38
|
|
|
Doom Mathematic posted:1000 microservices is enough that you're back up to a milliservice. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 01:09
|
|
|
Come to my new NDC talk on nano-services to fix the bloat of those ancient microservices
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 03:46
|
|
|
How long until people start trying to sell me on macroservice architectures?
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 04:02
|
|
|
leper khan posted:How long until people start trying to sell me on macroservice architectures? Software as a Single Transaction
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 04:04
|
|
|
leper khan posted:How long until people start trying to sell me on macroservice architectures? you joke but all these things move in cycles. thin clients vs. fat clients, monolithic vs. modular. someone's going to be selling "Schematic NoSQL" within five years, bet
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 06:54
|
|
|
Localized Internetless Cloud
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 14:42
|
|
|
The cloud... condensed
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 15:35
|
|
|
Hammerite posted:The cloud... condensed Clound On Premises
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 15:47
|
|
|
wilderthanmild posted:Clound On Premises I know a place that uses this a lot. https://aws.amazon.com/outposts/ e: wants to use.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 16:17
|
|
|
JehovahsWetness posted:I know a place that uses this a lot. For when your engineers are Stockholm syndrome'd into sticking with AWS?
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 16:23
|
|
|
Protocol7 posted:For when your engineers are Stockholm syndrome'd into sticking with AWS? I imagine if your whole system is build to depend on AWS technologies, decoupling that would cost money and require information about why was build like that and how it work.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 17:01
|
|
|
we use outposts at my job, they have tons of issues like no support for NLBs
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 18:13
|
|
|
Protocol7 posted:For when your engineers are Stockholm syndrome'd into sticking with AWS? Mostly when the rest of your poo poo is AWS but you have a data residency requirement I’d think.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 18:36
|
|
|
Jeez, I was just making a lovely joke, don't need to be goonsplained why you might use something like Outposts. I can click on the link provided and read about the purported benefits.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 18:48
|
|
|
more falafel please posted:someone's going to be selling "Schematic NoSQL" within five years, bet nodejs + mongoose -> mongodb is already a very popular thing
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 20:28
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:Localized Internetless Cloud People have been selling on-prem systems with a bit of a management layer on top as “private cloud” for the better part of a decade now.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 20:36
|
|
|
It may be instructive to think of "cloud" as simply a programmable data center, irrespective of where it's located, if it's owned or rented, etc.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 20:45
|
|
|
Yeah and a "private cloud" has a lot of value for some scenarios, because you can use whatever cloud technologies you want to use while also not actually hosting your critically sensitive customer/financial data on machines you don't physically control.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 21:10
|
|
|
more falafel please posted:you joke but all these things move in cycles. thin clients vs. fat clients, monolithic vs. modular. someone's going to be selling "Schematic NoSQL" within five years, bet Within negative five years, in fact.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 22:07
|
|
|
Doom Mathematic posted:Yeah and a "private cloud" has a lot of value for some scenarios, because you can use whatever cloud technologies you want to use while also not actually hosting your critically sensitive customer/financial data on machines you don't physically control. Yup. I always thought that OwnCloud was a fantastic product name.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2021 15:49
|
|
|
NihilCredo posted:Yup. I always thought that OwnCloud was a fantastic product name. I've been sitting in my OwnCloud a lot more since WFH started
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2021 16:21
|
|
|
Bongo Bill posted:It may be instructive to think of "cloud" as simply a programmable data center, irrespective of where it's located, if it's owned or rented, etc. There are two different definitions you need to think about here. If you're talking about the technical benefits of "cloud" then "abstraction layer over a giant resource pool that can be reallocated easily and automatically on demand" works pretty well, and "private cloud" just means that you happen to own rather than rent the resource pool. That has all kinds of advantages and disadvantages and you can analyze the whole system to figure out what makes the most sense before you go with private vs public infrastructure. If you're dealing with executives who have no idea what "cloud" is besides the new thing that's going to somehow cut costs by telling everyone that all new proposals need to include the phrase "cloud technology" to get funding, then you can score political points by rebranding that crusty out-of-date "datacenter" as a sexy, cutting-edge "private cloud." Never mind that half the software in there doesn't even officially support running in a VM or that provisioning new resources takes three weeks and a VP's signature, it's got that big buzzword energy.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2021 17:08
|
|
|
These private clouds are also a godsend if you're some exec who understands you can just wave around the AWS bill and go "this is so expensive, there must be another way!". Then you write up some insanely optimistic proposal for building a datacenter, using a private cloud, and leave after the migration but before anyone realizes you now have a lot of exciting new problems and maintenance costs. Always be migrating, if you're in your own datacenter, migrate to AWS. If you're in a cloud already, bring it back home. You can always invent big projects, you just do the opposite of what your company is doing now.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2021 18:53
|
|
|
wilderthanmild posted:Rather than like actually validating the date it just checked that it was 57 characters long. I appreciate your company's dedication to not having anyone in Mountain time.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2021 19:12
|
|
|
Scaevolus posted:I appreciate your company's dedication to not having anyone in Mountain time. Yeah, this code was hidden a long time specifically because we didn't have anyone in Mountain time until now.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2021 19:54
|
|
|
I guess this is more of an awkward nerd presenters at conferences horror, but... Presenter on ethics in image synthesis: "It's important that we as researchers & engineers make sure that we have explicit permission when using a real person as a subject. The Obama video was, in hindsight, a mistake." A couple presenters later, in the papers preview: "Are you tired of your deepfakes and fake baby pictures being rejected due to high frequency artifacts? Come to my talk to fix this!" (The ethics presentation was really good and more people should think about that. Also SIGGRAPH should probably have rejected the paper that was all about synthesising novel tennis matches from footage of famous players if it was going to put its reviewers where its mouth is.)
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2021 23:30
|
|
|
Xerophyte posted:I guess this is more of an awkward nerd presenters at conferences horror, but... Oh, I loved the part where they were talking about how it might make sense to put a time limit on CC and other copyrights to stop people from misusing them in deepfakes instead of... you know... limiting the deepfakers?! Less coding, more horror, still SIGGRAPH: https://twitter.com/lunasorcery/status/1424857476369948674 And they have all those "please choose of one of the many pronoun roles" posts in the Discord, too.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2021 00:15
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:Oh, I loved the part where they were talking about how it might make sense to put a time limit on CC and other copyrights to stop people from misusing them in deepfakes instead of... you know... limiting the deepfakers?! I thought that was mostly reasonable in context. Being able to do contextual video editing, relighting, etc has enough legitimate use to be worth furthering, deepfakes is more a matter of malicious usage than bad research. While presenting that research you probably shouldn't assume that some image or video some random person uploaded to the internet under CC0 10 years ago is fair game for putting your words in their mouth, even though the license says you can. Problem with that line of thought is more that you probably shouldn't assume that something posted today is fair game either. Of course, image processing is a field where the standard algorithm test image was a specific Playboy scan for 30 years so I shouldn't hope for too much. The pronoun selector made me feel old and insufficiently woke, but if someone really cares if they are known as they, xe or zim then no skin of my back I guess. I'm doubtful if actually works to make others not misgender them, though.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2021 02:29
|
|
|
Whatcode:
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 00:00
|
|
|
Spatial posted:What gently caress, squirt, anal squirt.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 00:37
|
|
|
Spatial posted:What Getting a function pointer to the double overload of sqrt and either passing it to fqSqrt or initializing fqSqrt with it, depending on what fqSqrt actually is.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 02:32
|
|
|
chglcu posted:Getting a function pointer to the double overload of sqrt and either passing it to fqSqrt or initializing fqSqrt with it, depending on what fqSqrt actually is. Volmarias posted:gently caress, squirt, anal squirt. I mean ... it's quite obvious what fqSqrt is.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 02:36
|
|
|
Volguus posted:I mean ... it's quite obvious what fqSqrt is. Yes, I thought so too
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 02:39
|
|
|
Volguus posted:I mean ... it's quite obvious what fqSqrt is. The only thought I had was quad-precision float square root.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 05:55
|
|
|
-0.0 bug in the wild: https://dolphin-emu.org/blog/2021/09/07/dolphin-progress-report-august-2021/ As always and forever, gently caress everything about floating point math.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2021 19:53
|
|
|
Beef posted:-0.0 bug in the wild: There is a long-standing bug at my workplace where a certain library expects that round-tripping some data through deserialization -> reserialization should result in a byte-equivalent result (if you don't modify anything in-between), but deserialization drops the sign of zero (and probably also messes up NaNs, I kind of forget). It's been a headache for literal years but I don't think it's been fixed yet.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2021 21:09
|
|
|
Beef posted:-0.0 bug in the wild: quote:While there is an extremely small performance hit from using two instructions instead of one, we assure you, you won't notice. Probably. Surely there isn't a game being dumb with basic FMA negation instructions to such a degree as to cause a noticeable performance hit. SURELY. (link to next month's Progress Report here) Although this is about a hypothetical game that isn't yet demonstrated to exist, it rubs me the wrong way. "Being dumb enough"? So if a development house created a game that runs just fine on the hardware they developed it for, but your lovely emulator fucks it up, that's their fault and they're "dumb", are they?
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2021 21:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 05:46 |
|
|
Possibly? Windows made SimCity work even thought they accessed deallocated memory, but that doesn't stop SimCity from being a dumb dumb for doing so.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2021 22:59
|
|