Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: dead gay comedy forums)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
crepeface
Nov 5, 2004

r*p*f*c*
mila delving into the abyss to fish these gems out for us only for his gifts to be SPURNED

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Cookie Cutter
Nov 29, 2020

Is there something else that's bothering you Mr. President?

mila kunis posted:

Lenin and ML's in general have done more harm to the left than the right ever could.

Larpers like the guy you quoted forget that the pre 1917 Social Democrats supporterd the Socialist Revolutionairy party (SR's) under Kerensky and their violent overthrow of the Tsar. Lenins Coup overthrew the first government in world history ever run by a democratic socialist. The first overthrow of a leftist ruler was done by a Tankie basically who successfully turned the first post-revolutionairy state into red fascism essentially.

Lenin himself feared leftists more than he ever did the right because they threatened his rightist-charlatan ambitions and could call him out on his hypocrisy.


absolutely atrocious take :barf:

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

Judge Dredd Scott posted:

are there any english language books about the soviet legal system?? or the PRC one, even

about any era would be fine. i just realized i have no idea what an attempt at what 'socialist law' would really look like and want to attempt to fill that gap at least a little

it's not what you're asking for but the pamphlet from the 30s that I uploaded a while back, Through Soviet Russia, has a bit where the writer visits a Soviet court (in Ukraine iirc) and it's an interesting little glimpse. Let me find it

edit: it's here

John Charity Spring has issued a correction as of 10:12 on Sep 10, 2021

Aeolius
Jul 16, 2003

Simon Templeman Fanclub

Judge Dredd Scott posted:

are there any english language books about the soviet legal system?? or the PRC one, even

about any era would be fine. i just realized i have no idea what an attempt at what 'socialist law' would really look like and want to attempt to fill that gap at least a little

John Quigley's Soviet Legal Innovation and the Law of the Western World might hold some interest. It's as much about their law as it is about its ripples in the world at large, though. From the preface:

quote:

The leaders of the Western world were able to maintain themselves and their legal orders. But to do so, they could not run in place. They parried Lenin’s thrusts to blunt the impact in their realms of his biting critique of their rule. A dialectic developed between the Soviet Union and the West. In its efforts to counter the Soviet Union, the West absorbed many of the ideas it found threatening.

As Western leaders adjusted their policies, they changed the legal systems of their countries. The change did not come overnight or in a single package of new laws. Nor did it come at the same pace everywhere in the Western world. But come it did, and with a force that would render Western law by the turn of the twenty-first century lightyears different from Western law at the turn of the twentieth. Western law did not disappear, but it did not remain the same.

...

I was launched into the study of law in the Soviet Union by the satellite (Sputnik) that was launched by the Soviet Union in 1957.The American government determined it must know more about the Soviet threat, a task that was complicated by the fact that American scholars had little access to Soviet society. The U.S. Congress passed the National Defense Education Act. Efforts were to be made in higher education to understand the USSR and to counteract the Soviet threat. President Dwight Eisenhower negotiated a treaty with the Soviet Union for the exchange of scholars. The Soviet government sought access to the West, and the West sought access to the Soviet Union. Each calculated that it would gain more than it would lose.

I was part of this high-stakes chess match. My base of operation was just up the hill from the Kremlin, the center of Soviet political power. Leonid Brezhnev had assumed control, and the Cold War showed no signs of abating. I gained an opportunity to observe, albeit within limits, the society whose confrontation with the West was the defining circumstance of an era.

What was striking to a young scholar about the concepts promoted in Soviet legal and political philosophy was precisely the challenge they posed to the West. Everything I had previously been told was good was evil. The free market was bad. Only an organized economy could serve social needs. The rule of law, seen in the West as the basis of social order, was only a stop-gap approach to the proper regulation of life in society. Instead, life should be organized so that law is not needed. Rather than punishing individuals who violate rules, society should reorganize itself to eliminate the urge to bad conduct.

...

At the level of international politics, statesmen too were examining the Soviet ideas and reacting to them. Their reaction forms the subject of this book. In that reaction may be found a key to what differentiates Western law of today from Western law as it stood when Lenin sat for the St. Petersburg law examination in 1891.

Yossarian-22
Oct 26, 2014

mila kunis posted:

Lenin and ML's in general have done more harm to the left than the right ever could.

Larpers like the guy you quoted forget that the pre 1917 Social Democrats supporterd the Socialist Revolutionairy party (SR's) under Kerensky and their violent overthrow of the Tsar. Lenins Coup overthrew the first government in world history ever run by a democratic socialist. The first overthrow of a leftist ruler was done by a Tankie basically who successfully turned the first post-revolutionairy state into red fascism essentially.

Lenin himself feared leftists more than he ever did the right because they threatened his rightist-charlatan ambitions and could call him out on his hypocrisy.

How is it that I'm autistic and better than detecting sarcasm and joke posts than 90% of forum posters who surely aren'- nevermind

MeatwadIsGod
Sep 30, 2004

Foretold by Gyromancy
Anyone familiar with mila kunis' posting knew it was an unsourced quote :colbert:

Torpor
Oct 20, 2008

.. and now for my next trick, I'll pretend to be a political commentator...

HONK HONK

Deified Data posted:

https://twitter.com/jacksonhinklle/status/1434851140319989764?s=20

the discourse on ML twitter over the weekend has been fun

to be fair “American patriot” is so vague as to be meaningless.

Michael parenti seemed to caution against leftists falling into the trap of making America the problem rather than the capitalists and leadership. which is a rake that the left can never stop stepping on.

Torpor has issued a correction as of 21:58 on Sep 10, 2021

Ferrinus
Jun 19, 2003

i'm finding this quite easy, i guess in part because i'm a fast type but also because i have a coherent mental model of the world
the idea that Real Leftists are the greatest threat to phony socialist Regimes like the ussr, china, cuba, venezuela, and coincidentally every other socialist country that has ever existed is really funny because the implication is that socialism is actually wildly popular and an entire country will want to march in lockstep behind you so long as they think you're a socialist, so all you have to do is proclaim your socialism really loudly and you win, and the only reason you haven't won is that some charlatan has gotten there ahead of you to suck up all the socialist-loving oxygen, so of course your primary enemies are the fake socialists who have stolen your rightful place at the top

Yossarian-22
Oct 26, 2014

Ferrinus posted:

the idea that Real Leftists are the greatest threat to phony socialist Regimes like the ussr, china, cuba, venezuela, and coincidentally every other socialist country that has ever existed is really funny because the implication is that socialism is actually wildly popular and an entire country will want to march in lockstep behind you so long as they think you're a socialist, so all you have to do is proclaim your socialism really loudly and you win, and the only reason you haven't won is that some charlatan has gotten there ahead of you to suck up all the socialist-loving oxygen, so of course your primary enemies are the fake socialists who have stolen your rightful place at the top

I would argue that the contradictions embodied by isolated socialist regimes that end up repressing workers can lead to workers becoming radicalized in many contradictory directions, even "to the left," hence why Solidarnosc appealed to so many people in Poland for example. Even though the party of Solidarnosc/the nationalist moment that Poland had in the 80s had rightist elements and rightist ends, it also prayed on genuine leftist grievances.

It's just more or less a matter of cui bono, and >90% of the time a socialist regime meets fierce left-wing opposition those end up either being co-opted for imperialistic ends or a cat's paw for them in the first place. The one exception I can think of is arguably Hungary in 1956, and foreign actors attempted to pull that in all sorts of directions as well. It just had the exceptional quality of workers literally forming their own soviets before getting crushed by the USSR.

Ferrinus
Jun 19, 2003

i'm finding this quite easy, i guess in part because i'm a fast type but also because i have a coherent mental model of the world
iirc '56 hungary was the one where soviet claims that they were quashing a fascist uprising were actually entirely credible and then the later one was murkier but i could be mixing them up

Yossarian-22
Oct 26, 2014

Ferrinus posted:

iirc '56 hungary was the one where soviet claims that they were quashing a fascist uprising were actually entirely credible and then the later one was murkier but i could be mixing them up

Imre Nagy was a very Gorbachev type figure who wanted to end Hungary's relationship with the Warsaw Pact and free political prisoners whether liberal or far-right, and much of the uprising was centered around him. There was some fascist cardinal who got released and tried to take over the protests, and of course the CIA tried to stir up those anticommunist/far right elements as well. This is most of the basis for that claim I think, but the main base of the movement was in workers who formed councils but were too afraid to try and take over the state themselves.

It's kind of a both/and scenario imo. I think the Hungarian working class deserves sympathy for what they tried to do but given that they allowed for a power vacuum to occur, I think there was legitimate reason for the USSR to step in (although granted it was probably more about the Warsaw Pact question than any latent fascism).

Trash Ops
Jun 19, 2012

im having fun, isnt everyone else?

i have been meaning to find more about the prague spring since it seems like they were trying to do some of the same reforms that killed the ussr when they were done too late, and that worked great for deng and china.

hungary was def some fash + spook poo poo though

mycomancy
Oct 16, 2016

Aeolius posted:

John Quigley's Soviet Legal Innovation and the Law of the Western World might hold some interest. It's as much about their law as it is about its ripples in the world at large, though. From the preface:

Holy poo poo, I was running around unknowingly espousing Soviet legal theory at the age of...twelve? Thirteen? God drat...

The Voice of Labor
Apr 8, 2020

bad news. looks like joe is cancelled

Schweinhund posted:

Stalin got a 13 year old girl pregnant when he was 35 and abandoned her.

https://medium.com/short-history/young-stalin-affair-f80e8d508012

Goast
Jul 23, 2011

by VideoGames
and if you bring up epstein that would be whataboutism

elaboration
Feb 21, 2020

Aeolius posted:

John Quigley's Soviet Legal Innovation and the Law of the Western World might hold some interest. It's as much about their law as it is about its ripples in the world at large, though. From the preface:

this is pretty drat close to what i was looking for honestly, the compare/contrast to western law will do a good job contextualizing it all i think. thank you so much!

Red and Black
Sep 5, 2011

I was looking at this poll of Russians on their preferred system. Apparently a plurality of 49% want to return to the soviet system

https://twitter.com/leonidragozin/status/1436262575839322112

It makes me wonder, are there polls like this for other formerly communist states? Like Poland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, etc.

fart simpson
Jul 2, 2005

DEATH TO AMERICA
:xickos:

Red and Black posted:

I was looking at this poll of Russians on their preferred system. Apparently a plurality of 49% want to return to the soviet system

https://twitter.com/leonidragozin/status/1436262575839322112

It makes me wonder, are there polls like this for other formerly communist states? Like Poland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, etc.

not the most recent data but it’s a popular position in most of the former communist countries last i saw

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2010/04/28/hungary-better-off-under-communism/

A remarkable 72% of Hungarians say that most people in their country are actually worse off today economically than they were under communism. Only 8% say most people in Hungary are better off, and 16% say things are about the same. In no other Central or Eastern European country surveyed did so many believe that economic life is worse now than during the communist era.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Yossarian-22 posted:

Imre Nagy was a very Gorbachev type figure who wanted to end Hungary's relationship with the Warsaw Pact and free political prisoners whether liberal or far-right, and much of the uprising was centered around him. There was some fascist cardinal who got released and tried to take over the protests, and of course the CIA tried to stir up those anticommunist/far right elements as well. This is most of the basis for that claim I think, but the main base of the movement was in workers who formed councils but were too afraid to try and take over the state themselves.

It's kind of a both/and scenario imo. I think the Hungarian working class deserves sympathy for what they tried to do but given that they allowed for a power vacuum to occur, I think there was legitimate reason for the USSR to step in (although granted it was probably more about the Warsaw Pact question than any latent fascism).

At least some of the leaders of armed portions of the movement were likely sympathetic to the old regime. The founder of the Jobbik party was the head of one of the largest groups.

Ultimately, there was little love by the Hungarians for the Soviets before 1956, not only were they an ally of the Nazis but some of the hardest fighting of the war was done in Hungary. Budapest was nearly leveled.

Red and Black
Sep 5, 2011

fart simpson posted:

not the most recent data but it’s a popular position in most of the former communist countries last i saw

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2010/04/28/hungary-better-off-under-communism/

A remarkable 72% of Hungarians say that most people in their country are actually worse off today economically than they were under communism. Only 8% say most people in Hungary are better off, and 16% say things are about the same. In no other Central or Eastern European country surveyed did so many believe that economic life is worse now than during the communist era.

Wow



I wonder why Poland loves capitalism so much, did they get the short end of the stick during the Soviet era? 35% is still higher than I think most people would expect in any case

namesake
Jun 19, 2006

"When I was a girl, around 12 or 13, I had a fantasy that I'd grow up to marry Captain Scarlet, but he'd be busy fighting the Mysterons so I'd cuckold him with the sexiest people I could think of - Nigel Mansell, Pat Sharp and Mr. Blobby."

Poland has a long hatred of Russia and had a crap Soviet government - it's not so surprising they would think anything is better than that.

oscarthewilde
May 16, 2012


I would often go there
To the tiny church there

Judge Dredd Scott posted:

are there any english language books about the soviet legal system?? or the PRC one, even

about any era would be fine. i just realized i have no idea what an attempt at what 'socialist law' would really look like and want to attempt to fill that gap at least a little

Mieville’s Between Equal Rights deals a lot with Soviet legal theorist Pashukanis in the first half, the second half is application of Marxist theory to the international legal sphere. Actually a really interesting book, still need to write a proper paper based on it.

Red and Black
Sep 5, 2011

There's also this study from two years ago which seems to show a large uptick of support for the market economy in formerly communist states since 2010

https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/10/15/european-public-opinion-three-decades-after-the-fall-of-communism/



e: also this 2009 poll

https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2009/11/02/end-of-communism-cheered-but-now-with-more-reservations/



which seems to contradict the poll that was taken just a year later. Unless you can simultaneously feel things were better economically during communism than under capitalism, and still prefer capitalism

Red and Black has issued a correction as of 12:54 on Sep 11, 2021

genericnick
Dec 26, 2012

Red and Black posted:

There's also this study from two years ago which seems to show a large uptick of support for the market economy in formerly communist states since 2010

https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/10/15/european-public-opinion-three-decades-after-the-fall-of-communism/



e: also this 2009 poll

https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2009/11/02/end-of-communism-cheered-but-now-with-more-reservations/



which seems to contradict the poll that was taken just a year later. Unless you can simultaneously feel things were better economically during communism than under capitalism, and still prefer capitalism

I guess you you could add the ability to travel to the West and the collapse of the intrusive policing system under the headline of "change to capitalism"

Enjoy
Apr 18, 2009
e

Red and Black
Sep 5, 2011

genericnick posted:

I guess you you could add the ability to travel to the West and the collapse of the intrusive policing system under the headline of "change to capitalism"

Yeah, also looking at this age comparison chart gives me the impression that the older generations more sympathetic to socialism are simply dying off, leaving a younger generation that's grown up under capitalism.



from 2019:



Red and Black has issued a correction as of 13:32 on Sep 11, 2021

Doktor Avalanche
Dec 30, 2008

the only response you'll get to that is "they're old, they don't know what they're talking about!" or something about nostalgia etc
which has as its underlying premise that young people are these perfectly rational beings unaffected by growing up in a capitalist society (probably living in a frictionless vacuum too) whereas the olds have holes in their brains

Yossarian-22
Oct 26, 2014

I love how this same journo immediately tries to spin the numbers Nate Silver 2016 GOP primary style - https://twitter.com/leonidragozin/status/1436266538160504832?s=19

In Training
Jun 28, 2008

what was up in 08, were the people excited for medvedev.

Hefty Leftist
Jun 26, 2011

"You know how vodka or whiskey are distilled multiple times to taste good? It's the same with shit. After being digested for the third time shit starts to taste reeeeeeaaaally yummy."


has there been any marxist analysis written on the rise of support for social democracy over the last 10 years, specifically bernie, corbyn etc? i want to know the class forces behind why support for social democracy has risen, especially in inner-city areas of the west. there's an emphasis that it's a purely working class movement but i'm not convinced of that all, my (very) rudimentary hypothesis is that it's far more based in middle-class/bourgeois opposition that's attempting to win over the working class in contrast to established support of neoliberalism in the bourgeoisie. also wondering if overaccumulation in capitalism is creating a crisis of faith in neoliberalism or not. i'd love to do more reading on this because i think it's an important topic to understand, especially going forward now that neo-keynesianism social democracy has more or less fallen completely flat in the west with its defeat/inevitable co-option.

Hefty Leftist has issued a correction as of 09:06 on Sep 12, 2021

SSJ_naruto_2003
Oct 12, 2012



I know you mean the 'support' and not whether or not they took power but thinking about Corbyn and Bernie just makes me depressed wrt the end of those projects/movements

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold
a couple of bag of bones socdems were the only tolerable opposition bourgeois ‘democracy’ allowed as long as they didn’t threaten to directly control any lever of power. they became popular because they were the only ones available in the traditional political career paths with ideas for when the failures of capitalism became impossible to ignore any longer

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

SSJ_naruto_2003 posted:

I know you mean the 'support' and not whether or not they took power but thinking about Corbyn and Bernie just makes me depressed wrt the end of those projects/movements

I dunno conclusively proving that electoral reformism is a dead end is useful at least. granted it was fairly obvious but it’s nice to have experimental proof

wynott dunn
Aug 9, 2006

What is to be done?

Who or what can challenge, and stand a chance at beating, the corporate juggernauts dominating the world?
reactionary right is out there spreading carbon copied nazi propaganda and it feels like it isn’t alarming as many people as it should

I also can’t understanding those who believe or make this stuff but I guess that’s why I’m not a reactionary

misterevilcat
Apr 30, 2009
Currently really struggling to read through Losurdo's Liberalism, a counter history. Is Losurdo as clunky and difficult in the original Italian? I'm starting to think that verso deliberately hosed up the translation due to Losurdo's well know Stalin centrism.

F Stop Fitzgerald
Dec 12, 2010

misterevilcat posted:

Currently really struggling to read through Losurdo's Liberalism, a counter history. Is Losurdo as clunky and difficult in the original Italian? I'm starting to think that verso deliberately hosed up the translation due to Losurdo's well know Stalin centrism.

you know i wonder if that might be the translation. ive found Losurdo is usually pretty breezy imo but i remember Liberalism was noticeably less so than the other stuff i've read.

Dreylad
Jun 19, 2001

Raskolnikov38 posted:

I dunno conclusively proving that electoral reformism is a dead end is useful at least. granted it was fairly obvious but it’s nice to have experimental proof

it's not a dead end but if people want to bring it about it's a multi-generational project. even the new right had complete electoral failures for decades before it came into being and was able to seize institutional power, and it never faced the same kind of institutional hostility the way any kind of nascent left would.

i think what people underestimate if enough people do decide to go that route and commit to building something that will take 40 years to grasp power is that a lot of your movement can probably be bought off with mild social democratic reforms

shrike82
Jun 11, 2005

not sure why you'd assume the premise - the dynamic is people talk revolution during non-election years and then over-invest in the left candidate on an election year

it's happened every single time even in CSPAM and i expect it to happen again in 2024 whether it's deathbed Bernie or "Tax the Rich" AOC

platzapS
Aug 4, 2007

rip gonzalo and norm

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

F Stop Fitzgerald
Dec 12, 2010

platzapS posted:

rip gonzalo and norm

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply