Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: dead gay comedy forums)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Virtual Russian
Sep 15, 2008

bobmarleysghost posted:

Is there any good writing on Art and communism?
I'm curious about reading both the artist's and the party's perspectives.

Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction is university mandatory reading everywhere. It does present a very particular view, and can at times even be interpreted as quite critical of marxist aesthetics. It is a gold standard though, to the point that I involutarily roll my eyes when someone tells me I need to read it/would like it. I have an art history degree and my supervisor was a Yugo Marxist, I've read that thing so many times.

https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/benjamin.htm

The Total Art of Stalinism by Boris Groys is a personal favourite. It dives into the narratives around constructivism, suprematism, and socialist realism in a way that cannot really be parralleled elsewhere. Too much of soviet art history you are exposed to in the west is essentially CIA propaghanda and strictly anti-stalin and pro-constructivist in an incredibly facile manner. Groys is not kind to stalin by any means, but he is fair, and he does much to disspell the western narrative of Stalin supressing the constructivist geniuses and moving soviet art backwards away from modernism. Disclaimer: I love constructivism and personally think socialist-realism lacked imagination and portrayed the very possible and unattainable, which was the opposite of what it set out to do. A kids movie about exploring the moon was once supressed as it was deemed that human beings on the moon was too outlandish and fantastical to fit within the boundries of socialist-realism. Infact this was the opposite case, well mostly.

https://monoskop.org/images/e/e5/Groys_Boris_The_Total_Art_of_Stalinism_Avant-Garde_Aesthetic_Dictatorship_and_Beyond.pdf

The Movie in question - which whips rear end IMO. The modernist soundtrack is either a love it or loathe it though. The model work in this is top notch. (for just a good scene exhibiting the movies strengths start here : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDhJKzuOb2w&t=392s

The movie from start:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDhJKzuOb2w


I wrote my thesis on socialism, revolution, and art, specifically focusing on William Morris -> Constructivism - I can probably dig up a lot of other good articles, but I teach art all day and am tired. I will never tire of recommending people soviet cinema though.

Virtual Russian has issued a correction as of 02:17 on Aug 5, 2021

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

The Atomic Man-Boy
Jul 23, 2007

tokin opposition posted:

Denouncing Cuba for revisionism over their weed policy everyday

Anyway this thread has made me give up anarchism as a viable political project

Yeah, this whole Cuba episode has mostly quashed any anarcho-curious thoughts I had after seeing a lot of anarchists have the entirely wrong opinion on Cuba. Like having the "Oh, you think the CIA is messing with Cuba? Ha, you think the CIA is messing with everything!" levels of wrong.

Anyways, anyone know a good book on the history of the USSR?

MLSM
Apr 3, 2021

by Azathoth

bobmarleysghost posted:

Is there any good writing on Art and communism?
I'm curious about reading both the artist's and the party's perspectives.

Mao Zedong was particularly good on this question: https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-3/mswv3_08.htm

Virtual Russian
Sep 15, 2008


I think this follows one of the key mistakes a lot of prominent marxists make on the subject of art. They always seem to view it from the outside, they see it fundementally as a tool. Something to be used by them to achieve an end. It is very instrumentalist and IMO runs totally contrary to what art should be, especially in a marxist soceity. Here Mao talks of "art for the masses", but not really "art by the masses." Here Mao essentially seems to take aim at the special class of people know as "artists" and (not incorrectly) points out that they make art with and for petite-bourgeois sensibilities. His goal seems to be to have artists embody the soul of the worker, and make art for that worker to consume. To me, this misses entirely the truly liberating and revolutionary potential of art. We should not focus on the content of art, but instead should step back to examine the processes and contexts in which art is created. Art should not be made for someone, but by someone. Top down culture should be cast aside, we should smash the very notion of the artist, for the idea that creation of culture/art belongs to a special caste of people (artists) needs to be done away with entirely. Art, a bourgeois term for what I prefer to call "cultural-production" should be something everyone engages in and with. We are all naturally creative, and in a soceity that would ideally give us more and more leisure time a truly liberated people would set themselves to creating culture actively, not just consuming culture passively. Instead of the privileged few making culture for all to consume, we should all be engaged in a massive network of culture in which we are both producer and consumer. No one style is revolutionary, nor is another counter-revolutionary. The individual act of making culture no matter the form is revolutionary; passive consumption of culture is of course naturally counter-revolutionary. Does it really matter if one watches Hollywood or Mosfilm for 8 hours a day on the couch if all one does is sit idle on a couch?

Virtual Russian has issued a correction as of 05:10 on Aug 5, 2021

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold
my view on art is that I like Ilya repin and I see no need to develop the view any further

mila kunis
Jun 10, 2011

The Atomic Man-Boy posted:

Yeah, this whole Cuba episode has mostly quashed any anarcho-curious thoughts I had after seeing a lot of anarchists have the entirely wrong opinion on Cuba. Like having the "Oh, you think the CIA is messing with Cuba? Ha, you think the CIA is messing with everything!" levels of wrong.

Anyways, anyone know a good book on the history of the USSR?

huge number of books on various topics here, pick your poison:

https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3934654

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
Continuing my reading:

1.

___

2.


___

3.


___
This next chapter is about Cuba's medical internationalism

4.



___

5.


The succeeding pages also note Cuban expeditions to:

* Conga-Brazzaville (now the Republic of Congo) in 1966
* Guinea Bissau in 1966
* Peru in 1970, responding to an earthquake
* Chile in 1971, responding to another earthquake
* Nicaragua in 1972, responding to an earthquake (and despite the country being ruled by the Somoza dictatorship)
* Honduras in 1974, responding to an earthquake
* Angola in 1976-1977; this one tends to be what some people are specifically familiar with, as Cuba sent over 30,000 military troops and 200 healthcare workers to defend the MPLA against UNITA and FNLA
* Mexico in 1985, earthquake
* El Salvador in 1986, earthquake
* Ecuador in 1987, earthquake
* Nicaragua in 1988, hurricane
* Iran in 1990, earthquake
* Brazil in 1990, radiation poisoning
* Nicaragua in 1991, flooding
* Nicaragua again in 1992, volcanic eruption
* Honduras, Guatemala, and Nicaragua in 1998, Hurricane Mitch
* Colombia in 1999, earthquake
* Honduras in 1999, dengue epidemic
* Venezuela in 1999, floods

I will note here that while the author also mentions a Cuban expedition to Ethiopia in 1977, this is the one that tends to be a bit more controversial. More on this later.

6.



On a personal note, I was stunned as I read this section - I never even knew of this programme by Cuba. Incredible.

exmarx
Feb 18, 2012


The experience over the years
of nothing getting better
only worse.

Virtual Russian posted:

Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction is university mandatory reading everywhere. It does present a very particular view, and can at times even be interpreted as quite critical of marxist aesthetics. It is a gold standard though, to the point that I involutarily roll my eyes when someone tells me I need to read it/would like it. I have an art history degree and my supervisor was a Yugo Marxist, I've read that thing so many times.

https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/benjamin.htm

walter benjamin ftw

i'd also recommend john berger's art criticism (rip)

oscarthewilde
May 16, 2012


I would often go there
To the tiny church there

bobmarleysghost posted:

Is there any good writing on Art and communism?
I'm curious about reading both the artist's and the party's perspectives.

this is the only revolutionary music ever made and if you like jazz you’re a dirty reactionary

https://youtu.be/JEY9lmCZbIc

wynott dunn
Aug 9, 2006

What is to be done?

Who or what can challenge, and stand a chance at beating, the corporate juggernauts dominating the world?

gradenko_2000 posted:

On a personal note, I was stunned as I read this section - I never even knew of this programme by Cuba. Incredible.

I fundamentally don’t understand ghouls who read this and conclude that communism is bad

Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

gradenko_2000 posted:

On a personal note, I was stunned as I read this section - I never even knew of this programme by Cuba. Incredible.

They're legitimately the only country where I truly respect the people and the government and basically support them almost unconditionally lol. This is probably pretty trite but us Americans love to jack off about how our massive military is actually doing some good in the world because we sometimes drop rice bags out of airplanes or whatever. But the fuckin' Cubans have been doing about 100x what we do on .1% of the budget. And that's just what their military forces do, let alone the rest of the government and volunteer efforts.

Fauxbot
Jan 20, 2009

I need more wine.

exmarx posted:

walter benjamin ftw

i'd also recommend john berger's art criticism (rip)

berger owned

MeatwadIsGod
Sep 30, 2004

Foretold by Gyromancy
Cuba is imo the best gateway drug for Americans to start deprogramming our anticommunism. Since they're a tiny island nation blockaded by this huge superpower it gives them a kind of sympathetic underdog character and the same is true of the July 26 guerillas in the Sierra Maestra. Obviously they had very well organized urban networks in Havana or Santiago under people like Frank Pais but the guerillas in the mountains get bled down to like 15 guys in the early days and about 2 years later they've taken Oriente, Santa Clara, and Havana. Then you get into what they actually accomplished in terms of literacy, public health, etc. despite the constant US harassment (including kidnapping, supporting reactionary guerillas in the Escambray, etc.) and it makes them look even more superhuman. Plus it's easier for Americans to unlearn propaganda about the dastardly Soviets when they realize what a lifeline the USSR was to Cuba once the embargo ramped up and that Cuba modeled its institutions on the USSR (JUCEPLAN, etc.). And then you realize "oh poo poo every socialist state has made similar extraordinary accomplishments under similar handicaps" and whatever latent anticommunism you had is pretty much gone

MeatwadIsGod has issued a correction as of 12:40 on Aug 5, 2021

mycomancy
Oct 16, 2016

MeatwadIsGod posted:

Cuba is imo the best gateway drug for Americans to start deprogramming our anticommunism. Since they're a tiny island nation blockaded by this huge superpower it gives them a kind of sympathetic underdog character and the same is true of the July 26 guerillas in the Sierra Maestra. Obviously they had very well organized urban networks in Havana or Santiago under people like Frank Pais but the guerillas in the mountains get bled down to like 15 guys in the early days and about 2 years later they've taken Oriente, Santa Clara, and Havana. Then you get into what they actually accomplished in terms of literacy, public health, etc. despite the constant US harassment (including kidnapping, supporting reactionary guerillas in the Escambray, etc.) and it makes them look even more superhuman. Plus it's easier for Americans to unlearn propaganda about the dastardly Soviets when they realize what a lifeline the USSR was to Cuba once the embargo ramped up and that Cuba modeled its institutions on the USSR (JUCEPLAN, etc.). And then you realize "oh poo poo every socialist state has made similar extraordinary accomplishments under similar handicaps" and whatever latent anticommunism you had is pretty much gone

Please leave my head, this is a restricted area.

Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
i simply grew up really poor and hosed up and the only positive change in my entire life was from the state sending my mom to rehab on the state's dime. so i just slowly kept thinking 'why did I get so lucky? why doesn't everyone have this? why do all these rich kids have it so easy when i went hungry as a child?' and so all the liberal propaganda slowly fell away basically as soon as I had to consider any part of it in my own context. anyway then i joined the military and discovered firsthand that the state is incredibly stupid and dysfunctional and pretty much only accomplishes things by accident unless they directly make the ruling class money or supports their power. and the last flip from 'incredibly angry big government liberal' to 'raging communist' was complete

Larry Parrish has issued a correction as of 13:15 on Aug 5, 2021

bobmarleysghost
Mar 7, 2006




thanks as well!

Virtual Russian posted:

Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction is university mandatory reading everywhere. It does present a very particular view, and can at times even be interpreted as quite critical of marxist aesthetics. It is a gold standard though, to the point that I involutarily roll my eyes when someone tells me I need to read it/would like it. I have an art history degree and my supervisor was a Yugo Marxist, I've read that thing so many times.

https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/benjamin.htm

The Total Art of Stalinism by Boris Groys is a personal favourite. It dives into the narratives around constructivism, suprematism, and socialist realism in a way that cannot really be parralleled elsewhere. Too much of soviet art history you are exposed to in the west is essentially CIA propaghanda and strictly anti-stalin and pro-constructivist in an incredibly facile manner. Groys is not kind to stalin by any means, but he is fair, and he does much to disspell the western narrative of Stalin supressing the constructivist geniuses and moving soviet art backwards away from modernism. Disclaimer: I love constructivism and personally think socialist-realism lacked imagination and portrayed the very possible and unattainable, which was the opposite of what it set out to do. A kids movie about exploring the moon was once supressed as it was deemed that human beings on the moon was too outlandish and fantastical to fit within the boundries of socialist-realism. Infact this was the opposite case, well mostly.

https://monoskop.org/images/e/e5/Groys_Boris_The_Total_Art_of_Stalinism_Avant-Garde_Aesthetic_Dictatorship_and_Beyond.pdf

The Movie in question - which whips rear end IMO. The modernist soundtrack is either a love it or loathe it though. The model work in this is top notch. (for just a good scene exhibiting the movies strengths start here : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDhJKzuOb2w&t=392s

The movie from start:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDhJKzuOb2w


I wrote my thesis on socialism, revolution, and art, specifically focusing on William Morris -> Constructivism - I can probably dig up a lot of other good articles, but I teach art all day and am tired. I will never tire of recommending people soviet cinema though.

This is super informative thank you, I'll have to read through it all and will definitely come back to you with questions.

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


bobmarleysghost posted:

thanks as well!

This is super informative thank you, I'll have to read through it all and will definitely come back to you with questions.

Walter Benjamin is among the GOAT on the subject. From there, the usual Marxist academic route is to go to Adorno/Horkheimer: the first is good but too much of an egghead so you gotta trim him occasionally (he loving hated jazz, the idiot). The latter is far more of a sociologist. IMHO, there is a far greater value in reading them in order to figure out the peculiar view of Marxism and socialism in the USA, as they were quite formative for a lot of American intellectuals who studied with them during their exile from Germany

and yeah, Marxism and art is generally divided in: Marxist aesthetics, a "what is art, and most importantly, what makes for good art?" theory from Marxist principles, and the political economy of art, which is more about what the big thinkers had to say about the material conditions that make art possible or not, like how capitalism deprives art to the many in order to make it a product, etc.

F Stop Fitzgerald
Dec 12, 2010

https://twitter.com/codet_t/status/1423290282041245702

mawarannahr
May 21, 2019

John Charity Spring posted:

Speaking as someone who flirted with Trotskyism for a short while about 10 years ago, Trotskyism is an easy fit for any western liberal who's radicalising but doesn't want to confront a lot of anti-communist propaganda directed at states like the USSR or China. It lets you position yourself firmly at Real Communism Hasn't Been Tried. Also a basic grasp of 'permanent revolution' is appealing because of its urgency and call-to-action; even though no action has ever followed from it, it gives a compelling extra 'socialist' dimension to add on to the anti-communist critiques of Stalin etc; that they didn't do enough to spread the revolution. Also a lot of Trotskyist arguments and positions are very similar to those advanced by 'democratic socialists' like George Orwell who I was also into for a bit in my early twenties. It's a kind of left-wing viewpoint that doesn't challenge too much liberal orthodoxy; much like anarchism, it's attractive in places like the UK and USA for that reason.

I don't want to universalise my own experience but I've talked to quite a few Former Trots or other people who found it compelling at first and their experiences lined up with my own pretty closely. Once I started learning more about the history of socialist states and the actual events rather than reheated Robert Conquest pablum, as well as trying to develop a genuine internationalism rather than one that was mainly based on Well I Could Have Done It Better And Purer, the appeal of Trotskyism fell away pretty fast.

I was in SA for four months and felt iffy about the foreign policy stances but it felt like I was “doing something” in my own city/state (and they have achieved some things in WA, but no socialism ) and this sounds about right for most people who are involved. the foreign policy of active opposition to CCP, especially for HK , was hard to ignore while joining and glossed over if you asked about it. then covid happened and it became impossible to ignore that most of was written in their paper about China was incorrect, plagiarized, and in service of something other than socialism, and that was that.

the camaraderie was nice and I miss it. oh well.

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
Speaking of Trotskyists

https://twitter.com/WSWS_Updates/st...ingawful.com%2F

F Stop Fitzgerald
Dec 12, 2010

quote:

• In January, fascist forces attempted to overthrow the US government and install a presidential dictatorship, a coup directed from the White House. Emboldened by the spinelessness of the Democrats, leading figures in the Republican Party openly defend right-wing violence and insurrection.

How is it possible that under these unprecedented conditions the political and media establishment can be fixated on whether Gov. Cuomo bestowed unwanted kisses on certain staff members or even touched them inappropriately?

quote:

The complaints hardly rise to the level of being judged on the basis of their truth or non-truth. Did Cuomo comment on the looks of Executive Assistant #1, ask Trooper #1 why she didn’t wear a dress or “grab the butt” of State Entity Employee #1? We have no idea and couldn’t care less.

In Training
Jun 28, 2008


parody lol

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

they've truly never seen a creep they didn't love

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018


lmao

Cpt_Obvious
Jun 18, 2007


:yikes:

exmarx
Feb 18, 2012


The experience over the years
of nothing getting better
only worse.
broader than art, raymond williams and stuart hall were marxists + p much invented cultural studies. williams' writing is pretty dense, but his stuff on hegemony and cultural change is great.

wynott dunn
Aug 9, 2006

What is to be done?

Who or what can challenge, and stand a chance at beating, the corporate juggernauts dominating the world?
that’s a yikeseroo

emTme3
Nov 7, 2012

by Hand Knit

oscarthewilde posted:

this is the only revolutionary music ever made and if you like jazz you’re a dirty reactionary

https://youtu.be/JEY9lmCZbIc

schoenberg/serialism has been called the logic of stalinism applied to music. it's certainly an egalitarianism of tonality, but it's also kind of rhythmically autistic.

jazz ain't reactionary bro. groove music in general is the music that expresses the experience of life under commodified time - which is why it only emerged on the 20c after the triumph of the commodified work day, and why it has totally eclipsed all other kinds of music since. groove music is defined by a reversal of aristocratic/bourgeois metric hierarchies - the underlying impulse of groove is revolutionary as heck. jazz musicians made the revolution that they couldn’t make in society in music instead - and that revolution has continued through rock, hiphop, metal, edm, etc.

mark abel has an excellent histmat book on the subject, one of my favorite books of music theory ever.

for me metal is the music that has the most potential for revolutionary horizons today, but you can hear the experience of the global proletariat in anything that grooves really. such a beautifully human thing to do - to take the structure of one's subjugation and make it danceable.

emTme3 has issued a correction as of 22:07 on Aug 5, 2021

namesake
Jun 19, 2006

"When I was a girl, around 12 or 13, I had a fantasy that I'd grow up to marry Captain Scarlet, but he'd be busy fighting the Mysterons so I'd cuckold him with the sexiest people I could think of - Nigel Mansell, Pat Sharp and Mr. Blobby."

oscarthewilde posted:

this is the only revolutionary music ever made and if you like jazz you’re a dirty reactionary

https://youtu.be/JEY9lmCZbIc

Wrong!

It's Maoist disco - https://youtu.be/x5RAvDZZyCI

Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

https://youtu.be/H6wl-EyhXl0

bagual
Oct 29, 2010

inconspicuous
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfVio8TMJpY

fart simpson
Jul 2, 2005

DEATH TO AMERICA
:xickos:


incredible

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013






shaking my drat head

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsOMEUamYkc

F Stop Fitzgerald
Dec 12, 2010

you are all wrong

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUjqYfyvynQ

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


belated golden birthday death anniversary boy



the scottie pippen of marxism and the the obviously best beard game of all time

Virtual Russian
Sep 15, 2008

https://youtu.be/OdWgx4VJe5A

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
No Cuba book excerpts today, folks - this chapter is all about a history of the US blockade and CIA operations against Cuba, which sucks and is bad, but isn't really anything to be learned from in the Marxism thread.

Death to America.

MLSM
Apr 3, 2021

by Azathoth

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MC0Om8v8H7g

mawarannahr
May 21, 2019



real David Brooks hours

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Stairmaster
Jun 8, 2012

lmao

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply