Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
Which horse film is your favorite?
This poll is closed.
Black Beauty 2 1.06%
A Talking Pony!?! 4 2.13%
Mr. Hands 2x Apple Flavor 117 62.23%
War Horse 11 5.85%
Mr. Hands 54 28.72%
Total: 188 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Post
  • Reply
Petey
Nov 26, 2005

For who knows what is good for a person in life, during the few and meaningless days they pass through like a shadow? Who can tell them what will happen under the sun after they are gone?

Fritz the Horse posted:

a lot of this seems to revolve around endpoint (severe disease vs. infection). Based on the data from Israel,

1) Booster shots greatly improve protection against severe disease for those aged 60+ whose immunity is waning
2) Booster shots have not been shown to meaningfully improve protection against severe disease for those under 60 years of age
3) Booster shots improve protection against infection in all populations

if I had to try and tl;dr the current science based on the links I posted earlier, that would pretty much be it.

To me the major decision appears to be whether we as a society/nation should prioritize preventing infection or preventing severe disease (hospitalization / hospital beds / death etc). The needs of communities will vary tremendously by state/region/locality.

What's so frustrating to me is that, according to the Times (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/17/us/fda-pfizer-booster-covid.html), stuff like this:

quote:

Those who have criticized the administration’s booster strategy as overly broad or premature said the advisory committee acted as a necessary check on Friday.

The meeting “put the F.D.A. back in the driver’s seat,” said Dr. Luciana Borio, a former acting chief scientist at the agency. The expert panel, she said, “was allowed to maintain its scientific independence. It understood there were significant limitations with the data presented and that the F.D.A. needs to review the data carefully before making a decision.”


happens at the same time as stuff like this

quote:

But the panel unanimously embraced a fallback position to limit additional shots to older adults and others at high risk of severe Covid illness. Then, after an informal poll pushed by a senior F.D.A. official, committee members specified that health care workers, emergency responders and others whose jobs put them at special risk should also be eligible for the booster shots. The official — Dr. Peter Marks, who oversees the F.D.A.’s vaccine division — said the at-risk group would also include teachers.


The set of activities as described are not consistent with "a careful review of the data." They are consistent with one group of scientists claiming to be the true bearers of Science, and then making a contingent decision that aligns with their policy preferences under the veil of Science. Doing a straw poll and then deciding "well it's important to keep these jobs from infection but not these other people" is not the kind of thing that an unelected, unaccountable group of outside scientists should get to decide for the nation, and I hope that the Biden administration will not take their recommendation as dispositive.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Bathtub Cheese
Jun 15, 2008

I lust for Chinese world conquest. The truth does not matter before the supremacy of Dear Leader Xi.
Greg Abbott openly admitted to getting a booster already, and likely other VIPs got them too. Why is it good enough for them while everyone else has to wait for the green light from the panel with the Great Barrington Declaration signatory at the FDA? Why does the FDA know better than Israel's regulators?

Bathtub Cheese fucked around with this message at 14:10 on Sep 18, 2021

Shifty Pony
Dec 28, 2004

Up ta somethin'


Fritz the Horse posted:

a lot of this seems to revolve around endpoint (severe disease vs. infection). Based on the data from Israel,

1) Booster shots greatly improve protection against severe disease for those aged 60+ whose immunity is waning
2) Booster shots have not been shown to meaningfully improve protection against severe disease for those under 60 years of age
3) Booster shots improve protection against infection in all populations

if I had to try and tl;dr the current science based on the links I posted earlier, that would pretty much be it.

To me the major decision appears to be whether we as a society/nation should prioritize preventing infection or preventing severe disease (hospitalization / hospital beds / death etc). The needs of communities will vary tremendously by state/region/locality.

But that either or prioritization framing is problematic, since barring something really really unusual about Covid preventing infection should also prevent severe disease.

And I would (and have) argue hard that we should aim to prevent infection as well as severe disease. The health data we have so far we've seen that any infection is capable of causing long-lasting health consequences that can significantly impede quality of life.

Then there are the non-health effects to consider. It is not an exaggeration to say that a single infection could throughly gently caress up the lives of dozens of people. For example if I were to test positive everyone in my household would have to stay home for two weeks or more, even if it were asymptomatic. My wife works healthcare with at-risk populations and she can't be seeing patients when there's the slightest chance that she's in the incubation period so all those patients need to get rescheduled and will go without needed medical care until that happens. My kid is in daycare and if he were to test positive within a couple days of the family going into quarantine his whole daycare class would have to quarantine for two weeks as well leaving his teachers without work and seven or eight families scrambling to figure out child care or losing income as a family member stays home.

As far as I can tell neither the potential for long term health effects and loss of quality of life from non-severe infections nor the economic/social effects of any infection are being acknowledged by the advisory panel. And that's a huge problem.

Victar
Nov 8, 2009

Bored? Need something to read while camping Time-Lost Protodrake?

www.vicfanfic.com

Bathtub Cheese posted:

Greg Abbott openly admitted to getting a booster already, and likely other VIPs got them too. Why is it good enough for them while everyone else has to wait for the green light from the panel with the Great Barrington Declaration signatory at the FDA? Why does the FDA know better than Israel's regulators?

I can't find a source for Greg Abbott "openly admitting" to getting a booster. All I can find are two anonymous allegations that he got one, while his office refuses to comment. It's worth noting that he is under 65.

https://www.houstonpress.com/news/did-abbott-get-a-covid-booster-shot-before-cdc-approval-11751932

Yes this story is a month old. It's what I could find.

Bathtub Cheese
Jun 15, 2008

I lust for Chinese world conquest. The truth does not matter before the supremacy of Dear Leader Xi.

Victar posted:

I can't find a source for Greg Abbott "openly admitting" to getting a booster. All I can find are two anonymous allegations that he got one, while his office refuses to comment. It's worth noting that he is under 65.

https://www.houstonpress.com/news/did-abbott-get-a-covid-booster-shot-before-cdc-approval-11751932

Yes this story is a month old. It's what I could find.

My bad. Still, there's no reason to doubt the allegations except for their anonymity, and anonymous allegations were treated as smoking gun evidence of Trump's wrongdoing by liberals for 5 years.

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>

Platystemon posted:

“Potential vaccine injuries on the order of one in a million will be ammunition to antivaccine elements. Therefore, we will just have to let a hundred million people take their chances with so-called mild breakthrough cases at a rate greater than one in ten.”

I’m not sure that that line of reasoning checks out.

from what i saw, the current rate of vaccinated people who are hospitalized who end up needing O2 is 4%. So it's almost assured that even if they do get sick and even if they are one of the very few who needs hospitalization, even then it's almost always very mild.

Thoguh
Nov 8, 2002

College Slice

Herstory Begins Now posted:

from what i saw, the current rate of vaccinated people who are hospitalized who end up needing O2 is 4%. So it's almost assured that even if they do get sick and even if they are one of the very few who needs hospitalization, even then it's almost always very mild.

Jesus Christ.

MooselanderII
Feb 18, 2004

Herstory Begins Now posted:

from what i saw, the current rate of vaccinated people who are hospitalized who end up needing O2 is 4%. So it's almost assured that even if they do get sick and even if they are one of the very few who needs hospitalization, even then it's almost always very mild.

Can you post that source? Thanks.

poll plane variant
Jan 12, 2021

by sebmojo

Herstory Begins Now posted:

from what i saw, the current rate of vaccinated people who are hospitalized who end up needing O2 is 4%. So it's almost assured that even if they do get sick and even if they are one of the very few who needs hospitalization, even then it's almost always very mild.

What the gently caress is mild hospitalization, what on Earth are you talking about

nexous
Jan 14, 2003

I just want to be pure
What is the hospital doing for you if not providing oxygen? Do you just sit there in case you need oxygen?

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

Why would you even be admitted to the hospital if you didn’t need oxygen? A bad fever?

nexous
Jan 14, 2003

I just want to be pure
If it’s the hospital rejecting 96% of vaxxed people cause they’re not sick enough to admit, then that makes sense. Because the hospital is full of a bunch of loving chud morons who have been licking doorknobs to prove covid doesn’t exist

7of7
Jul 1, 2008
There was a study on the topic of reasons for hospitalization pre and post vaccination.



quote:

Question: How well do COVID-19 hospitalization metrics correlate with severity of disease?

Findings: In a retrospective cohort of patients hospitalized and with a detected SARS-CoV-2 infection, the proportion of inpatients with moderate to severe disease at any time during their hospitalization as defined by any documentation of SpO2 <94% or receipt of any supplemental oxygen fell from 64% early in the pandemic to 52% (43% in vaccinated and 55% in unvaccinated patients) by the end of June 2021.

Meaning: Consideration should be given to updating the case definition of COVID-19 hospitalizations to better reflect cases of hospitalization caused by COVID-19 versus hospitalizations associated with detection of SARS-CoV-2. Documentation of SpO2 <94% is a simple and objective measure that could be incorporated into the surveillance definition to improve the value of the metric.

Mischievous Mink
May 29, 2012

Herstory Begins Now posted:

from what i saw, the current rate of vaccinated people who are hospitalized who end up needing O2 is 4%. So it's almost assured that even if they do get sick and even if they are one of the very few who needs hospitalization, even then it's almost always very mild.


Well in my state, in a county with one of the highest vaccination rates in the country, 25% of covid deaths look to be vaccinated people. The vaccine is important and everyone needs to get it, but I'd love to see what source you're going by because it's not looking especially rosy to me. Maybe I'm misinterpreting what the page I'm reading says; https://kingcounty.gov/depts/health/covid-19/data/vaccination-outcomes.aspx

Of course that's deaths, but even then, it says 17% of hospitalizations are fully vaccinated. I'm sure they're being hospitalized for less severe issues than unvaccinated folks but it's serious enough to be hospitalized.

Mr Luxury Yacht
Apr 16, 2012


Mischievous Mink posted:


Well in my state, in a county with one of the highest vaccination rates in the country, 25% of covid deaths look to be vaccinated people. The vaccine is important and everyone needs to get it, but I'd love to see what source you're going by because it's not looking especially rosy to me. Maybe I'm misinterpreting what the page I'm reading says; https://kingcounty.gov/depts/health/covid-19/data/vaccination-outcomes.aspx

Of course that's deaths, but even then, it says 17% of hospitalizations are fully vaccinated. I'm sure they're being hospitalized for less severe issues than unvaccinated folks but it's serious enough to be hospitalized.

Is there an age breakdown on the deaths/hospitalizations for breakthroughs?

Similar data up here noted a number of cases but they were heavily concentrated in older demographics (with zero deaths under 50 and only two under 60). Basically supporting urgency on a booster for seniors but less so for younger folks.

Killer robot
Sep 6, 2010

I was having the most wonderful dream. I think you were in it!
Pillbug

nexous posted:

What is the hospital doing for you if not providing oxygen? Do you just sit there in case you need oxygen?

Hydration, IV medication, observation and treatment for high fever. Even just like flu or something people end up hospitalized without needing oxygen. Neither disease always fucks you up primarily in a respiratory way.

I have no idea how it breaks down with covid other than the link just posted, but that part isn't strange on its own.

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

We don't need to have that dialogue because it's obvious, trivial, and has already been had a thousand times.

Mr Luxury Yacht posted:

Is there an age breakdown on the deaths/hospitalizations for breakthroughs?

Similar data up here noted a number of cases but they were heavily concentrated in older demographics (with zero deaths under 50 and only two under 60). Basically supporting urgency on a booster for seniors but less so for younger folks.

CDC has a number of breakdowns of breakthrough infection distributions through the MMWR site I posted earlier.

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane

Mr Luxury Yacht posted:

Is there an age breakdown on the deaths/hospitalizations for breakthroughs?

Similar data up here noted a number of cases but they were heavily concentrated in older demographics (with zero deaths under 50 and only two under 60). Basically supporting urgency on a booster for seniors but less so for younger folks.

The other important aspect is that, yes, in places with a high rate of vaccination, you would expect quite a few of the severely ill to be vaccinated. If you're pushing 80% vaccination or higher, that's overwhelmingly most people in that place. Looking at the data, 80% of people are vaccinated in King County. This means, using that same data, 75% of deaths are occurring in 1/5 of the population. That's incredibly, incredibly significant.

The sad truth is that the vaccine is not perfect, and more must be done to control case numbers, because there are those for whom the vaccine does not offer sufficient protection, but the vaccine is still very, very good.

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>

nexous posted:

What is the hospital doing for you if not providing oxygen? Do you just sit there in case you need oxygen?

basically admit you for observation to make sure you don't get worse, as appears to be by far the most common case with vaccinated hospitalizations

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>

Mischievous Mink posted:


Well in my state, in a county with one of the highest vaccination rates in the country, 25% of covid deaths look to be vaccinated people. The vaccine is important and everyone needs to get it, but I'd love to see what source you're going by because it's not looking especially rosy to me. Maybe I'm misinterpreting what the page I'm reading says; https://kingcounty.gov/depts/health/covid-19/data/vaccination-outcomes.aspx

Of course that's deaths, but even then, it says 17% of hospitalizations are fully vaccinated. I'm sure they're being hospitalized for less severe issues than unvaccinated folks but it's serious enough to be hospitalized.

Deaths would still be common because the vast majority of people at extremely high risk of dying from covid are vaccinated.

Which loops back around to why giving 3rd shots to people over 65 or otherwise not getting full protection from 2 shots is very much a good thing and is currently being done.

MooselanderII posted:

Can you post that source? Thanks.

A review of nationwide hospitalization data from the VA

here's discussion of it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgNMnaO52nk&t=331s

Herstory Begins Now fucked around with this message at 18:33 on Sep 18, 2021

Platystemon
Feb 13, 2012

BREADS

PT6A posted:

Looking at the data, 80% of people are vaccinated in King County.

Once again children are considered nonpersons.

It does make some sense to separate the demographics by age here, but at least be explicit about it.

Platystemon fucked around with this message at 19:19 on Sep 18, 2021

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane

Platystemon posted:

Children confirmed as nonpersons.

You know, could you maybe be 20% less a prick because I forgot to check one single option on a government website?

Okay, it's 70%. The point still stands: the vaccine is very, very effective even if some of the vaccinated are ending up in hospital, and as I said before, we still need to control case growth via NPIs due to those who cannot be vaccinated and those who do not have a strong response to the vaccine.

Why is everyone constantly at each others' throats here, ready to take any tiny mistake as the worst possible thing it could ever mean? Y'all need to touch grass.

GonadTheBallbarian
Jul 23, 2007


PT6A posted:

You know, could you maybe be 20% less a prick because I forgot to check one single option on a government website?

Okay, it's 70%. The point still stands: the vaccine is very, very effective even if some of the vaccinated are ending up in hospital, and as I said before, we still need to control case growth via NPIs due to those who cannot be vaccinated and those who do not have a strong response to the vaccine.

Why is everyone constantly at each others' throats here, ready to take any tiny mistake as the worst possible thing it could ever mean? Y'all need to touch grass.

It's D&D. The point is to get bent out of shape and snipe at each other instead of learn!

In all seriousness though, I think the frustration surrounding the kids thing has more to do with chuds/brunch covidians running with the bigger number and using that to justify their lovely behaviour, so it's a pretty big sore spot for many- especially parents. That's all

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane
I think the frustration around the kids should be focused on the fact that the school system is doing sweet gently caress all to protect them, and failing to recognize that COVID is airborne and deal with the implications of that. Or on vaccines not being available. Or on the consistent denial that COVID is an issue in kids at all. Not whether they are included in a percentage of people vaccinated. There is more than enough to be pissed off about without jumping to saying to another poster "oh so you don't think children are people???"

mod sassinator
Dec 13, 2006
I came here to Kick Ass and Chew Bubblegum,
and I'm All out of Ass

Victar posted:

I can't find a source for Greg Abbott "openly admitting" to getting a booster. All I can find are two anonymous allegations that he got one, while his office refuses to comment. It's worth noting that he is under 65.

https://www.houstonpress.com/news/did-abbott-get-a-covid-booster-shot-before-cdc-approval-11751932

Yes this story is a month old. It's what I could find.

this is the _first_ google hit for "abbot got booster dose"

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/texas-gov-greg-abbott-tests-positive-covid-n1277021

quote:

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott tests positive for Covid after banning mask, vaccine mandates

Abbott has told people he got a third booster dose of a vaccine.

Platystemon
Feb 13, 2012

BREADS
I apologize because I recall that you are Canadian.

I don’t know that there is a single American county that breaks eighty percent vaccination. I found Martin County, NC on the NYT map, but other sources say its well below the NYT’s figure.

When Americans make statements like that, they know what they’re doing (including the government of King County), but a Canadian may not realize that American institutions are continually massaging the statistics and ignoring children at every turn.

mod sassinator
Dec 13, 2006
I came here to Kick Ass and Chew Bubblegum,
and I'm All out of Ass

Herstory Begins Now posted:

Which loops back around to why giving 3rd shots to people over 65 or otherwise not getting full protection from 2 shots is very much a good thing and is currently being done.

False, currently booster doses are _not_ approved or able to be given to 65 year olds. What happened yesterday was an advisory panel vote, the FDA and then CDC and Whitehouse have to approve the booster plan. They may or may not use the advisory panel information in their decision. But right now if you are 65+ and healthy you cannot get a booster and you are very at risk of waning immunity causing a serious infection. The data for the need to give boosters has been available for months now and the Biden whitehouse has dragged its feet this long and even longer to approve boosters for them.

Tarezax
Sep 12, 2009

MORT cancels dance: interrupted by MORT
I'm confused, haven't the elderly and immunocompromised been getting boosters for weeks now?

mod sassinator
Dec 13, 2006
I came here to Kick Ass and Chew Bubblegum,
and I'm All out of Ass

Tarezax posted:

I'm confused, haven't the elderly and immunocompromised been getting boosters for weeks now?

Only people with a very narrow list of immonocompromised conditions can get a booster. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommendations/immuno.html#anchor_1630089738910

A healthy 65 year old without any condition on that list cannot qualify and get a booster as of this moment.

GonadTheBallbarian
Jul 23, 2007


PT6A posted:

I think the frustration around the kids should be focused on the fact that the school system is doing sweet gently caress all to protect them, and failing to recognize that COVID is airborne and deal with the implications of that. Or on vaccines not being available. Or on the consistent denial that COVID is an issue in kids at all. Not whether they are included in a percentage of people vaccinated. There is more than enough to be pissed off about without jumping to saying to another poster "oh so you don't think children are people???"

Parents are getting battered from all sides, it really seems like nobody in power gives the slightest gently caress about it. As a parent, if I had to wager why people jump to that kind of a response, it's because most people we talk to don't even think about kids and proceed to gently caress us over constantly because of the X% of eligible number getting bandied about. People then make the mistake of thinking that number includes kids when it doesn't... aaand yeah. Lots of heated arguments over it.

Again, not taking sides or dumping on anyone here, just that it's a really raw sore spot for a lot of people! It's a totally understandable and common thing to step into as you saw, so sorry about all that and have a good weekend

Bel Shazar
Sep 14, 2012

'or other drugs that may suppress your immune response' might open a door depending on your medication's side effects.

GonadTheBallbarian
Jul 23, 2007


Platystemon posted:

I apologize because I recall that you are Canadian.

I don’t know that there is a single American county that breaks eighty percent vaccination. I found Martin County, NC on the NYT map, but other sources say its well below the NYT’s figure.

When Americans make statements like that, they know what they’re doing (including the government of King County), but a Canadian may not realize that American institutions are continually massaging the statistics and ignoring children at every turn.

Yeah, they often don't here in BC because while the vax rates are high, the communication and reporting from DBH/BCCDC is abysmal. Almost like it's intentionally hard to understand!

Most people actually do think the "% of eligible" means "% of total"

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane

Platystemon posted:

I apologize because I recall that you are Canadian.

I don’t know that there is a single American county that breaks eighty percent vaccination. I found Martin County, NC on the NYT map, but other sources say its well below the NYT’s figure.

When Americans make statements like that, they know what they’re doing (including the government of King County), but a Canadian may not realize that American institutions are continually massaging the statistics and ignoring children at every turn.

Oh we've definitely been doing that in Alberta. It's horrifying, for a lot of reasons. We've also tied re-opening province-wide to overall vaccination rates, meaning that some places are getting absolutely rocked by COVID (health areas where 2% of the population has an active infection, for example) because they have no protection and no resources. Here, too, children have been repeatedly ignored -- both in terms of the risk that COVID poses to them, and the role they play in community transmission.

This problem definitely crosses borders, but the point of my post is not that it's safe to re-open with NPIs (it's not) or that high rates of community vaccination protects children at this point (it doesn't). It's to say that, in areas with high rates of vaccination (whether you measure that only with those eligible, or the total population), the vaccine provides quite good protection on a personal level despite a seemingly large percentage of those with severe outcomes* being vaccinated. It's basically what we would expect to see regardless of how you measure that percentage because, statistically**, children under 12 are not being hospitalized at a significant rate relative to all other age groups.

* Yes, there are severe outcomes like long COVID that aren't reflected in hospitalized/ICU/death numbers. I'm talking just about those states for now because that's the data we have.

** Yes, this doesn't change the fact that it's still reckless to re-open too early without protecting children, as "it's statistically rare" doesn't mean a goddamn thing when it's your child who draws the short straw.

EDIT: I think there's also a lingering hangover from the idea that was promulgated early on that a vaccination rate of 70% would be enough for herd immunity. Turns out: no! That was wrong, and fairly stupid. The real question I wanted to answer -- and it was one that made me nervous for a long time too -- was "can it both be true that 70% of people/80% of eligible people are vaccinated, AND the vaccine is effective, AND 25% of the people in hospital are vaccinated". The answer is: yes, that is possible, because (as the edge case example) if you have 100% vaccination, and the vaccine is 88% effective, you'll still have some cases hospitalized, and 100% of them will be vaccinated.

This goes to make the point that we must continue NPIs in addition to encouraging vaccination for community protection, and that it must be a priority to vaccinate children ASAP. We're on the same side.

PT6A fucked around with this message at 19:59 on Sep 18, 2021

Fritz the Horse
Dec 26, 2019

... of course!

Mischievous Mink posted:


Well in my state, in a county with one of the highest vaccination rates in the country, 25% of covid deaths look to be vaccinated people. The vaccine is important and everyone needs to get it, but I'd love to see what source you're going by because it's not looking especially rosy to me. Maybe I'm misinterpreting what the page I'm reading says; https://kingcounty.gov/depts/health/covid-19/data/vaccination-outcomes.aspx

Of course that's deaths, but even then, it says 17% of hospitalizations are fully vaccinated. I'm sure they're being hospitalized for less severe issues than unvaccinated folks but it's serious enough to be hospitalized.


Mr Luxury Yacht posted:

Is there an age breakdown on the deaths/hospitalizations for breakthroughs?

Similar data up here noted a number of cases but they were heavily concentrated in older demographics (with zero deaths under 50 and only two under 60). Basically supporting urgency on a booster for seniors but less so for younger folks.

Yeah this pattern is what prompted Israel to roll out boosters to 60+ people in July. They noticed that more than 60% of hospitalizations were of vaccinated (almost entirely elderly) people and found waning immunity.

I do genuinely hope boosters/additional shots get to the elderly ASAP. I'm not much for doom and gloom but based on Israel's experience we might end up with a wave of hospitalizations of the vaccinated elderly in a few months.

IIRC vaccine uptake among the elderly was pretty quick here in the US?

Fritz the Horse fucked around with this message at 20:13 on Sep 18, 2021

Professor Beetus
Apr 12, 2007

They can fight us
But they'll never Beetus
Informal thread rule, be especially nice to parents right now as most parents in the US particularly are having to choose between a lot of mostly lovely options right now.

Went out and stocked up on N95s because my wife's work is barreling right ahead with a bigostly unvaxxed super spreader conference and we can't afford her to not attend, nor can we afford to properly isolate for two weeks after, so there will be a lot of upstairs/downstairs action and a lot of mask wearing in our own home. We are exceptionally lucky that her exposure at the conference is very low, but she is nervous because she got J and J and can't help herself from reading stories about Delta.

This is the kind of lovely thing that capitalism forces us all to do during normal times anyway, and now with a nasty deadly pandemic on top of it. If you are an individual citizen there's not a whole lot you can do about other than do the best you can with your means, and that's what we're doing.

E: please try to keep up on the pet taxes. A lot of times I check in from my phone and it's a pain in the rear end for me to spot it for someone. Feel free to post a tax if you don't see one at the top of the page. Don't get spammy with pet pics or anything but once a page at least is good bipartisan policy.

e2: yeah sure a guy that's had to navigate t1d over the last 20 years including pre-ACA preexisting conditions hellscape is unaware of our failing empire. One of the things that most concerns me about this pandemic is watching our healthcare system buckle and collapse as though a couple of 747s slammed into it. :fuckoff:

Professor Beetus fucked around with this message at 20:21 on Sep 18, 2021

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>

mod sassinator posted:

False, currently booster doses are _not_ approved or able to be given to 65 year olds. What happened yesterday was an advisory panel vote, the FDA and then CDC and Whitehouse have to approve the booster plan. They may or may not use the advisory panel information in their decision. But right now if you are 65+ and healthy you cannot get a booster and you are very at risk of waning immunity causing a serious infection. The data for the need to give boosters has been available for months now and the Biden whitehouse has dragged its feet this long and even longer to approve boosters for them.

i said 3rd shots, not boosters. they're not the same thing and I even stated the difference in the post you quoted

mod sassinator
Dec 13, 2006
I came here to Kick Ass and Chew Bubblegum,
and I'm All out of Ass

Herstory Begins Now posted:

i said 3rd shots, not boosters. they're not the same thing and I even stated the difference in the post you quoted

Neither third shots or boosters are currently allowed for any healthy person of any age.

poll plane variant
Jan 12, 2021

by sebmojo

mod sassinator posted:

Neither third shots or boosters are currently allowed for any healthy person of any age.

I feel like we're in a weird situation where the Israeli data is relentlessly publicized and it's easy to get a third dose but the official approval is withheld for "the vaccines are perfect" messaging reasons

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006
Update: my friend that I convinced to get vaccinated followed through. She just sent me this



I have to admit I half expected her to just say that to get me to go away. She has her follow up on Oct 9

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



HonorableTB posted:

Update: my friend that I convinced to get vaccinated followed through. She just sent me this



I have to admit I half expected her to just say that to get me to go away. She has her follow up on Oct 9

Fantastic, especially in times like this it's so gratifying to see stuff like this, you've done good work

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply