|
angry armadillo posted:A ticket came in: Seemingly if someone creates a mailbox with the same email that was used for a Team, the Team gets deleted. Looks like I'm gonna have fun testing this on Monday
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2021 18:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 01:40 |
|
|
Internet Explorer posted:Ah, I see you've met our "DevOps" team. It was more about staying the gently caress away from something so old. Our "also prod", in some cases, is dev.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2021 18:52
|
|
|
Everyone has a dev environment, it just happens to also be the prod environment for a lot of orgs 
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2021 18:55
|
|
|
AlexDeGruven posted:It was more about staying the gently caress away from something so old. Oh yeah, for sure. Not saying you were in the wrong. Just mostly lamenting at my situation. There's definitely some nuance between "so old don't touch, move off" and "don't touch, we're too incompetent."
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2021 18:58
|
|
|
Wibla posted:Everyone has a dev environment, it just happens to also be the prod environment for a lot of orgs I love passive aggressively berating clients for not having any kind of testing environment. "Let us know when your in house dev has completed their testing of this change" is a fun one to use
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2021 19:20
|
|
|
Nothing says "production" like "proof-of-concept".
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2021 19:55
|
|
|
D34THROW posted:
yeah, that's why I think I'm wrong - A user created the team, another dude in our team created the email and he was not working today, I just picked up the phone to "ahhh my team has gone" and restored it duffmensch posted:Looks like I'm gonna have fun testing this on Monday
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2021 20:18
|
|
You would think that you would get some sort of warning that it already exists? Granted, I'm not at all familiar with Teams but...that doesn't exactly seem like an edge case Microsoft couldn't have anticipated.
|
angry armadillo posted:yeah, that's why I think I'm wrong - A user created the team, another dude in our team created the email and he was not working today, I just picked up the phone to "ahhh my team has gone" and restored it If it’s like my users in HR, one of the owners of the team meant to leave the group and instead deleted it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2021 00:21
|
|
|
I officially accepted the new position last Friday. Helpdesk is officially in the rearview mirror. I took myself out of the call queue this morning and I'm spending the next two weeks training my replacement. What a cool feeling 
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2021 17:31
|
|
|
That's loving great. Congrats!
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2021 17:40
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:I officially accepted the new position last Friday. Congrats!!! Living the dream 😂
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2021 17:58
|
|
|
Congrats, life in IT gets marginally better when you no longer are in helpdesk.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2021 18:13
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:I officially accepted the new position last Friday. HUZZAH! Also grats to everyone who doesn't work for Facebook today. Relentless fucked around with this message at 20:34 on Oct 4, 2021 |
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2021 19:25
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:I officially accepted the new position last Friday. Congrats!
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2021 20:52
|
|
|
pour a drink for the network operations centre at Facebook per this message on NANOG, someone tried to drop one BGP route, dropped all of them, and everything else broke as a consequence gossip that employee badges to get into the buildings aren't working either a completely normal IT fuckup, and aren't we all glad we didn't pull that one I'm seeing Twitter and Discord slow down too, for unknown reasons - but probably something to do with this. So if someone calls up "  THE INTERNET IS DOWN!!! " now you know
divabot fucked around with this message at 21:07 on Oct 4, 2021 |
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2021 21:05
|
|
|
divabot posted:pour a drink for the network operations centre at Facebook Apparently the facebook.com domain is showing as available to buy/squat too.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2021 21:08
|
|
|
Kurieg posted:Apparently the facebook.com domain is showing as available to buy/squat too. https://twitter.com/jack/status/1445079948432117778 Nothing more to say other than 
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2021 21:21
|
|
|
divabot posted:pour a drink for the network operations centre at Facebook Counterpoint: gently caress facebook
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2021 22:15
|
|
|
SyNack Sassimov posted:Counterpoint: gently caress facebook Countercounterpoint: their NOC is pretty nice based off my limited interactions with them.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2021 22:35
|
|
|
Rip to the guys and gals in the trenches but gently caress Facebook as a company
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2021 22:36
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:I officially accepted the new position last Friday.  Renegret posted:Countercounterpoint: their NOC is pretty nice based off my limited interactions with them. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2021 23:01
|
|
|
Hello everyone, I have what I think is a remnant of Print Nightmare giving my entire company a nightmare, and I've come for help. First, grats Larches, get it! Now, we have a client that does a lot of sharing of USB label printers. These are very specific label printers that interface with very specific medical software, of course. Since Print Nightmare, my company has adopted a standard process ripped wholesale off r/sysadmin that entails disallowing the spooler to accept client connections and only allowing Point and Print to the server. Not the ultimate fix, but keeps people printing for now. Unfortunately, this locks computers out of sharing over network via USB. My technical escalation created another OU for 'printer hosts' under Desktops and broke inheritance. This allowed for an HP printer to be shared over USB, but not the label printers. He was unable to add security permissions to share the label printers. I added the computers hosting the label printers to the 'allowed connections' list and it took right off, they can now print. It's after hours and no one knows that it's fixed - would that create a security concern for the computers hosting the printers? I'm a bit out of my depth and wondering if I need to break it before they notice it's working.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2021 23:21
|
|
|
I don't know where else to put this. Liquids don't compress and cylinders are really strong, right? https://mobile.twitter.com/caylenb/status/1075583545446301696?s=19
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2021 01:47
|
|
|
Not your typical liquid cooling.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2021 01:55
|
|
|
Silly Newbie posted:I don't know where else to put this. Liquids don't compress and cylinders are really strong, right? To compressive force, yeah, but shearing or torsional force? Someone bumps that tower in the wrong way everything's gonna explode very wetly.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2021 03:23
|
|
|
Kurieg posted:To compressive force, yeah, but shearing or torsional force? Someone bumps that tower in the wrong way everything's gonna explode very wetly. if you read, there was apparently an emergency fix, but still 4 cans exploded before they fixed it. the emergency fix involved someone flying from japan for some reason E: sorry, 3 cans https://twitter.com/caylenb/status/1075583909616705536
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2021 03:54
|
|
|
Kurieg posted:To compressive force, yeah, but shearing or torsional force? Someone bumps that tower in the wrong way everything's gonna explode very wetly. But not that strong 
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2021 06:53
|
|
|
RFC2324 posted:Don't forget to airgap that thing! The lab manager wanted ssh access to it. Why now after all this time I didn't ask.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2021 07:25
|
|
|
Silly Newbie posted:I don't know where else to put this. Liquids don't compress and cylinders are really strong, right? The project manager wanted psssshhh access to it. Why nowafter all this time I didn't ask.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2021 07:33
|
|
|
mllaneza posted:The lab manager wanted ssh access to it. Why now after all this time I didn't ask. do you have an infosec department? or at least the ability to point a nessus scanner at that thing so you can point at it and go "this is bad!!!!"
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2021 07:41
|
|
|
Shoulda gone with a PaaS solution Pepsi as a Service
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2021 12:20
|
|
|
Total call/ticket count from users calling about Facebook being down yesterday: 14. Three of those were the same user who called back twice to ask if it was back up yet and if we could "expedite this."
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2021 15:44
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:Rip to the guys and gals in the trenches but gently caress Facebook as a company That's the thing though, and this is probably a little off topic so I don't know that we should discuss it in depth, but at this point, if you work for FB and are not actively trying to find another job, you're part of the problem. Yeah, big tech is all bad, FAANG is evil, etc., but all the other parts of FAANG at least have redeeming qualities. Amazon tortures workers etc. but has revolutionized online shopping and their attitude towards customer service is one of the reasons they've been so successful, Apple runs sweatshops but makes incredible devices and has pushed the industry forward in all sorts of ways. Netflix I'm actually not sure there's much bad about, and Google is for all their faults (geo-fence warrants, China kowtowing, pay gap) still providing incredible products which until Manifest v3 is forced on us can be enjoyed mostly for free, i.e. without ads. 10 years ago, even 5 years ago maybe, you could have said FB provides a valuable service of connecting friends and family, but after all the revelations of how they don't control their platform or the ways it's misused to deceive and mislead, I don't think there's any redeeming value to the company or its "product" (the real product is you to a much vaster extent than Google), and I have no sympathy towards anyone working there. Basically, this: https://twitter.com/QuinnyPig/status/1445073096973582340
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2021 16:19
|
|
|
Sunblood posted:Total call/ticket count from users calling about Facebook being down yesterday: 14. Was it affecting production
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2021 16:19
|
|
|
Sunblood posted:Total call/ticket count from users calling about Facebook being down yesterday: 14. Why? Well some people just used the internet for FIFA back in 2010. And others... Sky told them it was us
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2021 16:19
|
|
|
Fil5000 posted:Update - apparently he's now raised a support ticket directly with the supplier. This is ridiculous. How is this happening Update update - it doesn't appear anyone's spoken to him. After his ticket raised directly with the supplier didn't get the result he wanted they closed it. And sent him a survey. Which he responded to with zeroes. So now our business partner's director is getting involved. A genuine cluster gently caress, I've never seen the like.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2021 16:25
|
|
|
Just sack the clown at this point, it's costing too much
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2021 16:40
|
|
|
I entirely agree
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2021 18:10
|
|
|
This PrintNightmare mitigation is an actual loving nightmare.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2021 20:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 01:40 |
|
|
MustardFacial posted:This PrintNightmare mitigation is an actual loving nightmare. Just an endless stream of printer tickets. Dark days.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2021 20:26
|
|