Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
ArmedZombie
Jun 6, 2004

hot cocoa on the couch posted:

i once had my alternator die on me while i was driving on the highway in my old civic. my lights shut off, my power steering cut out and all my instruments died, but it had a mechanical fuel pump, distributor and manual transmission in it so the tiny bit of juice required to fire the spark plugs drove me another 18 nervewracking kilometers to the next exit where i got off, pulled into the nearest gas station, and it promptly died lol. had my brother bring me a spare, he boosted me and i was on my way in under 3 hours

i hope to never own one of these stupid drm pieces of poo poo

maybe cars aren't the problem. maybe electricity is the problem. :thunk:




no it's cars.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

hot cocoa on the couch
Dec 8, 2009

ArmZ posted:

maybe cars aren't the problem. maybe electricity is the problem. :thunk:




no it's cars.

well, in your country it's both lol (assuming you're in america)

Leroy Diplowski
Aug 25, 2005

The Candyman Can :science:

Visit My Candy Shop

And SA Mart Thread

Fitzy Fitz posted:

Microcars for the elderly and disabled are ok imo

I'm sorry this is the I hate cars thread the justify cars for your pet edge cases thread is probably in D&D or something.

The old can ride in my pedicab with the quadruple amputees. Tho I will say some of the olds in my life have an amazing ability to keep riding. I have three neighbors over 75 yrs old that ride daily tho one of them just swapped out for an ebike because we live in hilly semi rural area and she was struggling on this Raleigh mixtie that she had been riding since the 70s probably.

ArmedZombie
Jun 6, 2004

hot cocoa on the couch posted:

well, in your country it's both lol (assuming you're in america)

the usa has a robust and relatively cheap electric grid :colbert:

except for texas

hot cocoa on the couch
Dec 8, 2009

ArmZ posted:

the usa has a robust and relatively cheap electric grid :colbert:

except for texas

yeah robust at burning hella coal and natural gas lmao

ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth

hot cocoa on the couch posted:

yeah robust at burning hella coal and natural gas lmao

Illinois get's like 54% of it's power from Nuclear Energy. loving owns.

Also the Texas grid is more reliable then the hell that is California and their 3rd-world "rolling brownouts," plus the Texas grid is heavily powered by wind and also nuclear energy.

Anyway, nuclear powered bullet trains. I want to get door-to-door from brooklyn to a friend in SF in under 4hours.

ArmedZombie
Jun 6, 2004

hot cocoa on the couch posted:

yeah robust at burning hella coal and natural gas lmao

https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/share-of-coal-fired-generation-in-total-electricity-generation-2010-2019

hot cocoa on the couch
Dec 8, 2009


are you agreeing with me? or actually saying that 79% of the US' energy mix being carbon emitting is okay?

e: getting sidetracked here. this is the cspam car chat thread, not the nuclear power generation supremacy thread!

hot cocoa on the couch has issued a correction as of 17:01 on Sep 23, 2021

indigi
Jul 20, 2004

how can we not talk about family
when family's all that we got?

ate poo poo on live tv posted:

Illinois get's like 54% of it's power from Nuclear Energy. loving owns.

Also the Texas grid is more reliable then the hell that is California and their 3rd-world "rolling brownouts," plus the Texas grid is heavily powered by wind and also nuclear energy.

Anyway, nuclear powered bullet trains. I want to get door-to-door from brooklyn to a friend in SF in under 4hours.

at that speed you can put windmills on the top of the train and it will be able to power itself for most of the trip…. genius

Fitzy Fitz
May 14, 2005




https://twitter.com/fawfulfan/status/1440364368793718786?s=20

genericnick
Dec 26, 2012


Sounds like something a dumb person would write

Buck Wildman
Mar 30, 2010

I am Metango, Galactic Governor



?????????

Fitzy Fitz
May 14, 2005




I'm only familiar with recent rail proposals for the Southeast, but it's funny that he left out the most common one for an Atlanta-Charlotte line. Just more dumb car brain.

Blockade
Oct 22, 2008

Crossposting from the cyberhell thread

Car locks up due to software bug mid highway driving, but hey thats just having a 'cutting edge' car

https://twitter.com/repkord/status/1440908464625106946

Weembles
Apr 19, 2004


People love dismissing the Netherlands as some sort of unique bycycling unicorn, but they made all of the same mistakes the US did in the mid-20th century. They just decided to stop making them.

Here's a video about the canal they tore out to build an urban highway - which they tore out to build a canal.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fePpwYCs_JM

indigi
Jul 20, 2004

how can we not talk about family
when family's all that we got?

even under his ridiculous framework there’s no reason not to connect the Midwest and east coast with a Philly-Pittsburgh-Chicago branch, or DC-Charlotte-Atlanta

brakeless
Apr 11, 2011

maybe... if you build a rail network, maybe people will want move to live near that network and maybe you can build new dense, walkable communities

of course trains are socialism and the average american is physically incapable of walking 500 m in one go but maybe...

Blockade
Oct 22, 2008

indigi posted:

even under his ridiculous framework there’s no reason not to connect the Midwest and east coast with a Philly-Pittsburgh-Chicago branch, or DC-Charlotte-Atlanta

What the hell does this mean

https://twitter.com/fawfulfan/status/1440718357888585729

vyelkin
Jan 2, 2011
Beijing and Shanghai are linked by 1200 km of high-speed rail but the United States of America is too big to have high speed rail between cities like Chicago and New York, which are a whopping, let's see here, 1200 km away from each other

hot cocoa on the couch
Dec 8, 2009

as long as you ignore china, japan and europe, it's clear to see that high speed trains simply do not work

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


vyelkin posted:

Beijing and Shanghai are linked by 1200 km of high-speed rail but the United States of America is too big to have high speed rail between cities like Chicago and New York, which are a whopping, let's see here, 1200 km away from each other

one funny quirk about china discourse in the USA is the total incapability of so many americans to comprehend that China is roughly the same size of the USA

Fitzy Fitz
May 14, 2005




American visiting any city with decent transportation infrastructure: "Oh it was wonderful. We took the trolleys/trains/buses everywhere and walked all over the city. Everything was accessible from our hotel room downtown."
American returning home to their suburb: "Vote NO on the new rail proposal that would bring crime to our community, wouldn't see enough ridership to turn a profit, and would drain our city's finances."

vyelkin
Jan 2, 2011

Fitzy Fitz posted:

American visiting any city with decent transportation infrastructure: "Oh it was wonderful. We took the trolleys/trains/buses everywhere and walked all over the city. Everything was accessible from our hotel room downtown."
American returning home to their suburb: "Vote NO on the new rail proposal that would bring crime to our community, wouldn't see enough ridership to turn a profit, and would drain our city's finances."

https://twitter.com/bro_neill/status/1348355127216910336?lang=en

Man Musk
Jan 13, 2010

Leroy Diplowski posted:

I'm sorry this is the I hate cars thread the justify cars for your pet edge cases thread is probably in D&D or something.

The old can ride in my pedicab with the quadruple amputees. Tho I will say some of the olds in my life have an amazing ability to keep riding. I have three neighbors over 75 yrs old that ride daily tho one of them just swapped out for an ebike because we live in hilly semi rural area and she was struggling on this Raleigh mixtie that she had been riding since the 70s probably.

ebikes are rad as heck

QUEER FRASIER
May 31, 2011


I love how car-brain sets up a completely different set of assumptions for train line vs freeway construction

Why can't we fund HSR? Well it's expensive and doesn't pay for itself!! Unlike the freeway system that's definitely not a giant pit of taxpayer dollars subsidizing private profits

Why can't even my fictional imagined US train lines connect? Because there's no point to building train lines through non-densely populated areas! Nevermind that we've been building freeways through the middle of loving nowhere for 70 years and watching them incubate development in entirely new areas

Mr. Sharps
Jul 30, 2006

The only true law is that which leads to freedom. There is no other.



Man Musk posted:

ebikes are rad as heck

:hai:

vyelkin
Jan 2, 2011

QUEER FRASIER posted:

Why can't even my fictional imagined US train lines connect? Because there's no point to building train lines through non-densely populated areas! Nevermind that we've been building freeways through the middle of loving nowhere for 70 years and watching them incubate development in entirely new areas

it's also just plain stupid because even in non-densely-populated areas of the US there are cities big enough to be worth linking with HSR. like take for instance that guy's dumbass map where he claims there's no point linking the networks. his three little tiny networks in the midwest, northeast, and southeast connect cities like Detroit (metro pop 4.4M), Milwaukee (metro pop 1.6M), Madison (metro pop 900k), Minneapolis (metro pop 3.7M), Baltimore (metro pop 2.8M), Jacksonville (metro pop 1.5M), Orlando (metro pop 2.5M), and Tampa (metro pop 3.1M).

why not link those up? im sure he would tell you something whiny about population centres and distances, but honestly when you're imagining a map that doesn't exist in real life and has no cost estimates attached to it, how much trouble would it be to expand your connections from detroit and chicago through Indianapolis (metro pop 2M), Cincinnati (metro pop 2.2M), Columbus (metro pop 2.1M), Cleveland (metro pop 2.1M), and Pittsburgh (metro pop 2.4M) to link up to DC and Philly? why not then extend that network down the eastern seaboard to hit Richmond (metro pop 1.2M), Raleigh/Durham (metro pop 2M), and Charlotte (metro pop 2.7M) on the way to Atlanta? if you can justify HSR to Madison, Wisconsin, you can justify it to literally all of those cities and end up with a proper HSR network, but car culture has convinced people that better transportation networks aren't possible and centrist neoliberalism has convinced people that it's better to be """""realistic"""" than to be ambitious

indigi
Jul 20, 2004

how can we not talk about family
when family's all that we got?

https://twitter.com/getfiscal/status/1441105023606214660?s=20

Tony Two Bapes
Mar 30, 2009

vyelkin posted:

it's also just plain stupid because even in non-densely-populated areas of the US there are cities big enough to be worth linking with HSR. like take for instance that guy's dumbass map where he claims there's no point linking the networks. his three little tiny networks in the midwest, northeast, and southeast connect cities like Detroit (metro pop 4.4M), Milwaukee (metro pop 1.6M), Madison (metro pop 900k), Minneapolis (metro pop 3.7M), Baltimore (metro pop 2.8M), Jacksonville (metro pop 1.5M), Orlando (metro pop 2.5M), and Tampa (metro pop 3.1M).

why not link those up? im sure he would tell you something whiny about population centres and distances, but honestly when you're imagining a map that doesn't exist in real life and has no cost estimates attached to it, how much trouble would it be to expand your connections from detroit and chicago through Indianapolis (metro pop 2M), Cincinnati (metro pop 2.2M), Columbus (metro pop 2.1M), Cleveland (metro pop 2.1M), and Pittsburgh (metro pop 2.4M) to link up to DC and Philly? why not then extend that network down the eastern seaboard to hit Richmond (metro pop 1.2M), Raleigh/Durham (metro pop 2M), and Charlotte (metro pop 2.7M) on the way to Atlanta? if you can justify HSR to Madison, Wisconsin, you can justify it to literally all of those cities and end up with a proper HSR network, but car culture has convinced people that better transportation networks aren't possible and centrist neoliberalism has convinced people that it's better to be """""realistic"""" than to be ambitious

tbh a bigger problem with linking HSR networks in the USA is the existing regulatory environment our railroads operate in. our rail network with a few notable exceptions, such as the northeast corridor (amtrak) and other little chunks (various state providers, but not all portions of their operated networks) is entirely privately owned. the class 1 freight railroads are typically hostile to intrusions onto their rights-of-way of any variety, including shared services with transit providers. this is due to a whole host of reasons, but the most obvious one is that freight railroads are highly conservative, profit driven enterprises that haven't evolved since the 19th century for the most part - they will resist anything that impacts their bottom line. further, the freight railroads are federally regulated by the FRA and can't operationally be compelled to do anything by local or state agencies - the agencies typically responsible for passenger transit like commuter rail or state-funded amtrak services. they own all the track and all the areas around that track on the tax map, and you can't do anything about it - if they say you can't use a portion of their track, that's pretty much the end of the discussion.

the feds don't really have an appetite for taking on the freight railroads due to the incredible political support needed to change policy at the federal level, as well as the considerable legal cost that would be associated with any attempt to do so, as the freights have a host of lobbyists to keep things the way they are, and armies of lawyers to fight other moves like state-led condemnation (eminent domain) attempts. basically, to get the freight railroads to agree to let a transit agency use their ROW for uninterrupted HSR, you'd need new federal legislation to force them to comply, and the feds would likely have to pay for the lion's share of track upgrades that would make HSR physically comfortable for passengers. this is due to our little buddy the 5th amendment, which prevents "takings without just compensation" - this includes regulatory takings, which the railroad would probably argue this hypothetical legislation is, and they'd and probably win in today's political environment.

this is not even considering the operational difficulty of implementing HSR on existing freight ROWs, including but not limited to substandard track for HSR operations (a lot of our network was built in the 19th and early 20th century with curves and such features you'd never build today that physically can't run a HSR train), different PTC standards and tech on different railroads, different signalling and control technology and implementation, labor union agreements, maintenance agreements, etc.

HSR is a lot more than just running a faster train on some existing tracks - you need signal upgrades, electrification, straight ROW, upgraded (AND continually maintained) rail, etc. absent national legislation to compel the freight railroads, you'd probably need to purchase (even eminent domain REQUIRES payment) all new ROW for significant chunks of the whole thing - easier to do in states with lots of federal lands but extraordinarily expensive in developed states like those in the northeast. effectively, you'd be building a new interstate highway system, but in an environment with a lot more regulations than existed at the time of the interstate's conception, like NEPA at the national level, which requires a years long process of environmental and historical review, and compliance with all the the different laws in the 50 states. this is not to say a national HSR can't be done in the USA, but that it's an extraordinarily complicated undertaking due to how we treat railroads in general extending back to before cars even really existed in the way they do now, and much more so than can be explained in this little post. but hey, we nationalized them once (USRA), bailed them out big time (Conrail, Amtrak), so we could probably do it again if stuff got bad enough.

Zerg Mans
Oct 19, 2006

ArmZ posted:

correct, it is an italian greyhound.

how does it speak without opposable thumbs

Zerg Mans
Oct 19, 2006

SKULL.GIF posted:

one funny quirk about china discourse in the USA is the total incapability of so many americans to comprehend that China is roughly the same size of the USA



lol love that you included taiwan

Fitzy Fitz
May 14, 2005





Amazing how the biggest barriers to change & progress can be totally imaginary

lobster shirt
Jun 14, 2021

https://twitter.com/aashtospeaks/status/1161699516673925121

wow yes this poo poo is great, love that we destroyed our cities to build these things

Zurtilik
Oct 23, 2015

The Biggest Brain in Guardia
What about Six Flag builds a giant trans-continental rollercoaster?!

Zerg Mans
Oct 19, 2006

lobster shirt posted:

https://twitter.com/aashtospeaks/status/1161699516673925121

wow yes this poo poo is great, love that we destroyed our cities to build these things

don't use roundabouts, have they not played factorio

Tony Two Bapes
Mar 30, 2009

Fitzy Fitz posted:

Amazing how the biggest barriers to change & progress can be totally imaginary

no disagreements here. country is a weird, mean place.

Fitzy Fitz
May 14, 2005




lobster shirt posted:

https://twitter.com/aashtospeaks/status/1161699516673925121

wow yes this poo poo is great, love that we destroyed our cities to build these things

Why are the lanes on the bridge backwards

hot cocoa on the couch
Dec 8, 2009

it way improves traffic flow because both sides of the road can enter the highway at the same time iirc

Lastgirl
Sep 7, 1997


Good Morning!
Sunday Morning!

indigi posted:

even under his ridiculous framework there’s no reason not to connect the Midwest and east coast with a Philly-Pittsburgh-Chicago branch, or DC-Charlotte-Atlanta

the us is the best nation in the world and can do whatever, but in this extremely specific condition, its impossible in this day and age we boldly go nowhere

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

lobster shirt
Jun 14, 2021

Fitzy Fitz posted:

Why are the lanes on the bridge backwards

its a madness rune

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply